wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 16:58:40 -0500, ESAD wrote:

I'm sort of recalling a phrase from our junior high pre-gym physicals,
in which the doc called in for the day said something like "bend over
and cough." Or maybe turn your head and cough. It isn't my best memory
from more than 50 years ago.

Coach Sandusky? ;-)

There were suspicions... 😄

On 1/15/2013 6:19 PM, ESAD wrote:
On 1/15/13 6:13 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 16:47:49 -0500, ESAD wrote:

The ghettos in this country existed long before the war on poverty, and
most of the people who you are targeting weren't allowed to live
elsewhere or get training for decent jobs.

What percentage of the people in DC were below the poverty level in
1964 and what is that percentage now?
The big city is the absolute worst place to expect to find jobs for
moderately skilled labor. The available labor force far exceeds the
number of food service, maid and trash collector jobs available,



Yeah, isn't it sad that "whitey" for so long in the DC suburbs (and in
other suburbs) had "restrictions" that kept moderately skilled works of
color from moving near the locus of decent jobs?

CITE!

In article 6720f309-41e1-4e93-8cde-1d0390020874
@w3g2000yqj.googlegroups.com, says...

Bend over and cough?

I thought the phrase was 'Turn your head and cough?'

Harry, are you sure you've had a physical lately

Apparently not one that he enjoyed!

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 16:14:26 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 13:36:49 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

Ghettos are exclusive to Democrats?? You are nothing short of a narrow
minded idiot!!!

Ghettos are a product of the war on poverty. They dumped huge amounts
of money in the inner cities and people moved toward that money. We
ended up with a massive pool of unskilled labor in a place with very
little market for it. (except in the criminal enterprises)

They would have done a lot better to spread the money evenly across
the country and letting the poor people disperse or simply get aid
where they were.

In that regard, democrats have certainly benefitted from, the
concentrations of welfare recipients in the big cities. Virtually all
of them are governed by democratic legislatures.

Are you SERIOUS????? There weren't ghettos before this war on
poverty??????

Find one cite that says the concentration of poor people in inner
cities was greater before the late 60s than it is now.

You didn't say that, you said "Ghettos are a product of the war on
poverty". That's pure bull****.

But even before that, I asked "ghettos are exclusive to
Democrats?"

Is there a ghetto with a republican representative?

Historically YES.

Now, please give cite that the ghettos are a direct product of the "war
on poverty"......

Before the 60s, these areas were home to the working poor, now there
are far more unemployed people than employed people (at least people
working on a W-2 job)

Please give cite.

http://www.encyclopedia.com/topic/ghetto.aspx

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 16:47:49 -0500, ESAD wrote:

The ghettos in this country existed long before the war on poverty, and
most of the people who you are targeting weren't allowed to live
elsewhere or get training for decent jobs.

What percentage of the people in DC were below the poverty level in
1964 and what is that percentage now?

What does that have to do with your assertion there ghettos are a result
of affirmative action?

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 16:58:40 -0500, ESAD wrote:

I'm sort of recalling a phrase from our junior high pre-gym physicals,
in which the doc called in for the day said something like "bend over
and cough." Or maybe turn your head and cough. It isn't my best memory
from more than 50 years ago.

Coach Sandusky? ;-)

Harry thought that was an awful thick finger!!

On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 16:47:49 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/15/13 2:53 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 13:36:49 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

Ghettos are exclusive to Democrats?? You are nothing short of a narrow
minded idiot!!!

Ghettos are a product of the war on poverty. They dumped huge amounts
of money in the inner cities and people moved toward that money. We
ended up with a massive pool of unskilled labor in a place with very
little market for it. (except in the criminal enterprises)

They would have done a lot better to spread the money evenly across
the country and letting the poor people disperse or simply get aid
where they were.

In that regard, democrats have certainly benefitted from, the
concentrations of welfare recipients in the big cities. Virtually all
of them are governed by democratic legislatures.


The ghettos in this country existed long before the war on poverty, and
most of the people who you are targeting weren't allowed to live
elsewhere or get training for decent jobs.

Perhaps the big cities would have more disparity of governing if the
Republicans weren't such racists.

How long have the corrupt Democrats been running the ghettos, ESAD?

Detroit has not had a Republican mayor for over 40 years - yet you blame the problem on Republicans?

Here, try this: http://tinyurl.com/o42at


Salmonbait

--

'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument!

On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 09:40:45 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 16:47:49 -0500, ESAD wrote:

The ghettos in this country existed long before the war on poverty, and
most of the people who you are targeting weren't allowed to live
elsewhere or get training for decent jobs.

What percentage of the people in DC were below the poverty level in
1964 and what is that percentage now?

What does that have to do with your assertion there ghettos are a result
of affirmative action?


Here, this should answer your questions regarding the continuance of ghettos:

The Democrats have contributed greatly to the poor - by keeping them
poor.

Interesting........
City, State, % of People Below the Poverty Level
1. Detroit, MI 32.5%
2. Buffalo, NY 29..9%
3. Cincinnati, OH 27.8%
4. Cleveland, OH 27.0%
5. Miami, FL 26.9%
5. St. Louis, MO 26.8%
7. El Paso, TX 26.4%
8. Milwaukee, WI 26.2%
9. Philadelphia, PA 25.1%
10. Newark, NJ 24.2%
U.S. Census Bureau, 2006 American Community Survey, August 2007

What do the top ten cities (over 250,000) with the highest poverty
rate all have in common? Democrat mayors.


Detroit, MI (1st on the poverty rate list) hasn't elected a
Republican mayor since 1961;


Buffalo, NY (2nd) hasn't elected one since 1954;

Cincinnati, OH (3rd)...since 1984;

Cleveland, OH (4th)...since 1989;

Miami, FL (5th) has never had a Republican mayor;

St. Louis, MO (6th)....since 1949;

El Paso, TX (7th) has never had a Republican mayor;

Milwaukee, WI (8th)...since 1908;

Philadelphia, PA (9th)...since 1952;

Newark, NJ (10th)...since 1907.

Einstein once said, 'The definition of insanity is doing the same
thing over and over again and expecting different results.'


Salmonbait

--

'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument!

On 1/16/13 10:32 AM, Salmonbait wrote:

Detroit has not had a Republican mayor for over 40 years - yet you blame the problem on Republicans?



Salmonbait


The fact that you keep repeating the same bull**** doesn't make it
correct or smell better.

On 1/16/2013 10:32 AM, Salmonbait wrote:


Perhaps the big cities would have more disparity of governing if the
Republicans weren't such racists.

Your statement is bogus, as it is built on the false narrative that
republicans are racist, when so obviously it's the democrats who are
intolerant and racist...



How long have the corrupt Democrats been running the ghettos, ESAD?

Detroit has not had a Republican mayor for over 40 years - yet you blame the problem on Republicans?

Here, try this: http://tinyurl.com/o42at


Salmonbait


His question was invalid.