|
Opening day
In article , cell201
@state.com says... "iBoaterer" wrote in message ... In article , cell201 @state.com says... "iBoaterer" wrote in message ... In article , cell201 @state.com says... "iBoaterer" wrote in message ... Keeping score? Hey, let's keep score of the racist, low life crap you spew! Now, go back, and show me where these people had bought a ticket to enter the venue. Gee, can't find any? Hmmmm..... You DO remember, don't you, that that was my whole argument to start with? I'm guessing not.... ----------------------------------------------------- Guess you missed this in the last link: "Before each game at Yankee Stadium, a public address system announcement warns fans that Major League Baseball rules forbid them to go on the field or to throw anything on it. Anyone doing so, the announcement says, will be arrested and prosecuted. Sco "justwaitafrekinminute": 4 -------- "iBoaterer": 0 I'm sorry, please show me where that says anything about whether they had a ticket or not..... ------------------------------------------- Please indicate in the public address announcement where it matters if you have a ticket or not. Sco "justwaitafrekinminute": 5 -------- "iBoaterer": 0 Gee, you tend to play stupid, are you really? First of all, your quote contains errors that would have it thrown out of court in an instant. If you have trouble finding it, let me know. Second, I SPECIFICALLY asked stated that the persons in question have a ticket to the game. Thirdly, you idiotic, childish "score" is erroneous in that I have correctly rebuttaled each and every time. ------------------------------------------ ------------------------------G A M E O V E ---------------------- =================== You Lose ================ =============== Insert quarter to play again ======== Thanks, I knew a long time ago I won. |
Opening day
|
Opening day
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:19:08 -0400, J Herring
wrote: Question for you - you must have missed it the first time: When you chamber a round at the range do you then put the pistol aside, or stand around and shoot the ****, such that you need to put the thumb safety on? That would violate your first rule - not ready to fire 'til you're ready to fire. If you've chambered a round, it should be because you're ready to fire - no need to put the safety on, other than to immediately take it off again while aiming. ========== I'd personally question whether or not Harry has *any* meaningful exerience at a well run gun range. If he exhibited the kind of behavior and attitude at my range that he exhibits here, he would have been permanently banned from the property. |
Opening day
On 4/3/2013 9:12 AM, Gil T. Azell wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote in message m... On 4/3/13 8:42 AM, Gil T. Azell wrote: ------------------------------G A M E O V ---------------------- =================== You Lose ================ =============== Insert quarter to play again ======== Another right-wing regular with a new handle. Bye-bye, asshole...into the bozo bin you go. ----------------------------------------------- Help me .... I'm f a l l i n g He he. Nice one. |
Opening day
On 4/3/13 10:48 AM, Wayne B wrote:
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:19:08 -0400, J Herring wrote: Question for you - you must have missed it the first time: When you chamber a round at the range do you then put the pistol aside, or stand around and shoot the ****, such that you need to put the thumb safety on? That would violate your first rule - not ready to fire 'til you're ready to fire. If you've chambered a round, it should be because you're ready to fire - no need to put the safety on, other than to immediately take it off again while aiming. ========== I'd personally question whether or not Harry has *any* meaningful exerience at a well run gun range. If he exhibited the kind of behavior and attitude at my range that he exhibits here, he would have been permanently banned from the property. I'm a dues-paying member of a nice gun club, w'hine, and it has a very well run firing range. An arrogant asshole like you would never get past the range officers, and you'd never get the three recommendations of existing club members you'd need. |
Opening day
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 11:50:36 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 4/3/13 10:48 AM, Wayne B wrote: On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:19:08 -0400, J Herring wrote: Question for you - you must have missed it the first time: When you chamber a round at the range do you then put the pistol aside, or stand around and shoot the ****, such that you need to put the thumb safety on? That would violate your first rule - not ready to fire 'til you're ready to fire. If you've chambered a round, it should be because you're ready to fire - no need to put the safety on, other than to immediately take it off again while aiming. ========== I'd personally question whether or not Harry has *any* meaningful exerience at a well run gun range. If he exhibited the kind of behavior and attitude at my range that he exhibits here, he would have been permanently banned from the property. I'm a dues-paying member of a nice gun club, w'hine, and it has a very well run firing range. An arrogant asshole like you would never get past the range officers, and you'd never get the three recommendations of existing club members you'd need. ==== Arrogant is as arrogant does. (With apologies to Forrest Gump) Do you have split personality issues? |
Opening day
