Sharpton prediction
 

"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...

In article ,

says...


The ME with the exemplary qualificaitons should have been able to
not get hostile when the
defense started asking her questions.

What "qualifications" are needed to have witnessed a crime?

------------------------------------

The ME didn't witness any crime with respect to her testimony. All
she did was evaluate Zimmerman's head wounds from photographs and
review the report of the examination by the Physician Assistant. It
was based on the photos and the PA report that she determined that
Zimmerman's injuries were "very minor". Somehow she was also able to
determine that only one punch in the face and one "smashing" of his
head on the concrete took place.

When challenged on this determination on cross examination by defense
she became somewhat frustrated and hostile because she was forced to
admit that more than one punch and more than one head banging on the
concrete walkway *could* have taken place.

Sharpton prediction
 

"Eisboch" wrote:
"iBoaterer" wrote in message ...

In article ,
says...


The ME with the exemplary qualificaitons should have been able to not
get hostile when the
defense started asking her questions.

What "qualifications" are needed to have witnessed a crime?

------------------------------------

The ME didn't witness any crime with respect to her testimony. All she
did was evaluate Zimmerman's head wounds from photographs and review the
report of the examination by the Physician Assistant. It was based on
the photos and the PA report that she determined that Zimmerman's
injuries were "very minor". Somehow she was also able to determine that
only one punch in the face and one "smashing" of his head on the concrete took place.

When challenged on this determination on cross examination by defense she
became somewhat frustrated and hostile because she was forced to admit
that more than one punch and more than one head banging on the concrete
walkway *could* have taken place.

Dude Zimmerman bang his head on the concrete or punch himself first?

Sharpton prediction
 

In article ,
says...

"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...

In article ,

says...


The ME with the exemplary qualificaitons should have been able to
not get hostile when the
defense started asking her questions.

What "qualifications" are needed to have witnessed a crime?

------------------------------------

The ME didn't witness any crime with respect to her testimony. All
she did was evaluate Zimmerman's head wounds from photographs and
review the report of the examination by the Physician Assistant. It
was based on the photos and the PA report that she determined that
Zimmerman's injuries were "very minor". Somehow she was also able to
determine that only one punch in the face and one "smashing" of his
head on the concrete took place.

When challenged on this determination on cross examination by defense
she became somewhat frustrated and hostile because she was forced to
admit that more than one punch and more than one head banging on the
concrete walkway *could* have taken place.

She was giving testimony AS an "expert WITNESS".

Sharpton prediction
 

"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...



What "qualifications" are needed to have witnessed a crime?

------------------------------------

The ME didn't witness any crime with respect to her testimony. All
she did was evaluate Zimmerman's head wounds from photographs and
review the report of the examination by the Physician Assistant.
It
was based on the photos and the PA report that she determined that
Zimmerman's injuries were "very minor". Somehow she was also able
to
determine that only one punch in the face and one "smashing" of his
head on the concrete took place.

When challenged on this determination on cross examination by
defense
she became somewhat frustrated and hostile because she was forced to
admit that more than one punch and more than one head banging on the
concrete walkway *could* have taken place.

She was giving testimony AS an "expert WITNESS".

-----------------------------------------------

Read what you posted above. You made the statement, "What
"qualifications" are needed to have witnessed a crime?"

She didn't "witness" any crime. She testified as a witness for the
prosecution on her evaluation of Zimmerman's injuries based on photos
and a PA's examination. What became contested was her statement that
the injuries were a result of only two actions .... a punch in the
nose and a single "smash" of the head on the concrete walkway.

Sharpton prediction
 

On 7/3/2013 10:20 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
"Eisboch" wrote:
"iBoaterer" wrote in message ...

In article ,
says...


The ME with the exemplary qualificaitons should have been able to not
get hostile when the
defense started asking her questions.

What "qualifications" are needed to have witnessed a crime?

------------------------------------

The ME didn't witness any crime with respect to her testimony. All she
did was evaluate Zimmerman's head wounds from photographs and review the
report of the examination by the Physician Assistant. It was based on
the photos and the PA report that she determined that Zimmerman's
injuries were "very minor". Somehow she was also able to determine that
only one punch in the face and one "smashing" of his head on the concrete took place.

When challenged on this determination on cross examination by defense she
became somewhat frustrated and hostile because she was forced to admit
that more than one punch and more than one head banging on the concrete
walkway *could* have taken place.

Dude Zimmerman bang his head on the concrete or punch himself first?

Proper English?

Sharpton prediction
 

In article ,
says...

