The idiots have spoken...
 

Former governor Mark Sanford won a Republican runoff election in South
Carolina’s 1st congressional district on Tuesday, advancing to a
head-to-head race against Democratic nominee Elizabeth Colbert Busch
that early indicators suggest will be competitive.

The idiots have spoken...
 

In article ,
says...

Former governor Mark Sanford won a Republican runoff election in South
Carolina?s 1st congressional district on Tuesday, advancing to a
head-to-head race against Democratic nominee Elizabeth Colbert Busch
that early indicators suggest will be competitive.

Gee, I guess now adultery is okay for the Christian right wingers.

The idiots have spoken...
 

On 4/3/13 8:39 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

Former governor Mark Sanford won a Republican runoff election in South
Carolina?s 1st congressional district on Tuesday, advancing to a
head-to-head race against Democratic nominee Elizabeth Colbert Busch
that early indicators suggest will be competitive.

Gee, I guess now adultery is okay for the Christian right wingers.


It's always been ok for the hypocritical right wingers, especially in
the south, and, apparently, especially in south carolina, where serial
adulterer Newt Gingrich won the Republican primary in 2012. And let's
not forget that South Carolina was where George W. Bush's 2000 primary
campaign made ugly and false racial allusions about one of John McCain's
children, to wit, from Wiki:

"The smears claimed that McCain had fathered a black child out of
wedlock (the McCains' dark-skinned daughter was adopted from
Bangladesh), that his wife Cindy was a drug addict, that he was a
homosexual, and that he was a "Manchurian Candidate" who was either a
traitor or mentally unstable from his North Vietnam POW days..."

The Bush campaign denied all this, of course, but that's not the point.
The voters of South Carolina, who were leaning towards McCain, dropped
their support and gave Bush the primary victory.

Stupid people making stupid choices.

The idiots have spoken...
 

On 4/3/2013 8:49 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
Stupid people making stupid choices.

Never more evident than in November of 2012

The idiots have spoken...
 

On 4/3/13 9:23 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:01:18 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Former governor Mark Sanford won a Republican runoff election in South
Carolina’s 1st congressional district on Tuesday, advancing to a
head-to-head race against Democratic nominee Elizabeth Colbert Busch
that early indicators suggest will be competitive.

Yeah, but:

When you chamber a round at the range do you then put the pistol aside, or stand around and shoot
the ****, such that you need to put the thumb safety on? That would violate your first rule - not
ready to fire 'til you're ready to fire. If you've chambered a round, it should be because you're
ready to fire - no need to put the safety on, other than to immediately take it off again while
aiming.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.



Yawn. Herring's got a new burr up his ass.

The idiots have spoken...
 

On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:01:18 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Former governor Mark Sanford won a Republican runoff election in South
Carolina’s 1st congressional district on Tuesday, advancing to a
head-to-head race against Democratic nominee Elizabeth Colbert Busch
that early indicators suggest will be competitive.

Yeah, but:

When you chamber a round at the range do you then put the pistol aside, or stand around and shoot
the ****, such that you need to put the thumb safety on? That would violate your first rule - not
ready to fire 'til you're ready to fire. If you've chambered a round, it should be because you're
ready to fire - no need to put the safety on, other than to immediately take it off again while
aiming.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.

The idiots have spoken...
 

On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 08:49:43 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:


Stupid people making stupid choices.

Speaking of:

When you chamber a round at the range do you then put the pistol aside, or stand around and shoot
the ****, such that you need to put the thumb safety on? That would violate your first rule - not
ready to fire 'til you're ready to fire. If you've chambered a round, it should be because you're
ready to fire - no need to put the safety on, other than to immediately take it off again while
aiming.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.

The idiots have spoken...
 

On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:23:01 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/3/13 9:23 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:01:18 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Former governor Mark Sanford won a Republican runoff election in South
Carolina’s 1st congressional district on Tuesday, advancing to a
head-to-head race against Democratic nominee Elizabeth Colbert Busch
that early indicators suggest will be competitive.

Yeah, but:

When you chamber a round at the range do you then put the pistol aside, or stand around and shoot
the ****, such that you need to put the thumb safety on? That would violate your first rule - not
ready to fire 'til you're ready to fire. If you've chambered a round, it should be because you're
ready to fire - no need to put the safety on, other than to immediately take it off again while
aiming.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.



Yawn. Herring's got a new burr up his ass.

You stressed the importance of a safety over and over. You say the only time you use it is on the
range during the interval between chambering a round and shooting the round.

Unless you're not ready to shoot, why did you chamber the round?

If you are ready to shoot, why not shoot?

Your long winded explanations of 'conditions' didn't answer the question.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.

The idiots have spoken...
 

On 4/3/2013 9:23 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
When you chamber a round at the range do you then put the pistol
aside, or stand around and shoot
the ****, such that you need to put the thumb safety on? That would
violate your first rule - not
ready to fire 'til you're ready to fire. If you've chambered a round,
it should be because you're
ready to fire - no need to put the safety on, other than to
immediately take it off again while
aiming.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.



Yawn. Herring's got a new burr up his ass.

John's gun safety question got you stumped?

The idiots have spoken...
 

On 4/3/2013 9:32 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:23:01 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/3/13 9:23 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:01:18 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Former governor Mark Sanford won a Republican runoff election in South
Carolina’s 1st congressional district on Tuesday, advancing to a
head-to-head race against Democratic nominee Elizabeth Colbert Busch
that early indicators suggest will be competitive.

Yeah, but:

When you chamber a round at the range do you then put the pistol aside, or stand around and shoot
the ****, such that you need to put the thumb safety on? That would violate your first rule - not
ready to fire 'til you're ready to fire. If you've chambered a round, it should be because you're
ready to fire - no need to put the safety on, other than to immediately take it off again while
aiming.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.



Yawn. Herring's got a new burr up his ass.

You stressed the importance of a safety over and over. You say the only time you use it is on the
range during the interval between chambering a round and shooting the round.

Unless you're not ready to shoot, why did you chamber the round?

If you are ready to shoot, why not shoot?

Your long winded explanations of 'conditions' didn't answer the question.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.


Harry doesn't leave home without belt, suspenders, and depends. Does
that answer your question?