| Page 2 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
A bit of reality for the...
In article , says...
"iBoaterer" wrote in message ... In article , says... "F.O.A.D." wrote in message ... On 7/15/13 6:31 PM, Eisboch wrote: You think Martin Bashir is a "mainstream" journalist? Thanks for the laugh. He spent years as a newsman for the BBC and for ABC, and hosted Nightline for a while. That's all pretty mainsteam. --------------------------------- I guess it all depends on one's point of reference. Personally, I'd like to see Bashir and Piers Morgan deported back to the mother country. I agree on both counts. Come to this country, then tell everyone what's wrong with this country!!! -------------------------------------------- Morgan does more than just complain about what's wrong with the USA. He has become a loud activist for banning the private ownership of handguns and rudely interrupts or talks over anyone who disagrees with him. I can't understand why CNN pays him the big bucks for this unless is purely from a standpoint of ratings. Bashir is similar in his bashing of American culture and laws. He also talks over his guests if they don't share his viewpoints. I find it very difficult to listen to either which is too bad because if they were more considerate and polite to their guests, I'd probably at listen to them even if I didn't agree with them. Both expel a "I am superior to all" attitude. Yet the have to come to the US of A to earn a big fat paycheck. The only fitting description is whores. |
A bit of reality for the...
On 7/16/2013 5:37 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 16:07:50 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/16/2013 12:52 PM, wrote: On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:52:50 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: What was the verdict? Did you hear the juror? They all agreed that Martin attacked Zimmerman. Which proves not a thing, other than a jury of five white people and one who wasn't, and living in a "cracker" town with a history of racism, sanctioned the murder of a black kid. But this is America...what else would you expect? Yet you felt obligated to arm yourself and potentially "murder" someone. Your argument simply does not wash. I don't do guns (much:) but I feel there are three kinds of gun owners... Hobbyists, folks who want to preserve general society, and folks who want to get away with being assholes... How does a gun "preserve general society"? Ask Adolf. John (Gun Nut) H. Seriously, do I have to explain what I meant? |
A bit of reality for the...
In article ,
says... On 7/16/2013 5:37 PM, John H wrote: On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 16:07:50 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/16/2013 12:52 PM, wrote: On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:52:50 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: What was the verdict? Did you hear the juror? They all agreed that Martin attacked Zimmerman. Which proves not a thing, other than a jury of five white people and one who wasn't, and living in a "cracker" town with a history of racism, sanctioned the murder of a black kid. But this is America...what else would you expect? Yet you felt obligated to arm yourself and potentially "murder" someone. Your argument simply does not wash. I don't do guns (much:) but I feel there are three kinds of gun owners... Hobbyists, folks who want to preserve general society, and folks who want to get away with being assholes... How does a gun "preserve general society"? Ask Adolf. John (Gun Nut) H. Seriously, do I have to explain what I meant? Yes, please do, insane one. |
A bit of reality for the...
In article ,
says... On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 13:11:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 7/16/13 12:52 PM, wrote: On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:52:50 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: What was the verdict? Did you hear the juror? They all agreed that Martin attacked Zimmerman. Which proves not a thing, other than a jury of five white people and one who wasn't, and living in a "cracker" town with a history of racism, sanctioned the murder of a black kid. But this is America...what else would you expect? Yet you felt obligated to arm yourself and potentially "murder" someone. Your argument simply does not wash I wasn't patrolling anyone's neighborhood, looking for someone to stalk, confront and shoot. Zimmerman was. If that was his intent, why did he call the cops and why didn't he simply confront Martin right away when he had the tactical advantage of knowing where he was.? It's called CYA. |
A bit of reality for the...
In article ,
says... On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 13:05:37 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:03:20 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: What was the verdict? Did you hear the juror? They all agreed that Martin attacked Zimmerman. cite? Why don't you track down that juror interview and listen yourself. That's not true. Show me. http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/15/justic...man-juror-book "I think George got in a little bit too deep, which he shouldn't have been there. But Trayvon decided that he wasn't going to let him scare him ... and I think Trayvon got mad and attacked him," she said. Uh, YOU said "they ALL agreed that Martin attacked Zimmerman". Not one, ALL.... Notice if you will, the lady specifically said "*I* think". |
A bit of reality for the...
On 7/17/2013 1:43 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 13:11:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 7/16/13 12:52 PM, wrote: On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:52:50 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: What was the verdict? Did you hear the juror? They all agreed that Martin attacked Zimmerman. Which proves not a thing, other than a jury of five white people and one who wasn't, and living in a "cracker" town with a history of racism, sanctioned the murder of a black kid. But this is America...what else would you expect? Yet you felt obligated to arm yourself and potentially "murder" someone. Your argument simply does not wash I wasn't patrolling anyone's neighborhood, looking for someone to stalk, confront and shoot. Zimmerman was. If that was his intent, why did he call the cops and why didn't he simply confront Martin right away when he had the tactical advantage of knowing where he was.? Harry did patrol Baltimore harbor with sole the intention of stalking and shooting one of our former lady contributors. Baltimore is quite a distance from his normal stomping grounds, I might add. |
A bit of reality for the...
