In article ,
says...

On 3/9/2013 9:25 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 3/9/2013 8:28 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 3/8/2013 4:43 PM, True North wrote:
On Friday, March 8, 2013 5:39:35 PM UTC-4, True North wrote:
On Friday, March 8, 2013 4:29:08 PM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:

Doh..I'm gonna put a beating on this Playbook.
Should be 'danger'.


We don't care about your spelling crap, just learn how to post without
turning a line into four pages.

There, I trimmed it down for you three morons. Now you can quit whining
and post something right up your alley, like nasty, vulgar things about
poster's children, spouses and other family members, and resume your
racial slurs and Christian hatred.




And you can continue your name calling and lies about my daughters and
their education.. You are the same as anybody here except you lie about
who you are out of embarrassment... Not our problem drunk...

What lies have I told about your daughters?

You keep talking about my one daughter that works in CT and saying she
is the same one that has a masters degree in DC... You see, you can set
the levels at any place you wish, but attacking family, is attacking
family, just like coming here hundreds of times a week to call me names
is not any better or worse than the one bad word I used.... You are what
you are kevin, everybody here knows it..

YOU, dip**** are too insane to understand that it is YOU that started
attacking families. Again, I'll ask, what lies have I told about your
daughters. NAME ONE, liar.

In article ,
says...

On 3/9/2013 9:29 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 3/9/13 9:12 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 3/9/2013 6:13 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 3/8/13 11:52 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 3/8/2013 11:35 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 08 Mar 2013 19:54:46 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/8/13 7:47 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 08 Mar 2013 15:29:08 -0500, "F.O.A.D."
wrote:

...off "accidents" this past week.

Oooops.
It was a pretty tiough week on the roads too but those deaths are
not
news.
Once the traffic jams clear, we forget about it.


Let's not get into the shooting deaths vs. road accident deaths
thingie
again.

It's funny that the left doesn't want to talk about cars when they are
talking about deaths but it is the first thing they bring up if they
want to talk about registration and licensing.


It's a product of being a progressive. Having no real core values
beyond
self indulgence makes it hard to keep consistent with your views and
beliefs...

Considering your vile behavior here and the way you apparently speak in
front of your children at home, it seems you are the one sans values.


You come here every day and spew lies and names at everybody including
my kids... You have no leg to stand on here kevin. Not to mention I
never pushed my wife down the stairs or tried to burn my kid out of her
bed...


Oh? What names am i calling your kids? Be specific.

Harry, you are funny...

Gee, can't answer, eh, liar?

In article ,
says...

On 3/9/2013 9:32 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 3/9/13 9:31 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 3/9/2013 9:29 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 3/9/13 9:12 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 3/9/2013 6:13 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 3/8/13 11:52 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 3/8/2013 11:35 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 08 Mar 2013 19:54:46 -0500, "F.O.A.D."
wrote:

On 3/8/13 7:47 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 08 Mar 2013 15:29:08 -0500, "F.O.A.D."
wrote:

...off "accidents" this past week.

Oooops.
It was a pretty tiough week on the roads too but those deaths are
not
news.
Once the traffic jams clear, we forget about it.


Let's not get into the shooting deaths vs. road accident deaths
thingie
again.

It's funny that the left doesn't want to talk about cars when they
are
talking about deaths but it is the first thing they bring up if they
want to talk about registration and licensing.


It's a product of being a progressive. Having no real core values
beyond
self indulgence makes it hard to keep consistent with your views and
beliefs...

Considering your vile behavior here and the way you apparently
speak in
front of your children at home, it seems you are the one sans values.


You come here every day and spew lies and names at everybody including
my kids... You have no leg to stand on here kevin. Not to mention I
never pushed my wife down the stairs or tried to burn my kid out of her
bed...


Oh? What names am i calling your kids? Be specific.

Harry, you are funny...


Is this like your claim of blackmail? Just crap you made up? Seriously,
what names am I calling your kids?

I owe you no explanations... nobody is being fooled he0

Yep, can't answer, liar!!

In article ,
says...

On 3/9/2013 9:32 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 3/9/2013 6:13 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 3/8/13 11:52 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 3/8/2013 11:35 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 08 Mar 2013 19:54:46 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/8/13 7:47 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 08 Mar 2013 15:29:08 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

...off "accidents" this past week.

Oooops.
It was a pretty tiough week on the roads too but those deaths are not
news.
Once the traffic jams clear, we forget about it.


Let's not get into the shooting deaths vs. road accident deaths thingie
again.

It's funny that the left doesn't want to talk about cars when they are
talking about deaths but it is the first thing they bring up if they
want to talk about registration and licensing.


It's a product of being a progressive. Having no real core values beyond
self indulgence makes it hard to keep consistent with your views and
beliefs...

Considering your vile behavior here and the way you apparently speak in
front of your children at home, it seems you are the one sans values.


You come here every day and spew lies and names at everybody including
my kids... You have no leg to stand on here kevin. Not to mention I
never pushed my wife down the stairs or tried to burn my kid out of her
bed...

