|
So, Scotty is against Sany aid....so....
|
So, Scotty is against Sany aid....so....
On 1/6/13 10:53 AM, JustWait wrote:
Bull****... Show me the post where somebody besides harry or don said "it's not a problem". You lie, but it's what I expect from a progressive anyway.. If I see a URL that interests me and it looks "broken," (such as a space in the wrong place or a two line URL that isn't going to work), I have the necessary "skills" to resolve the issue, and we're not talking about complex skills being needed. The fact is, you are ignorant and lazy. Period. |
So, Scotty is against Sany aid....so....
|
So, Scotty is against Sany aid....so....
On 1/6/2013 10:15 AM, Salmon Bait wrote:
On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 09:33:11 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: That's odd, Mr. Internet Guru.... I use the same reader as you, and I have no problems! And of course, name calling is what happens when you have been found, once again, to be a complete idiot. How Harryesque. Notice, if you will, the only ones to have trouble with the links I provide are you, Greg and Meyer.... Everyone else says it's not a problem!!! Hmmmmmm? The use of http://tinyurl.com/ would make the process so much easier. Put the button in your browser tool bar, and life is quite simple. Check out the link below to see how much trouble is saved - no copying, no pasting, just a quick click or double-click, depending on your news reader. http://tinyurl.com/o42at I think we should ask him for cites from "everyone else" |
So, Scotty is against Sany aid....so....
|
So, Scotty is against Sany aid....so....
On 1/6/2013 1:21 PM, Meyer wrote:
On 1/6/2013 10:15 AM, Salmon Bait wrote: On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 09:33:11 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: That's odd, Mr. Internet Guru.... I use the same reader as you, and I have no problems! And of course, name calling is what happens when you have been found, once again, to be a complete idiot. How Harryesque. Notice, if you will, the only ones to have trouble with the links I provide are you, Greg and Meyer.... Everyone else says it's not a problem!!! Hmmmmmm? The use of http://tinyurl.com/ would make the process so much easier. Put the button in your browser tool bar, and life is quite simple. Check out the link below to see how much trouble is saved - no copying, no pasting, just a quick click or double-click, depending on your news reader. http://tinyurl.com/o42at I think we should ask him for cites from "everyone else" He lied.. Nobody said it... |
So, Scotty is against Sany aid....so....
On 1/6/2013 2:38 PM, BAR wrote:
In article , says... On 1/6/13 10:53 AM, JustWait wrote: Bull****... Show me the post where somebody besides harry or don said "it's not a problem". You lie, but it's what I expect from a progressive anyway.. If I see a URL that interests me and it looks "broken," (such as a space in the wrong place or a two line URL that isn't going to work), I have the necessary "skills" to resolve the issue, and we're not talking about complex skills being needed. The fact is, you are ignorant and lazy. Period. We would all appreciate it if you would focus your efforts on paying your current and back taxes. We are tired of paying your fair share along with paying our own fair share. Don't you remember? Harry used to own an old red tobbaco barn,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, , until it vanished. |
So, Scotty is against Sany aid....so....
In article , says...
On 1/6/2013 1:21 PM, Meyer wrote: On 1/6/2013 10:15 AM, Salmon Bait wrote: On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 09:33:11 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: That's odd, Mr. Internet Guru.... I use the same reader as you, and I have no problems! And of course, name calling is what happens when you have been found, once again, to be a complete idiot. How Harryesque. Notice, if you will, the only ones to have trouble with the links I provide are you, Greg and Meyer.... Everyone else says it's not a problem!!! Hmmmmmm? The use of http://tinyurl.com/ would make the process so much easier. Put the button in your browser tool bar, and life is quite simple. Check out the link below to see how much trouble is saved - no copying, no pasting, just a quick click or double-click, depending on your news reader. http://tinyurl.com/o42at I think we should ask him for cites from "everyone else" He lied.. Nobody said it... Really? Nobody said that they had no problem? Let's see, even Don said he had no problem, how does it feel to be dumber than him? |
So, Scotty is against Sany aid....so....
