Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#29
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message news ![]() On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 10:05:13 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: In article , says... We were on the right course in the 70's when we realized the danger of the automobile and lowered the speed limit to 55. Many lives were saved and many more could have been saved, too, if the limit had been decreased even farther to 5-10 MPH or even lower. Think of the lives that could have been saved! However, a group of hoodlums promoting the false god of common sense not only kept that from happening, but returned us to speeds as high as or higher than before. Speed (like guns) KILLS! ========================= The 55 mph speed limit was not put into law for safety reasons. It was part of the 1974 Emergency Highway Energy Conservation Act, drafted in response to oil price spikes and supply disruptions during the 1973 oil crisis. The "safety" benefit has never been proven to be related to the decreased speed limit. In fact, in the first few months of it's implementation, traffic accidents actually increased. Overall however, accidents and fatalities decreased during it's implementation but also after it was repealed. The decrease in accidents and fatalities are attributed mainly to automobile safety improvements over the years, not to a 55 mph speed limit. I concede your first statement, however the "safety" aspect was an unintended consequence. Your statement that the "safety benefit" has never been "proven" is just ridiculously false. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0716164339.htm --------------------------------------------------------- It's not "ridiculously false". I won't bother linking studies that conflict with the one you provided, but highway accidents and fatalities *have* decreased since 1974 according to several statistical studies in terms of numbers per cars on the road. The "Speed Kills" campaign was a offshoot of the 55 mph speed limit by a group advocating lowering the limits. All in all, the whole thing was a failure. It didn't really reduce the fuel consumption rate and it didn't reduce accidents, other than for a one year study that turned out to be a continuation of a trend anyway. If you are interested, there are plenty of sources of this data. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A list of failures longer than a list of accomplishments... | General | |||
THis list | General | |||
This list | General | |||
The B LIST!!! | ASA | |||
LIST OF THREADS ON:LIST: NAUTICAL THREADS - OCT 26, 03 TO NOV 02, 03 - | ASA |