|
What a joke
|
What a joke
In article ,
says... In article , says... "F.O.A.D." wrote in message m... On 7/3/13 6:12 AM, Tim wrote: On Tuesday, July 2, 2013 2:46:46 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote: Personally, I haven't "lined up" with either side yet. "But, Harry. you're pronounced Zimmerman guilty from the world 'go'. No need for a trial." I think you are quoting someone else there, Tim. I think anyone who has a record of violence and who is outside his or her home and who shoots an unarmed stranger is likely guilty of a serious felony. Zimmerman has a record of violence, he was not in his home, he was advised to leave Mr. Martin to the police, he stalked Martin instead, and when the situation he created got away from him, he shot and killed Martin. -------------------------------------------- May be the case. But to be accurate, the "record of violence" you reference has been determined to be rather minor in nature as it relates to his prior arrest. Basically, he was drinking along with a friend and acted like an idiot, same as most drunks do. The initial charge of "resisting an officer with violence" was reduced to "resisting an officer without violence" and then dismissed when he agreed to enter an alcohol abuse program. As to the domestic violence accusation ... there was never a charge. An ex-girlfriend filed for a restraining order. Zimmerman filed a counter restraining order. Both were granted. That was the end of that. A "domestic violence" charge was never pursued by either. If Zimmerman's past is important then so is Martin's. There are several examples of alleged actions and behavior that diminish the portrayal of him being a upright, law abiding model citizen. The only one that has been officially acknowledged by records and his family is the school suspensions. In fact, he was under a suspension when this whole affair occurred. I am waiting for the Martin was an angel card to be played. I am also waiting for a picture of Marin that isn't three or four years old being used. The obvious message of using an older picuture portraying Martin as a pre-teen is dishonest. Was it also dishonest for FOX to show pictures of a young suit wearing Zimmerman? |
What a joke
|
What a joke
|
What a joke
|
What a joke
|
What a joke
On 7/3/2013 9:00 AM, BAR wrote:
In article , says... "F.O.A.D." wrote in message m... On 7/3/13 6:12 AM, Tim wrote: On Tuesday, July 2, 2013 2:46:46 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote: Personally, I haven't "lined up" with either side yet. "But, Harry. you're pronounced Zimmerman guilty from the world 'go'. No need for a trial." I think you are quoting someone else there, Tim. I think anyone who has a record of violence and who is outside his or her home and who shoots an unarmed stranger is likely guilty of a serious felony. Zimmerman has a record of violence, he was not in his home, he was advised to leave Mr. Martin to the police, he stalked Martin instead, and when the situation he created got away from him, he shot and killed Martin. -------------------------------------------- May be the case. But to be accurate, the "record of violence" you reference has been determined to be rather minor in nature as it relates to his prior arrest. Basically, he was drinking along with a friend and acted like an idiot, same as most drunks do. The initial charge of "resisting an officer with violence" was reduced to "resisting an officer without violence" and then dismissed when he agreed to enter an alcohol abuse program. As to the domestic violence accusation ... there was never a charge. An ex-girlfriend filed for a restraining order. Zimmerman filed a counter restraining order. Both were granted. That was the end of that. A "domestic violence" charge was never pursued by either. If Zimmerman's past is important then so is Martin's. There are several examples of alleged actions and behavior that diminish the portrayal of him being a upright, law abiding model citizen. The only one that has been officially acknowledged by records and his family is the school suspensions. In fact, he was under a suspension when this whole affair occurred. I am waiting for the Martin was an angel card to be played. I am also waiting for a picture of Marin that isn't three or four years old being used. The obvious message of using an older picuture portraying Martin as a pre-teen is dishonest. It was huge in this case. The news made this case by convincing everyone including one witness (who later recanted based on real photos) who initially thought Zimmerman was "on top" but later realized the false representation with a old picture of Martin, made her think "Zimmerman" was the one on top. She later changed her testimony, even in court here.... but by now of course, that picture got Sharpton on top and started all of this... It was the drooling MSM that did this... |