In article ,
says... In article , says... "iBoaterer" wrote in message ... In article , says... "F.O.A.D." wrote in message ... On 7/15/13 6:31 PM, Eisboch wrote: You think Martin Bashir is a "mainstream" journalist? Thanks for the laugh. He spent years as a newsman for the BBC and for ABC, and hosted Nightline for a while. That's all pretty mainsteam. --------------------------------- I guess it all depends on one's point of reference. Personally, I'd like to see Bashir and Piers Morgan deported back to the mother country. I agree on both counts. Come to this country, then tell everyone what's wrong with this country!!! -------------------------------------------- Morgan does more than just complain about what's wrong with the USA. He has become a loud activist for banning the private ownership of handguns and rudely interrupts or talks over anyone who disagrees with him. I can't understand why CNN pays him the big bucks for this unless is purely from a standpoint of ratings. Bashir is similar in his bashing of American culture and laws. He also talks over his guests if they don't share his viewpoints. I find it very difficult to listen to either which is too bad because if they were more considerate and polite to their guests, I'd probably at listen to them even if I didn't agree with them. Both expel a "I am superior to all" attitude. Yet the have to come to the US of A to earn a big fat paycheck. The only fitting description is whores. Yes, that Stuart Varney sure is a whore. |
A bit of reality for the...
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 21:11:11 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 7/16/2013 5:37 PM, John H wrote: On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 16:07:50 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/16/2013 12:52 PM, wrote: On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:52:50 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: What was the verdict? Did you hear the juror? They all agreed that Martin attacked Zimmerman. Which proves not a thing, other than a jury of five white people and one who wasn't, and living in a "cracker" town with a history of racism, sanctioned the murder of a black kid. But this is America...what else would you expect? Yet you felt obligated to arm yourself and potentially "murder" someone. Your argument simply does not wash. I don't do guns (much:) but I feel there are three kinds of gun owners... Hobbyists, folks who want to preserve general society, and folks who want to get away with being assholes... How does a gun "preserve general society"? Ask Adolf. John (Gun Nut) H. Seriously, do I have to explain what I meant? Did you ask how a gun preserves general society? I thought that was from Loogy. I figured you had more sense than to ask the question. John (Gun Nut) H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
A bit of reality for the...
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:23:29 -0400, Hank© wrote:
On 7/17/2013 1:43 AM, wrote: On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 13:11:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 7/16/13 12:52 PM, wrote: On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:52:50 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: What was the verdict? Did you hear the juror? They all agreed that Martin attacked Zimmerman. Which proves not a thing, other than a jury of five white people and one who wasn't, and living in a "cracker" town with a history of racism, sanctioned the murder of a black kid. But this is America...what else would you expect? Yet you felt obligated to arm yourself and potentially "murder" someone. Your argument simply does not wash I wasn't patrolling anyone's neighborhood, looking for someone to stalk, confront and shoot. Zimmerman was. If that was his intent, why did he call the cops and why didn't he simply confront Martin right away when he had the tactical advantage of knowing where he was.? Harry did patrol Baltimore harbor with sole the intention of stalking and shooting one of our former lady contributors. Baltimore is quite a distance from his normal stomping grounds, I might add. I remember that. John (Gun Nut) H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
A bit of reality for the...
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 08:30:45 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 13:05:37 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:03:20 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: What was the verdict? Did you hear the juror? They all agreed that Martin attacked Zimmerman. cite? Why don't you track down that juror interview and listen yourself. That's not true. Show me. http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/15/justic...man-juror-book "I think George got in a little bit too deep, which he shouldn't have been there. But Trayvon decided that he wasn't going to let him scare him ... and I think Trayvon got mad and attacked him," she said. Uh, YOU said "they ALL agreed that Martin attacked Zimmerman". Not one, ALL.... Notice if you will, the lady specifically said "*I* think". They *all* agreed he was not guilty. They didn't all agree that Zimmerman attacked Martin, so they *all* must have agreed to the converse - else the self defense aspect would be meaningless. It must be a bitch being Loogy. John (Gun Nut) H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
A bit of reality for the...
On 7/17/2013 1:05 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 21:11:11 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 7/16/2013 5:37 PM, John H wrote: On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 16:07:50 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/16/2013 12:52 PM, wrote: On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:52:50 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: What was the verdict? Did you hear the juror? They all agreed that Martin attacked Zimmerman. Which proves not a thing, other than a jury of five white people and one who wasn't, and living in a "cracker" town with a history of racism, sanctioned the murder of a black kid. But this is America...what else would you expect? Yet you felt obligated to arm yourself and potentially "murder" someone. Your argument simply does not wash. I don't do guns (much:) but I feel there are three kinds of gun owners... Hobbyists, folks who want to preserve general society, and folks who want to get away with being assholes... How does a gun "preserve general society"? Ask Adolf. John (Gun Nut) H. Seriously, do I have to explain what I meant? Did you ask how a gun preserves general society? I thought that was from Loogy. I figured you had more sense than to ask the question. John (Gun Nut) H. This is a case of a misplaced response... it was to whomever asked "how does a gun preserve general society". I should have put it above your post... |
A bit of reality for the...