In article om,
says... On 1/6/2013 2:38 PM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On 1/6/13 10:53 AM, JustWait wrote: Bull****... Show me the post where somebody besides harry or don said "it's not a problem". You lie, but it's what I expect from a progressive anyway.. If I see a URL that interests me and it looks "broken," (such as a space in the wrong place or a two line URL that isn't going to work), I have the necessary "skills" to resolve the issue, and we're not talking about complex skills being needed. The fact is, you are ignorant and lazy. Period. We would all appreciate it if you would focus your efforts on paying your current and back taxes. We are tired of paying your fair share along with paying our own fair share. Don't you remember? Harry used to own an old red tobbaco barn,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, , until it vanished. The Maryland Red Barn didn't vanish, the old, very old building up and moved to Harry's landlord's neighbor's property. |
So, Scotty is against Sany aid....so....
In article ,
says... In article om, says... On 1/6/2013 2:38 PM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On 1/6/13 10:53 AM, JustWait wrote: Bull****... Show me the post where somebody besides harry or don said "it's not a problem". You lie, but it's what I expect from a progressive anyway.. If I see a URL that interests me and it looks "broken," (such as a space in the wrong place or a two line URL that isn't going to work), I have the necessary "skills" to resolve the issue, and we're not talking about complex skills being needed. The fact is, you are ignorant and lazy. Period. We would all appreciate it if you would focus your efforts on paying your current and back taxes. We are tired of paying your fair share along with paying our own fair share. Don't you remember? Harry used to own an old red tobbaco barn,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, , until it vanished. The Maryland Red Barn didn't vanish, the old, very old building up and moved to Harry's landlord's neighbor's property. The Maryland Red Barn probably got scared thinking it would be sold for back taxes.... |
So, Scotty is against Sany aid....so....
On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 11:06:36 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 09:33:11 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 1/5/2013 4:05 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 5 Jan 2013 14:42:53 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: === It turns out that there is an easy way to post long links without them becoming broken. The trick is to enclose the link in angle brackets like this: http://xfinity.comcast.net/articles/news-politics/20130102/US.Superstorm.Aid/ That way there is no need to cut and paste, use tiny URLs, etc. I know, but really, I thought that people here were at least competent enough to take a space out of a link after copying and pasting. But, alas, they've proven me wrong! Such a narrow twit.. You know, some folks readers might be different than yours.. Mine will not copy and paste a broken line in one shot, it' takes each line separately... If you would just put the ****ing arrows in, we could all just click on the ****ing thing, you stupid as ****, idiot... that is those of us who still think you may put up a relevant link someday... That's odd, Mr. Internet Guru.... I use the same reader as you, and I have no problems! And of course, name calling is what happens when you have been found, once again, to be a complete idiot. How Harryesque. Notice, if you will, the only ones to have trouble with the links I provide are you, Greg and Meyer.... Everyone else says it's not a problem!!! Hmmmmmm? The use of http://tinyurl.com/ would make the process so much easier. Put the button in your browser tool bar, and life is quite simple. Check out the link below to see how much trouble is saved - no copying, no pasting, just a quick click or double-click, depending on your news reader. http://tinyurl.com/o42at Yes, I've apologized, I really never realized that I was dealing with some Neanderthals that didn't know how to cut and paste. I thought everyone here was at the very least smart enough to do that, and I was wrong. Cutting and pasting is for the third grade and folks like ESAD. You've proven that you're well past the ESAD stage, unless the 'S' means 'Steak'! |
So, Scotty is against Sany aid....so....
|
So, Scotty is against Sany aid....so....
|
So, Scotty is against Sany aid....so....
In article ,
says... On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 11:06:36 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 09:33:11 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 1/5/2013 4:05 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 5 Jan 2013 14:42:53 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: === It turns out that there is an easy way to post long links without them becoming broken. The trick is to enclose the link in angle brackets like this: http://xfinity.comcast.net/articles/news-politics/20130102/US.Superstorm.Aid/ That way there is no need to cut and paste, use tiny URLs, etc. I know, but really, I thought that people here were at least competent enough to take a space out of a link after copying and pasting. But, alas, they've proven me wrong! Such a narrow twit.. You know, some folks readers might be different than yours.. Mine will not copy and paste a broken line in one shot, it' takes each line separately... If you would just put the ****ing arrows in, we could all just click on the ****ing thing, you stupid as ****, idiot... that is those of us who still think you may put up a relevant link someday... That's odd, Mr. Internet Guru.... I use the same reader as you, and I have no problems! And of course, name calling is what happens when you have been found, once again, to be a complete idiot. How Harryesque. Notice, if you will, the only ones to have trouble with the links I provide are you, Greg and Meyer.... Everyone else says it's not a problem!!! Hmmmmmm? The use of http://tinyurl.com/ would make the process so much easier. Put the button in your browser tool bar, and life is quite simple. Check out the link below to see how much trouble is saved - no copying, no pasting, just a quick click or double-click, depending on your news reader. http://tinyurl.com/o42at Yes, I've apologized, I really never realized that I was dealing with some Neanderthals that didn't know how to cut and paste. I thought everyone here was at the very least smart enough to do that, and I was wrong. Cutting and pasting is for the third grade and folks like ESAD. You've proven that you're well past the ESAD stage, unless the 'S' means 'Steak'! Again, I agree, anyone passed a third grade education should be able to cut and paste and take a space out of a URL, thanks for pointing that out. |
So, Scotty is against Sany aid....so....
