NRA Specials
 

iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 4/10/2013 6:15 PM, Hank© wrote:
On 4/10/2013 5:54 PM, True North wrote:
Nothing ......and that reflects just what the MiniMan is worth.
Thanks for your interest.


Is it too much to ask that you give us a hint as to who and what you are
talking about?

He calls me miniman, because he is an insecure little loser... Have you
seen the petri dish he raised his family in?

And Scotty's vulgar nasty crap about poster's families starts....

Scotty is hoping to cash in somehow on his charges of being blackmailed.

NRA Specials
 

In article ,
says...

On 10 Apr 2013 20:28:49 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:

True North wrote:
He's an amusing little man.
Almost worth the price of admission to this newsgroup all by himself.

When my wife did her internship at one of florida's forensic hospitals, I
sometimes would meet her for lunch. The general cafeteria where we ate was
available to patients from unlocked wards. Most of the ones I recall were
saner than psychosnotty.

Harry, instead of taking third-grade pot shots at Scotty, you should share some of your firearms
knowledge with those of us who can use it, like Eisbock and me.

For example, you seriously downplayed my recent purchase because it didn't have a thumb safety, like
my revolvers. That's OK, because you mentioned some 'special circumstances' in which you actually
used yours for something besides a quick 'on/off' switch at the range.

I really hope you'll share this knowledge with us. What 'special circumstances' warranted your
chambering a round and then applying the thumb safety?


Salmonbait

I'd like you to share your vast knowledge of alloys and polymers.

NRA Specials
 

iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 4/10/2013 10:12 PM, True North wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 April 2013 22:30:33 UTC-3, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On 4/10/2013 8:12 PM, Earl wrote:

True North wrote:

Nothing ......and that reflects just what the MiniMan is worth.

Thanks for your interest.

Did you forget how to reply properly to a post?



Don't take donnies little victories away from him.. He feels so brave

when he calls names on the net:)

I'd call you that & worse to your face, MiniMan.


Wow, another threat from the pig of NS... Did your wife get her shots
yet, or did the vet do the dogs first?

As predicted, the low class fool starts his vulgar nasty trash to people
who can't defend themselves here. What a cowardly act.

Wait til his daughter moves out to be with a decent guy with a decent job
and snotty is left with a kitchen full of rusting motorbike parts.

NRA Specials
 

On 4/11/2013 8:07 AM, True North wrote:
On Thursday, 11 April 2013 08:50:18 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 4/11/2013 7:29 AM, True North wrote:

I wouldn't go there again Horseman.



I feel like I'm eavesdropping on a private conversation.



You obviously don't know what to include and what to exclude from your

newsgroup posts. Here's some gratis help for you. Show us that *you cave

the capability* to learn something.



First of all Hanky, since I don't speak 'merican, you'll have to explain what
"you cave the capability" means in the Queen's English.


Sorry fella. If you need a translation you'll need to consult the Queens
English Guide For Dummys.

Apparently, you've been reading your Usenet Guide For Dummys. Thank you.
For your information, there's a whole section of Dummy books in most
bookstores.

NRA Specials
 

On 4/11/2013 8:46 AM, True North wrote:
You'd have to pry my Canadian citizenship from my cold dead fingers.

What were you before you got your Canadian citizenship papers?

NRA Specials
 

On Thursday, 11 April 2013 09:54:28 UTC-3, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...



You'd have to pry my Canadian citizenship from my cold dead fingers.



Uh, Don, Canada is in North America.


So is Mexico, but I doubt they call themselves Americans... at least the ones who stay south of the Rio Grande.

NRA Specials
 

On Thursday, 11 April 2013 10:29:20 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 4/11/2013 8:46 AM, True North wrote:

You'd have to pry my Canadian citizenship from my cold dead fingers.



What were you before you got your Canadian citizenship papers?

The unborn..............

NRA Specials
 

On 4/11/2013 10:33 AM, True North wrote:
On Thursday, 11 April 2013 10:29:20 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 4/11/2013 8:46 AM, True North wrote:

You'd have to pry my Canadian citizenship from my cold dead fingers.



What were you before you got your Canadian citizenship papers?

The unborn..............


So what is it you hold in your cold undead fingers? Natural citisens
don't hold their citisanship in their fingers.

NRA Specials
 

On 4/11/13 10:33 AM, True North wrote:
On Thursday, 11 April 2013 10:29:20 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 4/11/2013 8:46 AM, True North wrote:

You'd have to pry my Canadian citizenship from my cold dead fingers.



What were you before you got your Canadian citizenship papers?

The unborn..............



ding, ding, ding, we have a winner.

NRA Specials
 

In article ,
says...

On Thursday, 11 April 2013 09:54:28 UTC-3, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...



You'd have to pry my Canadian citizenship from my cold dead fingers.



Uh, Don, Canada is in North America.


So is Mexico, but I doubt they call themselves Americans... at least the ones who stay south of the Rio Grande.

They ARE Americans.

NRA Specials
 

On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 07:30:43 -0700 (PDT), True North wrote:

On Thursday, 11 April 2013 09:54:28 UTC-3, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...



You'd have to pry my Canadian citizenship from my cold dead fingers.



Uh, Don, Canada is in North America.


So is Mexico, but I doubt they call themselves Americans... at least the ones who stay south of the Rio Grande.

Actually, they do realize that they're also Americans, and I'm sure they can spell the name
properly. I'm glad to see you've learned to do so.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.