On 7/17/2013 1:06 PM, John H wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:23:29 -0400, Hank© wrote: On 7/17/2013 1:43 AM, wrote: On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 13:11:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 7/16/13 12:52 PM, wrote: On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:52:50 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: What was the verdict? Did you hear the juror? They all agreed that Martin attacked Zimmerman. Which proves not a thing, other than a jury of five white people and one who wasn't, and living in a "cracker" town with a history of racism, sanctioned the murder of a black kid. But this is America...what else would you expect? Yet you felt obligated to arm yourself and potentially "murder" someone. Your argument simply does not wash I wasn't patrolling anyone's neighborhood, looking for someone to stalk, confront and shoot. Zimmerman was. If that was his intent, why did he call the cops and why didn't he simply confront Martin right away when he had the tactical advantage of knowing where he was.? Harry did patrol Baltimore harbor with sole the intention of stalking and shooting one of our former lady contributors. Baltimore is quite a distance from his normal stomping grounds, I might add. I remember that. John (Gun Nut) H. Is that the person he ended up photographing in their private property (a marina iirc), and posting here without her permission? |
A bit of reality for the...
In article ,
says... On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 21:11:11 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 7/16/2013 5:37 PM, John H wrote: On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 16:07:50 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/16/2013 12:52 PM, wrote: On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:52:50 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: What was the verdict? Did you hear the juror? They all agreed that Martin attacked Zimmerman. Which proves not a thing, other than a jury of five white people and one who wasn't, and living in a "cracker" town with a history of racism, sanctioned the murder of a black kid. But this is America...what else would you expect? Yet you felt obligated to arm yourself and potentially "murder" someone. Your argument simply does not wash. I don't do guns (much:) but I feel there are three kinds of gun owners... Hobbyists, folks who want to preserve general society, and folks who want to get away with being assholes... How does a gun "preserve general society"? Ask Adolf. John (Gun Nut) H. Seriously, do I have to explain what I meant? Did you ask how a gun preserves general society? I thought that was from Loogy. I figured you had more sense than to ask the question. John (Gun Nut) H. How DO guns "preserve society"? Was there no societal structure before guns? |
A bit of reality for the...
In article ,
says... On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:23:29 -0400, Hank© wrote: On 7/17/2013 1:43 AM, wrote: On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 13:11:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 7/16/13 12:52 PM, wrote: On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:52:50 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: What was the verdict? Did you hear the juror? They all agreed that Martin attacked Zimmerman. Which proves not a thing, other than a jury of five white people and one who wasn't, and living in a "cracker" town with a history of racism, sanctioned the murder of a black kid. But this is America...what else would you expect? Yet you felt obligated to arm yourself and potentially "murder" someone. Your argument simply does not wash I wasn't patrolling anyone's neighborhood, looking for someone to stalk, confront and shoot. Zimmerman was. If that was his intent, why did he call the cops and why didn't he simply confront Martin right away when he had the tactical advantage of knowing where he was.? Harry did patrol Baltimore harbor with sole the intention of stalking and shooting one of our former lady contributors. Baltimore is quite a distance from his normal stomping grounds, I might add. I remember that. John (Gun Nut) H. That is NOTHING short of a blatant lie and you know it. Because of your narrow-mindedness, you've never had much respect here, I can only hope you have much less now with that bull****. |
A bit of reality for the...
In article ,
says... On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 08:30:45 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 13:05:37 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:03:20 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: What was the verdict? Did you hear the juror? They all agreed that Martin attacked Zimmerman. cite? Why don't you track down that juror interview and listen yourself. That's not true. Show me. http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/15/justic...man-juror-book "I think George got in a little bit too deep, which he shouldn't have been there. But Trayvon decided that he wasn't going to let him scare him ... and I think Trayvon got mad and attacked him," she said. Uh, YOU said "they ALL agreed that Martin attacked Zimmerman". Not one, ALL.... Notice if you will, the lady specifically said "*I* think". They *all* agreed he was not guilty. They didn't all agree that Zimmerman attacked Martin, so they *all* must have agreed to the converse - else the self defense aspect would be meaningless. It must be a bitch being Loogy. John (Gun Nut) H. Pssst, here you go, moron. http://tinyurl.com/mw2fy8x |
A bit of reality for the...
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 14:34:53 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 21:11:11 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 7/16/2013 5:37 PM, John H wrote: On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 16:07:50 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/16/2013 12:52 PM, wrote: On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:52:50 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: What was the verdict? Did you hear the juror? They all agreed that Martin attacked Zimmerman. Which proves not a thing, other than a jury of five white people and one who wasn't, and living in a "cracker" town with a history of racism, sanctioned the murder of a black kid. But this is America...what else would you expect? Yet you felt obligated to arm yourself and potentially "murder" someone. Your argument simply does not wash. I don't do guns (much:) but I feel there are three kinds of gun owners... Hobbyists, folks who want to preserve general society, and folks who want to get away with being assholes... How does a gun "preserve general society"? Ask Adolf. John (Gun Nut) H. Seriously, do I have to explain what I meant? Did you ask how a gun preserves general society? I thought that was from Loogy. I figured you had more sense than to ask the question. John (Gun Nut) H. How DO guns "preserve society"? Was there no societal structure before guns? Ask Adolf. John (Gun Nut) H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
A bit of reality for the...