What a joke
On 7/3/2013 9:43 AM, Hank© wrote:
On 7/3/2013 9:00 AM, BAR wrote: In article , says... "F.O.A.D." wrote in message m... On 7/3/13 6:12 AM, Tim wrote: On Tuesday, July 2, 2013 2:46:46 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote: Personally, I haven't "lined up" with either side yet. "But, Harry. you're pronounced Zimmerman guilty from the world 'go'. No need for a trial." I think you are quoting someone else there, Tim. I think anyone who has a record of violence and who is outside his or her home and who shoots an unarmed stranger is likely guilty of a serious felony. Zimmerman has a record of violence, he was not in his home, he was advised to leave Mr. Martin to the police, he stalked Martin instead, and when the situation he created got away from him, he shot and killed Martin. -------------------------------------------- May be the case. But to be accurate, the "record of violence" you reference has been determined to be rather minor in nature as it relates to his prior arrest. Basically, he was drinking along with a friend and acted like an idiot, same as most drunks do. The initial charge of "resisting an officer with violence" was reduced to "resisting an officer without violence" and then dismissed when he agreed to enter an alcohol abuse program. As to the domestic violence accusation ... there was never a charge. An ex-girlfriend filed for a restraining order. Zimmerman filed a counter restraining order. Both were granted. That was the end of that. A "domestic violence" charge was never pursued by either. If Zimmerman's past is important then so is Martin's. There are several examples of alleged actions and behavior that diminish the portrayal of him being a upright, law abiding model citizen. The only one that has been officially acknowledged by records and his family is the school suspensions. In fact, he was under a suspension when this whole affair occurred. I am waiting for the Martin was an angel card to be played. I am also waiting for a picture of Marin that isn't three or four years old being used. The obvious message of using an older picuture portraying Martin as a pre-teen is dishonest. Most likely It will be Al who plays that card. The parents know he was no angel and I doubt they will say he is/was. If they play it in court, it's all over... |
What a joke
In article ,
says... On 7/3/2013 9:43 AM, Hank© wrote: On 7/3/2013 9:00 AM, BAR wrote: In article , says... "F.O.A.D." wrote in message m... On 7/3/13 6:12 AM, Tim wrote: On Tuesday, July 2, 2013 2:46:46 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote: Personally, I haven't "lined up" with either side yet. "But, Harry. you're pronounced Zimmerman guilty from the world 'go'. No need for a trial." I think you are quoting someone else there, Tim. I think anyone who has a record of violence and who is outside his or her home and who shoots an unarmed stranger is likely guilty of a serious felony. Zimmerman has a record of violence, he was not in his home, he was advised to leave Mr. Martin to the police, he stalked Martin instead, and when the situation he created got away from him, he shot and killed Martin. -------------------------------------------- May be the case. But to be accurate, the "record of violence" you reference has been determined to be rather minor in nature as it relates to his prior arrest. Basically, he was drinking along with a friend and acted like an idiot, same as most drunks do. The initial charge of "resisting an officer with violence" was reduced to "resisting an officer without violence" and then dismissed when he agreed to enter an alcohol abuse program. As to the domestic violence accusation ... there was never a charge. An ex-girlfriend filed for a restraining order. Zimmerman filed a counter restraining order. Both were granted. That was the end of that. A "domestic violence" charge was never pursued by either. If Zimmerman's past is important then so is Martin's. There are several examples of alleged actions and behavior that diminish the portrayal of him being a upright, law abiding model citizen. The only one that has been officially acknowledged by records and his family is the school suspensions. In fact, he was under a suspension when this whole affair occurred. I am waiting for the Martin was an angel card to be played. I am also waiting for a picture of Marin that isn't three or four years old being used. The obvious message of using an older picuture portraying Martin as a pre-teen is dishonest. Most likely It will be Al who plays that card. The parents know he was no angel and I doubt they will say he is/was. If they play it in court, it's all over... Holy **** you are stupid!!!! |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:03 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com