On 4/3/13 5:16 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 11:50:36 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 4/3/13 10:48 AM, Wayne B wrote: On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:19:08 -0400, J Herring wrote: Question for you - you must have missed it the first time: When you chamber a round at the range do you then put the pistol aside, or stand around and shoot the ****, such that you need to put the thumb safety on? That would violate your first rule - not ready to fire 'til you're ready to fire. If you've chambered a round, it should be because you're ready to fire - no need to put the safety on, other than to immediately take it off again while aiming. ========== I'd personally question whether or not Harry has *any* meaningful exerience at a well run gun range. If he exhibited the kind of behavior and attitude at my range that he exhibits here, he would have been permanently banned from the property. I'm a dues-paying member of a nice gun club, w'hine, and it has a very well run firing range. An arrogant asshole like you would never get past the range officers, and you'd never get the three recommendations of existing club members you'd need. ==== Arrogant is as arrogant does. (With apologies to Forrest Gump) Do you have split personality issues? Are you still beating your wife? |
Opening day
On 4/3/2013 10:48 AM, Wayne B wrote:
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:19:08 -0400, J Herring wrote: Question for you - you must have missed it the first time: When you chamber a round at the range do you then put the pistol aside, or stand around and shoot the ****, such that you need to put the thumb safety on? That would violate your first rule - not ready to fire 'til you're ready to fire. If you've chambered a round, it should be because you're ready to fire - no need to put the safety on, other than to immediately take it off again while aiming. ========== I'd personally question whether or not Harry has *any* meaningful exerience at a well run gun range. If he exhibited the kind of behavior and attitude at my range that he exhibits here, he would have been permanently banned from the property. He has been kicked out of several gun groups, the last one we saw the admin actually called him an "asshat"... LOL! He shoots illegally, on others property from everything he has told us. |
Opening day
On 4/3/13 8:25 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 4/3/2013 10:48 AM, Wayne B wrote: On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:19:08 -0400, J Herring wrote: Question for you - you must have missed it the first time: When you chamber a round at the range do you then put the pistol aside, or stand around and shoot the ****, such that you need to put the thumb safety on? That would violate your first rule - not ready to fire 'til you're ready to fire. If you've chambered a round, it should be because you're ready to fire - no need to put the safety on, other than to immediately take it off again while aiming. ========== I'd personally question whether or not Harry has *any* meaningful exerience at a well run gun range. If he exhibited the kind of behavior and attitude at my range that he exhibits here, he would have been permanently banned from the property. He has been kicked out of several gun groups, the last one we saw the admin actually called him an "asshat"... LOL! He shoots illegally, on others property from everything he has told us. Oooh...another charge of "illegality" coming from the newsgroup fluffer and blackmail whiner. |
Opening day
|
Opening day
On 4/4/2013 11:32 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
Oh, I definitely was a persona non grata at a Maryland gun discussion board, and I am proud of it. I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to background checks on gun purchasers and mandatory safety training for first time gun purchasers, and I said so. I made the mistake of thinking the "boys" there were rational. I do read and post on two other gun discussion boards. Apparently there are fewer crazies there. Apparently, you have a lot of experience getting tossed from discussion groups. The Android forum is just one other example. |
Opening day
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:38:49 -0400, Hank© wrote:
On 4/4/2013 11:32 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: Oh, I definitely was a persona non grata at a Maryland gun discussion board, and I am proud of it. I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to background checks on gun purchasers and mandatory safety training for first time gun purchasers, and I said so. I made the mistake of thinking the "boys" there were rational. I do read and post on two other gun discussion boards. Apparently there are fewer crazies there. Apparently, you have a lot of experience getting tossed from discussion groups. The Android forum is just one other example. I 'really' believe he was tossed because of his lack of opposition to background checks and being pro safety training. What a crock. Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand. |
Opening day
On 4/4/13 12:53 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:38:49 -0400, Hank© wrote: On 4/4/2013 11:32 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: Oh, I definitely was a persona non grata at a Maryland gun discussion board, and I am proud of it. I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to background checks on gun purchasers and mandatory safety training for first time gun purchasers, and I said so. I made the mistake of thinking the "boys" there were rational. I do read and post on two other gun discussion boards. Apparently there are fewer crazies there. Apparently, you have a lot of experience getting tossed from discussion groups. The Android forum is just one other example. I 'really' believe he was tossed because of his lack of opposition to background checks and being pro safety training. What a crock. Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand. And once again you prove you cannot comprehend what you read. "I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to background checks on gun purchasers and mandatory safety training for first time gun purchasers, and I said so." Apparently he who laughs last does laugh best. Some of the boys on that Maryland gun discussion board must be having strokes over what is about to happen in this state. :) |
