The idiots have spoken...
 

Former governor Mark Sanford won a Republican runoff election in South
Carolina’s 1st congressional district on Tuesday, advancing to a
head-to-head race against Democratic nominee Elizabeth Colbert Busch
that early indicators suggest will be competitive.

The idiots have spoken...
 

In article ,
says...

Former governor Mark Sanford won a Republican runoff election in South
Carolina?s 1st congressional district on Tuesday, advancing to a
head-to-head race against Democratic nominee Elizabeth Colbert Busch
that early indicators suggest will be competitive.

Gee, I guess now adultery is okay for the Christian right wingers.

The idiots have spoken...
 

On 4/3/13 8:39 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

Former governor Mark Sanford won a Republican runoff election in South
Carolina?s 1st congressional district on Tuesday, advancing to a
head-to-head race against Democratic nominee Elizabeth Colbert Busch
that early indicators suggest will be competitive.

Gee, I guess now adultery is okay for the Christian right wingers.


It's always been ok for the hypocritical right wingers, especially in
the south, and, apparently, especially in south carolina, where serial
adulterer Newt Gingrich won the Republican primary in 2012. And let's
not forget that South Carolina was where George W. Bush's 2000 primary
campaign made ugly and false racial allusions about one of John McCain's
children, to wit, from Wiki:

"The smears claimed that McCain had fathered a black child out of
wedlock (the McCains' dark-skinned daughter was adopted from
Bangladesh), that his wife Cindy was a drug addict, that he was a
homosexual, and that he was a "Manchurian Candidate" who was either a
traitor or mentally unstable from his North Vietnam POW days..."

The Bush campaign denied all this, of course, but that's not the point.
The voters of South Carolina, who were leaning towards McCain, dropped
their support and gave Bush the primary victory.

Stupid people making stupid choices.

The idiots have spoken...
 

On 4/3/2013 8:49 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
Stupid people making stupid choices.

Never more evident than in November of 2012

The idiots have spoken...
 

On 4/3/13 9:23 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:01:18 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Former governor Mark Sanford won a Republican runoff election in South
Carolina’s 1st congressional district on Tuesday, advancing to a
head-to-head race against Democratic nominee Elizabeth Colbert Busch
that early indicators suggest will be competitive.

Yeah, but:

When you chamber a round at the range do you then put the pistol aside, or stand around and shoot
the ****, such that you need to put the thumb safety on? That would violate your first rule - not
ready to fire 'til you're ready to fire. If you've chambered a round, it should be because you're
ready to fire - no need to put the safety on, other than to immediately take it off again while
aiming.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.



Yawn. Herring's got a new burr up his ass.

The idiots have spoken...
 

On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:01:18 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Former governor Mark Sanford won a Republican runoff election in South
Carolina’s 1st congressional district on Tuesday, advancing to a
head-to-head race against Democratic nominee Elizabeth Colbert Busch
that early indicators suggest will be competitive.

Yeah, but:

When you chamber a round at the range do you then put the pistol aside, or stand around and shoot
the ****, such that you need to put the thumb safety on? That would violate your first rule - not
ready to fire 'til you're ready to fire. If you've chambered a round, it should be because you're
ready to fire - no need to put the safety on, other than to immediately take it off again while
aiming.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.

The idiots have spoken...
 

On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 08:49:43 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:


Stupid people making stupid choices.

Speaking of:

When you chamber a round at the range do you then put the pistol aside, or stand around and shoot
the ****, such that you need to put the thumb safety on? That would violate your first rule - not
ready to fire 'til you're ready to fire. If you've chambered a round, it should be because you're
ready to fire - no need to put the safety on, other than to immediately take it off again while
aiming.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.

The idiots have spoken...
 

On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:23:01 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/3/13 9:23 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:01:18 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Former governor Mark Sanford won a Republican runoff election in South
Carolina’s 1st congressional district on Tuesday, advancing to a
head-to-head race against Democratic nominee Elizabeth Colbert Busch
that early indicators suggest will be competitive.

Yeah, but:

When you chamber a round at the range do you then put the pistol aside, or stand around and shoot
the ****, such that you need to put the thumb safety on? That would violate your first rule - not
ready to fire 'til you're ready to fire. If you've chambered a round, it should be because you're
ready to fire - no need to put the safety on, other than to immediately take it off again while
aiming.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.



Yawn. Herring's got a new burr up his ass.

