| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
here you go JPS...
"iBoaterer" wrote in message ... In article , says... "iBoaterer" wrote in message ... In article , says... On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 11:42:10 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 6/27/13 11:29 AM, wrote: None of this is necessary, of course, if you come across a kid on the street carrying a soft drink and a bag of candy. Just shoot him. Make sure you are in Florida, of course. You keep leaving out the "punch in the nose" and "beat your head on the concrete" part Yeah, and the best part about that, absolutely NO Zimmerman DNA on the kids hands..... --------------------------------------------------- Assuming the reports of injuries to the back of Zimmerman's head are accurate, how did he get them? Self inflicted perhaps? Stranger things have been done to conceal a crime. ------------------------------ Self inflicted? That's a stretch, given the timeline as reported by witnesses. The defense was going out of their way this morning to establish the timeline of events and prove there was no time for anything like that or for another person to be involved. The witness has testified that it was Martin on top, Zimmerman on the bottom and it was Zimmerman calling for help, in his opinion. That's pretty strong testimony. Funny thing is, he is technically the prosecution's witness. |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
here you go JPS...
In article ,
says... "iBoaterer" wrote in message ... In article , says... "iBoaterer" wrote in message ... In article , says... On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 11:42:10 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 6/27/13 11:29 AM, wrote: None of this is necessary, of course, if you come across a kid on the street carrying a soft drink and a bag of candy. Just shoot him. Make sure you are in Florida, of course. You keep leaving out the "punch in the nose" and "beat your head on the concrete" part Yeah, and the best part about that, absolutely NO Zimmerman DNA on the kids hands..... --------------------------------------------------- Assuming the reports of injuries to the back of Zimmerman's head are accurate, how did he get them? Self inflicted perhaps? Stranger things have been done to conceal a crime. ------------------------------ Self inflicted? That's a stretch, given the timeline as reported by witnesses. The defense was going out of their way this morning to establish the timeline of events and prove there was no time for anything like that or for another person to be involved. The witness has testified that it was Martin on top, Zimmerman on the bottom and it was Zimmerman calling for help, in his opinion. That's pretty strong testimony. Funny thing is, he is technically the prosecution's witness. Sound experts agree that the screaming for help was Martin. |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
here you go JPS...
"iBoaterer" wrote in message ... In article , says... "iBoaterer" wrote in message ... In article , says... "iBoaterer" wrote in message ... In article , says... On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 11:42:10 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 6/27/13 11:29 AM, wrote: None of this is necessary, of course, if you come across a kid on the street carrying a soft drink and a bag of candy. Just shoot him. Make sure you are in Florida, of course. You keep leaving out the "punch in the nose" and "beat your head on the concrete" part Yeah, and the best part about that, absolutely NO Zimmerman DNA on the kids hands..... --------------------------------------------------- Assuming the reports of injuries to the back of Zimmerman's head are accurate, how did he get them? Self inflicted perhaps? Stranger things have been done to conceal a crime. ------------------------------ Self inflicted? That's a stretch, given the timeline as reported by witnesses. The defense was going out of their way this morning to establish the timeline of events and prove there was no time for anything like that or for another person to be involved. The witness has testified that it was Martin on top, Zimmerman on the bottom and it was Zimmerman calling for help, in his opinion. That's pretty strong testimony. Funny thing is, he is technically the prosecution's witness. Sound experts agree that the screaming for help was Martin. ---------------------------------------- That's not what I've heard. I've heard that the experts can *not* agree, due to the poor quality tape recordings based on a cell phone. The witness who testified this morning (Cook) said he was of the opinion that the screams for help came from Zimmerman .... who was on his back with Martin on top. He admitted he can't be 100 percent sure, but that was his impression. They are showing the trial on CNN. You can also find several places that are streaming it live on the Internet. You can hear this first hand for yourself, if you so desire. |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
here you go JPS...
