| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#12
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Yet Another U.S. Navy Screw Up...Boating Related
On 3/28/2013 7:55 PM, BAR wrote:
In article , says... "Hank©" wrote in message eb.com... On 3/28/2013 5:23 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: Ships Costing U.S. $37 Billion Lack Firepower, Navy Told By David Lerman - Mar 28, 2013 It's our money being wasted. Why are you gloating? ---------------------------------------- I read an article about the cost overruns on these ships a month or so ago. It bothered me that the two versions are being built by companies owned (in one case) by a foreign country (Italy) and the other as a joint venture or something with a company in Australia. Why aren't American warships built by Americans? We may not have the capacity to build the ships. Maybe they just don't want to have to **** with unions crybabies and waste? |
|
#13
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yet Another U.S. Navy Screw Up...Boating Related
|
|
#14
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yet Another U.S. Navy Screw Up...Boating Related
JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 3/28/2013 7:55 PM, BAR wrote: In article , says... "Hank©" wrote in message eb.com... On 3/28/2013 5:23 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: Ships Costing U.S. $37 Billion Lack Firepower, Navy Told By David Lerman - Mar 28, 2013 It's our money being wasted. Why are you gloating? ---------------------------------------- I read an article about the cost overruns on these ships a month or so ago. It bothered me that the two versions are being built by companies owned (in one case) by a foreign country (Italy) and the other as a joint venture or something with a company in Australia. Why aren't American warships built by Americans? We may not have the capacity to build the ships. Maybe they just don't want to have to **** with unions crybabies and waste? You couldn't qualify for a job picking up trash at a shipyard. |
|
#15
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yet Another U.S. Navy Screw Up...Boating Related
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 23:36:18 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote: On 3/28/2013 7:55 PM, BAR wrote: In article , says... "Hank©" wrote in message eb.com... On 3/28/2013 5:23 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: Ships Costing U.S. $37 Billion Lack Firepower, Navy Told By David Lerman - Mar 28, 2013 It's our money being wasted. Why are you gloating? ---------------------------------------- I read an article about the cost overruns on these ships a month or so ago. It bothered me that the two versions are being built by companies owned (in one case) by a foreign country (Italy) and the other as a joint venture or something with a company in Australia. Why aren't American warships built by Americans? We may not have the capacity to build the ships. Maybe they just don't want to have to **** with unions crybabies and waste? Maybe you're just completely full of ****. http://americanmanufacturing.org/blo...-american-soil |
|
#16
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yet Another U.S. Navy Screw Up...Boating Related
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 21:18:09 -0400, wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 17:54:43 -0700, Urin Asshole wrote: On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 20:49:03 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 19:59:14 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: It is why I think we can't trust our government with our money. Yeah, we should turn our economy over to the Wall Street banksters... Who do you think runs it now? A better question is who do you think should continue to run it? It appears that it will be the highest bidder. Unless people like Elizabeth Warren can do something. |
|
#17
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yet Another U.S. Navy Screw Up...Boating Related
On 3/29/2013 1:23 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 21:39:05 -0700, Urin Asshole wrote: On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 21:18:09 -0400, wrote: Who do you think runs it now? A better question is who do you think should continue to run it? It appears that it will be the highest bidder. Unless people like Elizabeth Warren can do something. She looks good on MSNBC but she has been pretty ineffective in actually accomplishing much. That is the main reason she went to the senate. Every other post she was given was reduced to being meaningless pretty much immediately. Let's see what big money does to her in the Senate. I fear that when the reality of fund raising raises it's ugly head she will just be another bought and paid for tool of the rich ... or she will be gone. Warren, she already is bought and paid for.. Not to mention, like so many others she cheated her way in... |
|
#18
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yet Another U.S. Navy Screw Up...Boating Related
|
|
#19
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yet Another U.S. Navy Screw Up...Boating Related
|
|
#20
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yet Another U.S. Navy Screw Up...Boating Related
In article ,
says... "BAR" wrote in message . .. In article , says... "Hank©" wrote in message eb.com... On 3/28/2013 5:23 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: Ships Costing U.S. $37 Billion Lack Firepower, Navy Told By David Lerman - Mar 28, 2013 It's our money being wasted. Why are you gloating? ---------------------------------------- I read an article about the cost overruns on these ships a month or so ago. It bothered me that the two versions are being built by companies owned (in one case) by a foreign country (Italy) and the other as a joint venture or something with a company in Australia. Why aren't American warships built by Americans? We may not have the capacity to build the ships. -------------------------------------- That's damn scary. Not really. At the beginning of WW II we didn't have the "capacity" either until factories and facilities that were making other things re- tooled to help in the effort (and make a lot of money in the process). |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| It's Navy, so it is boating related... | General | |||
| Boating related? | General | |||
| ( OT ) but boating related | General | |||
Linear Mode
