|
Merikan Taliban
On Thu, 9 May 2013 05:47:23 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
On Thursday, May 9, 2013 7:29:30 AM UTC-4, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 8 May 2013 20:34:04 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote in message ... I don't recall the righties complaining when the Bush Admin killed tens of thousands of Iraqis during that trumped up war. --------------------------------------------------------- Harry, I don't recall you complaining about it either until much later when we found ourselves dealing with an internal power struggle within Iraq. Seems like when things are going well the liberals are all for it. It's only when things don't work out as planned that all the Monday morning quarterbacking starts. Ah, no. I think if we go back to the start of that war you'll find the small cadre of "libruls" here (I know I was very vocal about my displeasure) were firmly against going into Iraq. The fact that our congress did the go-along-to-get-along soft shoe doesn't account for "libruls." And your proof is? The congress-critter liberals are on video demanding blood. jps is full of it. Little reading comprehension problem? Try again, dip****. |
Merikan Taliban
In article , says...
On Wed, 08 May 2013 21:23:19 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 5/8/13 8:40 PM, wrote: On Wed, 08 May 2013 19:33:09 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: I don't recall the righties complaining when the Bush Admin killed tens of thousands of Iraqis during that trumped up war. I guess I must not be a "righty" ... but I didn't even want the war when it was GHWB doing it. That just enabled the 20 years of Iraq war that followed. You also ignore the 20,000 that Iraq says we killed between the Kuwait liberation and the GW invasion, in the name of WMD inspections and saving the Kurds. We were bombing them regularly in the supposed decade of "peace" leading up to the invasion.. We've been slaughtering non-combatants non stop since the end of WWII. Why are you limiting this to "after WWII"? Do you think the 8th Air Force and the RAF were all that selective in their bombing? The US was at least trying to target defense industries with daylight bombing and the over hyped Norden bomb site but Bomber Harris was just opening the bomb bays and letting them go over anything he thought might have a lot of Germans in it. Once LeMay got to his B29s over Japan, we used napalm on their population centers with very little regard to their lack of combatant status. This really goes back through the union army in our own civil war and the conquest of the southwest, from the Indians and the Mexicans. That doens't fit with Harry's view. |
Merikan Taliban
In article , says...
In article , says... In article , says... On Wed, 08 May 2013 16:12:47 -0400, wrote: On Wed, 08 May 2013 11:25:12 -0700, jps wrote: In Afghanistan, religious extremists commit murder with their own hands. In Merika, religious idiots have others handle their sins. Our government uses robots to execute people (plus anyone else within 50 meters) that they used to arrest and take to Gitmo. Is that better? I would think death penalty opponents would be up in arms about this. Death without a trial for suspicion of terrorism? Nope, not a word when a Democrat is in the White House. As a whole, I bet Anwar al-Awlaki would have rather been water boarded a few times and be in Guantanamo with a chance to get out. They would have a pretty hard time finding him guilty of anything in an American court. Speech, even anti-American speech is still protected. All that said, I still think he should have been killed ... but I would kill the remaining bomber too. Death penalty should be taken up by the religious before us atheist "libruls" don't ya think? The good news is that more states are either passing legislation against or refusing to put people to death. It's not a deterrent, never has been never will be. But, the killing of babies in the womb is just a woman's choice. You really should read more on the physical sciences instead of what FOX tells you. You forget, I have a daughter who was a very very pre-mature baby. When she was born her nipples on her breasts hadn't formed yet, the formed within a week. But, she was alive and is now 19 years old. |
Merikan Taliban
In article ,
says... In article , says... In article , says... In article , says... On Wed, 08 May 2013 16:12:47 -0400, wrote: On Wed, 08 May 2013 11:25:12 -0700, jps wrote: In Afghanistan, religious extremists commit murder with their own hands. In Merika, religious idiots have others handle their sins. Our government uses robots to execute people (plus anyone else within 50 meters) that they used to arrest and take to Gitmo. Is that better? I would think death penalty opponents would be up in arms about this. Death without a trial for suspicion of terrorism? Nope, not a word when a Democrat is in the White House. As a whole, I bet Anwar al-Awlaki would have rather been water boarded a few times and be in Guantanamo with a chance to get out. They would have a pretty hard time finding him guilty of anything in an American court. Speech, even anti-American speech is still protected. All that said, I still think he should have been killed ... but I would kill the remaining bomber too. Death penalty should be taken up by the religious before us atheist "libruls" don't ya think? The good news is that more states are either passing legislation against or refusing to put people to death. It's not a deterrent, never has been never will be. But, the killing of babies in the womb is just a woman's choice. You really should read more on the physical sciences instead of what FOX tells you. You forget, I have a daughter who was a very very pre-mature baby. When she was born her nipples on her breasts hadn't formed yet, the formed within a week. But, she was alive and is now 19 years old. So? While medical science is miraculous these days, it still has nothing to do with "killing babies in the womb". I suppose we could use your examples of modern science, and say that medical technology hasn't changed just like the gasoline engine hasn't changed, but that would be silly. Truth be, if left to NATURAL cause and affect, your daughter probably wouldn't have made it. |