You stressed the importance of a safety over and over. You say the only time you use it is on the
range during the interval between chambering a round and shooting the round.

Unless you're not ready to shoot, why did you chamber the round?

If you are ready to shoot, why not shoot?

Your long winded explanations of 'conditions' didn't answer the question.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.

The idiots have spoken...
 

On 4/3/2013 9:23 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
When you chamber a round at the range do you then put the pistol
aside, or stand around and shoot
the ****, such that you need to put the thumb safety on? That would
violate your first rule - not
ready to fire 'til you're ready to fire. If you've chambered a round,
it should be because you're
ready to fire - no need to put the safety on, other than to
immediately take it off again while
aiming.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.



Yawn. Herring's got a new burr up his ass.

John's gun safety question got you stumped?

The idiots have spoken...
 

On 4/3/2013 9:32 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:23:01 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/3/13 9:23 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:01:18 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Former governor Mark Sanford won a Republican runoff election in South
Carolina’s 1st congressional district on Tuesday, advancing to a
head-to-head race against Democratic nominee Elizabeth Colbert Busch
that early indicators suggest will be competitive.

Yeah, but:

When you chamber a round at the range do you then put the pistol aside, or stand around and shoot
the ****, such that you need to put the thumb safety on? That would violate your first rule - not
ready to fire 'til you're ready to fire. If you've chambered a round, it should be because you're
ready to fire - no need to put the safety on, other than to immediately take it off again while
aiming.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.



Yawn. Herring's got a new burr up his ass.

You stressed the importance of a safety over and over. You say the only time you use it is on the
range during the interval between chambering a round and shooting the round.

Unless you're not ready to shoot, why did you chamber the round?

If you are ready to shoot, why not shoot?

Your long winded explanations of 'conditions' didn't answer the question.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.


Harry doesn't leave home without belt, suspenders, and depends. Does
that answer your question?

The idiots have spoken...
 

On 4/3/13 9:32 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:23:01 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/3/13 9:23 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:01:18 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Former governor Mark Sanford won a Republican runoff election in South
Carolina’s 1st congressional district on Tuesday, advancing to a
head-to-head race against Democratic nominee Elizabeth Colbert Busch
that early indicators suggest will be competitive.

Yeah, but:

When you chamber a round at the range do you then put the pistol aside, or stand around and shoot
the ****, such that you need to put the thumb safety on? That would violate your first rule - not
ready to fire 'til you're ready to fire. If you've chambered a round, it should be because you're
ready to fire - no need to put the safety on, other than to immediately take it off again while
aiming.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.



Yawn. Herring's got a new burr up his ass.

You stressed the importance of a safety over and over. You say the only time you use it is on the
range during the interval between chambering a round and shooting the round.

Unless you're not ready to shoot, why did you chamber the round?

If you are ready to shoot, why not shoot?

Your long winded explanations of 'conditions' didn't answer the question.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.



snerk

*Among other reasons*, gotta be ready to shoot *instantly* in case some
crazed rightie with an assault rife wanders onto the range and starts
firing at everyone. If a round is chambered and the safety is on, all I
have to do is flip off the safety and fire. And until I fire and the
safety is on, the weapon is safer than your unsafe "trigger safety."

Weren't you issued an M1911A1 when you were making war against the
Vietnamese? Didn't it have a safety? Weren't you told why? How about its
military replacement, the Beretta M9? Does it have thumb safeties, or is
it equipped with the non-safe "safe trigger," instead?

The idiots have spoken...
 

On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:39:09 -0400, Hank© wrote:

On 4/3/2013 9:23 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
When you chamber a round at the range do you then put the pistol
aside, or stand around and shoot
the ****, such that you need to put the thumb safety on? That would
violate your first rule - not
ready to fire 'til you're ready to fire. If you've chambered a round,
it should be because you're
ready to fire - no need to put the safety on, other than to
immediately take it off again while
aiming.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.



Yawn. Herring's got a new burr up his ass.

John's gun safety question got you stumped?

Well, given his comments it's a pretty hard question.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.

The idiots have spoken...
 

In article ,
says...

On 4/3/13 9:32 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:23:01 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/3/13 9:23 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:01:18 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Former governor Mark Sanford won a Republican runoff election in South
Carolina?s 1st congressional district on Tuesday, advancing to a
head-to-head race against Democratic nominee Elizabeth Colbert Busch
that early indicators suggest will be competitive.

