|
Importing
Does anyone know what issues surround buying a boat in Canada and bringing it into the United States? |
Importing
If you buy new, the builder should prepare all the paperwork. I'm not even sure what it
is, since all I saw was the normal builder's certificate used for documentation, but I think some other paper got filed by an import agent. When we called Immigration in Oswego they told us nothing had to be done for the boat - we had been warned they would assume this was a small boat, so we then called Customs. The met us in Phoenix (about 3 hours down the canal), looked over the boat, and charged us $25 for a sticker. This was all pre-9/11. I've heard you can no longer do Immigration with the "picture phone." If its is used boat you should call customs to see just what they require. Because of NAFTA, there should be no duties. -jeff "Steve Daniels, Seek of Spam" wrote in message ... Does anyone know what issues surround buying a boat in Canada and bringing it into the United States? |
Importing
WRONG! There will indeed be duty to be paid. It's that way when buying in
the US and importing to Canada. CM "Jeff Morris" jeffmo@NoSpam-sv-lokiDOTcom wrote in message | Because of NAFTA, there should be no duties. |
Importing
So why didn't I have to pay anything? I even have a piece of paper signed by the customs
official that says duty free. "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message ... WRONG! There will indeed be duty to be paid. It's that way when buying in the US and importing to Canada. CM "Jeff Morris" jeffmo@NoSpam-sv-lokiDOTcom wrote in message | Because of NAFTA, there should be no duties. |
Importing
I bought my boat in BC, Canada 3 years ago. There was *no* duty to be paid
if the boat was built in the USA or in Canada. There were also no Canadian taxes to be paid, but the broker told me that in order to avoid the Canadian taxes, they had to deliver the boat to me in the U.S. and I had to take possession here. The sale and transfer was all simple with no complications. A delivery captain brought the boat down from Vancouver to Blain for a minimal charge, customs brought their sniffer dogs on board and I took possession in a bout 30 min. "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message ... WRONG! There will indeed be duty to be paid. It's that way when buying in the US and importing to Canada. CM "Jeff Morris" jeffmo@NoSpam-sv-lokiDOTcom wrote in message | Because of NAFTA, there should be no duties. |
Importing
WRONG! There will indeed be duty to be paid. It's that way when buying = in the US and importing to Canada. CM It's a wash when you trade it for the VAT. --=20 katysails s/v Chanteuse Kirie Elite 32 http://katysails.tripod.com "Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea." - Robert A. Heinlein |
Importing
Duties will be levied for a canadian made (or any other country of origin).
You won't have to pay duties on a used US boat because it's US origin. Brokers can handle it all. "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message ... WRONG! There will indeed be duty to be paid. It's that way when buying in the US and importing to Canada. CM "Jeff Morris" jeffmo@NoSpam-sv-lokiDOTcom wrote in message | Because of NAFTA, there should be no duties. |
Importing
If it's a Canadian built vessel coming from the USA... Canadian Customs
advised my friend that duties may be imposed. CM "SGD" wrote in message ... | Duties will be levied for a canadian made (or any other country of origin). | You won't have to pay duties on a used US boat because it's US origin. | Brokers can handle it all. | | | "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message | ... | WRONG! There will indeed be duty to be paid. It's that way when buying in | the US and importing to Canada. | | CM | | "Jeff Morris" jeffmo@NoSpam-sv-lokiDOTcom wrote in message | | | Because of NAFTA, there should be no duties. | | | | | |
Importing
Wrong. Recreational yachts built in Canada, Mexico, and a variety of other countries are duty free.
But please, consult with Customs on this. http://dataweb.usitc.gov/scripts/tariff/0310c89.pdf -- -jeff "SGD" wrote in message ... Duties will be levied for a canadian made (or any other country of origin). You won't have to pay duties on a used US boat because it's US origin. Brokers can handle it all. "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message ... WRONG! There will indeed be duty to be paid. It's that way when buying in the US and importing to Canada. CM "Jeff Morris" jeffmo@NoSpam-sv-lokiDOTcom wrote in message | Because of NAFTA, there should be no duties. |
Importing
I'll make sure to make that available to Canadian Customs.... which says
duties may be imposed. Free Trade sucks so much backwash! I hate it! It only makes any sense when both signators have a reasonably close GDP. CM "Jeff Morris" wrote in message ... | Wrong. Recreational yachts built in Canada, Mexico, and a variety of other countries are duty free. | But please, consult with Customs on this. | | http://dataweb.usitc.gov/scripts/tariff/0310c89.pdf | | | -- | -jeff | | "SGD" wrote in message ... | Duties will be levied for a canadian made (or any other country of origin). | You won't have to pay duties on a used US boat because it's US origin. | Brokers can handle it all. | | | "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message | ... | WRONG! There will indeed be duty to be paid. It's that way when buying in | the US and importing to Canada. | | CM | | "Jeff Morris" jeffmo@NoSpam-sv-lokiDOTcom wrote in message | | | Because of NAFTA, there should be no duties. | | | | | | | |
Importing
That would be something like California and Britain.