Opening day
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:56:38 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 4/4/13 12:53 PM, J Herring wrote: On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:38:49 -0400, Hank© wrote: On 4/4/2013 11:32 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: Oh, I definitely was a persona non grata at a Maryland gun discussion board, and I am proud of it. I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to background checks on gun purchasers and mandatory safety training for first time gun purchasers, and I said so. I made the mistake of thinking the "boys" there were rational. I do read and post on two other gun discussion boards. Apparently there are fewer crazies there. Apparently, you have a lot of experience getting tossed from discussion groups. The Android forum is just one other example. I 'really' believe he was tossed because of his lack of opposition to background checks and being pro safety training. What a crock. Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand. And once again you prove you cannot comprehend what you read. "I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to background checks on gun purchasers and mandatory safety training for first time gun purchasers, and I said so." Apparently he who laughs last does laugh best. Some of the boys on that Maryland gun discussion board must be having strokes over what is about to happen in this state. :) What is the difference between 'lack of opposition' and 'not opposed'? What is the difference between 'NOT opposed to...mandatory safety training' and 'being pro safety training'? Reading comprehension comments??? Tell us about those 'special circumstances', ESAD. Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand. |
Opening day
On 4/4/13 1:04 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:56:38 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 4/4/13 12:53 PM, J Herring wrote: On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:38:49 -0400, Hank© wrote: On 4/4/2013 11:32 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: Oh, I definitely was a persona non grata at a Maryland gun discussion board, and I am proud of it. I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to background checks on gun purchasers and mandatory safety training for first time gun purchasers, and I said so. I made the mistake of thinking the "boys" there were rational. I do read and post on two other gun discussion boards. Apparently there are fewer crazies there. Apparently, you have a lot of experience getting tossed from discussion groups. The Android forum is just one other example. I 'really' believe he was tossed because of his lack of opposition to background checks and being pro safety training. What a crock. Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand. And once again you prove you cannot comprehend what you read. "I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to background checks on gun purchasers and mandatory safety training for first time gun purchasers, and I said so." Apparently he who laughs last does laugh best. Some of the boys on that Maryland gun discussion board must be having strokes over what is about to happen in this state. :) What is the difference between 'lack of opposition' and 'not opposed'? What is the difference between 'NOT opposed to...mandatory safety training' and 'being pro safety training'? Reading comprehension comments??? Tell us about those 'special circumstances', ESAD. Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand. The "I said so" part. |
Opening day
On 4/4/2013 12:56 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 4/4/13 12:53 PM, J Herring wrote: On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:38:49 -0400, wrote: On 4/4/2013 11:32 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: Oh, I definitely was a persona non grata at a Maryland gun discussion board, and I am proud of it. I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to background checks on gun purchasers and mandatory safety training for first time gun purchasers, and I said so. I made the mistake of thinking the "boys" there were rational. I do read and post on two other gun discussion boards. Apparently there are fewer crazies there. Apparently, you have a lot of experience getting tossed from discussion groups. The Android forum is just one other example. I 'really' believe he was tossed because of his lack of opposition to background checks and being pro safety training. What a crock. Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand. And once again you prove you cannot comprehend what you read. "I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to background checks on gun purchasers and mandatory safety training for first time gun purchasers, and I said so." Apparently he who laughs last does laugh best. Some of the boys on that Maryland gun discussion board must be having strokes over what is about to happen in this state. :) You are having trouble with reality. I can help you turn your life around and discover why you can't get along with anyone. Send me an email |
Opening day