Yeah, but:

When you chamber a round at the range do you then put the pistol aside, or stand around and shoot
the ****, such that you need to put the thumb safety on? That would violate your first rule - not
ready to fire 'til you're ready to fire. If you've chambered a round, it should be because you're
ready to fire - no need to put the safety on, other than to immediately take it off again while
aiming.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.



Yawn. Herring's got a new burr up his ass.

You stressed the importance of a safety over and over. You say the only time you use it is on the
range during the interval between chambering a round and shooting the round.

Unless you're not ready to shoot, why did you chamber the round?

If you are ready to shoot, why not shoot?

Your long winded explanations of 'conditions' didn't answer the question.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.



snerk

*Among other reasons*, gotta be ready to shoot *instantly* in case some
crazed rightie with an assault rife wanders onto the range and starts
firing at everyone. If a round is chambered and the safety is on, all I
have to do is flip off the safety and fire. And until I fire and the
safety is on, the weapon is safer than your unsafe "trigger safety."

Weren't you issued an M1911A1 when you were making war against the
Vietnamese? Didn't it have a safety? Weren't you told why? How about its
military replacement, the Beretta M9? Does it have thumb safeties, or is
it equipped with the non-safe "safe trigger," instead?

Holy ****, Herring is going as bat**** crazy as Scotty!!!

The idiots have spoken...
 

On 4/3/2013 9:49 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 4/3/13 9:32 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:23:01 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/3/13 9:23 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:01:18 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Former governor Mark Sanford won a Republican runoff election in South
Carolina’s 1st congressional district on Tuesday, advancing to a
head-to-head race against Democratic nominee Elizabeth Colbert Busch
that early indicators suggest will be competitive.

Yeah, but:

When you chamber a round at the range do you then put the pistol
aside, or stand around and shoot
the ****, such that you need to put the thumb safety on? That would
violate your first rule - not
ready to fire 'til you're ready to fire. If you've chambered a
round, it should be because you're
ready to fire - no need to put the safety on, other than to
immediately take it off again while
aiming.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.



Yawn. Herring's got a new burr up his ass.

You stressed the importance of a safety over and over. You say the
only time you use it is on the
range during the interval between chambering a round and shooting the
round.

Unless you're not ready to shoot, why did you chamber the round?

If you are ready to shoot, why not shoot?

Your long winded explanations of 'conditions' didn't answer the question.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.



snerk

*Among other reasons*, gotta be ready to shoot *instantly* in case some
crazed rightie with an assault rife wanders onto the range and starts
firing at everyone. If a round is chambered and the safety is on, all I
have to do is flip off the safety and fire. And until I fire and the
safety is on, the weapon is safer than your unsafe "trigger safety."

Weren't you issued an M1911A1 when you were making war against the
Vietnamese? Didn't it have a safety? Weren't you told why? How about its
military replacement, the Beretta M9? Does it have thumb safeties, or is
it equipped with the non-safe "safe trigger," instead?




Gotta be ready to shoot instantly doesn't mean safety on, fella.
If you are gonna rag on John's guns, you better find out how they work,
before you SHOOT your mouth off.

The idiots have spoken...
 

On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 10:29:01 -0400, Hank© wrote:

On 4/3/2013 9:49 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 4/3/13 9:32 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:23:01 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/3/13 9:23 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:01:18 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Former governor Mark Sanford won a Republican runoff election in South
Carolina’s 1st congressional district on Tuesday, advancing to a
head-to-head race against Democratic nominee Elizabeth Colbert Busch
that early indicators suggest will be competitive.

Yeah, but:

When you chamber a round at the range do you then put the pistol
aside, or stand around and shoot
the ****, such that you need to put the thumb safety on? That would
violate your first rule - not
ready to fire 'til you're ready to fire. If you've chambered a
round, it should be because you're
ready to fire - no need to put the safety on, other than to
immediately take it off again while
aiming.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.



Yawn. Herring's got a new burr up his ass.

You stressed the importance of a safety over and over. You say the
only time you use it is on the
range during the interval between chambering a round and shooting the
round.

Unless you're not ready to shoot, why did you chamber the round?

If you are ready to shoot, why not shoot?

Your long winded explanations of 'conditions' didn't answer the question.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.



snerk

*Among other reasons*, gotta be ready to shoot *instantly* in case some
crazed rightie with an assault rife wanders onto the range and starts
firing at everyone. If a round is chambered and the safety is on, all I
have to do is flip off the safety and fire. And until I fire and the
safety is on, the weapon is safer than your unsafe "trigger safety."

