On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 17:42:18 -0500, J Herring
wrote:

True, but it still hurt. Also, a cheap McDonald's was right around $5, and that was off the main
drags.

===

Same with London. Mickey D's was the only place where you could get a
decent lunch at a reasonable price. The other good value was the fish
and chips places that were off the beaten path.

On 3/4/13 6:20 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 17:42:18 -0500, J Herring
wrote:

True, but it still hurt. Also, a cheap McDonald's was right around $5, and that was off the main
drags.

===

Same with London. Mickey D's was the only place where you could get a
decent lunch at a reasonable price. The other good value was the fish
and chips places that were off the beaten path.


Expecting to find dirt cheap meals in the world's major capitals is kind
of a weird undertaking, but, hey, if you think McDonald's offers a
"decent lunch," why, anything is possible. There are pretty good places
in London to get a decent lunch for under 10 quid.

On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 19:20:06 -0400, Wayne B wrote:

On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 17:42:18 -0500, J Herring
wrote:

True, but it still hurt. Also, a cheap McDonald's was right around $5, and that was off the main
drags.

===

Same with London. Mickey D's was the only place where you could get a
decent lunch at a reasonable price. The other good value was the fish
and chips places that were off the beaten path.

Well, we had no choice with the MD's. With four kids in tow, the shouting was unbearable when they
spotted the golden arches. The place was a madhouse. The French seemed to love it as much as the
kids.
--
Salmonbait

All decisions are the result of binary thinking.