On 4/4/2013 11:32 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 4/4/13 11:25 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 4/3/2013 10:48 AM, Wayne B wrote: On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:19:08 -0400, J Herring wrote: Question for you - you must have missed it the first time: When you chamber a round at the range do you then put the pistol aside, or stand around and shoot the ****, such that you need to put the thumb safety on? That would violate your first rule - not ready to fire 'til you're ready to fire. If you've chambered a round, it should be because you're ready to fire - no need to put the safety on, other than to immediately take it off again while aiming. ========== I'd personally question whether or not Harry has *any* meaningful exerience at a well run gun range. If he exhibited the kind of behavior and attitude at my range that he exhibits here, he would have been permanently banned from the property. He has been kicked out of several gun groups, the last one we saw the admin actually called him an "asshat"... LOL! He shoots illegally, on others property from everything he has told us. Cite? I didn't think so, just more lies from you. Oh, I definitely was a persona non grata at a Maryland gun discussion board, and I am proud of it. I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to background checks on gun purchasers and mandatory safety training for first time gun purchasers, and I said so. I made the mistake of thinking the "boys" there were rational. I do read and post on two other gun discussion boards. Apparently there are fewer crazies there. You got booted for political bull****. We all read the thread... |
Opening day
On 4/4/2013 12:53 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:38:49 -0400, Hank© wrote: On 4/4/2013 11:32 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: Oh, I definitely was a persona non grata at a Maryland gun discussion board, and I am proud of it. I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to background checks on gun purchasers and mandatory safety training for first time gun purchasers, and I said so. I made the mistake of thinking the "boys" there were rational. I do read and post on two other gun discussion boards. Apparently there are fewer crazies there. Apparently, you have a lot of experience getting tossed from discussion groups. The Android forum is just one other example. I 'really' believe he was tossed because of his lack of opposition to background checks and being pro safety training. What a crock. Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand. No, we all read the thread. He was over there trolling with his DNC bull**** being his usual asshat... |
Opening day
On 4/4/2013 1:04 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:56:38 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 4/4/13 12:53 PM, J Herring wrote: On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:38:49 -0400, Hank© wrote: On 4/4/2013 11:32 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: Oh, I definitely was a persona non grata at a Maryland gun discussion board, and I am proud of it. I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to background checks on gun purchasers and mandatory safety training for first time gun purchasers, and I said so. I made the mistake of thinking the "boys" there were rational. I do read and post on two other gun discussion boards. Apparently there are fewer crazies there. Apparently, you have a lot of experience getting tossed from discussion groups. The Android forum is just one other example. I 'really' believe he was tossed because of his lack of opposition to background checks and being pro safety training. What a crock. Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand. And once again you prove you cannot comprehend what you read. "I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to background checks on gun purchasers and mandatory safety training for first time gun purchasers, and I said so." Apparently he who laughs last does laugh best. Some of the boys on that Maryland gun discussion board must be having strokes over what is about to happen in this state. :) What is the difference between 'lack of opposition' and 'not opposed'? What is the difference between 'NOT opposed to...mandatory safety training' and 'being pro safety training'? Reading comprehension comments??? Tell us about those 'special circumstances', ESAD. Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand. I'd be willing to help fix Harry for free, if he'd only give me the chance. |
Opening day
On 4/4/13 1:10 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 4/4/2013 11:32 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 4/4/13 11:25 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 4/3/2013 10:48 AM, Wayne B wrote: On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:19:08 -0400, J Herring wrote: Question for you - you must have missed it the first time: When you chamber a round at the range do you then put the pistol aside, or stand around and shoot the ****, such that you need to put the thumb safety on? That would violate your first rule - not ready to fire 'til you're ready to fire. If you've chambered a round, it should be because you're ready to fire - no need to put the safety on, other than to immediately take it off again while aiming. ========== I'd personally question whether or not Harry has *any* meaningful exerience at a well run gun range. If he exhibited the kind of behavior and attitude at my range that he exhibits here, he would have been permanently banned from the property. He has been kicked out of several gun groups, the last one we saw the admin actually called him an "asshat"... LOL! He shoots illegally, on others property from everything he has told us. Cite? I didn't think so, just more lies from you. Oh, I definitely was a persona non grata at a Maryland gun discussion board, and I am proud of it. I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to background checks on gun purchasers and mandatory safety training for first time gun purchasers, and I said so. I made the mistake of thinking the "boys" there were rational. I do read and post on two other gun discussion boards. Apparently there are fewer crazies there. You got booted for political bull****. We all read the thread... You're just betraying your idiocy once again, but I won't tell you why. BTW, how's your blackmail case proceeding? We haven't heard anything yet down here. |
Opening day