Weren't you issued an M1911A1 when you were making war against the
Vietnamese? Didn't it have a safety? Weren't you told why? How about its
military replacement, the Beretta M9? Does it have thumb safeties, or is
it equipped with the non-safe "safe trigger," instead?




Gotta be ready to shoot instantly doesn't mean safety on, fella.
If you are gonna rag on John's guns, you better find out how they work,
before you SHOOT your mouth off.

He obviously realizes he made a fool of himself with his 'conditions' essay, stolen from the
Internet most likely. Perhaps he should have read it before hitting the 'post' button.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.

The idiots have spoken...
 

On 4/3/2013 11:28 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 10:29:01 -0400, Hank© wrote:

On 4/3/2013 9:49 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 4/3/13 9:32 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:23:01 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/3/13 9:23 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:01:18 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Former governor Mark Sanford won a Republican runoff election in South
Carolina’s 1st congressional district on Tuesday, advancing to a
head-to-head race against Democratic nominee Elizabeth Colbert Busch
that early indicators suggest will be competitive.

Yeah, but:

When you chamber a round at the range do you then put the pistol
aside, or stand around and shoot
the ****, such that you need to put the thumb safety on? That would
violate your first rule - not
ready to fire 'til you're ready to fire. If you've chambered a
round, it should be because you're
ready to fire - no need to put the safety on, other than to
immediately take it off again while
aiming.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.



Yawn. Herring's got a new burr up his ass.

You stressed the importance of a safety over and over. You say the
only time you use it is on the
range during the interval between chambering a round and shooting the
round.

Unless you're not ready to shoot, why did you chamber the round?

If you are ready to shoot, why not shoot?

Your long winded explanations of 'conditions' didn't answer the question.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.



snerk

*Among other reasons*, gotta be ready to shoot *instantly* in case some
crazed rightie with an assault rife wanders onto the range and starts
firing at everyone. If a round is chambered and the safety is on, all I
have to do is flip off the safety and fire. And until I fire and the
safety is on, the weapon is safer than your unsafe "trigger safety."

Weren't you issued an M1911A1 when you were making war against the
Vietnamese? Didn't it have a safety? Weren't you told why? How about its
military replacement, the Beretta M9? Does it have thumb safeties, or is
it equipped with the non-safe "safe trigger," instead?




Gotta be ready to shoot instantly doesn't mean safety on, fella.
If you are gonna rag on John's guns, you better find out how they work,
before you SHOOT your mouth off.

He obviously realizes he made a fool of himself with his 'conditions' essay, stolen from the
Internet most likely. Perhaps he should have read it before hitting the 'post' button.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.


He doesn't get it. He just plods along like a doofus.

The idiots have spoken...
 

J Herring wrote:
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 10:29:01 -0400, Hank© wrote:

On 4/3/2013 9:49 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 4/3/13 9:32 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:23:01 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/3/13 9:23 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:01:18 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Former governor Mark Sanford won a Republican runoff election in South
CarolinaÂ’s 1st congressional district on Tuesday, advancing to a
head-to-head race against Democratic nominee Elizabeth Colbert Busch
that early indicators suggest will be competitive.

Yeah, but:

When you chamber a round at the range do you then put the pistol
aside, or stand around and shoot
the ****, such that you need to put the thumb safety on? That would
violate your first rule - not
ready to fire 'til you're ready to fire. If you've chambered a
round, it should be because you're
ready to fire - no need to put the safety on, other than to
immediately take it off again while
aiming.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.



Yawn. Herring's got a new burr up his ass.

You stressed the importance of a safety over and over. You say the
only time you use it is on the
range during the interval between chambering a round and shooting the
round.

Unless you're not ready to shoot, why did you chamber the round?

If you are ready to shoot, why not shoot?

Your long winded explanations of 'conditions' didn't answer the question.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.



snerk

*Among other reasons*, gotta be ready to shoot *instantly* in case some
crazed rightie with an assault rife wanders onto the range and starts
firing at everyone. If a round is chambered and the safety is on, all I
have to do is flip off the safety and fire. And until I fire and the
safety is on, the weapon is safer than your unsafe "trigger safety."