Does Canada have a GDP? :-) "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message ... I'll make sure to make that available to Canadian Customs.... which says duties may be imposed. Free Trade sucks so much backwash! I hate it! It only makes any sense when both signators have a reasonably close GDP. CM "Jeff Morris" wrote in message ... | Wrong. Recreational yachts built in Canada, Mexico, and a variety of other countries are duty free. | But please, consult with Customs on this. | | http://dataweb.usitc.gov/scripts/tariff/0310c89.pdf | | | -- | -jeff | | "SGD" wrote in message ... | Duties will be levied for a canadian made (or any other country of origin). | You won't have to pay duties on a used US boat because it's US origin. | Brokers can handle it all. | | | "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message | ... | WRONG! There will indeed be duty to be paid. It's that way when buying in | the US and importing to Canada. | | CM | | "Jeff Morris" jeffmo@NoSpam-sv-lokiDOTcom wrote in message | | | Because of NAFTA, there should be no duties. | | | | | | | |
Importing
That file describes duties for bringing products into the USA; I have no idea if the
tariffs are reciprocal. And I'm baffled at the concept of Canada charging a tariff on a boat that was built in Canada. So what don't you like about free trade? Should I have had to pay US Customs a few thousand buck for buying a Canadian boat? I would think that free trade does more to help the Canadian builders than to hurt them. "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message ... I'll make sure to make that available to Canadian Customs.... which says duties may be imposed. Free Trade sucks so much backwash! I hate it! It only makes any sense when both signators have a reasonably close GDP. CM "Jeff Morris" wrote in message ... | Wrong. Recreational yachts built in Canada, Mexico, and a variety of other countries are duty free. | But please, consult with Customs on this. | | http://dataweb.usitc.gov/scripts/tariff/0310c89.pdf | | | -- | -jeff | | "SGD" wrote in message ... | Duties will be levied for a canadian made (or any other country of origin). | You won't have to pay duties on a used US boat because it's US origin. | Brokers can handle it all. | | | "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message | ... | WRONG! There will indeed be duty to be paid. It's that way when buying in | the US and importing to Canada. | | CM | | "Jeff Morris" jeffmo@NoSpam-sv-lokiDOTcom wrote in message | | | Because of NAFTA, there should be no duties. | | | | | | | |
Importing
A million and a half in Maple Syrup and Back Bacon alone!