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 13:14:49 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 4/4/13 1:10 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 4/4/2013 11:32 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 4/4/13 11:25 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 4/3/2013 10:48 AM, Wayne B wrote: On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:19:08 -0400, J Herring wrote: Question for you - you must have missed it the first time: When you chamber a round at the range do you then put the pistol aside, or stand around and shoot the ****, such that you need to put the thumb safety on? That would violate your first rule - not ready to fire 'til you're ready to fire. If you've chambered a round, it should be because you're ready to fire - no need to put the safety on, other than to immediately take it off again while aiming. ========== I'd personally question whether or not Harry has *any* meaningful exerience at a well run gun range. If he exhibited the kind of behavior and attitude at my range that he exhibits here, he would have been permanently banned from the property. He has been kicked out of several gun groups, the last one we saw the admin actually called him an "asshat"... LOL! He shoots illegally, on others property from everything he has told us. Cite? I didn't think so, just more lies from you. Oh, I definitely was a persona non grata at a Maryland gun discussion board, and I am proud of it. I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to background checks on gun purchasers and mandatory safety training for first time gun purchasers, and I said so. I made the mistake of thinking the "boys" there were rational. I do read and post on two other gun discussion boards. Apparently there are fewer crazies there. You got booted for political bull****. We all read the thread... You're just betraying your idiocy once again, but I won't tell you why. BTW, how's your blackmail case proceeding? We haven't heard anything yet down here. How's those 'special circumstances' proceeding? We haven't heard anything yet down here. Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand. |
Opening day
|
Opening day
On 4/4/2013 1:12 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 4/4/2013 12:53 PM, J Herring wrote: On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:38:49 -0400, Hank© wrote: On 4/4/2013 11:32 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: Oh, I definitely was a persona non grata at a Maryland gun discussion board, and I am proud of it. I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to background checks on gun purchasers and mandatory safety training for first time gun purchasers, and I said so. I made the mistake of thinking the "boys" there were rational. I do read and post on two other gun discussion boards. Apparently there are fewer crazies there. Apparently, you have a lot of experience getting tossed from discussion groups. The Android forum is just one other example. I 'really' believe he was tossed because of his lack of opposition to background checks and being pro safety training. What a crock. Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand. No, we all read the thread. He was over there trolling with his DNC bull**** being his usual asshat... Isn't "over there" the place where he picked up his Asshat nik? Harry is so ****ed at mdshooters.com that he put up this website. http://marylandshooter.com/ |
Opening day
|
Opening day
In article ,
says... On 4/4/2013 11:32 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 4/4/13 11:25 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 4/3/2013 10:48 AM, Wayne B wrote: On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:19:08 -0400, J Herring wrote: Question for you - you must have missed it the first time: When you chamber a round at the range do you then put the pistol aside, or stand around and shoot the ****, such that you need to put the thumb safety on? That would violate your first rule - not ready to fire 'til you're ready to fire. If you've chambered a round, it should be because you're ready to fire - no need to put the safety on, other than to immediately take it off again while aiming. ========== I'd personally question whether or not Harry has *any* meaningful exerience at a well run gun range. If he exhibited the kind of behavior and attitude at my range that he exhibits here, he would have been permanently banned from the property. He has been kicked out of several gun groups, the last one we saw the admin actually called him an "asshat"... LOL! He shoots illegally, on others property from everything he has told us. Cite? I didn't think so, just more lies from you. Oh, I definitely was a persona non grata at a Maryland gun discussion board, and I am proud of it. I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to background checks on gun purchasers and mandatory safety training for first time gun purchasers, and I said so. I made the mistake of thinking the "boys" there were rational. I do read and post on two other gun discussion boards. Apparently there are fewer crazies there. You got booted for political bull****. We all read the thread... No, "we" didn't please post it. |
Opening day