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 14:36:13 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:23:29 -0400, Hank© wrote: On 7/17/2013 1:43 AM, wrote: On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 13:11:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 7/16/13 12:52 PM, wrote: On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:52:50 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: What was the verdict? Did you hear the juror? They all agreed that Martin attacked Zimmerman. Which proves not a thing, other than a jury of five white people and one who wasn't, and living in a "cracker" town with a history of racism, sanctioned the murder of a black kid. But this is America...what else would you expect? Yet you felt obligated to arm yourself and potentially "murder" someone. Your argument simply does not wash I wasn't patrolling anyone's neighborhood, looking for someone to stalk, confront and shoot. Zimmerman was. If that was his intent, why did he call the cops and why didn't he simply confront Martin right away when he had the tactical advantage of knowing where he was.? Harry did patrol Baltimore harbor with sole the intention of stalking and shooting one of our former lady contributors. Baltimore is quite a distance from his normal stomping grounds, I might add. I remember that. John (Gun Nut) H. That is NOTHING short of a blatant lie and you know it. Because of your narrow-mindedness, you've never had much respect here, I can only hope you have much less now with that bull****. Are you saying I *don't* remember that? Or were you replying to Hank? Loogy, did someone smack you in the jaw today? I hope you stood your ground. John (Gun Nut) H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
A bit of reality for the...
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 14:37:54 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 08:30:45 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 13:05:37 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:03:20 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: What was the verdict? Did you hear the juror? They all agreed that Martin attacked Zimmerman. cite? Why don't you track down that juror interview and listen yourself. That's not true. Show me. http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/15/justic...man-juror-book "I think George got in a little bit too deep, which he shouldn't have been there. But Trayvon decided that he wasn't going to let him scare him ... and I think Trayvon got mad and attacked him," she said. Uh, YOU said "they ALL agreed that Martin attacked Zimmerman". Not one, ALL.... Notice if you will, the lady specifically said "*I* think". They *all* agreed he was not guilty. They didn't all agree that Zimmerman attacked Martin, so they *all* must have agreed to the converse - else the self defense aspect would be meaningless. It must be a bitch being Loogy. John (Gun Nut) H. Pssst, here you go, moron. http://tinyurl.com/mw2fy8x From your cite: "The death of a teenager weighed heavily on our hearts but in the end we did what the law required us to do." Amen. Case closed. They all agreed he was not guilty - which implies acting in self defense. It must be a bitch being Loogy is all I can say. John (Gun Nut) H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
A bit of reality for the...
On 7/17/2013 2:51 PM, John H wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 14:34:53 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 21:11:11 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 7/16/2013 5:37 PM, John H wrote: On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 16:07:50 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/16/2013 12:52 PM, wrote: On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:52:50 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: What was the verdict? Did you hear the juror? They all agreed that Martin attacked Zimmerman. Which proves not a thing, other than a jury of five white people and one who wasn't, and living in a "cracker" town with a history of racism, sanctioned the murder of a black kid. But this is America...what else would you expect? Yet you felt obligated to arm yourself and potentially "murder" someone. Your argument simply does not wash. I don't do guns (much:) but I feel there are three kinds of gun owners... Hobbyists, folks who want to preserve general society, and folks who want to get away with being assholes... How does a gun "preserve general society"? Ask Adolf. John (Gun Nut) H. Seriously, do I have to explain what I meant? Did you ask how a gun preserves general society? I thought that was from Loogy. I figured you had more sense than to ask the question. John (Gun Nut) H. How DO guns "preserve society"? Was there no societal structure before guns? Ask Adolf. John (Gun Nut) H. I am guessing he doesn't know the difference between the words, "preserve" and "create"... I wish folks would read the words:) And you all talk about me... kevin (I presume as it seems a kevin question) just wrote a question that even taken in context makes no sense. Why would start a question about "preserving" society, and turn it into a question about things that might have happened "before guns"? Dumb... |
A bit of reality for the...
On 7/17/2013 1:17 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 7/17/2013 1:06 PM, John H wrote: On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:23:29 -0400, Hank© wrote: On 7/17/2013 1:43 AM, wrote: On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 13:11:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 7/16/13 12:52 PM, wrote: On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:52:50 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: What was the verdict? Did you hear the juror? They all agreed that Martin attacked Zimmerman. Which proves not a thing, other than a jury of five white people and one who wasn't, and living in a "cracker" town with a history of racism, sanctioned the murder of a black kid. But this is America...what else would you expect? Yet you felt obligated to arm yourself and potentially "murder" someone. Your argument simply does not wash I wasn't patrolling anyone's neighborhood, looking for someone to stalk, confront and shoot. Zimmerman was. If that was his intent, why did he call the cops and why didn't he simply confront Martin right away when he had the tactical advantage of knowing where he was.? Harry did patrol Baltimore harbor with sole the intention of stalking and shooting one of our former lady contributors. Baltimore is quite a distance from his normal stomping grounds, I might add. I remember that. John (Gun Nut) H. Is that the person he ended up photographing in their private property (a marina iirc), and posting here without her permission? You remember the incident too? Harry was quite proud of himself for that little caper. |
A bit of reality for the...
In article ,
says... On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 14:36:13 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:23:29 -0400, Hank© wrote: On 7/17/2013 1:43 AM, wrote: On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 13:11:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 7/16/13 12:52 PM, wrote: On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:52:50 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: What was the verdict? Did you hear the juror? They all agreed that Martin attacked Zimmerman. Which proves not a thing, other than a jury of five white people and one who wasn't, and living in a "cracker" town with a history of racism, sanctioned the murder of a black kid. But this is America...what else would you expect? Yet you felt obligated to arm yourself and potentially "murder" someone. Your argument simply does not wash I wasn't patrolling anyone's neighborhood, looking for someone to stalk, confront and shoot. Zimmerman was. If that was his intent, why did he call the cops and why didn't he simply confront Martin right away when he had the tactical advantage of knowing where he was.? Harry did patrol Baltimore harbor with sole the intention of stalking and shooting one of our former lady contributors. Baltimore is quite a distance from his normal stomping grounds, I might add. I remember that. John (Gun Nut) H. That is NOTHING short of a blatant lie and you know it. Because of your narrow-mindedness, you've never had much respect here, I can only hope you have much less now with that bull****. Are you saying I *don't* remember that? If you remember Harry going to Baltimore harbor with "sole intention of stalking and shooting one of our former lady contributors" you are indeed either a liar or senile. Which one? |
A bit of reality for the...