"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...



What "qualifications" are needed to have witnessed a crime?

------------------------------------

The ME didn't witness any crime with respect to her testimony. All
she did was evaluate Zimmerman's head wounds from photographs and
review the report of the examination by the Physician Assistant.
It
was based on the photos and the PA report that she determined that
Zimmerman's injuries were "very minor". Somehow she was also able
to
determine that only one punch in the face and one "smashing" of his
head on the concrete took place.

When challenged on this determination on cross examination by
defense
she became somewhat frustrated and hostile because she was forced to
admit that more than one punch and more than one head banging on the
concrete walkway *could* have taken place.

She was giving testimony AS an "expert WITNESS".

-----------------------------------------------

Read what you posted above. You made the statement, "What
"qualifications" are needed to have witnessed a crime?"

She didn't "witness" any crime. She testified as a witness for the
prosecution on her evaluation of Zimmerman's injuries based on photos
and a PA's examination. What became contested was her statement that
the injuries were a result of only two actions .... a punch in the
nose and a single "smash" of the head on the concrete walkway.

Oh, boy. It's VERY clear that like the FOXites, you've made up your mind
already.

Sharpton prediction
 

On 3 Jul 2013 14:20:22 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote
"Eisboch" wrote:
"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...

In article ,

says...


The ME with the exemplary qualificaitons should have been able
to not
get hostile when the
defense started asking her questions.

What "qualifications" are needed to have witnessed a crime?

------------------------------------

The ME didn't witness any crime with respect to her testimony.
All she
did was evaluate Zimmerman's head wounds from photographs and
review the
report of the examination by the Physician Assistant. It was
based on
the photos and the PA report that she determined that Zimmerman's
injuries were "very minor". Somehow she was also able to
determine that
only one punch in the face and one "smashing" of his head on the
concrete took place.

When challenged on this determination on cross examination by
defense she
became somewhat frustrated and hostile because she was forced to
admit
that more than one punch and more than one head banging on the
concrete
walkway *could* have taken place.


Dude Zimmerman bang his head on the concrete or punch himself first?

You comments make it seem you bang your own head on concrete. Just
sayin!

Sharpton prediction
 

On 3 Jul 2013 14:20:22 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:

When challenged on this determination on cross examination by defense she
became somewhat frustrated and hostile because she was forced to admit
that more than one punch and more than one head banging on the concrete
walkway *could* have taken place.

Dude Zimmerman bang his head on the concrete or punch himself first?

===

Well dude he or duden't he?

Sharpton prediction
 

"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...



What "qualifications" are needed to have witnessed a crime?

------------------------------------

The ME didn't witness any crime with respect to her testimony.
All
she did was evaluate Zimmerman's head wounds from photographs and
review the report of the examination by the Physician Assistant.


She was giving testimony AS an "expert WITNESS".

-----------------------------------------------

Read what you posted above. You made the statement, "What
"qualifications" are needed to have witnessed a crime?"

She didn't "witness" any crime. She testified as a witness for the
prosecution on her evaluation of Zimmerman's injuries based on
photos
and a PA's examination. What became contested was her statement
that
the injuries were a result of only two actions .... a punch in the
nose and a single "smash" of the head on the concrete walkway.

Oh, boy. It's VERY clear that like the FOXites, you've made up your
mind
already.

--------------------------------

I have not. I wish you would pay attention to what you post and what
is posted as a response.

As it pertains to the medical examiner you stated:

What "qualifications" are needed to have witnessed a crime?

I answered that she was *not* a witness to a crime in this case. She
was simply providing testimony regarding head wounds.

How do you conclude that I've "made up my mind" based on that?
I've stated several times that I don't know.

Sharpton prediction
 

In article , says...

"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...

In article ,

says...


The ME with the exemplary qualificaitons should have been able to
not get hostile when the
defense started asking her questions.

What "qualifications" are needed to have witnessed a crime?

------------------------------------

The ME didn't witness any crime with respect to her testimony. All
she did was evaluate Zimmerman's head wounds from photographs and
review the report of the examination by the Physician Assistant. It
was based on the photos and the PA report that she determined that
Zimmerman's injuries were "very minor". Somehow she was also able to
determine that only one punch in the face and one "smashing" of his
head on the concrete took place.

When challenged on this determination on cross examination by defense
she became somewhat frustrated and hostile because she was forced to
admit that more than one punch and more than one head banging on the
concrete walkway *could* have taken place.

It shows that the ME was biased and her qualifications weren't relied upon to come to her
conclusion.