On 4/4/13 1:30 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 4/4/2013 12:53 PM, J Herring wrote: On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:38:49 -0400, Hank© wrote: On 4/4/2013 11:32 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: Oh, I definitely was a persona non grata at a Maryland gun discussion board, and I am proud of it. I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to background checks on gun purchasers and mandatory safety training for first time gun purchasers, and I said so. I made the mistake of thinking the "boys" there were rational. I do read and post on two other gun discussion boards. Apparently there are fewer crazies there. Apparently, you have a lot of experience getting tossed from discussion groups. The Android forum is just one other example. I 'really' believe he was tossed because of his lack of opposition to background checks and being pro safety training. What a crock. Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand. No, we all read the thread. He was over there trolling with his DNC bull**** being his usual asshat... Who is this "we" you always speak of? Come on, if you are going to be a crazy insane fool, have the balls to own it. Some of the boys at the Maryland gun site are busy collecting the names and addresses of those who have contributed to the campaigns of the state lawmakers who are approving the new regulations. Why? So they can contact them. There are some heavy duty corporate donors, too, including banks. I'm not sure what the goal of the "contact" is, since the die is cast. The reality is that the majority of Marylanders live in the more populated areas, and they made it clear to their state lawmakers they supported the governor's plan to tighten gun regs here. So, the proposed regs, for the most part, are getting through our state's legislature and likely will be signed into law next week by the governor. |
Opening day
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 13:45:38 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 4/4/13 1:30 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 4/4/2013 12:53 PM, J Herring wrote: On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:38:49 -0400, Hank© wrote: On 4/4/2013 11:32 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: Oh, I definitely was a persona non grata at a Maryland gun discussion board, and I am proud of it. I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to background checks on gun purchasers and mandatory safety training for first time gun purchasers, and I said so. I made the mistake of thinking the "boys" there were rational. I do read and post on two other gun discussion boards. Apparently there are fewer crazies there. Apparently, you have a lot of experience getting tossed from discussion groups. The Android forum is just one other example. I 'really' believe he was tossed because of his lack of opposition to background checks and being pro safety training. What a crock. Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand. No, we all read the thread. He was over there trolling with his DNC bull**** being his usual asshat... Who is this "we" you always speak of? Come on, if you are going to be a crazy insane fool, have the balls to own it. Some of the boys at the Maryland gun site are busy collecting the names and addresses of those who have contributed to the campaigns of the state lawmakers who are approving the new regulations. Why? So they can contact them. There are some heavy duty corporate donors, too, including banks. I'm not sure what the goal of the "contact" is, since the die is cast. The reality is that the majority of Marylanders live in the more populated areas, and they made it clear to their state lawmakers they supported the governor's plan to tighten gun regs here. So, the proposed regs, for the most part, are getting through our state's legislature and likely will be signed into law next week by the governor. Sure, ESAD. Now tell about your 'special circumstances' which caused you to use your thumb safety! As to the Maryland regs - which ones would have prevented the Newtown massacre? Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand. |
Opening day
In article ,
says... On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 13:45:38 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 4/4/13 1:30 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 4/4/2013 12:53 PM, J Herring wrote: On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:38:49 -0400, Hank© wrote: On 4/4/2013 11:32 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: Oh, I definitely was a persona non grata at a Maryland gun discussion board, and I am proud of it. I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to background checks on gun purchasers and mandatory safety training for first time gun purchasers, and I said so. I made the mistake of thinking the "boys" there were rational. I do read and post on two other gun discussion boards. Apparently there are fewer crazies there. Apparently, you have a lot of experience getting tossed from discussion groups. The Android forum is just one other example. I 'really' believe he was tossed because of his lack of opposition to background checks and being pro safety training. What a crock. Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand. No, we all read the thread. He was over there trolling with his DNC bull**** being his usual asshat... Who is this "we" you always speak of? Come on, if you are going to be a crazy insane fool, have the balls to own it. Some of the boys at the Maryland gun site are busy collecting the names and addresses of those who have contributed to the campaigns of the state lawmakers who are approving the new regulations. Why? So they can contact them. There are some heavy duty corporate donors, too, including banks. I'm not sure what the goal of the "contact" is, since the die is cast. The reality is that the majority of Marylanders live in the more populated areas, and they made it clear to their state lawmakers they supported the governor's plan to tighten gun regs here. So, the proposed regs, for the most part, are getting through our state's legislature and likely will be signed into law next week by the governor. Sure, ESAD. Now tell about your 'special circumstances' which caused you to use your thumb safety! As to the Maryland regs - which ones would have prevented the Newtown massacre? Salmonbait Probably the same special circumstances that made a polymer and an alloy one in the same. |
Opening day
I hope there's something to limit ex-military from stockpiling firearms.