CM "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... | That would be something like California and Britain. | | Does Canada have a GDP? :-) | | "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message | ... | I'll make sure to make that available to Canadian Customs.... which says | duties may be imposed. | | Free Trade sucks so much backwash! I hate it! It only makes any sense when | both signators have a reasonably close GDP. | | CM | | | | | "Jeff Morris" wrote in message | ... | | Wrong. Recreational yachts built in Canada, Mexico, and a variety of | other countries are duty free. | | But please, consult with Customs on this. | | | | http://dataweb.usitc.gov/scripts/tariff/0310c89.pdf | | | | | | -- | | -jeff | | | | "SGD" wrote in message | ... | | Duties will be levied for a canadian made (or any other country of | origin). | | You won't have to pay duties on a used US boat because it's US origin. | | Brokers can handle it all. | | | | | | "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message | | ... | | WRONG! There will indeed be duty to be paid. It's that way when | buying in | | the US and importing to Canada. | | | | CM | | | | "Jeff Morris" jeffmo@NoSpam-sv-lokiDOTcom wrote in message | | | | | Because of NAFTA, there should be no duties. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Importing
It does more to screw the local population having to compete with prices
willing to be paid by a more affluent US consumer. It does nothing to stem protectionist tariffs and duties arbitrarily imposed by the US against Canadian goods. We gain nothing from Free Trade.... CM "Jeff Morris" wrote in message ... | That file describes duties for bringing products into the USA; I have no idea if the | tariffs are reciprocal. | | And I'm baffled at the concept of Canada charging a tariff on a boat that was built in | Canada. | | So what don't you like about free trade? Should I have had to pay US Customs a few | thousand buck for buying a Canadian boat? I would think that free trade does more to help | the Canadian builders than to hurt them. | | | | "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message | ... | I'll make sure to make that available to Canadian Customs.... which says | duties may be imposed. | | Free Trade sucks so much backwash! I hate it! It only makes any sense when | both signators have a reasonably close GDP. | | CM | | | | | "Jeff Morris" wrote in message | ... | | Wrong. Recreational yachts built in Canada, Mexico, and a variety of | other countries are duty free. | | But please, consult with Customs on this. | | | | http://dataweb.usitc.gov/scripts/tariff/0310c89.pdf | | | | | | -- | | -jeff | | | | "SGD" wrote in message | ... | | Duties will be levied for a canadian made (or any other country of | origin). | | You won't have to pay duties on a used US boat because it's US origin. | | Brokers can handle it all. | | | | | | "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message | | ... | | WRONG! There will indeed be duty to be paid. It's that way when | buying in | | the US and importing to Canada. | | | | CM | | | | "Jeff Morris" jeffmo@NoSpam-sv-lokiDOTcom wrote in message | | | | | Because of NAFTA, there should be no duties. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Importing
Free Trade sucks so much backwash! I hate it! It only makes any sense =
when both signators have a reasonably close GDP. Since we've shipped all our industry to Mexico since NAFTA and done = ourselves in economically, I have to agree... --=20 katysails s/v Chanteuse Kirie Elite 32 http://katysails.tripod.com "Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea." - Robert A. Heinlein |
Importing
Actually, we're the most productive workers on the planet.
"katysails" wrote in message ... Free Trade sucks so much backwash! I hate it! It only makes any sense when both signators have a reasonably close GDP. Since we've shipped all our industry to Mexico since NAFTA and done ourselves in economically, I have to agree... -- katysails s/v Chanteuse Kirie Elite 32 http://katysails.tripod.com "Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea." - Robert A. Heinlein |
Importing
Actually, we're the most productive workers on the planet.
Yes, we are, and that has nothing to do with it. We are also the most = highly paid productive workers on the planet which makes the profit = margins for corporations shrink...so they are moving to Mexico where = labor isn't quite as productive but is way, way cheaper. --=20 katysails s/v Chanteuse Kirie Elite 32 http://katysails.tripod.com "Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea." - Robert A. Heinlein |
Importing
Ultimately, the only way to improve the situation is for US
workers to be even more productive. Protection won't work in the long term. "katysails" wrote in message ... Actually, we're the most productive workers on the planet. Yes, we are, and that has nothing to do with it. We are also the most highly paid productive workers on the planet which makes the profit margins for corporations shrink...so they are moving to Mexico where labor isn't quite as productive but is way, way cheaper. -- katysails s/v Chanteuse Kirie Elite 32 http://katysails.tripod.com "Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea." - Robert A. Heinlein |
Importing
Jonathan Ganz wrote:
Ultimately, the only way to improve the situation is for US workers to be even more productive. ... Unfortunately, it's not that simple. The bottom line is what an item costs to produce, which includes labor but many other costs we'd rather ignore. For example, our draconian environmental statutes add more to production costs than does labor for many industrial operations such as chrome plating. These regulations are a major reason heavy industry has fled the U.S. Moreover, increasing per-worker productivity requires automation which costs money and itself puts people out of work. That new robomachine that allows one operator to do the work of ten not only costs big bucks, which must be added to the items it produces, but puts nine workers on the street. It may be more profitable to move to a 3rd world country than raise the capital to buy the new machine, especially if buying it means downsizing anyway. Now consider what happens when productivity becomes so high that everything is made by machines, without labor. Without jobs, nobody can buy anything and without sales there are no profits and ... |
