Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,588
Default How to give insecure right-wing males the sh*ts...

In article ,
says...

On 2/3/2013 8:49 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...

On 2/2/2013 8:13 PM,
wrote:
On Sat, 02 Feb 2013 11:58:33 -0500, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

On 2/2/2013 11:52 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...

On 2/2/2013 10:30 AM, ESAD wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...v=r0Be8LnuG3U#!

Be careful.. While you are burying your head in the sand pro choice, pro
gay rights conservatives are popping up all around you, we are more
libertarian than right. We are everywhere, democrats are fuked...

Oh, cool, I didn't know you were were pro gay rights. Let the marriages
begin!



You didn't know, because you just assume and argue.. Next time try
listening... But just to **** you off I will tell you that I support gay
rights, BECAUSE I am a Christian, not because I personally approve.

How can you adopt such a position, when the Mormon church has clearly
stated that acting upon same-sex attraction is a sin.

How can you be so stupid? I told you my position, I do not speak for the
Mormon Church.


But a sin is a sin. See you in hell.


...of that you can be sure.


Really? You are sure there is a hell HOW??
  #22   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2013
Posts: 457
Default How to give insecure right-wing males the sh*ts...

On Sat, 02 Feb 2013 21:26:21 -0500, wrote:

On Sat, 02 Feb 2013 21:08:45 -0500, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

On 2/2/2013 8:13 PM,
wrote:
On Sat, 02 Feb 2013 11:58:33 -0500, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

On 2/2/2013 11:52 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...

On 2/2/2013 10:30 AM, ESAD wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...v=r0Be8LnuG3U#!

Be careful.. While you are burying your head in the sand pro choice, pro
gay rights conservatives are popping up all around you, we are more
libertarian than right. We are everywhere, democrats are fuked...

Oh, cool, I didn't know you were were pro gay rights. Let the marriages
begin!



You didn't know, because you just assume and argue.. Next time try
listening... But just to **** you off I will tell you that I support gay
rights, BECAUSE I am a Christian, not because I personally approve.

How can you adopt such a position, when the Mormon church has clearly
stated that acting upon same-sex attraction is a sin.


How can you be so stupid? I told you my position, I do not speak for the
Mormon Church.


“What we do know is that the doctrine of the church – that sexual
activity should only occur between a man and a woman who are married –
has not changed and is not changing,” (Elder Quentin Cook)




C'mon, name calling?

You've made it clear that you are Mormon, yet you don't believe that
you should follow the Mormon teachings. That is about as confusing as
an atheist that believes in God.

And your response is name calling.


Why try to interject your feelings for religion into whether or not gays should have equal rights as
non-gays. Civil rights are civil rights. The Constitution doesn't distinguish between gays and
non-gays, both are entitled to the same protection under the law. That is not a religious issue.

However, gays who are 'unionized' are *not* living a 'marriage'. Meriam-Webster has it correct in
their primary definition:

Definition of MARRIAGE
1
a (1) : the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual
and contractual relationship recognized by law

....all rest is designed to appease the liberals.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument!

You know you live in a Country run by idiots if... You have to have your
parents signature to go on a school field trip but not to get an abortion.
  #23   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,370
Default How to give insecure right-wing males the sh*ts...

On 2/4/13 9:14 AM, Salmonbait wrote:

However, gays who are 'unionized' are *not* living a 'marriage'. Meriam-Webster has it correct in
their primary definition:

Definition of MARRIAGE
1
a (1) : the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual
and contractual relationship recognized by law


You are in no position by education or experience to determine the
validity of the definitions of words. And if you are going to "cite" a
dictionary, you might at least spell its name correctly.

*Meriam*-Webster, indeed. George and Charles Merriam are rolling in
their graves.

  #24   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,107
Default How to give insecure right-wing males the sh*ts...

On 2/4/2013 9:22 AM, ESAD wrote:
On 2/4/13 9:14 AM, Salmonbait wrote:

However, gays who are 'unionized' are *not* living a 'marriage'.
Meriam-Webster has it correct in
their primary definition:

Definition of MARRIAGE
1
a (1) : the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as
husband or wife in a consensual
and contractual relationship recognized by law


You are in no position by education or experience to determine the
validity of the definitions of words. And if you are going to "cite" a
dictionary, you might at least spell its name correctly.