Seems like every time there's a mass shooting by someone over 35, turns out he's a vet. |
Opening day
On 4/4/13 4:00 PM, True North wrote:
I hope there's something to limit ex-military from stockpiling firearms. Seems like every time there's a mass shooting by someone over 35, turns out he's a vet. A lot of them sure are. Herring motorbikes over to Wal-Mart every morning to buy more ammo. Can our boy be planning something rash? |
Opening day
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 16:04:16 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 4/4/13 4:00 PM, True North wrote: I hope there's something to limit ex-military from stockpiling firearms. Seems like every time there's a mass shooting by someone over 35, turns out he's a vet. A lot of them sure are. Herring motorbikes over to Wal-Mart every morning to buy more ammo. Can our boy be planning something rash? 'Special circumstances'? What a laugh. Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand. |
Opening day
On 4/4/2013 12:56 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 4/4/13 12:53 PM, J Herring wrote: On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:38:49 -0400, Hank© wrote: On 4/4/2013 11:32 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: Oh, I definitely was a persona non grata at a Maryland gun discussion board, and I am proud of it. I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to background checks on gun purchasers and mandatory safety training for first time gun purchasers, and I said so. I made the mistake of thinking the "boys" there were rational. I do read and post on two other gun discussion boards. Apparently there are fewer crazies there. Apparently, you have a lot of experience getting tossed from discussion groups. The Android forum is just one other example. I 'really' believe he was tossed because of his lack of opposition to background checks and being pro safety training. What a crock. Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand. And once again you prove you cannot comprehend what you read. "I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to background checks on gun purchasers and mandatory safety training for first time gun purchasers, and I said so." Apparently he who laughs last does laugh best. Some of the boys on that Maryland gun discussion board must be having strokes over what is about to happen in this state. :) You were tossed for being a political troll... period. |
Opening day
On 4/4/2013 1:30 PM, Hank© wrote:
On 4/4/2013 1:12 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 4/4/2013 12:53 PM, J Herring wrote: On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:38:49 -0400, Hank© wrote: On 4/4/2013 11:32 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: Oh, I definitely was a persona non grata at a Maryland gun discussion board, and I am proud of it. I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to background checks on gun purchasers and mandatory safety training for first time gun purchasers, and I said so. I made the mistake of thinking the "boys" there were rational. I do read and post on two other gun discussion boards. Apparently there are fewer crazies there. Apparently, you have a lot of experience getting tossed from discussion groups. The Android forum is just one other example. I 'really' believe he was tossed because of his lack of opposition to background checks and being pro safety training. What a crock. Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand. No, we all read the thread. He was over there trolling with his DNC bull**** being his usual asshat... Isn't "over there" the place where he picked up his Asshat nik? Harry is so ****ed at mdshooters.com that he put up this website. http://marylandshooter.com/ Wow, what a ****ing asshat...LOL! |
Opening day
On 4/4/2013 4:04 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 4/4/13 4:00 PM, True North wrote: I hope there's something to limit ex-military from stockpiling firearms. Seems like every time there's a mass shooting by someone over 35, turns out he's a vet. A lot of them sure are. Herring motorbikes over to Wal-Mart every morning to buy more ammo. Can our boy be planning something rash? What could he be possibly stockpiling for? After all you've killed all the stumps and wild dogs in Virginia. |
Opening day