Importing
.... you all work for microsoft ;-))
JaC =20 Without jobs, nobody can buy anything and without sales there are no = profits and .. |
Importing
Come on... I suppose you'd rather have the heavy industries
back, pumping their filth into the air around *your* home and killing *your* kids. Give me a break. Also, your assumption that automation will eliminate jobs was debunked in the 50s. It's just not true. Automation will eliminate *some* jobs, but others are created. We need to be knowledge workers not laborers. "Vito" wrote in message ... Jonathan Ganz wrote: Ultimately, the only way to improve the situation is for US workers to be even more productive. ... Unfortunately, it's not that simple. The bottom line is what an item costs to produce, which includes labor but many other costs we'd rather ignore. For example, our draconian environmental statutes add more to production costs than does labor for many industrial operations such as chrome plating. These regulations are a major reason heavy industry has fled the U.S. Moreover, increasing per-worker productivity requires automation which costs money and itself puts people out of work. That new robomachine that allows one operator to do the work of ten not only costs big bucks, which must be added to the items it produces, but puts nine workers on the street. It may be more profitable to move to a 3rd world country than raise the capital to buy the new machine, especially if buying it means downsizing anyway. Now consider what happens when productivity becomes so high that everything is made by machines, without labor. Without jobs, nobody can buy anything and without sales there are no profits and ... |
Importing
Jonathan Ganz wrote:
Come on... I suppose you'd rather have the heavy industries back, pumping their filth into the air around *your* home and killing *your* kids. Good news: I have no kids at home. Bad news: I've had to quit riding motorcycles because of all the trucks spraying imported wet garbage up and down the roads hereabouths. A nice chrome plating shop dumping a few poisons would be more welcome but the mob isn't interested in chrome shops. But that's beside the point, which is that if we want local employers to be able to compete with foreign companies that don't have to abide by our expensive laws then we'll have to tax imports to level the playing field. Give me a break. OK, arm or leg? (c: .... Also, your assumption that automation will eliminate jobs was debunked in the 50s. Yup, by propagandists fighting communism. Yasee capitalism is a great system but it will inevitably be killed by the same advancing technology that gave it birth and then what. Some prefer Naziism, others Communism and still others to stick their heads in the sand in denial. Me? I'm too old to care. It's just not true. Automation will eliminate *some* jobs, but others are created. We need to be knowledge workers not laborers. The flaw in your theory is that the jobs automation creates require ever more intellegence and education than an ever growing part of the population can provide. Not everyone can be a rocket scientist or MD even if they wanted to. When I graduated from High School half the class went to work at the Ford plant and the other half at the aircraft plant, all earning enough to buy homes and raise families. Less than 1 in 10 went to college and most of them flunked out. Those factory jobs are now done better and cheaper by machines. Ditto ever more "professional" jobs. There was a big demand for EEs til large scale integration came along. Then they became computer programmers, until high level languages came along. Then they became unemployed. I guess they should have got honest jobs as lawyers or ministers, right? Of course there are still plenty of jobs for kids getting out of high school today - at McDonalds and Wendys and Buggerking - but unless you are in the top half of the population and motivated and financed enough to get at least a BS don't expect to earn a living. Tomarrow .... If you had an *average* 15 year old kid what would you encourage him/her to do today? |
Importing
If we want local employers to be more competitive,
we should allow them to fail or survive by their own designs (with a bit of encouragement from the gov't). Very good news... :-) Good news: I have no kids at home. Bad news: I've had to quit riding motorcycles because of all the trucks spraying imported wet garbage up and down the roads hereabouths. A nice chrome plating shop dumping a few poisons would be more welcome but the mob isn't interested in chrome shops. But that's beside the point, which is that if we want local employers to be able to compete with foreign companies that don't have to abide by our expensive laws then we'll have to tax imports to level the playing field. I was thinking coffee break.... Give me a break. OK, arm or leg? (c: .... Also, your assumption that automation will eliminate jobs was debunked in the 50s. We're not currently using capitalism, so failure isn't really an option. Yup, by propagandists fighting communism. Yasee capitalism is a great system but it will inevitably be killed by the same advancing technology that gave it birth and then what. Some prefer Naziism, others Communism and still others to stick their heads in the sand in denial. Me? I'm too old to care. Not a flaw at all. One must constantly relearn and reeducate oneself to remain valuable. What you did years ago and how you survived or didn't isn't really related to professions or education today. Same goes for me, but I have a science and literature education, which means I can do most anything badly. :-} Watch the lawyere crack... my mom's a lawyer and she's quite honest and ethical, or so the stories go. It's just not true. Automation will eliminate *some* jobs, but others are created. We need to be knowledge workers not