In article ,
says... "iBoaterer" wrote in message ... In article , says... "iBoaterer" wrote in message ... In article , says... "iBoaterer" wrote in message ... In article , says... On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 11:42:10 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 6/27/13 11:29 AM, wrote: None of this is necessary, of course, if you come across a kid on the street carrying a soft drink and a bag of candy. Just shoot him. Make sure you are in Florida, of course. You keep leaving out the "punch in the nose" and "beat your head on the concrete" part Yeah, and the best part about that, absolutely NO Zimmerman DNA on the kids hands..... --------------------------------------------------- Assuming the reports of injuries to the back of Zimmerman's head are accurate, how did he get them? Self inflicted perhaps? Stranger things have been done to conceal a crime. ------------------------------ Self inflicted? That's a stretch, given the timeline as reported by witnesses. The defense was going out of their way this morning to establish the timeline of events and prove there was no time for anything like that or for another person to be involved. The witness has testified that it was Martin on top, Zimmerman on the bottom and it was Zimmerman calling for help, in his opinion. That's pretty strong testimony. Funny thing is, he is technically the prosecution's witness. Sound experts agree that the screaming for help was Martin. ---------------------------------------- That's not what I've heard. I've heard that the experts can *not* agree, due to the poor quality tape recordings based on a cell phone. The witness who testified this morning (Cook) said he was of the opinion that the screams for help came from Zimmerman .... who was on his back with Martin on top. He admitted he can't be 100 percent sure, but that was his impression. He wasn't an audio expert, he was a neighbor clearly taking sides. They are showing the trial on CNN. You can also find several places that are streaming it live on the Internet. You can hear this first hand for yourself, if you so desire. |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
here you go JPS...
|
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
here you go JPS...
On Friday, June 28, 2013 3:22:58 PM UTC-4, Eisboch wrote:
He may still be found guilty. The prosecution is now focusing on making a case that he (Zimmerman) was not in any "immediate danger". That's why they are trying to show that his injuries did not cause him to be confused or incapacitated. That's nuts. Zimm was certainly incapacitated (lying on the ground on your back being pummeled by a young, strong 200lb guy qualifies), and that in itself would tend to confuse someone. The jury is smarter than to fall for that. |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
here you go JPS...
On 6/28/2013 3:22 PM, Eisboch wrote:
"iBoaterer" wrote in message ... In article , says... The witness who testified this morning (Cook) said he was of the opinion that the screams for help came from Zimmerman .... who was on his back with Martin on top. He admitted he can't be 100 percent sure, but that was his impression. He wasn't an audio expert, he was a neighbor clearly taking sides. -------------------------------------------- Neighbor? Neighbor of whom? He testified he didn't know either one of the people involved. Who's *side* would he take? So, in your mind, a witness to the altercation who is a stranger to both parties, testifies under oath in a court room with "embellishments" to favor the prosecution? Are you so convinced that Zimmerman is guilty that the facts just don't matter? He may still be found guilty. The prosecution is now focusing on making a case that he (Zimmerman) was not in any "immediate danger". That's why they are trying to show that his injuries did not cause him to be confused or incapacitated. All Zimm needs to do is state that he perceived himself to be in danger. The extent of his injuries is irrelevant but do make a plausible case for him being concerned for his safety. |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
here you go JPS...
|
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
here you go JPS...
iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... "iBoaterer" wrote in message ... In article , says... On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 11:42:10 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 6/27/13 11:29 AM, wrote: None of this is necessary, of course, if you come across a kid on the street carrying a soft drink and a bag of candy. Just shoot him. Make sure you are in Florida, of course. You keep leaving out the "punch in the nose" and "beat your head on the concrete" part Yeah, and the best part about that, absolutely NO Zimmerman DNA on the kids hands..... --------------------------------------------------- Assuming the reports of injuries to the back of Zimmerman's head are accurate, how did he get them? Self inflicted perhaps? Stranger things have been done to conceal a crime. Billie Sol Estes. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
![iBoaterer[_3_] is offline](https://www.boatbanter.com/images/SultanThemeVB3R/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Hybrid Mode
