|
Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likes this
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 12:46:42 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 3/30/13 12:38 PM, Urin Asshole wrote: On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 10:23:16 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 06:49:57 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: "Wayne B" wrote in message ... On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 21:32:20 -0700, Urin Asshole wrote: I don't see multiple sides to the position of reducing gun violence. Study after study has shown and country after country has demonstrated that fewer guns means fewer deaths. ==== Carried to its logical end point, your view leads to the inescapable conclusion that eliminating all guns would eliminate all gun deaths. Since there are way too many people who would be all too happy to press for eliminating all guns, the NRA serves as an effective counterpoint to that line of reasoning. I think that if you actually knew any rural gun owners, you'd find that they are almost universally opposed to *any* increased gun control measures, mostly because they don't trust you city/suburban folks or the type of government that you advocate. ---------------------------------------- Yup. Sorta like imposing your religion onto others. Not even close. Sounds like a democracy to me. Nice try though. Read some DeToqueville You have no idea what legislative power is or the obligation of the population has to support those less fortunately. So, next time you pull **** out of your ass, kindly do it in private. Or even what the guy's name was. It ain't DeToqueville. It is de Tocqueville, Alexis de Tocqueville, and in usual discussion, the reference is Tocqueville, as in "Tocqueville said, among other things, that democracy in the United States had a fair balance of liberty and equality, and concern for the individual as well as the community which he lived." If Tocqueville visited these days, he'd have a far different opinion, thanks to the radicalization of the right. You are *so* f'ing smart, FOAESADD! Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort. |
Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likesthis
On 3/30/2013 12:58 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 12:46:42 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 3/30/13 12:38 PM, Urin Asshole wrote: On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 10:23:16 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 06:49:57 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: "Wayne B" wrote in message ... On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 21:32:20 -0700, Urin Asshole wrote: I don't see multiple sides to the position of reducing gun violence. Study after study has shown and country after country has demonstrated that fewer guns means fewer deaths. ==== Carried to its logical end point, your view leads to the inescapable conclusion that eliminating all guns would eliminate all gun deaths. Since there are way too many people who would be all too happy to press for eliminating all guns, the NRA serves as an effective counterpoint to that line of reasoning. I think that if you actually knew any rural gun owners, you'd find that they are almost universally opposed to *any* increased gun control measures, mostly because they don't trust you city/suburban folks or the type of government that you advocate. ---------------------------------------- Yup. Sorta like imposing your religion onto others. Not even close. Sounds like a democracy to me. Nice try though. Read some DeToqueville You have no idea what legislative power is or the obligation of the population has to support those less fortunately. So, next time you pull **** out of your ass, kindly do it in private. Or even what the guy's name was. It ain't DeToqueville. It is de Tocqueville, Alexis de Tocqueville, and in usual discussion, the reference is Tocqueville, as in "Tocqueville said, among other things, that democracy in the United States had a fair balance of liberty and equality, and concern for the individual as well as the community which he lived." If Tocqueville visited these days, he'd have a far different opinion, thanks to the radicalization of the right. You are *so* f'ing smart, FOAESADD! Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort. He's ****ed because the radical money lenders took his house away. |
Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likesthis
On 3/30/13 12:58 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 12:46:42 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 3/30/13 12:38 PM, Urin Asshole wrote: On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 10:23:16 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 06:49:57 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: "Wayne B" wrote in message ... On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 21:32:20 -0700, Urin Asshole wrote: I don't see multiple sides to the position of reducing gun violence. Study after study has shown and country after country has demonstrated that fewer guns means fewer deaths. ==== Carried to its logical end point, your view leads to the inescapable conclusion that eliminating all guns would eliminate all gun deaths. Since there are way too many people who would be all too happy to press for eliminating all guns, the NRA serves as an effective counterpoint to that line of reasoning. I think that if you actually knew any rural gun owners, you'd find that they are almost universally