laborers. The flaw in your theory is that the jobs automation creates require ever more intellegence and education than an ever growing part of the population can provide. Not everyone can be a rocket scientist or MD even if they wanted to. When I graduated from High School half the class went to work at the Ford plant and the other half at the aircraft plant, all earning enough to buy homes and raise families. Less than 1 in 10 went to college and most of them flunked out. Those factory jobs are now done better and cheaper by machines. Ditto ever more "professional" jobs. There was a big demand for EEs til large scale integration came along. Then they became computer programmers, until high level languages came along. Then they became unemployed. I guess they should have got honest jobs as lawyers or ministers, right? A BS or a BA is still valuable not so much for the actual degree, but for the testament to actually finishing something. That's a lot of what employers look for in new grads. Of course there are still plenty of jobs for kids getting out of high school today - at McDonalds and Wendys and Buggerking - but unless you are in the top half of the population and motivated and financed enough to get at least a BS don't expect to earn a living. Tomarrow .... I would tell them to find something they love to do, something they're really interested in doing and pursue that. If they're unsure, then experiment with different things when they get to college (no off-color or drug puns intended). I doesn't matter an iota what they pick, as long as they're motivated. If it's science or medicine, great. If it's being the best at repairing cars, that's great too. My mechanic works 3 days a week, 4-5 hours a day. He makes tons of money.. if that's what motivates him, which I doubt. I think he's motivated by excellence. If you had an *average* 15 year old kid what would you encourage him/her to do today? |
Importing
Throw a shoe into the machinery?
|
Importing
Vito wrote: Jonathan Ganz wrote: Come on... I suppose you'd rather have the heavy industries back, pumping their filth into the air around *your* home and killing *your* kids. Good news: I have no kids at home. Bad news: I've had to quit riding motorcycles because of all the trucks spraying imported wet garbage up and down the roads hereabouths. Wassat??? A nice chrome plating shop dumping a few poisons would be more welcome but the mob isn't interested in chrome shops. But that's beside the point, which is that if we want local employers to be able to compete with foreign companies that don't have to abide by our expensive laws then we'll have to tax imports to level the playing field. Only when it can be shown that the furrin mfgrs actually do so? Innocent until proved guilty is the basis for all law, or there is no law, just anarchy. Give me a break. OK, arm or leg? (c: .... Also, your assumption that automation will eliminate jobs was debunked in the 50s. Yup, by propagandists fighting communism. Yasee capitalism is a great system but it will inevitably be killed by the same advancing technology that gave it birth and then what. Some prefer Naziism, others Communism and still others to stick their heads in the sand in denial. Me? I'm too old to care. It's just not true. Automation will eliminate *some* jobs, but others are created. We need to be knowledge workers not laborers. The flaw in your theory is that the jobs automation creates require ever more intellegence and education than an ever growing part of the population can provide. Not everyone can be a rocket scientist or MD even if they wanted to. When I graduated from High School half the class went to work at the Ford plant and the other half at the aircraft plant, all earning enough to buy homes and raise families. Less than 1 in 10 went to college and most of them flunked out. Those factory jobs are now done better and cheaper by machines. Ditto ever more "professional" jobs. There was a big demand for EEs til large scale integration came along. Then they became computer programmers, until high level languages came along. Then they became unemployed. I guess they should have got honest jobs as lawyers or ministers, right? Of course there are still plenty of jobs for kids getting out of high school today - at McDonalds and Wendys and Buggerking - but unless you are in the top half of the population and motivated and financed enough to get at least a BS don't expect to earn a living. Tomarrow .... If you had an *average* 15 year old kid what would you encourage him/her to do today? Get elected? No, seriously, how about elder care, since most kids don't want to baby sit any more than their parents did? Form a housing co-op, squat in the woods, get off the grid, and grow vegetables and chickens! Make great arts and crafts. The rich will always appreciate well made local crafts, including entertainment. Outlaw recorded music broadcasts! Sow, Reap. -- Terry K - My email address is MY PROPERTY, and is protected by copyright legislation. Permission to reproduce it is specifically denied for mass mailing and unrequested solicitations. Reproduction or conveyance for any unauthorised purpose is THEFT and PLAGIARISM. Abuse is Invasion of privacy and harassment. Abusers may be prosecuted. -This notice footer released to public domain. Spamspoof salad by spamchock - SofDevCo |
Importing
Terry Spragg wrote:
The only reason there is any want anywhere in the world is because some of those (most?) who run industry seem to think that the way to 'win' is to either get richer than their niegbours, or to make them all poorer by any way they can. Ahem... which world would that be? Over here in the real world, there is 'want' because resources are limited. DSK |
Importing
If all the money (not material objects) was pooled and then divided by =
the world's population, what would the distribution look like? If = everything was equalized how much would each individual own? --=20 katysails s/v Chanteuse Kirie Elite 32 http://katysails.tripod.com "Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea." - Robert A. Heinlein |
Importing
$2. Of course I'd be dishing out the dosh...