Weren't you issued an M1911A1 when you were making war against the
Vietnamese? Didn't it have a safety? Weren't you told why? How about its
military replacement, the Beretta M9? Does it have thumb safeties, or is
it equipped with the non-safe "safe trigger," instead?




Gotta be ready to shoot instantly doesn't mean safety on, fella.
If you are gonna rag on John's guns, you better find out how they work,
before you SHOOT your mouth off.

He obviously realizes he made a fool of himself with his 'conditions'
essay, stolen from the
Internet most likely. Perhaps he should have read it before hitting the 'post' button.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.

snark. No, herring. I am simply not playing your game. You should move on,
polymer man.

The idiots have spoken...
 

On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:49:25 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/3/13 9:32 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:23:01 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/3/13 9:23 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:01:18 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Former governor Mark Sanford won a Republican runoff election in South
Carolina’s 1st congressional district on Tuesday, advancing to a
head-to-head race against Democratic nominee Elizabeth Colbert Busch
that early indicators suggest will be competitive.

Yeah, but:

When you chamber a round at the range do you then put the pistol aside, or stand around and shoot
the ****, such that you need to put the thumb safety on? That would violate your first rule - not
ready to fire 'til you're ready to fire. If you've chambered a round, it should be because you're
ready to fire - no need to put the safety on, other than to immediately take it off again while
aiming.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.



Yawn. Herring's got a new burr up his ass.

You stressed the importance of a safety over and over. You say the only time you use it is on the
range during the interval between chambering a round and shooting the round.

Unless you're not ready to shoot, why did you chamber the round?

If you are ready to shoot, why not shoot?

Your long winded explanations of 'conditions' didn't answer the question.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.



snerk

*Among other reasons*, gotta be ready to shoot *instantly* in case some
crazed rightie with an assault rife wanders onto the range and starts
firing at everyone. If a round is chambered and the safety is on, all I
have to do is flip off the safety and fire. And until I fire and the
safety is on, the weapon is safer than your unsafe "trigger safety."

From what you've said so far about your rationale for safeties, I doubt if you'd be able to find the
thumb safety so you could 'off' it. The P250, with a round in the chamber is capable of being shot
*instantly*.


Weren't you issued an M1911A1 when you were making war against the
Vietnamese? Didn't it have a safety? Weren't you told why? How about its
military replacement, the Beretta M9? Does it have thumb safeties, or is
it equipped with the non-safe "safe trigger," instead?


Don't you mean to say, "...when *we* were making war...", ESAD?

I'm surprised to see that the reason safeties are so important to you is because the military uses
them. You should have just stated that up front, rather than attempt to impress everyone with your
bull**** rationale.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.

The idiots have spoken...
 

J Herring wrote:
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:49:25 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/3/13 9:32 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:23:01 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/3/13 9:23 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:01:18 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Former governor Mark Sanford won a Republican runoff election in South
CarolinaÂ’s 1st congressional district on Tuesday, advancing to a
head-to-head race against Democratic nominee Elizabeth Colbert Busch
that early indicators suggest will be competitive.

Yeah, but:

When you chamber a round at the range do you then put the pistol
aside, or stand around and shoot
the ****, such that you need to put the thumb safety on? That would
violate your first rule - not
ready to fire 'til you're ready to fire. If you've chambered a round,
it should be because you're
ready to fire - no need to put the safety on, other than to
immediately take it off again while
aiming.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.



Yawn. Herring's got a new burr up his ass.

You stressed the importance of a safety over and over. You say the only
time you use it is on the
range during the interval between chambering a round and shooting the round.

Unless you're not ready to shoot, why did you chamber the round?

If you are ready to shoot, why not shoot?

Your long winded explanations of 'conditions' didn't answer the question.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.



snerk

*Among other reasons*, gotta be ready to shoot *instantly* in case some
crazed rightie with an assault rife wanders onto the range and starts
firing at everyone. If a round is chambered and the safety is on, all I
have to do is flip off the safety and fire. And until I fire and the
safety is on, the weapon is safer than your unsafe "trigger safety."

From what you've said so far about your rationale for safeties, I doubt
if you'd be able to find the
thumb safety so you could 'off' it. The P250, with a round in the chamber
is capable of being shot
*instantly*.


Weren't you issued an M1911A1 when you were making war against the
Vietnamese? Didn't it have a safety? Weren't you told why? How about its
military replacement, the Beretta M9? Does it have thumb safeties, or is
it equipped with the non-safe "safe trigger," instead?