NRA Specials
 

On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 12:52:00 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 12:04:17 -0400, J Herring
wrote:

On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 07:30:43 -0700 (PDT), True North wrote:

On Thursday, 11 April 2013 09:54:28 UTC-3, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...



You'd have to pry my Canadian citizenship from my cold dead fingers.



Uh, Don, Canada is in North America.


So is Mexico, but I doubt they call themselves Americans... at least the ones who stay south of the Rio Grande.

Actually, they do realize that they're also Americans, and I'm sure they can spell the name
properly. I'm glad to see you've learned to do so.



Latinos are adamant that they are all Americans and some are offended
that people only think you are American if you are in the Estados
Unidos.
At best we are Norte Americanos.

Amen.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.

NRA Specials
 

On 4/11/2013 10:51 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 4/11/13 10:33 AM, True North wrote:
On Thursday, 11 April 2013 10:29:20 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 4/11/2013 8:46 AM, True North wrote:

You'd have to pry my Canadian citizenship from my cold dead fingers.



What were you before you got your Canadian citizenship papers?

The unborn..............



ding, ding, ding, we have a winner.

it's spelled weiner.

NRA Specials
 

On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 15:23:13 -0400, Hank©
wrote:

On 4/11/2013 10:51 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 4/11/13 10:33 AM, True North wrote:
On Thursday, 11 April 2013 10:29:20 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 4/11/2013 8:46 AM, True North wrote:

You'd have to pry my Canadian citizenship from my cold dead fingers.



What were you before you got your Canadian citizenship papers?

The unborn..............



ding, ding, ding, we have a winner.

it's spelled weiner.

The thing you don't have?

NRA Specials
 

In article , says...

"BAR" wrote in message
. ..

In article ,
says...

"BAR" wrote in message
. ..

In article ,
says...


It's not the members. 74% of the NRA membership support universal
background checks. The nut case is Wayne LaPierre who happens to
get
all the media publicity. BTW ... he's not even the President of
the
NRA. He performs the roll of CEO and is the national spokesman
and
loud mouth. Problem is he doesn't present membership views ...
only
his own.

Please provide an objective source for your "74% of the NRA
membership
support universal
backgroud checks."

---------------------------------------------------

These will get you started. Objectivity is up to you to determine:

http://www.bradycampaign.org/studies/view/240/

Not objective.

http://www.statesman.com/news/news/local/politifact-polls-show-support-for-gun-checks-even-/nXFMt/

No reference to where the 74% comes from.

http://www.politico.com/story/2013/01/ny-poll-big-backing-for-assault-ban-86333.html

Not objective.

http://www.thecrimereport.org/news/crime-and-justice-news/2013-02-polls-support-background-checks

Nearly three quarters (74 percent) of NRA members supported requiring
a background check
system ?for all gun sales? in a January online survey by the Johns
Hopkins Bloomberg School
of Public Health (respondents were recruited offline using a
probability sampling method).

This poll is suspect on its face.

-----------------------------------------------------------

As I alluded to in my reply, I suspect *any* study or poll that
doesn't support your point of view is "suspect".
Doesn't matter. You are free to believe what you want to believe as
am I.

I distrust polls that only provide a final percentage without providing what the questions
are, what the acceptable answers were and what order the questions where asked.

NRA Specials
 

In article , says...

"BAR" wrote in message
. ..


Go back and read about the Massacheusetts ratification convention.

------------------------------------------------

I fail to see what it has to do with background checks to purchase a
gun in 2013.

Things have changed a bit since 1788 and changes to laws are sometimes
required. For example, I'd like to see a uniform travel law
established for permitted, legal gun owners. There's no Federal law
restricting inter-state travel but each state has it's own set of
rules and reciprocity agreements. I can't travel from MA to SC to
visit my son with a gun in my car without violating the law in several
states. In many ways I think traveling down RT 95 through New York,
New Jersey, and other areas south is probably more dangerous than some
war zones if you happen to be forced to stop in the wrong places.

Uniform travel law? If we are moving to national laws we should just go to the point where
each state has to recognize each other states CCP, concealed carry permits, without
modificaiton, exception or modification. If I am originally permitted in one state that
should be accepted by all states whenever I enter those states or when I move from state to
state. Why would one right be andy different from any other right?

NRA Specials
 

On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 21:02:41 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article , says...

"BAR" wrote in message
. ..


Go back and read about the Massacheusetts ratification convention.

------------------------------------------------

I fail to see what it has to do with background checks to purchase a
gun in 2013.

Things have changed a bit since 1788 and changes to laws are sometimes
required. For example, I'd like to see a uniform travel law
established for permitted, legal gun owners. There's no Federal law
restricting inter-state travel but each state has it's own set of
rules and reciprocity agreements. I can't travel from MA to SC to
visit my son with a gun in my car without violating the law in several
states. In many ways I think traveling down RT 95 through New York,
New Jersey, and other areas south is probably more dangerous than some
war zones if you happen to be forced to stop in the wrong places.

Uniform travel law? If we are moving to national laws we should just go to the point where
each state has to recognize each other states CCP, concealed carry permits, without
modificaiton, exception or modification. If I am originally permitted in one state that
should be accepted by all states whenever I enter those states or when I move from state to
state. Why would one right be andy different from any other right?

So, you don't believe in state's rights or you do? You don't when it
comes to guns, but you do when it comes to other things? Your "logic"
is so twisted not even a pretzel could sort it out.