;-P Cheers MC katysails wrote: If all the money (not material objects) was pooled and then divided by the world's population, what would the distribution look like? If everything was equalized how much would each individual own? |
Importing
Hi katysails: Havn't seen you around for a long time. I'm seahag's brother in-law.
katysails wrote: If all the money (not material objects) was pooled and then divided by the world's population, what would the distribution look like? If everything was equalized how much would each individual own? -- katysails s/v Chanteuse Kirie Elite 32 http://katysails.tripod.com "Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea." - Robert A. Heinlein -- Marine Worker, Composer, Artist http://www.toad.net/~crm Check out my Galleries and http://www.toad.net/~crm/neighborhood/index.htm "Peek into my neighborhood" Jeeper! [Nelly Belle] [0||||0] YJ 93 Bob's your Uncle. |
Importing
Hi katysails: Havn't seen you around for a long time. I'm seahag's =
brother in-law. Hi, vrolaw...if you been here can't say as to why you've missed me...I = been here.... --=20 katysails s/v Chanteuse Kirie Elite 32 http://katysails.tripod.com "Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea." - Robert A. Heinlein |
Importing
katysails wrote:
If all the money (not material objects) was pooled and then divided by the world's population, what would the distribution look like? If everything was equalized how much would each individual own? For the whole world, I doubt there are figures anywhere aproaching reasonable accuracy... might as well take a blind guess. For just the US it's not that hard to figure.. 291,100,000 people... $8,275,000,000 money supply (M3 for those into such technicalities) for each person in the US... $28.43 Annual income, if divided evenly across the US population, would be $34K per year. Disappointing to all the neo-Bolsheviks among us, but there it is. DSK |
Importing
Hey Bro! What'cha doing on this side of the tracks!?
Seahag Bob wrote: Hi katysails: Havn't seen you around for a long time. I'm seahag's brother in-law. katysails wrote: If all the money (not material objects) was pooled and then divided by the world's population, what would the distribution look like? If everything was equalized how much would each individual own? |
Importing
Disappointing to all the neo-Bolsheviks among us, but there it is.
But if everyone in the whole world could have 34K a year that wouldn't = be a bad thing at all. They should just make a world law that no one = can have more than 34K...(bet birth control would get thrown out the = window real fast!) --=20 katysails s/v Chanteuse Kirie Elite 32 http://katysails.tripod.com "Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea." - Robert A. Heinlein |
Importing
Got accidently cross posted to asa
Seahag wrote: Hey Bro! What'cha doing on this side of the tracks!? Seahag Bob wrote: Hi katysails: Havn't seen you around for a long time. I'm seahag's brother in-law. katysails wrote: If all the money (not material objects) was pooled and then divided by the world's population, what would the distribution look like? If everything was equalized how much would each individual own? -- Marine Worker, Composer, Artist http://www.toad.net/~crm Check out my Galleries and http://www.toad.net/~crm/neighborhood/index.htm "Peek into my neighborhood" Jeeper! [Nelly Belle] [0||||0] YJ 93 Bob's your Uncle. |
Importing
I think maybe Bob was commenting on my appearance on another list that I =
used to frequent quite a bit that I just re-suscribed to but have not = posted to yet.... --=20 katysails s/v Chanteuse Kirie Elite 32 http://katysails.tripod.com "Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea." - Robert A. Heinlein |
Importing
Yes that was it .
katysails wrote: I think maybe Bob was commenting on my appearance on another list that I used to frequent quite a bit that I just re-suscribed to but have not posted to yet.... -- katysails s/v Chanteuse Kirie Elite 32 http://katysails.tripod.com "Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea." - Robert A. Heinlein |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:46 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com