*Meriam*-Webster, indeed. George and Charles Merriam are rolling in
their graves.

So, old wise one, are you conceding that Merriam's definition of the
word marriage is valid? The whole world is waiting for your
proclamation. ;-)
  #25   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,588
Default How to give insecure right-wing males the sh*ts...

In article ,
says...

On 2/4/13 9:14 AM, Salmonbait wrote:

However, gays who are 'unionized' are *not* living a 'marriage'. Meriam-Webster has it correct in
their primary definition:

Definition of MARRIAGE
1
a (1) : the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual
and contractual relationship recognized by law


You are in no position by education or experience to determine the
validity of the definitions of words. And if you are going to "cite" a
dictionary, you might at least spell its name correctly.

*Meriam*-Webster, indeed. George and Charles Merriam are rolling in
their graves.


Didn't have the balls to post the WHOLE definition, which is:

mar·riage noun \'mer-ij, 'ma-rij\

Definition of MARRIAGE

1
a (1) : the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as
husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized
by law (2) : the state of being united to a person of the same sex in a
relationship like that of a traditional marriage same-sex marriage
b : the mutual relation of married persons : wedlock
c : the institution whereby individuals are joined in a marriage
2
: an act of marrying or the rite by which the married status is
effected; especially : the wedding ceremony and attendant festivities or
formalities
3
: an intimate or close union the marriage of painting and poetry ? J.
T. Shawcross


  #26   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,588
Default How to give insecure right-wing males the sh*ts...

In article om,
says...

On 2/4/2013 9:22 AM, ESAD wrote:
On 2/4/13 9:14 AM, Salmonbait wrote:

However, gays who are 'unionized' are *not* living a 'marriage'.
Meriam-Webster has it correct in
their primary definition:

Definition of MARRIAGE
1
a (1) : the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as
husband or wife in a consensual
and contractual relationship recognized by law


You are in no position by education or experience to determine the
validity of the definitions of words. And if you are going to "cite" a
dictionary, you might at least spell its name correctly.

*Meriam*-Webster, indeed. George and Charles Merriam are rolling in
their graves.

So, old wise one, are you conceding that Merriam's definition of the
word marriage is valid? The whole world is waiting for your
proclamation. ;-)


Yes, the WHOLE definition is!!

mar·riage noun \'mer-ij, 'ma-rij\

Definition of MARRIAGE

1
a (1) : the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as
husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized
by law (2) : the state of being united to a person of the same sex in a
relationship like that of a traditional marriage same-sex marriage
b : the mutual relation of married persons : wedlock
c : the institution whereby individuals are joined in a marriage
2
: an act of marrying or the rite by which the married status is
effected; especially : the wedding ceremony and attendant festivities or
formalities
3
: an intimate or close union the marriage of painting and poetry ? J.
T. Shawcross
  #27   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,370
Default How to give insecure right-wing males the sh*ts...

On 2/4/13 10:02 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 2/4/13 9:14 AM, Salmonbait wrote:

However, gays who are 'unionized' are *not* living a 'marriage'. Meriam-Webster has it correct in
their primary definition:

Definition of MARRIAGE
1
a (1) : the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual
and contractual relationship recognized by law


You are in no position by education or experience to determine the
validity of the definitions of words. And if you are going to "cite" a
dictionary, you might at least spell its name correctly.

*Meriam*-Webster, indeed. George and Charles Merriam are rolling in
their graves.


Didn't have the balls to post the WHOLE definition, which is:

mar·riage noun \'mer-ij, 'ma-rij\

Definition of MARRIAGE

1
a (1) : the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as
husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized
by law (2) : the state of being united to a person of the same sex in a
relationship like that of a traditional marriage same-sex marriage
b : the mutual relation of married persons : wedlock
c : the institution whereby individuals are joined in a marriage
2
: an act of marrying or the rite by which the married status is
effected; especially : the wedding ceremony and attendant festivities or
formalities
3
: an intimate or close union the marriage of painting and poetry ? J.
T. Shawcross



Herring's offering is not even a definition from a recognized
unabridged dictionary.
  #28   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,107
Default How to give insecure right-wing males the sh*ts...