|
So, Scotty is against Sany aid....so....
|
So, Scotty is against Sany aid....so....
In article m,
says... On 1/7/2013 11:07 AM, wrote: On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 09:33:11 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: That's odd, Mr. Internet Guru.... I use the same reader as you, and I have no problems! And of course, name calling is what happens when you have been found, once again, to be a complete idiot. How Harryesque. Notice, if you will, the only ones to have trouble with the links I provide are you, Greg and Meyer.... Everyone else says it's not a problem!!! Hmmmmmm? I know how to paste but I have to open a new browser instance, paste the url, delete the space and launch it instead of simply clicking the link. It is really seldom worth the effort for the crap you link. Exactly! Well, then, why whine and cry about your inability to do so? |
So, Scotty is against Sany aid....so....
On 1/7/13 12:03 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 11:19:52 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 1/7/13 11:07 AM, wrote: On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 09:33:11 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: That's odd, Mr. Internet Guru.... I use the same reader as you, and I have no problems! And of course, name calling is what happens when you have been found, once again, to be a complete idiot. How Harryesque. Notice, if you will, the only ones to have trouble with the links I provide are you, Greg and Meyer.... Everyone else says it's not a problem!!! Hmmmmmm? I know how to paste but I have to open a new browser instance, paste the url, delete the space and launch it instead of simply clicking the link. It is really seldom worth the effort for the crap you link. Well, perhaps if you weren't using a 19th Century news reader like Forte Agent... There are a number of reasons for using a simpler news reader than Outlook or some other bloatware. For one thing, it runs off a thumb drive and will execute on any windoze platform without actually being installed. That is handy if you have more than one machine. You must follow some usenet groups other than rec.boats, because carrying a thumb drive to be able to read this one from any windoze machine seems a waste of time and effort, considering the lack of content here. Facebook, interestingly, updates itself to its users no matter what machine they are on. If I visit with my iMac and then the next day visit with my tablet, my stuff to read is just where I left it after I logged out with the iMac...the old stuff I've already read is way down at the bottom of the list. Of course, no one really gives a damn about usenet anymore, so development ceased ages ago. |
So, Scotty is against Sany aid....so....
On 1/7/2013 11:04 AM, wrote:
On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 09:25:28 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sat, 5 Jan 2013 13:47:37 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: Yeah, I'm sure, since you first bitched and whined like a friggin' baby that nothing was being done to help Sandy victims. Then when I pointed out WHY, because Boehner wouldn't allow a vote to get something done, you instantly turned to FOX's answer that it was because of pork. Well, the pork is still there, Boehner let the Republicans vote for it. So, the question is, are you okay with it now? If so, what has changed? If not, are you going to vote against those Republicans in office for the pork they allowed? The bill they passed was not the same bill as the one they didn't. Not even close but you are too lazy or lack the intellectual curiosity/ability to find that out. Do I really have to look that one up for you too? The point is there is still much, much pork in the bill, but now that's okay right? And no, you don't look up much of anything, you position like Scotty's is usually made up in your head OK I looked it up and, sa usual you are full of **** This is the text of the bill that passed, No Alaska fisheries, No roof on the Smithsonian or any of the other crap in the 100 page H.R.1 H.R.41 -- To temporarily increase the borrowing authority of the Federal Emergency Management Agency for carrying out the National Flood Insurance Program. (Introduced in House - IH) HR 41 IH 113th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 41 To temporarily increase the borrowing authority of the Federal Emergency Management Agency for carrying out the National Flood Insurance Program. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES January 3, 2013 Mr. GARRETT (for himself, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN, Mr. LANCE, Mr. GRIMM, Mr. HANNA, Mr. KING of New York, Mr. MEEKS, Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New York, Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York, Mr. CROWLEY, Mr. NADLER, Mr. ANDREWS, Mr. RUNYAN, Mr. LOBIONDO, Ms. MENG, Mr. SEAN PATRICK MALONEY of New York, Mr. PASCRELL, Mr. TONKO, and Mr. BISHOP of New York) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned A BILL To temporarily increase the borrowing authority of the Federal Emergency Management Agency for carrying out the National Flood Insurance Program. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. TEMPORARY INCREASE IN BORROWING AUTHORITY FOR NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM. (a) Section 1309(a) of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4016(a)) is amended by striking `$20,725,000,000' and inserting `$30,425,000,000'. (b) The amount provided by this section is designated by the Congress as an emergency requirement pursuant to section 403(a) of S. Con. Res. 13 (111th Congress), the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2010, and as an emergency pursuant to section 4(g) of the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010 (2 U.S.C. 933(g)). Hey, do you have the same for the original bill the republicans forced the dems to dump? |
kevin still doesn't get it..