In article ,
says... On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 14:37:54 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 08:30:45 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 13:05:37 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:03:20 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: What was the verdict? Did you hear the juror? They all agreed that Martin attacked Zimmerman. cite? Why don't you track down that juror interview and listen yourself. That's not true. Show me. http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/15/justic...man-juror-book "I think George got in a little bit too deep, which he shouldn't have been there. But Trayvon decided that he wasn't going to let him scare him ... and I think Trayvon got mad and attacked him," she said. Uh, YOU said "they ALL agreed that Martin attacked Zimmerman". Not one, ALL.... Notice if you will, the lady specifically said "*I* think". They *all* agreed he was not guilty. They didn't all agree that Zimmerman attacked Martin, so they *all* must have agreed to the converse - else the self defense aspect would be meaningless. It must be a bitch being Loogy. John (Gun Nut) H. Pssst, here you go, moron. http://tinyurl.com/mw2fy8x From your cite: "The death of a teenager weighed heavily on our hearts but in the end we did what the law required us to do." Amen. Case closed. They all agreed he was not guilty - which implies acting in self defense. It must be a bitch being Loogy is all I can say. John (Gun Nut) H. Again, can you not comprehend a THING? You said "they all agreed that Martin attacked Zimmerman", now try to stay with that thought, at least until you need to go change your Depends. Where did you find out that "they all agreed that Martin attacked Zimmerman"? Cite? |
A bit of reality for the...
In article ,
says... On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 14:34:53 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 21:11:11 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 7/16/2013 5:37 PM, John H wrote: On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 16:07:50 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/16/2013 12:52 PM, wrote: On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:52:50 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: What was the verdict? Did you hear the juror? They all agreed that Martin attacked Zimmerman. Which proves not a thing, other than a jury of five white people and one who wasn't, and living in a "cracker" town with a history of racism, sanctioned the murder of a black kid. But this is America...what else would you expect? Yet you felt obligated to arm yourself and potentially "murder" someone. Your argument simply does not wash. I don't do guns (much:) but I feel there are three kinds of gun owners... Hobbyists, folks who want to preserve general society, and folks who want to get away with being assholes... How does a gun "preserve general society"? Ask Adolf. John (Gun Nut) H. Seriously, do I have to explain what I meant? Did you ask how a gun preserves general society? I thought that was from Loogy. I figured you had more sense than to ask the question. John (Gun Nut) H. How DO guns "preserve society"? Was there no societal structure before guns? Ask Adolf. John (Gun Nut) H. Adolf who? |
A bit of reality for the...
In article ,
says... On 7/17/2013 2:51 PM, John H wrote: On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 14:34:53 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 21:11:11 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 7/16/2013 5:37 PM, John H wrote: On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 16:07:50 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/16/2013 12:52 PM, wrote: On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:52:50 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: What was the verdict? Did you hear the juror? They all agreed that Martin attacked Zimmerman. Which proves not a thing, other than a jury of five white people and one who wasn't, and living in a "cracker" town with a history of racism, sanctioned the murder of a black kid. But this is America...what else would you expect? Yet you felt obligated to arm yourself and potentially "murder" someone. Your argument simply does not wash. I don't do guns (much:) but I feel there are three kinds of gun owners... Hobbyists, folks who want to preserve general society, and folks who want to get away with being assholes... How does a gun "preserve general society"? Ask Adolf. John (Gun Nut) H. Seriously, do I have to explain what I meant? Did you ask how a gun preserves general society? I thought that was from Loogy. I figured you had more sense than to ask the question. John (Gun Nut) H. How DO guns "preserve society"? Was there no societal structure before guns? Ask Adolf. John (Gun Nut) H. I am guessing he doesn't know the difference between the words, "preserve" and "create"... I wish folks would read the words:) Oh, I sure do, and I asked "how do guns preserve society"? Is your jawbone acting up again, you seem to be going insane again. Now care to answer? |
A bit of reality for the...
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 17:07:16 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 14:37:54 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 08:30:45 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 13:05:37 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:03:20 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: What was the verdict? Did you hear the juror? They all agreed that Martin attacked Zimmerman. cite? Why don't you track down that juror interview and listen yourself. That's not true. Show me. http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/15/justic...man-juror-book "I think George got in a little bit too deep, which he shouldn't have been there. But Trayvon decided that he wasn't going to let him scare him ... and I think Trayvon got mad and attacked him," she said. Uh, YOU said "they ALL agreed that Martin attacked Zimmerman". Not one, ALL.... Notice if you will, the lady specifically said "*I* think". They *all* agreed he was not guilty. They didn't all agree that Zimmerman attacked Martin, so they *all* must have agreed to the converse - else the self defense aspect would be meaningless. It must be a bitch being Loogy. John (Gun Nut) H. Pssst, here you go, moron. http://tinyurl.com/mw2fy8x From your cite: "The death of a teenager weighed heavily on our hearts but in the end we did what the law required us to do." Amen. Case closed. They all agreed he was not guilty - which implies acting in self defense. It must be a bitch being Loogy is all I can say. John (Gun Nut) H. Again, can you not comprehend a THING? You said "they all agreed that Martin attacked Zimmerman", now try to stay with that thought, at least until you need to go change your Depends. Where did you find out that "they all agreed that Martin attacked Zimmerman"? Cite? I didn't say that. You can't even quote properly. John (Gun Nut) H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
A bit of reality for the...
