|
really...
If you cut your family budget, you might shave your cable bill and stop
eating out. If they were going to shave your family budget they would sell your dog and tell you the kids can't go to college! This is ridiculous, stop campaigning and get back to work... it doesn't have to go down this way. |
really...
On 2/27/13 11:10 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
If you cut your family budget, you might shave your cable bill and stop eating out. If they were going to shave your family budget they would sell your dog and tell you the kids can't go to college! This is ridiculous, stop campaigning and get back to work... it doesn't have to go down this way. Are you being blackmailed again? |
really...
On 2/27/2013 11:12 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/27/13 11:10 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: If you cut your family budget, you might shave your cable bill and stop eating out. If they were going to shave your family budget they would sell your dog and tell you the kids can't go to college! This is ridiculous, stop campaigning and get back to work... it doesn't have to go down this way. Are you being blackmailed again? Yes, we all are.. The President came up with a plan that cuts the most essential things in our government while all the time never trying even once to avert the disaster. He is saying if he doesn't get to change the rules and double down on taxes he is going to let all the illegals out, fire teachers, doctors, daycare workers etc and won't even let the departments decide where to cut. This is blackmail of the treason persuasion... |
really...
On 2/27/13 11:21 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/27/2013 11:12 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 2/27/13 11:10 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: If you cut your family budget, you might shave your cable bill and stop eating out. If they were going to shave your family budget they would sell your dog and tell you the kids can't go to college! This is ridiculous, stop campaigning and get back to work... it doesn't have to go down this way. Are you being blackmailed again? Yes, we all are.. The President came up with a plan that cuts the most essential things in our government while all the time never trying even once to avert the disaster. He is saying if he doesn't get to change the rules and double down on taxes he is going to let all the illegals out, fire teachers, doctors, daycare workers etc and won't even let the departments decide where to cut. This is blackmail of the treason persuasion... I would have preferred that he dumped all the cuts on the DoD. Oh, and he has worked very hard to divert the disaster, but it seems the Repugs are determined to force the cuts on needed services and those who provide them. So sorry. Got a flight to Boston next week...hope the airports aren't much worse than usual. If it were just to New York, I'd ride the rails. |
really...
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:32:33 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
Oh, and he has worked very hard to divert the disaster ==== It was his idea. http://www.amazon.com/The-Price-Politics-Bob-Woodward/dp/1451651104 |
really...
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 7:36:55 PM UTC-5, Wayne B wrote:
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:32:33 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: Oh, and he has worked very hard to divert the disaster ==== It was his idea. http://www.amazon.com/The-Price-Politics-Bob-Woodward/dp/1451651104 Yup |
really...
|
really...
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 11:14:31 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 7:36:55 PM UTC-5, Wayne B wrote: On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:32:33 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: Oh, and he has worked very hard to divert the disaster ==== It was his idea. http://www.amazon.com/The-Price-Politics-Bob-Woodward/dp/1451651104 Yup Moron. http://tinyurl.com/bm3llve ==== Let me see if I understand this. You and some low profile blog site are challenging the journalistic integrity of Bob Woodward and the Washington Post? |
really...
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 13:39:47 -0400, Wayne B
wrote: On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 11:14:31 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 7:36:55 PM UTC-5, Wayne B wrote: On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:32:33 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: Oh, and he has worked very hard to divert the disaster ==== It was his idea. http://www.amazon.com/The-Price-Politics-Bob-Woodward/dp/1451651104 Yup Moron. http://tinyurl.com/bm3llve ==== Let me see if I understand this. You and some low profile blog site are challenging the journalistic integrity of Bob Woodward and the Washington Post? When he runs to Hannity the Manity, yes. |
really...
On 2/28/13 2:25 PM, Urin Asshole wrote:
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 13:39:47 -0400, Wayne B wrote: On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 11:14:31 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 7:36:55 PM UTC-5, Wayne B wrote: On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:32:33 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: Oh, and he has worked very hard to divert the disaster ==== It was his idea. http://www.amazon.com/The-Price-Politics-Bob-Woodward/dp/1451651104 Yup Moron. http://tinyurl.com/bm3llve ==== Let me see if I understand this. You and some low profile blog site are challenging the journalistic integrity of Bob Woodward and the Washington Post? When he runs to Hannity the Manity, yes. Really. If you heading to Hannity to whine, as Woodward reportedly is going to do, you've already lost. |
really...
In article ,
says... Now, I've heard the stories that maybe he and others never thought it would go this far, but that makes no difference to me. *If* this arm-twisting sequester concept originated in his administration .... and *if* he approved of it, he's gambling with American interests and the economy. No president, Senator or Congressman/woman has the right to gamble with national interests in a show of brinkmanship. The should all be impeached or fired. That's my story and I am sticking to it. Notice that I am not picking sides. They are *all* at fault. Why pay attention to "stories?" That's just spin, from either side. Here's the facts. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budget_Control_Act_of_2011 It's easy to read. Note when the legislation was agreed to. "as the midnight August 2, 2011, deadline for an unprecedented U.S. sovereign default drew nearer and nearer." You already forgot the Republican House was about to default on American debt, and make every one of us a deadbeat? The same Republican House had already done enough damage that U.S. credit was downgraded. Sequestration was the only way to get the Republican house to vote for the debt ceiling increase, and that prevented U.S. default. This country's citizens will never agree with the Republican party's desired method to solve the debt problem. But the Republican party will persist until they are destroyed. Why? Because the Republican party is full of uncompromising dumb-asses. Just get ready for more "bloodshed." This is only the beginning. Besides budgetary matters, the Republican party is soon to prove itself uncompromising on immigration reform and gun safety, preventing any advance in those areas. Why? Because the Republican party is full of uncompromising dumb-asses. Just watch. Let the chips fall where they may. |
really...