On 4/4/13 4:42 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 4/4/2013 1:30 PM, Hank© wrote: On 4/4/2013 1:12 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 4/4/2013 12:53 PM, J Herring wrote: On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:38:49 -0400, Hank© wrote: On 4/4/2013 11:32 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: Oh, I definitely was a persona non grata at a Maryland gun discussion board, and I am proud of it. I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to background checks on gun purchasers and mandatory safety training for first time gun purchasers, and I said so. I made the mistake of thinking the "boys" there were rational. I do read and post on two other gun discussion boards. Apparently there are fewer crazies there. Apparently, you have a lot of experience getting tossed from discussion groups. The Android forum is just one other example. I 'really' believe he was tossed because of his lack of opposition to background checks and being pro safety training. What a crock. Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand. No, we all read the thread. He was over there trolling with his DNC bull**** being his usual asshat... Isn't "over there" the place where he picked up his Asshat nik? Harry is so ****ed at mdshooters.com that he put up this website. http://marylandshooter.com/ Wow, what a ****ing asshat...LOL! Gotta love how moronic the really stupid here are. D'oh. |
Opening day
On 4/4/13 4:40 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 4/4/2013 12:56 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 4/4/13 12:53 PM, J Herring wrote: On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:38:49 -0400, Hank© wrote: On 4/4/2013 11:32 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: Oh, I definitely was a persona non grata at a Maryland gun discussion board, and I am proud of it. I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to background checks on gun purchasers and mandatory safety training for first time gun purchasers, and I said so. I made the mistake of thinking the "boys" there were rational. I do read and post on two other gun discussion boards. Apparently there are fewer crazies there. Apparently, you have a lot of experience getting tossed from discussion groups. The Android forum is just one other example. I 'really' believe he was tossed because of his lack of opposition to background checks and being pro safety training. What a crock. Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand. And once again you prove you cannot comprehend what you read. "I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to background checks on gun purchasers and mandatory safety training for first time gun purchasers, and I said so." Apparently he who laughs last does laugh best. Some of the boys on that Maryland gun discussion board must be having strokes over what is about to happen in this state. :) You were tossed for being a political troll... period. D'oh. The discussion board has a political subsection. The boys didn't like my lack of support for some of the crazier ideas. It's still going strong, with a number of the fellas discussing secession. That should be a funny undertaking. |
Opening day
"True North" wrote in message ... I hope there's something to limit ex-military from stockpiling firearms. Seems like every time there's a mass shooting by someone over 35, turns out he's a vet. ------------------------------------------ Where did you hear or read that? Simply not true. Interesting discussion on "Morning Joe" this morning about violence on TV, in movies and in video games. All the media focus is on the NRA lobbying for gun manufacturers yet many of the vocal supporters (usually Hollywood liberals) of more gun controls are the same ones acting in, producing, marketing and profiting by some of the most horrifically violent shows, movies and video games ever made, many targeted at young viewers. |
Opening day
On 4/4/13 5:00 PM, Eisboch wrote:
"True North" wrote in message ... I hope there's something to limit ex-military from stockpiling firearms. Seems like every time there's a mass shooting by someone over 35, turns out he's a vet. ------------------------------------------ Where did you hear or read that? Simply not true. Interesting discussion on "Morning Joe" this morning about violence on TV, in movies and in video games. All the media focus is on the NRA lobbying for gun manufacturers yet many of the vocal supporters (usually Hollywood liberals) of more gun controls are the same ones acting in, producing, marketing and profiting by some of the most horrifically violent shows, movies and video games ever made, many targeted at young viewers. Is there some quality, independent evidence that proves that violent movies, TV shows, and video games *cause* acts of violence in the real world. I know that from time to time such media is pointed out as the cause, but where is the proof? The Connecticut shooter, I understand, played violent media games, but he seemed to be suffering from mental illnesses. Media doesn't cause mental illness. |
Opening day
On 4/4/2013 5:05 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
Is there some quality, independent evidence that proves that violent movies, TV shows, and video games *cause* acts of violence in the real world. I know that from time to time such media is pointed out as the cause, but where is the proof? The Connecticut shooter, I understand, played violent media games, but he seemed to be suffering from mental illnesses. Media doesn't cause mental illness. I don't suppose you have any quality independent evidence that supports your emphatic claim, or do you? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com