Merikan Taliban
"iBoaterer" wrote in message ... So? While medical science is miraculous these days, it still has nothing to do with "killing babies in the womb". I suppose we could use your examples of modern science, and say that medical technology hasn't changed just like the gasoline engine hasn't changed, but that would be silly. Truth be, if left to NATURAL cause and affect, your daughter probably wouldn't have made it. ----------------------------------------------------- Interesting situation in Ohio with Ariel Castro. According to the police reports he raped the girls he held and at least one became pregnant. The reports allege that he starved the victim for several weeks and repeatedly hit her in the stomach until she had a miscarriage. Ohio law considers a fetus to be a human being, making him eligible for the death penalty if convicted. |
Merikan Taliban
On 5/10/13 9:55 AM, Eisboch wrote:
"iBoaterer" wrote in message ... So? While medical science is miraculous these days, it still has nothing to do with "killing babies in the womb". I suppose we could use your examples of modern science, and say that medical technology hasn't changed just like the gasoline engine hasn't changed, but that would be silly. Truth be, if left to NATURAL cause and affect, your daughter probably wouldn't have made it. ----------------------------------------------------- Interesting situation in Ohio with Ariel Castro. According to the police reports he raped the girls he held and at least one became pregnant. The reports allege that he starved the victim for several weeks and repeatedly hit her in the stomach until she had a miscarriage. Ohio law considers a fetus to be a human being, making him eligible for the death penalty if convicted. I'm not a defense attorney, but if I were, I would advise Mr. Castro to cop a plea that might get him life in prison without parole. The prosecutor says he is going to try to get the death penalty for the miscarriages, as you say, but I wonder if even the right-wingers on the U.S. Supreme Court will uphold such a sentence. |
Merikan Taliban
On 5/10/2013 7:14 AM, BAR wrote:
In article , says... In article , says... In article , says... On Wed, 08 May 2013 16:12:47 -0400, wrote: On Wed, 08 May 2013 11:25:12 -0700, jps wrote: In Afghanistan, religious extremists commit murder with their own hands. In Merika, religious idiots have others handle their sins. Our government uses robots to execute people (plus anyone else within 50 meters) that they used to arrest and take to Gitmo. Is that better? I would think death penalty opponents would be up in arms about this. Death without a trial for suspicion of terrorism? Nope, not a word when a Democrat is in the White House. As a whole, I bet Anwar al-Awlaki would have rather been water boarded a few times and be in Guantanamo with a chance to get out. They would have a pretty hard time finding him guilty of anything in an American court. Speech, even anti-American speech is still protected. All that said, I still think he should have been killed ... but I would kill the remaining bomber too. Death penalty should be taken up by the religious before us atheist "libruls" don't ya think? The good news is that more states are either passing legislation against or refusing to put people to death. It's not a deterrent, never has been never will be. But, the killing of babies in the womb is just a woman's choice. You really should read more on the physical sciences instead of what FOX tells you. You forget, I have a daughter who was a very very pre-mature baby. When she was born her nipples on her breasts hadn't formed yet, the formed within a week. But, she was alive and is now 19 years old. My daughter also was saved from the womb and certain death 7 weeks early... Now she is a motocross champion...:) |
Merikan Taliban
On 5/10/2013 10:02 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 5/10/13 9:55 AM, Eisboch wrote: "iBoaterer" wrote in message ... So? While medical science is miraculous these days, it still has nothing to do with "killing babies in the womb". I suppose we could use your examples of modern science, and say that medical technology hasn't changed just like the gasoline engine hasn't changed, but that would be silly. Truth be, if left to NATURAL cause and affect, your daughter probably wouldn't have made it. ----------------------------------------------------- Interesting situation in Ohio with Ariel Castro. According to the police reports he raped the girls he held and at least one became pregnant. The reports allege that he starved the victim for several weeks and repeatedly hit her in the stomach until she had a miscarriage. Ohio law considers a fetus to be a human being, making him eligible for the death penalty if convicted. I'm not a defense attorney, but if I were, I would advise Mr. Castro to cop a plea that might get him life in prison without parole. The prosecutor says he is going to try to get the death penalty for the miscarriages, as you say, but I wonder if even the right-wingers on the U.S. Supreme Court will uphold such a sentence. Why wouldn't they? |
Merikan Taliban
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:11 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com