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 14:37:06 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 2/28/13 2:25 PM, Urin Asshole wrote: On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 13:39:47 -0400, Wayne B wrote: On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 11:14:31 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 7:36:55 PM UTC-5, Wayne B wrote: On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:32:33 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: Oh, and he has worked very hard to divert the disaster ==== It was his idea. http://www.amazon.com/The-Price-Politics-Bob-Woodward/dp/1451651104 Yup Moron. http://tinyurl.com/bm3llve ==== Let me see if I understand this. You and some low profile blog site are challenging the journalistic integrity of Bob Woodward and the Washington Post? When he runs to Hannity the Manity, yes. Really. If you heading to Hannity to whine, as Woodward reportedly is going to do, you've already lost. I don't dismiss him entirely, but it sure is suspect. |
really...
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 14:38:20 -0600, Boating All Out wrote:
In article , says... Now, I've heard the stories that maybe he and others never thought it would go this far, but that makes no difference to me. *If* this arm-twisting sequester concept originated in his administration .... and *if* he approved of it, he's gambling with American interests and the economy. No president, Senator or Congressman/woman has the right to gamble with national interests in a show of brinkmanship. The should all be impeached or fired. That's my story and I am sticking to it. Notice that I am not picking sides. They are *all* at fault. Why pay attention to "stories?" That's just spin, from either side. Here's the facts. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budget_Control_Act_of_2011 It's easy to read. Note when the legislation was agreed to. "as the midnight August 2, 2011, deadline for an unprecedented U.S. sovereign default drew nearer and nearer." You already forgot the Republican House was about to default on American debt, and make every one of us a deadbeat? The same Republican House had already done enough damage that U.S. credit was downgraded. Sequestration was the only way to get the Republican house to vote for the debt ceiling increase, and that prevented U.S. default. This country's citizens will never agree with the Republican party's desired method to solve the debt problem. But the Republican party will persist until they are destroyed. Why? Because the Republican party is full of uncompromising dumb-asses. Just get ready for more "bloodshed." This is only the beginning. Besides budgetary matters, the Republican party is soon to prove itself uncompromising on immigration reform and gun safety, preventing any advance in those areas. Why? Because the Republican party is full of uncompromising dumb-asses. Just watch. Let the chips fall where they may. Horse****. Why not just say, "It's Bush's fault." -- Salmonbait All decisions are the result of binary thinking. |
really...
On 2/28/13 4:40 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 14:38:20 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... Now, I've heard the stories that maybe he and others never thought it would go this far, but that makes no difference to me. *If* this arm-twisting sequester concept originated in his administration .... and *if* he approved of it, he's gambling with American interests and the economy. No president, Senator or Congressman/woman has the right to gamble with national interests in a show of brinkmanship. The should all be impeached or fired. That's my story and I am sticking to it. Notice that I am not picking sides. They are *all* at fault. Why pay attention to "stories?" That's just spin, from either side. Here's the facts. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budget_Control_Act_of_2011 It's easy to read. Note when the legislation was agreed to. "as the midnight August 2, 2011, deadline for an unprecedented U.S. sovereign default drew nearer and nearer." You already forgot the Republican House was about to default on American debt, and make every one of us a deadbeat? The same Republican House had already done enough damage that U.S. credit was downgraded. Sequestration was the only way to get the Republican house to vote for the debt ceiling increase, and that prevented U.S. default. This country's citizens will never agree with the Republican party's desired method to solve the debt problem. But the Republican party will persist until they are destroyed. Why? Because the Republican party is full of uncompromising dumb-asses. Just get ready for more "bloodshed." This is only the beginning. Besides budgetary matters, the Republican party is soon to prove itself uncompromising on immigration reform and gun safety, preventing any advance in those areas. Why? Because the Republican party is full of uncompromising dumb-asses. Just watch. Let the chips fall where they may. Horse****. Why not just say, "It's Bush's fault." Ahh, J Herring an uncompromising Republican dumbass. |
really...
In article ,
says... On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 14:38:20 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... Now, I've heard the stories that maybe he and others never thought it would go this far, but that makes no difference to me. *If* this arm-twisting sequester concept originated in his administration .... and *if* he approved of it, he's gambling with American interests and the economy. No president, Senator or Congressman/woman has the right to gamble with national interests in a show of brinkmanship. The should all be impeached or fired. That's my story and I am sticking to it. Notice that I am not picking sides. They are *all* at fault. Why pay attention to "stories?" That's just spin, from either side. Here's the facts. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budget_Control_Act_of_2011 It's easy to read. Note when the legislation was agreed to. "as the midnight August 2, 2011, deadline for an unprecedented U.S. sovereign default drew nearer and nearer." You already forgot the Republican House was about to default on American debt, and make every one of us a deadbeat? The same Republican House had already done enough damage that U.S. credit was downgraded. Sequestration was the only way to get the Republican house to vote for the debt ceiling increase, and that prevented U.S. default. This country's citizens will never agree with the Republican party's desired method to solve the debt problem. But the Republican party will persist until they are destroyed. Why? Because the Republican party is full of uncompromising dumb-asses. Just get ready for more "bloodshed." This is only the beginning. Besides budgetary matters, the Republican party is soon to prove itself uncompromising on immigration reform and gun safety, preventing any advance in those areas. Why? Because the Republican party is full of uncompromising dumb-asses. Just watch. Let the chips fall where they may. Horse****. Why not just say, "It's Bush's fault." What part of this is bull****? Please give cite as to why. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:16 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com