In article ,
says...

On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 16:12:57 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 12:08:46 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 09:40:45 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 16:47:49 -0500, ESAD wrote:

The ghettos in this country existed long before the war on poverty, and
most of the people who you are targeting weren't allowed to live
elsewhere or get training for decent jobs.

What percentage of the people in DC were below the poverty level in
1964 and what is that percentage now?

What does that have to do with your assertion there ghettos are a result
of affirmative action?


Here, this should answer your questions regarding the continuance of ghettos:

The Democrats have contributed greatly to the poor - by keeping them
poor.

Interesting........
City, State, % of People Below the Poverty Level
1. Detroit, MI 32.5%
2. Buffalo, NY 29..9%
3. Cincinnati, OH 27.8%
4. Cleveland, OH 27.0%
5. Miami, FL 26.9%
5. St. Louis, MO 26.8%
7. El Paso, TX 26.4%
8. Milwaukee, WI 26.2%
9. Philadelphia, PA 25.1%
10. Newark, NJ 24.2%
U.S. Census Bureau, 2006 American Community Survey, August 2007

What do the top ten cities (over 250,000) with the highest poverty
rate all have in common? Democrat mayors.


Detroit, MI (1st on the poverty rate list) hasn't elected a
Republican mayor since 1961;


Buffalo, NY (2nd) hasn't elected one since 1954;

Cincinnati, OH (3rd)...since 1984;

Cleveland, OH (4th)...since 1989;

Miami, FL (5th) has never had a Republican mayor;

St. Louis, MO (6th)....since 1949;

El Paso, TX (7th) has never had a Republican mayor;

Milwaukee, WI (8th)...since 1908;

Philadelphia, PA (9th)...since 1952;

Newark, NJ (10th)...since 1907.

Einstein once said, 'The definition of insanity is doing the same
thing over and over again and expecting different results.'


Salmonbait

Man you are stupid. I'll try ONE MORE TIME.... Please show where
"ghettos are a product of affirmative action?" Ghettos have been a part
of the U.S. for ever.

Did I say "ghettos are a product of affirmative action?"

I'll let you decide.

http://tinyurl.com/o42at


Salmonbait

THAT is what this discussion is about, moron!!!! Plus, you answered MY
question which was "What does that have to do with your assertion there
ghettos are a result of affirmative action?" Please, I know you are
narrow minded and unable to think outside of what FOX tells you, but try
to keep up if you are going to interject.

I never mentioned affirmative action, nor was that the subject of this discussion.

Jeees, it must be really dark up there.


Salmonbait

Once again, the most narrow minded person on usenet talking to others
about being "dark up there".... How ironic.

In article ,
says...

"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 12:08:46 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 09:40:45 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 16:47:49 -0500, ESAD wrote:

The ghettos in this country existed long before the war on poverty,
and
most of the people who you are targeting weren't allowed to live
elsewhere or get training for decent jobs.

What percentage of the people in DC were below the poverty level in
1964 and what is that percentage now?

What does that have to do with your assertion there ghettos are a
result
of affirmative action?


Here, this should answer your questions regarding the continuance of
ghettos:

The Democrats have contributed greatly to the poor - by keeping them
poor.

Interesting........
City, State, % of People Below the Poverty Level
1. Detroit, MI 32.5%
2. Buffalo, NY 29..9%
3. Cincinnati, OH 27.8%
4. Cleveland, OH 27.0%
5. Miami, FL 26.9%
5. St. Louis, MO 26.8%
7. El Paso, TX 26.4%
8. Milwaukee, WI 26.2%
9. Philadelphia, PA 25.1%
10. Newark, NJ 24.2%
U.S. Census Bureau, 2006 American Community Survey, August 2007

What do the top ten cities (over 250,000) with the highest poverty
rate all have in common? Democrat mayors.


Detroit, MI (1st on the poverty rate list) hasn't elected a
Republican mayor since 1961;


Buffalo, NY (2nd) hasn't elected one since 1954;

Cincinnati, OH (3rd)...since 1984;

Cleveland, OH (4th)...since 1989;

Miami, FL (5th) has never had a Republican mayor;

St. Louis, MO (6th)....since 1949;

El Paso, TX (7th) has never had a Republican mayor;

Milwaukee, WI (8th)...since 1908;

Philadelphia, PA (9th)...since 1952;

Newark, NJ (10th)...since 1907.

