![]() |
Classy display
"Eisboch" wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote in message ... On 4/21/13 7:38 PM, Eisboch wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote in message ... On 4/21/13 7:07 PM, Eisboch wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote in message ... On 4/21/13 3:41 PM, Tim wrote: On Apr 21, 11:46 am, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 4/21/13 12:35 PM, Tim wrote: On Apr 21, 7:59 am, "F.O.A.D." wrote: Radical muslim extremists, radical christian extremists, what's the difference? There's a huge difference, Harry. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...-suspect-praye... There's a difference between the allegedly radical Muslim extremists who set off the bombs in Boston and the radical christian extremists who blow up abortion clinics and shoot abortion doctors? You look at extremism in a different way than I. There's wacko's and perverts out there, no doubt. But to me, that's not 'christian extremism.' If they say they are christians and are acting in hateful, extreme ways, they sure as hell are no different than radical muslim extremists who act the same way. Same, same. ----------------------------------------- There are radical Christian extremists who break laws. Radical Muslim extremists are abiding by their laws. That's the difference. When you've been blown up or shot to death by a muslim or christian radical religious extremist, you're just as dead. --------------------------------------------- Agreed, but the Christian extremist will most likely end up in prison for life or face the executioner. The Muslim extremist will be hailed as a hero, dead or alive in the eyes of many. My point is that Christianity is not the law of the land anywhere that I can think of but Islamic fundamentalism *is* in many areas of the world. I am referring to those led by religious zealots who incorrectly interpret a "Jihad" as being a choice of conversion to Islam or death. The difference is that unlike Christian extremist nut cases who act in violation of the laws of the land, the militant Muslim extremists are following the laws of their land, which happen to be governed and controlled by their religious leaders. Uh, there have been plenty of nations where one version of christianity or another has been the law of the land, and where all manner of atrocities have been committed in the name of "the faith." Europe was rife with this sort of thinking, and it was established by christians in central and south america. It's even reared its ugly head in this country, e.g., pre-Civil War Southern Baptists were advocates of slavery and that advocacy was based upon their interpretation of christianity. Religion rears its ugly head in many ways. About a third of Americans, according to recent legitimate surveys, would like the United States to adopt christianity as its official religion. ------------------------------------------- I spoke in the present tense. You are talking about history. Right...the christian Serbs didn't rape, pillage and slaughter Muslims a couple of decades ago. |
Classy display
"F.O.A.D." wrote in message ... "Eisboch" wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote in message ... On 4/21/13 7:38 PM, Eisboch wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote in message ... On 4/21/13 7:07 PM, Eisboch wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote in message ... On 4/21/13 3:41 PM, Tim wrote: On Apr 21, 11:46 am, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 4/21/13 12:35 PM, Tim wrote: On Apr 21, 7:59 am, "F.O.A.D." wrote: Radical muslim extremists, radical christian extremists, what's the difference? There's a huge difference, Harry. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...-suspect-praye... There's a difference between the allegedly radical Muslim extremists who set off the bombs in Boston and the radical christian extremists who blow up abortion clinics and shoot abortion doctors? You look at extremism in a different way than I. There's wacko's and perverts out there, no doubt. But to me, that's not 'christian extremism.' If they say they are christians and are acting in hateful, extreme ways, they sure as hell are no different than radical muslim extremists who act the same way. Same, same. ----------------------------------------- There are radical Christian extremists who break laws. Radical Muslim extremists are abiding by their laws. That's the difference. When you've been blown up or shot to death by a muslim or christian radical religious extremist, you're just as dead. --------------------------------------------- Agreed, but the Christian extremist will most likely end up in prison for life or face the executioner. The Muslim extremist will be hailed as a hero, dead or alive in the eyes of many. My point is that Christianity is not the law of the land anywhere that I can think of but Islamic fundamentalism *is* in many areas of the world. I am referring to those led by religious zealots who incorrectly interpret a "Jihad" as being a choice of conversion to Islam or death. The difference is that unlike Christian extremist nut cases who act in violation of the laws of the land, the militant Muslim extremists are following the laws of their land, which happen to be governed and controlled by their religious leaders. Uh, there have been plenty of nations where one version of christianity or another has been the law of the land, and where all manner of atrocities have been committed in the name of "the faith." Europe was rife with this sort of thinking, and it was established by christians in central and south america. It's even reared its ugly head in this country, e.g., pre-Civil War Southern Baptists were advocates of slavery and that advocacy was based upon their interpretation of christianity. Religion rears its ugly head in many ways. About a third of Americans, according to recent legitimate surveys, would like the United States to adopt christianity as its official religion. ------------------------------------------- I spoke in the present tense. You are talking about history. Right...the christian Serbs didn't rape, pillage and slaughter Muslims a couple of decades ago. ----------------------------------------- Muslims have been trying to exterminate Christian Serbs since the thirteenth century. It's a political war. Clinton didn't help matters much either when he was establishing policy. |
