On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 12:06:38 PM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/27/13 11:00 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:

On 2/27/2013 10:53 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:

On 2/27/13 10:16 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:



It was nearly 30 years ago I walked into a welfare office and

claimed paternity of my 6 month old daughter. They didn't know what to

do, had to call the home office LOL! So they took "mug" shots, and

fingerprints and told me that had never happened before. It took me

nearly ten years, but I paid the state back every penny with interest...

It was quite an experience and quite frankly, I have never regretted

that decision to give my girl, my name...



Your business is your business, but why were you subjected to mug shots

and fingerprints? Fathering a child, assuming both parents were of age,

is not a criminal act.



And, if the child was six months old when you claimed paternity, what

were you paying back for 10 years? Certainly not six months of

state-provided welfare payments.









Ok, I'll play, once... Mugshots and fingerprints, because they just

didn't know what else to do, they had "never had this happen before"

according to them.



The huge bill was because my first wife had birth issues, it was all

medical.. We never had the child on "welfare" after the birth... We were

young and it was her doctor seeing the coming problems, that told us to

put the mom on welfare until after the child was born so she would have

the best care... We were lucky we did.



Fair enough. I wasn't even aware you had a "first wife." You won't read

anything from me bringing this up again.


Most of us are more concerned about what he does here in this newsgroup than what he may or may not have done 20 or 30 years ago.
Besides, he's such a natural born liar that you'd have to hook him up to a polygraph machine before you could believe a word.