On 7/17/13 5:04 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 14:36:13 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:23:29 -0400, Hank© wrote: On 7/17/2013 1:43 AM, wrote: On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 13:11:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 7/16/13 12:52 PM, wrote: On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:52:50 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: What was the verdict? Did you hear the juror? They all agreed that Martin attacked Zimmerman. Which proves not a thing, other than a jury of five white people and one who wasn't, and living in a "cracker" town with a history of racism, sanctioned the murder of a black kid. But this is America...what else would you expect? Yet you felt obligated to arm yourself and potentially "murder" someone. Your argument simply does not wash I wasn't patrolling anyone's neighborhood, looking for someone to stalk, confront and shoot. Zimmerman was. If that was his intent, why did he call the cops and why didn't he simply confront Martin right away when he had the tactical advantage of knowing where he was.? Harry did patrol Baltimore harbor with sole the intention of stalking and shooting one of our former lady contributors. Baltimore is quite a distance from his normal stomping grounds, I might add. I remember that. John (Gun Nut) H. That is NOTHING short of a blatant lie and you know it. Because of your narrow-mindedness, you've never had much respect here, I can only hope you have much less now with that bull****. Are you saying I *don't* remember that? If you remember Harry going to Baltimore harbor with "sole intention of stalking and shooting one of our former lady contributors" you are indeed either a liar or senile. Which one? Amazing how the right-wing trash here comes up with its tales. Then and now, we frequently boat to Baltimore because of the city's attractions, Italian restaurants, Inner Harbor, and peripheral harbor areas. All I ever found of Mad Cow up there was an apartment tower with marina attached that looked like the one she described. I never took or posted any photos of her, but she did, from the docks of the Duldalk area power squadron, I believe. Dundalk had a few interesting marinas, including one that at the time had the lowest prices for fuel, gas or diesel, in the immediate area. Baltimore, or at least the river that reaches it from Chesapeake Bay, is just north of the Bay Bridge, which is just north of the entrance to the Annapolis area. It's a short boat ride away from here. Even Herring might have been able to find Annapolis or Baltimore in his 17-footer, when he had it. Herring is both a liar and senile. But, what would you expect from right-wing racist trash like Herring? |
A bit of reality for the...
In article ,
says... On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 17:07:16 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 14:37:54 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 08:30:45 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 13:05:37 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:03:20 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: What was the verdict? Did you hear the juror? They all agreed that Martin attacked Zimmerman. cite? Why don't you track down that juror interview and listen yourself. That's not true. Show me. http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/15/justic...man-juror-book "I think George got in a little bit too deep, which he shouldn't have been there. But Trayvon decided that he wasn't going to let him scare him ... and I think Trayvon got mad and attacked him," she said. Uh, YOU said "they ALL agreed that Martin attacked Zimmerman". Not one, ALL.... Notice if you will, the lady specifically said "*I* think". They *all* agreed he was not guilty. They didn't all agree that Zimmerman attacked Martin, so they *all* must have agreed to the converse - else the self defense aspect would be meaningless. It must be a bitch being Loogy. John (Gun Nut) H. Pssst, here you go, moron. http://tinyurl.com/mw2fy8x From your cite: "The death of a teenager weighed heavily on our hearts but in the end we did what the law required us to do." Amen. Case closed. They all agreed he was not guilty - which implies acting in self defense. It must be a bitch being Loogy is all I can say. John (Gun Nut) H. Again, can you not comprehend a THING? You said "they all agreed that Martin attacked Zimmerman", now try to stay with that thought, at least until you need to go change your Depends. Where did you find out that "they all agreed that Martin attacked Zimmerman"? Cite? I didn't say that. You can't even quote properly. John (Gun Nut) H. BULL****!!! I really can't figure out whether you ARE senile or just really, really stupid. |
A bit of reality for the...
On 7/17/2013 5:19 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 7/17/13 5:04 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 14:36:13 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:23:29 -0400, Hank© wrote: On 7/17/2013 1:43 AM, wrote: On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 13:11:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 7/16/13 12:52 PM, wrote: On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:52:50 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: What was the verdict? Did you hear the juror? They all agreed that Martin attacked Zimmerman. Which proves not a thing, other than a jury of five white people and one who wasn't, and living in a "cracker" town with a history of racism, sanctioned the murder of a black kid. But this is America...what else would you expect? Yet you felt obligated to arm yourself and potentially "murder" someone. Your argument simply does not wash I wasn't patrolling anyone's neighborhood, looking for someone to stalk, confront and shoot. Zimmerman was. If that was his intent, why did he call the cops and why didn't he simply confront Martin right away when he had the tactical advantage of knowing where he was.? Harry did patrol Baltimore harbor with sole the intention of stalking and shooting one of our former lady contributors. Baltimore is quite a distance from his normal stomping grounds, I might add. I remember that. John (Gun Nut) H. That is NOTHING short of a blatant lie and you know it. Because of your narrow-mindedness, you've never had much respect here, I can only hope you have much less now with that bull****. Are you saying I *don't* remember that? If you remember Harry going to Baltimore harbor with "sole intention of stalking and shooting one of our former lady contributors" you are indeed either a liar or senile. Which one? Amazing how the right-wing trash here comes up with its tales. Then and now, we frequently boat to Baltimore because of the city's attractions, Italian restaurants, Inner Harbor, and peripheral harbor areas. All I ever found of Mad Cow up there was an apartment tower with marina attached that looked like the one she described. I never took or posted any photos of her, but she did, from the docks of the Duldalk area power squadron, I believe. Dundalk had a few interesting marinas, including one that at the time had the lowest prices for fuel, gas or diesel, in the immediate area. Baltimore, or at least the river that reaches it from Chesapeake Bay, is just north of the Bay Bridge, which is just north of the entrance to the Annapolis area. It's a short boat ride away from here. Even Herring might have been able to find Annapolis or Baltimore in his 17-footer, when he had it. Herring is both a liar and senile. But, what would you expect from right-wing racist trash like Herring? That's a hell of a yarn you're spinning there Harry. |
A bit of reality for the...