Don't you mean to say, "...when *we* were making war...", ESAD?

I'm surprised to see that the reason safeties are so important to you is
because the military uses
them. You should have just stated that up front, rather than attempt to
impress everyone with your
bull**** rationale.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.

As usual your thought processes aren't processing.

The idiots have spoken...
 

On 4/3/13 11:34 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:49:25 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Weren't you issued an M1911A1 when you were making war against the
Vietnamese? Didn't it have a safety? Weren't you told why? How about its
military replacement, the Beretta M9? Does it have thumb safeties, or is
it equipped with the non-safe "safe trigger," instead?


Don't you mean to say, "...when *we* were making war...", ESAD?

No, Herring, I didn't mean to say "we." You were in Vietnam, making war
against the Vietnamese. Killing Vietnamese was not the reason I was there.

The idiots have spoken...
 

On 4/3/2013 11:46 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 4/3/13 11:34 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:49:25 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Weren't you issued an M1911A1 when you were making war against the
Vietnamese? Didn't it have a safety? Weren't you told why? How about its
military replacement, the Beretta M9? Does it have thumb safeties, or is
it equipped with the non-safe "safe trigger," instead?


Don't you mean to say, "...when *we* were making war...", ESAD?

No, Herring, I didn't mean to say "we." You were in Vietnam, making war
against the Vietnamese. Killing Vietnamese was not the reason I was there.


You were there under the general. How could we ever forget the general's
boy.

The idiots have spoken...
 

On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 11:46:12 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/3/13 11:34 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:49:25 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Weren't you issued an M1911A1 when you were making war against the
Vietnamese? Didn't it have a safety? Weren't you told why? How about its
military replacement, the Beretta M9? Does it have thumb safeties, or is
it equipped with the non-safe "safe trigger," instead?


Don't you mean to say, "...when *we* were making war...", ESAD?

No, Herring, I didn't mean to say "we." You were in Vietnam, making war
against the Vietnamese. Killing Vietnamese was not the reason I was there.

We were both there for the same reason, ESAD, to support the war.

Thanks.

Now, how about the stuff you embarrassingly snipped?

From what you've said so far about your rationale for safeties, I doubt if you'd be able to find the
thumb safety so you could 'off' it. The P250, with a round in the chamber is capable of being shot
*instantly*.

I'm surprised to see that the reason safeties are so important to you is because the military uses
them. You should have just stated that up front, rather than attempt to impress everyone with your
bull**** rationale.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.

The idiots have spoken...
 

On 4/3/13 1:00 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 11:46:12 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/3/13 11:34 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:49:25 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Weren't you issued an M1911A1 when you were making war against the
Vietnamese? Didn't it have a safety? Weren't you told why? How about its
military replacement, the Beretta M9? Does it have thumb safeties, or is
it equipped with the non-safe "safe trigger," instead?


Don't you mean to say, "...when *we* were making war...", ESAD?

No, Herring, I didn't mean to say "we." You were in Vietnam, making war
against the Vietnamese. Killing Vietnamese was not the reason I was there.

We were both there for the same reason, ESAD, to support the war.

Thanks.

Now, how about the stuff you embarrassingly snipped?

From what you've said so far about your rationale for safeties, I doubt if you'd be able to find the
thumb safety so you could 'off' it. The P250, with a round in the chamber is capable of being shot
*instantly*.

I'm surprised to see that the reason safeties are so important to you is because the military uses
them. You should have just stated that up front, rather than attempt to impress everyone with your
bull**** rationale.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.

Have you figured out the difference between polymer and alloy yet? Or
whether you should winterize your outboard's innards with WD 40? Or
whether you should use two cycle oil in your four stroke outboard?

The idiots have spoken...
 

In article om, hank57
@socialworker.net says...

On 4/3/2013 11:46 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 4/3/13 11:34 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:49:25 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Weren't you issued an M1911A1 when you were making war against the
Vietnamese? Didn't it have a safety? Weren't you told why? How about its
military replacement, the Beretta M9? Does it have thumb safeties, or is
it equipped with the non-safe "safe trigger," instead?


Don't you mean to say, "...when *we* were making war...", ESAD?

No, Herring, I didn't mean to say "we." You were in Vietnam, making war
against the Vietnamese. Killing Vietnamese was not the reason I was there.


You were there under the general. How could we ever forget the general's
boy.

You betcha!