Classy display
On 4/21/13 8:59 PM, Eisboch wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote in message ... "Eisboch" wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote in message ... On 4/21/13 7:38 PM, Eisboch wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote in message ... On 4/21/13 7:07 PM, Eisboch wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote in message ... On 4/21/13 3:41 PM, Tim wrote: On Apr 21, 11:46 am, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 4/21/13 12:35 PM, Tim wrote: On Apr 21, 7:59 am, "F.O.A.D." wrote: Radical muslim extremists, radical christian extremists, what's the difference? There's a huge difference, Harry. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...-suspect-praye... There's a difference between the allegedly radical Muslim extremists who set off the bombs in Boston and the radical christian extremists who blow up abortion clinics and shoot abortion doctors? You look at extremism in a different way than I. There's wacko's and perverts out there, no doubt. But to me, that's not 'christian extremism.' If they say they are christians and are acting in hateful, extreme ways, they sure as hell are no different than radical muslim extremists who act the same way. Same, same. ----------------------------------------- There are radical Christian extremists who break laws. Radical Muslim extremists are abiding by their laws. That's the difference. When you've been blown up or shot to death by a muslim or christian radical religious extremist, you're just as dead. --------------------------------------------- Agreed, but the Christian extremist will most likely end up in prison for life or face the executioner. The Muslim extremist will be hailed as a hero, dead or alive in the eyes of many. My point is that Christianity is not the law of the land anywhere that I can think of but Islamic fundamentalism *is* in many areas of the world. I am referring to those led by religious zealots who incorrectly interpret a "Jihad" as being a choice of conversion to Islam or death. The difference is that unlike Christian extremist nut cases who act in violation of the laws of the land, the militant Muslim extremists are following the laws of their land, which happen to be governed and controlled by their religious leaders. Uh, there have been plenty of nations where one version of christianity or another has been the law of the land, and where all manner of atrocities have been committed in the name of "the faith." Europe was rife with this sort of thinking, and it was established by christians in central and south america. It's even reared its ugly head in this country, e.g., pre-Civil War Southern Baptists were advocates of slavery and that advocacy was based upon their interpretation of christianity. Religion rears its ugly head in many ways. About a third of Americans, according to recent legitimate surveys, would like the United States to adopt christianity as its official religion. ------------------------------------------- I spoke in the present tense. You are talking about history. Right...the christian Serbs didn't rape, pillage and slaughter Muslims a couple of decades ago. ----------------------------------------- Muslims have been trying to exterminate Christian Serbs since the thirteenth century. It's a political war. Clinton didn't help matters much either when he was establishing policy. |
Classy display
On 4/21/13 8:59 PM, Eisboch wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote in message ... "Eisboch" wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote in message ... On 4/21/13 7:38 PM, Eisboch wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote in message ... On 4/21/13 7:07 PM, Eisboch wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote in message ... On 4/21/13 3:41 PM, Tim wrote: On Apr 21, 11:46 am, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 4/21/13 12:35 PM, Tim wrote: On Apr 21, 7:59 am, "F.O.A.D." wrote: Radical muslim extremists, radical christian extremists, what's the difference? There's a huge difference, Harry. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...-suspect-praye... There's a difference between the allegedly radical Muslim extremists who set off the bombs in Boston and the radical christian extremists who blow up abortion clinics and shoot abortion doctors? You look at extremism in a different way than I. There's wacko's and perverts out there, no doubt. But to me, that's not 'christian extremism.' If they say they are christians and are acting in hateful, extreme ways, they sure as hell are no different than radical muslim extremists who act the same way. Same, same. ----------------------------------------- There are radical Christian extremists who break laws. Radical Muslim extremists are abiding by their laws. That's the difference. When you've been blown up or shot to death by a muslim or christian radical religious extremist, you're just as dead. --------------------------------------------- Agreed, but the Christian extremist will most likely end up in prison for life or face the executioner. The Muslim extremist will be hailed as a hero, dead or alive in the eyes of many. My point is that Christianity is not the law of the land anywhere that I can think of but Islamic fundamentalism *is* in many areas of the world. I am referring to those led by religious zealots who incorrectly interpret a "Jihad" as being a choice of conversion to Islam or death. The difference is that unlike Christian extremist nut cases who act in violation of the laws of the land, the militant Muslim extremists are following the laws of their land, which happen to be governed and controlled by their religious leaders. Uh, there have been plenty of nations where one version of christianity or another has been the law of the land, and where all manner of atrocities have been committed in the name of "the faith." Europe was rife with this sort of thinking, and it was established by christians in central and south america. It's even reared its ugly head in this country, e.g., pre-Civil War Southern Baptists were