Einstein once said, 'The definition of insanity is doing the same
thing over and over again and expecting different results.'


Salmonbait

Man you are stupid. I'll try ONE MORE TIME.... Please show where
"ghettos are a product of affirmative action?" Ghettos have been a part
of the U.S. for ever.

Did I say "ghettos are a product of affirmative action?"

I'll let you decide.

http://tinyurl.com/o42at


Salmonbait

THAT is what this discussion is about, moron!!!! Plus, you answered MY
question which was "What does that have to do with your assertion there
ghettos are a result of affirmative action?" Please, I know you are
narrow minded and unable to think outside of what FOX tells you, but try
to keep up if you are going to interject.


---------------

There have been ghettos for a long time. Jews in Europe were in Jewish
ghettos. Here we did not have the extreme poverty level ghettos until the
civil rights act of 1964. Had lots of great items, but paying more per
unwed mother per child was not one of the high points. The blacks were
poorer than whites, but they overall had jobs. Most of the blacks in
Detroit, DC, and other large cities jobs now are collecting welfare. And
have a huge school dropout rate. 6x-7x middle class kids. Chicago has
something like a 74% drop out rate for male blacks. How are they going to
even get a job at McDonalds with that background?

Didn't have the extreme poverty level until 1964???? Are you
serious??????

Have you ever heard or studied about the Industrial Revolution???

In article ,
says...

On 17 Jan 2013 00:22:37 GMT, ESAD wrote:



Your claim that we did not have extreme poverty until the Civil Rights Act
of 1964 is absolutely absurd. If you believe that you have no idea of the
history of the lower income classes in this country. I don't believe you
said that.

It is not the number that is in question here, it is the
concentration.
When you pack that many desperate people in a small area, nothing good
can come of it. The lawless prey on the ones who are just trying to
get by, the school;s are **** so getting out is tough and they are
surrounded by some of the highest cost of living areas in the world so
there is no moving a few miles away. They can't ever afford it.
Unfortunately if they move anywhere different major parts of their
assistance is cut off so it is a trap.
If the money followed the person instead of being doled out of a
trough in the inner city, you might see a lot more dispersal.

In that regard, the way we run the war on poverty is racist.
Congressmen out in flyover country don't want "those people" so they
use the war on poverty money to pay them to move to the big city.

It still would make a lot more sense to get back to "welfare to work"
programs (a Clinton idea). Unfortunately any job most of these people
could do, is being done by an immigrant for less than the welfare pays
and not a living wage within several hundred miles of the ghetto they
live in.

Ever hear of the Industrial Revolution and it's ensuing living
conditions?

In article , says...

On 1/16/2013 6:33 PM, Califbill wrote:
"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 12:08:46 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 09:40:45 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 16:47:49 -0500, ESAD wrote:

The ghettos in this country existed long before the war on
poverty, and
most of the people who you are targeting weren't allowed to live
elsewhere or get training for decent jobs.

What percentage of the people in DC were below the poverty
level in
1964 and what is that percentage now?

What does that have to do with your assertion there ghettos are a
result
of affirmative action?


Here, this should answer your questions regarding the continuance
of ghettos:

The Democrats have contributed greatly to the poor - by keeping them
poor.

Interesting........
City, State, % of People Below the Poverty Level
1. Detroit, MI 32.5%
2. Buffalo, NY 29..9%
3. Cincinnati, OH 27.8%
4. Cleveland, OH 27.0%
5. Miami, FL 26.9%
5. St. Louis, MO 26.8%
7. El Paso, TX 26.4%
8. Milwaukee, WI 26.2%
9. Philadelphia, PA 25.1%
10. Newark, NJ 24.2%
U.S. Census Bureau, 2006 American Community Survey, August 2007

What do the top ten cities (over 250,000) with the highest poverty
rate all have in common? Democrat mayors.


