In article ,
says...

On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 16:49:39 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/27/13 1:57 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 13:06:51 -0500, Salmonbait
wrote:

...doesn't mention silencers or flash suppressors, or did I miss something?

http://tinyurl.com/a883sb7


Salmonbait

As usual from this gun dumb bimbo

Please. She's neither dumb nor a bimbo. You're simply on different
sides. It's not like she's crazy like Wayne LaPierre.

She doesn't seem to know much about the guns she wants to ban.

Probably not. It doesn't take an expert to see that we have a huge gun
violence problem in the U.S. though.


Does one have to be an expert in nuclear fusion to know that a
thermonuclear bomb kills a lot of innocent people when used.

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 10:21:21 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...


She doesn't seem to know much about the guns she wants to ban.

Probably not. It doesn't take an expert to see that we have a huge gun
violence problem in the U.S. though.

But this is handgun violence, not rifles, assault or otherwise.
Twice as many people were killed by people with their bare hands than
people with a rifle and you think "unarmed" people are harmless.

Where did I say that I think unarmed people are harmless?? But, please
give cite to that notion about twice as many people killed with "bare
hands than people with a rifle"... How about school aged children?

This legislation is as cosmetic as the features on the guns they want
to ban. The reality is it will sell MORE guns.

And silencers, don't forget those, the NRA wants them to keep children's
hearing loss at bay!!



Does one have to be an expert in nuclear fusion to know that a
thermonuclear bomb kills a lot of innocent people when used.

... yet even in the only war where they were used, the conventional
air raids killed a lot more people in the same length of time.
The fire bombing of Tokyo 9-10 March 1945 was far more deadly than
Hiroshima or Nagasaki..

So?

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:53:29 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

here did I say that I think unarmed people are harmless??

Trayvonn Martin

Cite?

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 16:19:10 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:53:29 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

here did I say that I think unarmed people are harmless??

Trayvonn Martin

Cite?

How many times did you write that Martin was only armed with Iced Tea
and Skittles?

Several, why? You said that *I* said that "unarmed people are harmless",
that is bull**** and a lie.

On 1/29/2013 9:18 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 16:19:10 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:53:29 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

here did I say that I think unarmed people are harmless??

Trayvonn Martin

Cite?

How many times did you write that Martin was only armed with Iced Tea
and Skittles?

Several, why? You said that *I* said that "unarmed people are harmless",
that is bull**** and a lie.


Ohhh, the big karate boy.. soooo tough.. LOL!

In article ,
says...

On 1/29/2013 9:18 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 16:19:10 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:53:29 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

here did I say that I think unarmed people are harmless??

Trayvonn Martin

Cite?

How many times did you write that Martin was only armed with Iced Tea
and Skittles?

Several, why? You said that *I* said that "unarmed people are harmless",
that is bull**** and a lie.


Ohhh, the big karate boy.. soooo tough.. LOL!

WTF are you babbling about NOW???? I didn't know Trayvon Martin knew
karate, cite?

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 09:18:16 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 16:19:10 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:53:29 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

here did I say that I think unarmed people are harmless??

Trayvonn Martin

Cite?

How many times did you write that Martin was only armed with Iced Tea
and Skittles?

Several, why? You said that *I* said that "unarmed people are harmless",
that is bull**** and a lie.

I really do not feel like digging through a couple hundred Trayvon
Martin posts for quotes but it is encouraging that now you agree
Trayvon did present a credible threat of bodily harm. We are making
progress.

Right....

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 11:44:12 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 09:18:16 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 16:19:10 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:53:29 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

here did I say that I think unarmed people are harmless??

Trayvonn Martin

Cite?

How many times did you write that Martin was only armed with Iced Tea
and Skittles?

Several, why? You said that *I* said that "unarmed people are harmless",
that is bull**** and a lie.

I really do not feel like digging through a couple hundred Trayvon
Martin posts for quotes but it is encouraging that now you agree
Trayvon did present a credible threat of bodily harm. We are making
progress.

Right....

Yes I am

Show me.

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 14:19:53 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,

I really do not feel like digging through a couple hundred Trayvon
Martin posts for quotes but it is encouraging that now you agree
Trayvon did present a credible threat of bodily harm. We are making
progress.

Right....

Yes I am

Show me.

OK

http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/u...ot-620x410.jpg
http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/u...immerman-6.jpg

And that proves that *I* said, as you originally stated, that *I* said
that an unarmed man is not a threat how? You're trying really hard to
deny that you accused me of saying something that I never, ever said,
that's for sure.

On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 14:58:57 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 14:19:53 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,

I really do not feel like digging through a couple hundred Trayvon
Martin posts for quotes but it is encouraging that now you agree
Trayvon did present a credible threat of bodily harm. We are making
progress.

Right....

Yes I am

Show me.

OK

http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/u...ot-620x410.jpg
http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/u...immerman-6.jpg



Wow! You've got the boy doing some fancy tap-dancing!


Salmonbait

--

'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument!