In article , says...

On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 07:09:46 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

On 3/29/2013 7:06 AM, BAR wrote:
In article , says...

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:41:18 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 09:10:35 -0700, jps wrote:

that gunshot fired a year
ago in East Baltimore


Maryland has some of the strictest gun laws in the country. They must
not really be that effective I guess.

The facts are a bit more nuance that making the case either way on
strict gun laws, except it seems with regard to carry permits. Those
cause more problems.

http://factcheck.org/2012/12/gun-rhetoric-vs-gun-facts/

Why doens't the article pick a date and compare all scenarios using the same time period?


Because they have a political agenda... There should be a site out there
dedicated to getting the facts out, but it's not this one

Well, you have a stupid agenda, but we don't hold it against you
because you ARE stupid.

Some day in the future you are going sit down and wonder where all of your freedoms went.
Then you may sit back and come to the realization that the non-stupid won. Enjoy your police
state.

On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 07:06:43 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article , says...

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:41:18 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 09:10:35 -0700, jps wrote:

that gunshot fired a year
ago in East Baltimore


Maryland has some of the strictest gun laws in the country. They must
not really be that effective I guess.

The facts are a bit more nuance that making the case either way on
strict gun laws, except it seems with regard to carry permits. Those
cause more problems.

http://factcheck.org/2012/12/gun-rhetoric-vs-gun-facts/

Why doens't the article pick a date and compare all scenarios using the same time period?

Feel free.