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 18:38:35 -0400, Hank© wrote:
On 7/17/2013 5:19 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 7/17/13 5:04 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 14:36:13 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:23:29 -0400, Hank© wrote: On 7/17/2013 1:43 AM, wrote: On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 13:11:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 7/16/13 12:52 PM, wrote: On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:52:50 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: What was the verdict? Did you hear the juror? They all agreed that Martin attacked Zimmerman. Which proves not a thing, other than a jury of five white people and one who wasn't, and living in a "cracker" town with a history of racism, sanctioned the murder of a black kid. But this is America...what else would you expect? Yet you felt obligated to arm yourself and potentially "murder" someone. Your argument simply does not wash I wasn't patrolling anyone's neighborhood, looking for someone to stalk, confront and shoot. Zimmerman was. If that was his intent, why did he call the cops and why didn't he simply confront Martin right away when he had the tactical advantage of knowing where he was.? Harry did patrol Baltimore harbor with sole the intention of stalking and shooting one of our former lady contributors. Baltimore is quite a distance from his normal stomping grounds, I might add. I remember that. John (Gun Nut) H. That is NOTHING short of a blatant lie and you know it. Because of your narrow-mindedness, you've never had much respect here, I can only hope you have much less now with that bull****. Are you saying I *don't* remember that? If you remember Harry going to Baltimore harbor with "sole intention of stalking and shooting one of our former lady contributors" you are indeed either a liar or senile. Which one? Amazing how the right-wing trash here comes up with its tales. Then and now, we frequently boat to Baltimore because of the city's attractions, Italian restaurants, Inner Harbor, and peripheral harbor areas. All I ever found of Mad Cow up there was an apartment tower with marina attached that looked like the one she described. I never took or posted any photos of her, but she did, from the docks of the Duldalk area power squadron, I believe. Dundalk had a few interesting marinas, including one that at the time had the lowest prices for fuel, gas or diesel, in the immediate area. Baltimore, or at least the river that reaches it from Chesapeake Bay, is just north of the Bay Bridge, which is just north of the entrance to the Annapolis area. It's a short boat ride away from here. Even Herring might have been able to find Annapolis or Baltimore in his 17-footer, when he had it. Herring is both a liar and senile. But, what would you expect from right-wing racist trash like Herring? That's a hell of a yarn you're spinning there Harry. Like a fine wine, his stories get better with age. John (Gun Nut) H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
A bit of reality for the...
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 17:29:06 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 17:07:16 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 14:37:54 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 08:30:45 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 13:05:37 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:03:20 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: What was the verdict? Did you hear the juror? They all agreed that Martin attacked Zimmerman. cite? Why don't you track down that juror interview and listen yourself. That's not true. Show me. http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/15/justic...man-juror-book "I think George got in a little bit too deep, which he shouldn't have been there. But Trayvon decided that he wasn't going to let him scare him ... and I think Trayvon got mad and attacked him," she said. Uh, YOU said "they ALL agreed that Martin attacked Zimmerman". Not one, ALL.... Notice if you will, the lady specifically said "*I* think". They *all* agreed he was not guilty. They didn't all agree that Zimmerman attacked Martin, so they *all* must have agreed to the converse - else the self defense aspect would be meaningless. It must be a bitch being Loogy. John (Gun Nut) H. Pssst, here you go, moron. http://tinyurl.com/mw2fy8x From your cite: "The death of a teenager weighed heavily on our hearts but in the end we did what the law required us to do." Amen. Case closed. They all agreed he was not guilty - which implies acting in self defense. It must be a bitch being Loogy is all I can say. John (Gun Nut) H. Again, can you not comprehend a THING? You said "they all agreed that Martin attacked Zimmerman", now try to stay with that thought, at least until you need to go change your Depends. Where did you find out that "they all agreed that Martin attacked Zimmerman"? Cite? I didn't say that. You can't even quote properly. John (Gun Nut) H. BULL****!!! I really can't figure out whether you ARE senile or just really, really stupid. Show me where I said what you quoted. Then all your name-calling will be accurate. Otherwise, things aren't looking too well for you. John (Gun Nut) H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
A bit of reality for the...