On 2/4/2013 10:06 AM, ESAD wrote:
On 2/4/13 10:02 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 2/4/13 9:14 AM, Salmonbait wrote:

However, gays who are 'unionized' are *not* living a 'marriage'.
Meriam-Webster has it correct in
their primary definition:

Definition of MARRIAGE
1
a (1) : the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as
husband or wife in a consensual
and contractual relationship recognized by law

You are in no position by education or experience to determine the
validity of the definitions of words. And if you are going to "cite" a
dictionary, you might at least spell its name correctly.

*Meriam*-Webster, indeed. George and Charles Merriam are rolling in
their graves.


Didn't have the balls to post the WHOLE definition, which is:

mar·riage noun \'mer-ij, 'ma-rij\

Definition of MARRIAGE

1
a (1) : the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as
husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized
by law (2) : the state of being united to a person of the same sex in a
relationship like that of a traditional marriage same-sex marriage
b : the mutual relation of married persons : wedlock
c : the institution whereby individuals are joined in a marriage
2
: an act of marrying or the rite by which the married status is
effected; especially : the wedding ceremony and attendant festivities or
formalities
3
: an intimate or close union the marriage of painting and poetry ? J.
T. Shawcross



Herring's offering is not even a definition from a recognized unabridged
dictionary.


It's a universally accepted definition. However, a few corn holers and
progressives might take exception to it.
  #29   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,588
Default How to give insecure right-wing males the sh*ts...

In article m,
says...

On 2/4/2013 10:06 AM, ESAD wrote:
On 2/4/13 10:02 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 2/4/13 9:14 AM, Salmonbait wrote:

However, gays who are 'unionized' are *not* living a 'marriage'.
Meriam-Webster has it correct in
their primary definition:

Definition of MARRIAGE
1
a (1) : the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as
husband or wife in a consensual
and contractual relationship recognized by law

You are in no position by education or experience to determine the
validity of the definitions of words. And if you are going to "cite" a
dictionary, you might at least spell its name correctly.

*Meriam*-Webster, indeed. George and Charles Merriam are rolling in
their graves.

Didn't have the balls to post the WHOLE definition, which is:

mar·riage noun \'mer-ij, 'ma-rij\

Definition of MARRIAGE

1
a (1) : the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as
husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized
by law (2) : the state of being united to a person of the same sex in a
relationship like that of a traditional marriage same-sex marriage
b : the mutual relation of married persons : wedlock
c : the institution whereby individuals are joined in a marriage
2
: an act of marrying or the rite by which the married status is
effected; especially : the wedding ceremony and attendant festivities or
formalities
3
: an intimate or close union the marriage of painting and poetry ? J.
T. Shawcross



Herring's offering is not even a definition from a recognized unabridged
dictionary.


It's a universally accepted definition. However, a few corn holers and
progressives might take exception to it.


"corn holers" because they believe a dictionary over Herring??
  #30   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2011
Posts: 541
Default How to give insecure right-wing males the sh*ts...

On 2/2/2013 10:47 AM, ESAD wrote:

Gays don't try to force non-gay members of society to conform to their
practices or beliefs.

Gays don't try to force "creationism" and other "stuporstitious" beliefs
onto gullible school children.


The ones in the priesthood certainly have.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
hi lols looking for real males Shakia Hopp General 0 October 29th 11 01:00 PM
Right wing strikes again... jps General 4 July 23rd 11 06:16 PM
New Fixed Wing Joe Cruising 10 November 11th 09 01:38 AM
Right Wing loses, Left Wing Wins Big H K[_3_] General 0 July 13th 09 11:58 AM
For red-blooded males, not conservative republicans HK General 5 February 7th 09 01:46 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017