...or I never grew pot in a dojo where I brought my and other local
kids. Just because it was long ago, doesn't make it any different. Quite
frankly you putting neighbor kids in that situation is lot's worse than
anything I have ever said here or in front of my kids in anger....
soooo.. bugger off, punk.

I can not for the life of me figure out what the hell you are talking
about, please do elaborate for the group.

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...


We were on the right course in the 70's when we realized the danger of
the automobile and lowered the speed limit to 55. Many lives were
saved and many more could have been saved, too, if the limit had been
decreased even farther to 5-10 MPH or even lower. Think of the lives
that could have been saved! However, a group of hoodlums promoting the
false god of common sense not only kept that from happening, but
returned us to speeds as high as or higher than before. Speed (like
guns) KILLS!

=========================

The 55 mph speed limit was not put into law for safety reasons. It
was part of the 1974 Emergency Highway Energy Conservation Act,
drafted in response to oil price spikes and supply disruptions during
the 1973 oil crisis.

The "safety" benefit has never been proven to be related to the
decreased speed limit. In fact, in the first few months of it's
implementation, traffic accidents actually increased. Overall
however, accidents and fatalities decreased during it's implementation
but also after it was repealed. The decrease in accidents and
fatalities are attributed mainly to automobile safety improvements
over the years, not to a 55 mph speed limit.

Yep!

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 08:35:21 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:


No, it's an utterly stupid argument. Cars aren't designed to kill, guns
are.

A car designed to go 3 times the speed limit is not designed for
transportation.\

Sure they are.

The vast majority of bullets fired never kill anything, man nor beast.

Doesn't matter, guns were invented to kill, cars were not.

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 08:36:12 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,


I'm sure YOU don't see the stupidity in that, so I'll try to educate you
by asking a question. What are cars designed to do? What are guns
designed to do?

They are designed to make a bullet go really fast. That is all.
Horse****. WHY would someone want a bullet to go really fast?


What
people actually shoot at is a conscious choice and most people shoot
at things that are not alive.

Guns are the invention of hunters. To kill things.

wrote in message news
On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 10:05:13 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:



In article ,
says...


We were on the right course in the 70's when we realized the danger
of
the automobile and lowered the speed limit to 55. Many lives were
saved and many more could have been saved, too, if the limit had been
decreased even farther to 5-10 MPH or even lower. Think of the lives
that could have been saved! However, a group of hoodlums promoting
the
false god of common sense not only kept that from happening, but
returned us to speeds as high as or higher than before. Speed (like
guns) KILLS!

=========================

The 55 mph speed limit was not put into law for safety reasons. It
was part of the 1974 Emergency Highway Energy Conservation Act,
drafted in response to oil price spikes and supply disruptions during
the 1973 oil crisis.

The "safety" benefit has never been proven to be related to the
decreased speed limit. In fact, in the first few months of it's
implementation, traffic accidents actually increased. Overall
however, accidents and fatalities decreased during it's
implementation
but also after it was repealed. The decrease in accidents and
fatalities are attributed mainly to automobile safety improvements
over the years, not to a 55 mph speed limit.

I concede your first statement, however the "safety" aspect was an
unintended consequence.

Your statement that the "safety benefit" has never been "proven" is
just ridiculously false.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0716164339.htm

---------------------------------------------------------

It's not "ridiculously false". I won't bother linking studies that
conflict with the one you provided, but highway accidents and
fatalities *have* decreased since 1974 according to several
statistical studies in terms of numbers per cars on the road. The
"Speed Kills" campaign was a offshoot of the 55 mph speed limit by a
group advocating lowering the limits. All in all, the whole thing
was a failure. It didn't really reduce the fuel consumption rate and
it didn't reduce accidents, other than for a one year study that
turned out to be a continuation of a trend anyway. If you are
interested, there are plenty of sources of this data.

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 10:28:20 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 08:36:12 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,


I'm sure YOU don't see the stupidity in that, so I'll try to educate you
by asking a question. What are cars designed to do? What are guns
designed to do?

They are designed to make a bullet go really fast. That is all.
Horse****. WHY would someone want a bullet to go really fast?


What
people actually shoot at is a conscious choice and most people shoot
at things that are not alive.

Guns are the invention of hunters. To kill things.


Microprocessors were designed by the guided missile community to kill
on a mass scale but we found peaceful uses for them.
In the same way the overwhelmingly vast majority of guns never kill
anyone.

Gee, then why do all of the hunters want them? And actually,
microprocessors were designed to get man into space.

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 10:27:09 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

A car designed to go 3 times the speed limit is not designed for
transportation.\

Sure they are.

A Chevy Volt is transportation.
A Tesla is something else.
If speed kills, this is a designed killer.

Would you be OK with a smart car that used the engine computer and the
nav system to regulate your speed to the speed limit?

Um..... just what does that have to do with the fact that guns are
designed to kill???