On 7/18/2013 9:30 AM, John H wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 18:38:35 -0400, Hank© wrote: On 7/17/2013 5:19 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 7/17/13 5:04 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 14:36:13 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:23:29 -0400, Hank© wrote: On 7/17/2013 1:43 AM, wrote: On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 13:11:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 7/16/13 12:52 PM, wrote: On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:52:50 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: What was the verdict? Did you hear the juror? They all agreed that Martin attacked Zimmerman. Which proves not a thing, other than a jury of five white people and one who wasn't, and living in a "cracker" town with a history of racism, sanctioned the murder of a black kid. But this is America...what else would you expect? Yet you felt obligated to arm yourself and potentially "murder" someone. Your argument simply does not wash I wasn't patrolling anyone's neighborhood, looking for someone to stalk, confront and shoot. Zimmerman was. If that was his intent, why did he call the cops and why didn't he simply confront Martin right away when he had the tactical advantage of knowing where he was.? Harry did patrol Baltimore harbor with sole the intention of stalking and shooting one of our former lady contributors. Baltimore is quite a distance from his normal stomping grounds, I might add. I remember that. John (Gun Nut) H. That is NOTHING short of a blatant lie and you know it. Because of your narrow-mindedness, you've never had much respect here, I can only hope you have much less now with that bull****. Are you saying I *don't* remember that? If you remember Harry going to Baltimore harbor with "sole intention of stalking and shooting one of our former lady contributors" you are indeed either a liar or senile. Which one? Amazing how the right-wing trash here comes up with its tales. Then and now, we frequently boat to Baltimore because of the city's attractions, Italian restaurants, Inner Harbor, and peripheral harbor areas. All I ever found of Mad Cow up there was an apartment tower with marina attached that looked like the one she described. I never took or posted any photos of her, but she did, from the docks of the Duldalk area power squadron, I believe. Dundalk had a few interesting marinas, including one that at the time had the lowest prices for fuel, gas or diesel, in the immediate area. Baltimore, or at least the river that reaches it from Chesapeake Bay, is just north of the Bay Bridge, which is just north of the entrance to the Annapolis area. It's a short boat ride away from here. Even Herring might have been able to find Annapolis or Baltimore in his 17-footer, when he had it. Herring is both a liar and senile. But, what would you expect from right-wing racist trash like Herring? That's a hell of a yarn you're spinning there Harry. Like a fine wine, his stories get better with age. John (Gun Nut) H. He does tend to polish up the rough edges given enough time to reflect on his outlandish stories. |
A bit of reality for the...
On 7/18/2013 9:54 AM, Hank© wrote:
On 7/18/2013 9:30 AM, John H wrote: On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 18:38:35 -0400, Hank© wrote: On 7/17/2013 5:19 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 7/17/13 5:04 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 14:36:13 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:23:29 -0400, Hank© wrote: On 7/17/2013 1:43 AM, wrote: On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 13:11:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 7/16/13 12:52 PM, wrote: On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:52:50 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: What was the verdict? Did you hear the juror? They all agreed that Martin attacked Zimmerman. Which proves not a thing, other than a jury of five white people and one who wasn't, and living in a "cracker" town with a history of racism, sanctioned the murder of a black kid. But this is America...what else would you expect? Yet you felt obligated to arm yourself and potentially "murder" someone. Your argument simply does not wash I wasn't patrolling anyone's neighborhood, looking for someone to stalk, confront and shoot. Zimmerman was. If that was his intent, why did he call the cops and why didn't he simply confront Martin right away when he had the tactical advantage of knowing where he was.? Harry did patrol Baltimore harbor with sole the intention of stalking and shooting one of our former lady contributors. Baltimore is quite a distance from his normal stomping grounds, I might add. I remember that. John (Gun Nut) H. That is NOTHING short of a blatant lie and you know it. Because of your narrow-mindedness, you've never had much respect here, I can only hope you have much less now with that bull****. Are you saying I *don't* remember that? If you remember Harry going to Baltimore harbor with "sole intention of stalking and shooting one of our former lady contributors" you are indeed either a liar or senile. Which one? Amazing how the right-wing trash here comes up with its tales. Then and now, we frequently boat to Baltimore because of the city's attractions, Italian restaurants, Inner Harbor, and peripheral harbor areas. All I ever found of Mad Cow up there was an apartment tower with marina attached that looked like the one she described. I never took or posted any photos of her, but she did, from the docks of the Duldalk area power squadron, I believe. Dundalk had a few interesting marinas, including one that at the time had the lowest prices for fuel, gas or diesel, in the immediate area. Baltimore, or at least the river that reaches it from Chesapeake Bay, is just north of the Bay Bridge, which is just north of the entrance to the Annapolis area. It's a short boat ride away from here. Even Herring might have been able to find Annapolis or Baltimore in his 17-footer, when he had it. Herring is both a liar and senile. But, what would you expect from right-wing racist trash like Herring? That's a hell of a yarn you're spinning there Harry. Like a fine wine, his stories get better with age. John (Gun Nut) H. He does tend to polish up the rough edges given enough time to reflect on his outlandish stories. Google killed harry.... His stories have morphed based on how easy it is now for folks to verify them now, compared to even a decade ago when he was king of the net.. and certainly the mostest bestest sailor ever... |
A bit of reality for the...
On 7/18/13 10:27 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
Google killed harry.... It's nice that Herring and FlaJim have you tethered so they can make you jump whenever they wish. So, who beat the crap out of you when you were 12 to the point that you had to have facial surgery? |
A bit of reality for the...
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:39 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com