Detroit, MI (1st on the poverty rate list) hasn't elected a
Republican mayor since 1961;


Buffalo, NY (2nd) hasn't elected one since 1954;

Cincinnati, OH (3rd)...since 1984;

Cleveland, OH (4th)...since 1989;

Miami, FL (5th) has never had a Republican mayor;

St. Louis, MO (6th)....since 1949;

El Paso, TX (7th) has never had a Republican mayor;

Milwaukee, WI (8th)...since 1908;

Philadelphia, PA (9th)...since 1952;

Newark, NJ (10th)...since 1907.

Einstein once said, 'The definition of insanity is doing the same
thing over and over again and expecting different results.'


Salmonbait

Man you are stupid. I'll try ONE MORE TIME.... Please show where
"ghettos are a product of affirmative action?" Ghettos have been a part
of the U.S. for ever.

Did I say "ghettos are a product of affirmative action?"

I'll let you decide.

http://tinyurl.com/o42at


Salmonbait

THAT is what this discussion is about, moron!!!! Plus, you answered MY
question which was "What does that have to do with your assertion there
ghettos are a result of affirmative action?" Please, I know you are
narrow minded and unable to think outside of what FOX tells you, but try
to keep up if you are going to interject.


---------------

There have been ghettos for a long time. Jews in Europe were in Jewish
ghettos. Here we did not have the extreme poverty level ghettos until
the civil rights act of 1964. Had lots of great items, but paying more
per unwed mother per child was not one of the high points. The blacks
were poorer than whites, but they overall had jobs. Most of the blacks
in Detroit, DC, and other large cities jobs now are collecting welfare.
And have a huge school dropout rate. 6x-7x middle class kids. Chicago
has something like a 74% drop out rate for male blacks. How are they
going to even get a job at McDonalds with that background?


When I was little, the ghettos were not strictly black and hispanic...
1964 changed that..

Bull****.

On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:26:43 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/16/13 5:24 PM, Salmonbait wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:09:34 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/16/13 5:06 PM, Salmonbait wrote:

Jeees, it must be really dark up there.



"Dark." Is that another code word you use to express your hatred towards
non-whites?

Actually it had to do with the absence of light in a portion of one's digestive tract.

More likely, it had to do with your black soul. You have followed your
party from right-wing conservatism to bat**** crazy right wing
anti-American racism. You seem to be on the verge of full-blown dementia.

As noted below.


Salmonbait

--

'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument!

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:26:43 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/16/13 5:24 PM, Salmonbait wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:09:34 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/16/13 5:06 PM, Salmonbait wrote:

Jeees, it must be really dark up there.



"Dark." Is that another code word you use to express your hatred towards
non-whites?

Actually it had to do with the absence of light in a portion of one's digestive tract.

More likely, it had to do with your black soul. You have followed your
party from right-wing conservatism to bat**** crazy right wing
anti-American racism. You seem to be on the verge of full-blown dementia.

As noted below.


Salmonbait

What name were you called?

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 09:17:11 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

Ever hear of the Industrial Revolution and it's ensuing living
conditions?

What's your point?

Ghettos were in existence long before the war on poverty. Now remember,
you said that ghettos were a result of that war on poverty. Wrongly.

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 11:12:56 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 09:17:11 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

Ever hear of the Industrial Revolution and it's ensuing living
conditions?

What's your point?

Ghettos were in existence long before the war on poverty. Now remember,
you said that ghettos were a result of that war on poverty. Wrongly.

The war on poverty did consolidate more poor people in the cities and
create zones where nobody works. That is different..

Please show me a "zone where nobody works"...

On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 13:07:00 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 11:12:56 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 09:17:11 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

Ever hear of the Industrial Revolution and it's ensuing living
conditions?

What's your point?

Ghettos were in existence long before the war on poverty. Now remember,
you said that ghettos were a result of that war on poverty. Wrongly.

The war on poverty did consolidate more poor people in the cities and
create zones where nobody works. That is different..

Please show me a "zone where nobody works"...

As you wish, Kevin.

http://tinyurl.com/y9vj366


Salmonbait

--

'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument!

On 1/17/13 5:06 PM, Salmonbait wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 13:07:00 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

Please show me a "zone where nobody works"...

As you wish, Kevin.

http://tinyurl.com/y9vj366


Salmonbait

--

'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument!


Is that a URL of your house, Herring? After all, no one works at your
house.