opposed to *any* increased gun control measures, mostly because they don't trust you city/suburban folks or the type of government that you advocate. ---------------------------------------- Yup. Sorta like imposing your religion onto others. Not even close. Sounds like a democracy to me. Nice try though. Read some DeToqueville You have no idea what legislative power is or the obligation of the population has to support those less fortunately. So, next time you pull **** out of your ass, kindly do it in private. Or even what the guy's name was. It ain't DeToqueville. It is de Tocqueville, Alexis de Tocqueville, and in usual discussion, the reference is Tocqueville, as in "Tocqueville said, among other things, that democracy in the United States had a fair balance of liberty and equality, and concern for the individual as well as the community which he lived." If Tocqueville visited these days, he'd have a far different opinion, thanks to the radicalization of the right. You are *so* f'ing smart, FOAESADD! Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort. Awwww. It's just something you learn when you get a good liberal arts education. Tocqueville was a progressive thinker. No one would accuse you of either of those attributes. |
Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likes this
In article ,
says... On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 12:46:42 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 3/30/13 12:38 PM, Urin Asshole wrote: On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 10:23:16 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 06:49:57 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: "Wayne B" wrote in message ... On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 21:32:20 -0700, Urin Asshole wrote: I don't see multiple sides to the position of reducing gun violence. Study after study has shown and country after country has demonstrated that fewer guns means fewer deaths. ==== Carried to its logical end point, your view leads to the inescapable conclusion that eliminating all guns would eliminate all gun deaths. Since there are way too many people who would be all too happy to press for eliminating all guns, the NRA serves as an effective counterpoint to that line of reasoning. I think that if you actually knew any rural gun owners, you'd find that they are almost universally opposed to *any* increased gun control measures, mostly because they don't trust you city/suburban folks or the type of government that you advocate. ---------------------------------------- Yup. Sorta like imposing your religion onto others. Not even close. Sounds like a democracy to me. Nice try though. Read some DeToqueville You have no idea what legislative power is or the obligation of the population has to support those less fortunately. So, next time you pull **** out of your ass, kindly do it in private. Or even what the guy's name was. It ain't DeToqueville. It is de Tocqueville, Alexis de Tocqueville, and in usual discussion, the reference is Tocqueville, as in "Tocqueville said, among other things, that democracy in the United States had a fair balance of liberty and equality, and concern for the individual as well as the community which he lived." If Tocqueville visited these days, he'd have a far different opinion, thanks to the radicalization of the right. You are *so* f'ing smart, FOAESADD! Salmonbait You.... aren't. |
Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likesthis
On 3/30/2013 1:29 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 3/30/13 12:58 PM, J Herring wrote: On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 12:46:42 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 3/30/13 12:38 PM, Urin Asshole wrote: On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 10:23:16 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 06:49:57 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: "Wayne B" wrote in message ... On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 21:32:20 -0700, Urin Asshole wrote: I don't see multiple sides to the position of reducing gun violence. Study after study has shown and country after country has demonstrated that fewer guns means fewer deaths. ==== Carried to its logical end point, your view leads to the inescapable conclusion that eliminating all guns would eliminate all gun deaths. Since there are way too many people who would be all too happy to press for eliminating all guns, the NRA serves as an effective counterpoint to that line of reasoning. I think that if you actually knew any rural gun owners, you'd find that they are almost universally opposed to *any* increased gun control measures, mostly because they don't trust you city/suburban folks or the type of government that you advocate. ---------------------------------------- Yup. Sorta like imposing your religion onto others. Not even close. Sounds like a democracy to me. Nice try though. Read some DeToqueville You have no idea what legislative power is or the obligation of the population has to support those less fortunately. So, next time you pull **** out of your ass, kindly do it in private. Or even what the guy's name was. It ain't DeToqueville. It is de Tocqueville, Alexis de Tocqueville, and in usual discussion, the reference is Tocqueville, as in "Tocqueville said, among other things, that democracy in the United States had a fair balance of liberty and equality, and concern for the individual as well as the community which he lived." If Tocqueville visited these days, he'd have a far different opinion, thanks to the radicalization of the right. You are *so* f'ing smart, FOAESADD! Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort. Awwww. It's just something you learn when you get a good liberal arts education. Tocqueville was a progressive thinker. No one would accuse you of either of those attributes. The world is over populated with liberal artists and lawyers. We need more doctors, dentists, nurses, engineers, and technicians. |
Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likes this
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 12:58:30 -0400, J Herring
wrote: On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 12:46:42 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 3/30/13 12:38 PM, Urin Asshole wrote: On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 10:23:16 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 06:49:57 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: "Wayne B" wrote in message ... On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 21:32:20 -0700, Urin Asshole wrote: I don't see multiple sides to the position of reducing gun violence. Study after study has shown and country after country has demonstrated that fewer guns means fewer deaths. ==== Carried to its logical end point, your view leads to the inescapable conclusion that eliminating all guns would eliminate all gun deaths. Since there are way too many people who would be all too happy to press for eliminating all guns, the NRA serves as an effective counterpoint to that line of reasoning. I think that if you actually knew any rural gun owners, you'd find that they are almost universally opposed to *any* increased gun control measures, mostly because they don't trust you city/suburban folks or the type of government that you advocate. ---------------------------------------- Yup. Sorta like imposing your religion onto others. Not even close. Sounds like a democracy to me. Nice try though. Read some DeToqueville You have no idea what legislative power is or the obligation of the population has to support those less fortunately. So, next time you pull **** out of your ass, kindly do it in private. Or even what the guy's name was. It ain't DeToqueville. It is de Tocqueville, Alexis de Tocqueville, and in usual discussion, the reference is Tocqueville, as in "Tocqueville said, among other things, that democracy in the United States had a fair balance of liberty and equality, and concern for the individual as well as the community which he lived." If Tocqueville visited these days, he'd have a far different opinion, thanks to the radicalization of the right. You are *so* f'ing smart, FOAESADD! Salmonbait That's quite the insult coming from someone like you. You could say the same thing about a turnip and mean it compared to you. |
Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likesthis
On 3/30/13 6:12 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 13:29:13 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 3/30/13 12:58 PM, J Herring wrote: On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 12:46:42 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 3/30/13 12:38 PM, Urin Asshole wrote: On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 10:23:16 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 06:49:57 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: "Wayne B" wrote in message ... On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 21:32:20 -0700, Urin Asshole wrote: I don't see multiple sides to the position of reducing gun violence. Study after study has shown and country after country has demonstrated that fewer guns means fewer deaths. ==== Carried to its logical end point, your view leads to the inescapable conclusion that eliminating all guns would eliminate all gun deaths. Since there are way too many people who would be all too happy to press for eliminating all guns, the NRA serves as an effective counterpoint to that line of reasoning. I think that if you actually knew any rural gun owners, you'd find that they are almost universally opposed to *any* increased gun control measures, mostly because they don't trust you city/suburban folks or the type of government that you advocate. ---------------------------------------- Yup. Sorta like imposing your religion onto others. Not even close. Sounds like a democracy to me. Nice try though. Read some DeToqueville You have no idea what legislative power is or the obligation of the population has to support those less fortunately. So, next time you pull **** out of your ass, kindly do it in private. Or even what the guy's name was. It ain't DeToqueville. It is de Tocqueville, Alexis de Tocqueville, and in usual discussion, the reference is Tocqueville, as in "Tocqueville said, among other things, that democracy in the United States had a fair balance of liberty and equality, and concern for the individual as well as the community which he lived." If Tocqueville visited these days, he'd have a far different opinion, thanks to the radicalization of the right. You are *so* f'ing smart, FOAESADD! Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort. Awwww. It's just something you learn when you get a good liberal arts education. Tocqueville was a progressive thinker. No one would accuse you of either of those attributes. I thank my lucky stars on a daily basis that you and I don't share attributes! Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort. Right...you're neither progressive nor a thinker. Got it. |
Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likes this
