On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 08:47:47 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/15/13 8:39 AM, Salmonbait wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 20:44:48 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/14/13 7:03 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:26:29 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/14/13 4:14 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 13/01/2013 5:46 PM, ESAD wrote:
...you've heard every dumb thing about sex you could possibly here,
along comes...

Stacey Campfield, a Republican state senator in Tenneseee. In a January
2012 interview with Michelangelo Signorile, he stated "most people
realize that AIDS came from the homosexual community – it was one guy
screwing a monkey, if I recall correctly, and then having sex with men.
It was an airline pilot, if I recall.... My understanding is that it is
virtually – not completely, but virtually – impossible to contract AIDS
through heterosexual sex...very rarely [transmitted]."[28][29] He later
quoted the odds of heterosexual vaginal transmission at 1 in 5 million.

I would bet Stacey Campfield is also a religious idiot, as you have to
set aside rationality.

But she is sort of right, just has the numbers wrong. I would bet
normal heterosexual vaginal contact of uninfected with infected is much
higher than 1 in 5 million. But it is far less likely than anal sex.
This is a politically incorrect to discuss, but is a fact. To be
correct, #1 method of getting AIDS/HIV is anal sex, yes, poop shoot sex
is the number one way.

No way around it, dipping it in the sh't is where diseases concentrate.



I think it is a bit more complicated.

Anal sex in itself doesn't cause the transmission of the HIV virus.
The HIV virus can be transferred via vaginal intercourse, anal sex, oral
sex, as well as needle sharing and blood transfusions, and by
vaginal-penile sex with a woman with the virus who is menstruating.

Anal transmission of the HIV virus would seem to depend upon infected
blood in the feces or in an anal passageway with hemorrhoids.

As for the rate of incidence, there probably are valid surveys somewhere
on line.

I suggest you use a lot of lube when you mess around with your fellow
right-wingers.

It is accurate that there is a gay connection to most AIDS cases tho,
either by needles, hookers, direct gay-ga, relationships or supposedly
straight people having "down low" sex with other guys then bringing it
home.



It is more accurate to say that the majority of AIDs cases result from
unprotected sex.

It is more accurate to say that the majority of AIDS cases result from unprotected *anal* sex.

No need to be so protective of your fellow liberal fudge packers.

Salmonbait


The majority of HIV/AIDs cases these days are the result of unprotected
*heterosexual* sex, which includes vaginal, oral, and rectal contact.
The key factor is "unprotected sex," not the point of entry.

You are such a typical rightie...so ignorant, so full of hate.


http://www.aidsmap.com/HIV-transmission-risk-during-anal-sex-18-times-higher-than-during-vaginal-sex/page/1446187/

or: http://tinyurl.com/cbkdu8j

Now STFU, ESAD.


Salmonbait

--

**Those who think they can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government
take care of them better take a closer look at the American Indian.**