On 1/30/2013 8:21 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 12:54:05 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

Invalid premise HOW, dip****? Zimmerman took after the kid, did you
happen to hear, and thus understand the 911 tapes??? What is wrong with
making correct and true statements again?

Nobody who was there has ever said anything but that Zimmerman was
following Martin and that he had lost sight of him until Martin
approached Zimmerman.,
Everyone else is only guessing.


MY point proven again.. this is getting old. Words have meaning,
"accosted" was used in this case to deliberately set a false narrative
that thinking folks just shouldn't stipulate to. There is no evidence,
or even credible suggestion that Zimmerman "accosted" Martin, it's a
lie, it's a loogism.. Period.

In article ,
says...

On 1/30/2013 8:21 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 12:54:05 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

Invalid premise HOW, dip****? Zimmerman took after the kid, did you
happen to hear, and thus understand the 911 tapes??? What is wrong with
making correct and true statements again?

Nobody who was there has ever said anything but that Zimmerman was
following Martin and that he had lost sight of him until Martin
approached Zimmerman.,
Everyone else is only guessing.


MY point proven again.. this is getting old. Words have meaning,
"accosted" was used in this case to deliberately set a false narrative
that thinking folks just shouldn't stipulate to. There is no evidence,
or even credible suggestion that Zimmerman "accosted" Martin, it's a
lie, it's a loogism.. Period.

He was "accosted" by Zimmerman, Zimmerman is heard on the 911 tapes
saying he is going to follow him.

On 1/31/2013 8:34 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 1/30/2013 8:21 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 12:54:05 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

Invalid premise HOW, dip****? Zimmerman took after the kid, did you
happen to hear, and thus understand the 911 tapes??? What is wrong with
making correct and true statements again?

Nobody who was there has ever said anything but that Zimmerman was
following Martin and that he had lost sight of him until Martin
approached Zimmerman.,
Everyone else is only guessing.


MY point proven again.. this is getting old. Words have meaning,
"accosted" was used in this case to deliberately set a false narrative
that thinking folks just shouldn't stipulate to. There is no evidence,
or even credible suggestion that Zimmerman "accosted" Martin, it's a
lie, it's a loogism.. Period.

He was "accosted" by Zimmerman,

No he wasn't, not one piece of evidenct to prove that. Words have
meaning, at most he was watched by Zimmerman...

Zimmerman is heard on the 911 tapes
saying he is going to follow him.

In article ,
says...

On 1/31/2013 8:34 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 1/30/2013 8:21 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 12:54:05 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

Invalid premise HOW, dip****? Zimmerman took after the kid, did you
happen to hear, and thus understand the 911 tapes??? What is wrong with
making correct and true statements again?

Nobody who was there has ever said anything but that Zimmerman was
following Martin and that he had lost sight of him until Martin
approached Zimmerman.,
Everyone else is only guessing.


MY point proven again.. this is getting old. Words have meaning,
"accosted" was used in this case to deliberately set a false narrative
that thinking folks just shouldn't stipulate to. There is no evidence,
or even credible suggestion that Zimmerman "accosted" Martin, it's a
lie, it's a loogism.. Period.

He was "accosted" by Zimmerman,

No he wasn't, not one piece of evidenct to prove that. Words have
meaning, at most he was watched by Zimmerman...

Zimmerman is heard on the 911 tapes
saying he is going to follow him.


Ever see this, idiot?

http://bcclist.com/2012/03/27/trayvo...zimmerman-map/

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 10:15:16 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:


Ever see this?

http://bcclist.com/2012/03/27/trayvo...zimmerman-map/

I saw the Oliver Stone JFK movie too, that doesn't mean it is true.

Where is the Zapruder film?

On 1/31/2013 12:12 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:34:17 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:



He was "accosted" by Zimmerman, Zimmerman is heard on the 911 tapes
saying he is going to follow him.

There is a big difference between following someone and accosting
them.


Exactly.

In article ,
says...

On 1/31/2013 12:12 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:34:17 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:



He was "accosted" by Zimmerman, Zimmerman is heard on the 911 tapes
saying he is going to follow him.

There is a big difference between following someone and accosting
them.


Exactly.

http://tinyurl.com/7vxtvg8

Moron. Are you really as stupid as you position yourself here or are you
just toying with everyone? I ask because you may very well be the
dumbest person I've ever encountered.

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:34:17 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:



He was "accosted" by Zimmerman, Zimmerman is heard on the 911 tapes
saying he is going to follow him.

There is a big difference between following someone and accosting
them.

Here you go:

http://tinyurl.com/7vxtvg8