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 13:29:13 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 3/30/13 12:58 PM, J Herring wrote: On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 12:46:42 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 3/30/13 12:38 PM, Urin Asshole wrote: On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 10:23:16 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 06:49:57 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: "Wayne B" wrote in message ... On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 21:32:20 -0700, Urin Asshole wrote: I don't see multiple sides to the position of reducing gun violence. Study after study has shown and country after country has demonstrated that fewer guns means fewer deaths. ==== Carried to its logical end point, your view leads to the inescapable conclusion that eliminating all guns would eliminate all gun deaths. Since there are way too many people who would be all too happy to press for eliminating all guns, the NRA serves as an effective counterpoint to that line of reasoning. I think that if you actually knew any rural gun owners, you'd find that they are almost universally opposed to *any* increased gun control measures, mostly because they don't trust you city/suburban folks or the type of government that you advocate. ---------------------------------------- Yup. Sorta like imposing your religion onto others. Not even close. Sounds like a democracy to me. Nice try though. Read some DeToqueville You have no idea what legislative power is or the obligation of the population has to support those less fortunately. So, next time you pull **** out of your ass, kindly do it in private. Or even what the guy's name was. It ain't DeToqueville. It is de Tocqueville, Alexis de Tocqueville, and in usual discussion, the reference is Tocqueville, as in "Tocqueville said, among other things, that democracy in the United States had a fair balance of liberty and equality, and concern for the individual as well as the community which he lived." If Tocqueville visited these days, he'd have a far different opinion, thanks to the radicalization of the right. You are *so* f'ing smart, FOAESADD! Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort. Awwww. It's just something you learn when you get a good liberal arts education. Tocqueville was a progressive thinker. No one would accuse you of either of those attributes. I thank my lucky stars on a daily basis that you and I don't share attributes! Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort. |
Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likes this
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 18:10:29 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 3/30/13 6:12 PM, J Herring wrote: On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 13:29:13 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 3/30/13 12:58 PM, J Herring wrote: On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 12:46:42 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 3/30/13 12:38 PM, Urin Asshole wrote: On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 10:23:16 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 06:49:57 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: "Wayne B" wrote in message ... On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 21:32:20 -0700, Urin Asshole wrote: I don't see multiple sides to the position of reducing gun violence. Study after study has shown and country after country has demonstrated that fewer guns means fewer deaths. ==== Carried to its logical end point, your view leads to the inescapable conclusion that eliminating all guns would eliminate all gun deaths. Since there are way too many people who would be all too happy to press for eliminating all guns, the NRA serves as an effective counterpoint to that line of reasoning. I think that if you actually knew any rural gun owners, you'd find that they are almost universally opposed to *any* increased gun control measures, mostly because they don't trust you city/suburban folks or the type of government that you advocate. ---------------------------------------- Yup. Sorta like imposing your religion onto others. Not even close. Sounds like a democracy to me. Nice try though. Read some DeToqueville You have no idea what legislative power is or the obligation of the population has to support those less fortunately. So, next time you pull **** out of your ass, kindly do it in private. Or even what the guy's name was. It ain't DeToqueville. It is de Tocqueville, Alexis de Tocqueville, and in usual discussion, the reference is Tocqueville, as in "Tocqueville said, among other things, that democracy in the United States had a fair balance of liberty and equality, and concern for the individual as well as the community which he lived." If Tocqueville visited these days, he'd have a far different opinion, thanks to the radicalization of the right. You are *so* f'ing smart, FOAESADD! Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort. Awwww. It's just something you learn when you get a good liberal arts education. Tocqueville was a progressive thinker. No one would accuse you of either of those attributes. I thank my lucky stars on a daily basis that you and I don't share attributes! Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort. Right...you're neither progressive nor a thinker. Got it. Not *nearly* of your caliber! Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:39 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com