advocates of slavery and that advocacy was based upon their interpretation of christianity. Religion rears its ugly head in many ways. About a third of Americans, according to recent legitimate surveys, would like the United States to adopt christianity as its official religion. ------------------------------------------- I spoke in the present tense. You are talking about history. Right...the christian Serbs didn't rape, pillage and slaughter Muslims a couple of decades ago. ----------------------------------------- Muslims have been trying to exterminate Christian Serbs since the thirteenth century. It's a political war. Clinton didn't help matters much either when he was establishing policy. Christians have been murdering Muslims for just as long. Christians have also spent centuries killing each other, and also Jews and Hindus. The big time religions are into big time blood letting. I'm not sure belief in a supreme being is as much the cause as is organized religion. I wonder if we'd be better off believing in a creator if we had to, but not having organized religions. |
Classy display
On Apr 21, 6:17*pm, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 4/21/13 7:07 PM, Eisboch wrote: "F.O.A.D." *wrote in message ... On 4/21/13 3:41 PM, Tim wrote: On Apr 21, 11:46 am, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 4/21/13 12:35 PM, Tim wrote: On Apr 21, 7:59 am, "F.O.A.D." wrote: Radical muslim extremists, radical christian extremists, what's the difference? There's a huge difference, Harry. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...-suspect-praye.... There's a difference between the allegedly radical Muslim extremists who set off the bombs in Boston and the radical christian extremists who blow up abortion clinics and shoot abortion doctors? You look at extremism in a different way than I. There's wacko's and perverts out there, no doubt. But to me, that's not 'christian extremism.' If they say they are christians and are acting in hateful, extreme ways, they sure as hell are no different than radical muslim extremists who act the same way. Same, same. ----------------------------------------- There are radical Christian extremists who break laws. Radical Muslim extremists are abiding by their laws. That's the difference. When you've been blown up or shot to death by a muslim or christian radical religious extremist, you're just as dead. When you've been blown up or shot to death by anybody you're just as dead, too. Harry it seems that your view is that anyone who blows up or shoots someone to death simply has to be some 'radical religious extremist' |
Classy display
On Apr 21, 6:52*pm, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
Uh, there have been plenty of nations where one version of Christianity or another has been the law of the land... Has been??? What about the 'is now?' |
Classy display
On 4/21/13 10:14 PM, Tim wrote:
On Apr 21, 6:17 pm, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 4/21/13 7:07 PM, Eisboch wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote in message ... On 4/21/13 3:41 PM, Tim wrote: On Apr 21, 11:46 am, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 4/21/13 12:35 PM, Tim wrote: On Apr 21, 7:59 am, "F.O.A.D." wrote: Radical muslim extremists, radical christian extremists, what's the difference? There's a huge difference, Harry. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...-suspect-praye... There's a difference between the allegedly radical Muslim extremists who set off the bombs in Boston and the radical christian extremists who blow up abortion clinics and shoot abortion doctors? You look at extremism in a different way than I. There's wacko's and perverts out there, no doubt. But to me, that's not 'christian extremism.' If they say they are christians and are acting in hateful, extreme ways, they sure as hell are no different than radical muslim extremists who act the same way. Same, same. ----------------------------------------- There are radical Christian extremists who break laws. Radical Muslim extremists are abiding by their laws. That's the difference. When you've been blown up or shot to death by a muslim or christian radical religious extremist, you're just as dead. When you've been blown up or shot to death by anybody you're just as dead, too. Harry it seems that your view is that anyone who blows up or shoots someone to death simply has to be some 'radical religious extremist' Not at all, but a significant number of crazies with guns and bombs are religious extremists. |
Classy display
On Sun, 21 Apr 2013 22:06:31 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
I'm not sure belief in a supreme being is as much the cause as is organized religion. === The problem is not so much religion as it is human nature. How do you fix that? It is in our genes through countless thousands of years of selective Darwinism to mistrust, and try to eliminate, those tribes which are different. Only when drawn together by a common goal are those differences temporarily put aside. |
Classy display
On 4/21/13 10:16 PM, Tim wrote:
On Apr 21, 6:52 pm, "F.O.A.D." wrote: Uh, there have been plenty of nations where one version of Christianity or another has been the law of the land... Has been??? What about the 'is now?' A number of states in this country have dumped the constitution and rule of law in favor of religious rule. Kansas is one, Virginia's Republican governor wannabe will do his best if he is elected. |
Classy display
On 4/21/13 10:18 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Sun, 21 Apr 2013 22:06:31 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: I'm not sure belief in a supreme being is as much the cause as is organized religion. === The problem is not so much religion as it is human nature. How do you fix that? It is in our genes through countless thousands of years of selective Darwinism to mistrust, and try to eliminate, those tribes which are different. Only when drawn together by a common goal are those differences temporarily put aside. What a wonderful rationalization and "escape clause" for the horrors perpetrated on civilizations by organized religion. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:04 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com