On 1/7/2013 10:13 AM, Salmonbait wrote:
On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 11:06:36 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 09:33:11 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 1/5/2013 4:05 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 5 Jan 2013 14:42:53 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: === It turns out that there is an easy way to post long links without them becoming broken. The trick is to enclose the link in angle brackets like this: http://xfinity.comcast.net/articles/news-politics/20130102/US.Superstorm.Aid/ That way there is no need to cut and paste, use tiny URLs, etc. I know, but really, I thought that people here were at least competent enough to take a space out of a link after copying and pasting. But, alas, they've proven me wrong! Such a narrow twit.. You know, some folks readers might be different than yours.. Mine will not copy and paste a broken line in one shot, it' takes each line separately... If you would just put the ****ing arrows in, we could all just click on the ****ing thing, you stupid as ****, idiot... that is those of us who still think you may put up a relevant link someday... That's odd, Mr. Internet Guru.... I use the same reader as you, and I have no problems! And of course, name calling is what happens when you have been found, once again, to be a complete idiot. How Harryesque. Notice, if you will, the only ones to have trouble with the links I provide are you, Greg and Meyer.... Everyone else says it's not a problem!!! Hmmmmmm? The use of http://tinyurl.com/ would make the process so much easier. Put the button in your browser tool bar, and life is quite simple. Check out the link below to see how much trouble is saved - no copying, no pasting, just a quick click or double-click, depending on your news reader. http://tinyurl.com/o42at Yes, I've apologized, I really never realized that I was dealing with some Neanderthals that didn't know how to cut and paste. I thought everyone here was at the very least smart enough to do that, and I was wrong. Cutting and pasting is for the third grade and folks like ESAD. You've proven that you're well past the ESAD stage, unless the 'S' means 'Steak'! |
Kevin still doesn't get it
|
So, Scotty is against Sany aid....so....
On 1/7/2013 11:23 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 1/7/2013 11:07 AM, wrote: On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 09:33:11 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: That's odd, Mr. Internet Guru.... I use the same reader as you, and I have no problems! And of course, name calling is what happens when you have been found, once again, to be a complete idiot. How Harryesque. Notice, if you will, the only ones to have trouble with the links I provide are you, Greg and Meyer.... Everyone else says it's not a problem!!! Hmmmmmm? I know how to paste but I have to open a new browser instance, paste the url, delete the space and launch it instead of simply clicking the link. It is really seldom worth the effort for the crap you link. Exactly! Exactly. I have told you all before. I don't know what it's called but kevin is a diseased mind. He seems to get off on simply wasting as much of your time as possible. For him, it's a rush knowing you are going through all that to read something that isn't even related to the conversation we are having.... I just don't get it, maybe some kind of head injury?? |
So, Scotty is against Sany aid....so....
On 1/7/2013 12:03 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 11:19:52 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 1/7/13 11:07 AM, wrote: On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 09:33:11 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: That's odd, Mr. Internet Guru.... I use the same reader as you, and I have no problems! And of course, name calling is what happens when you have been found, once again, to be a complete idiot. How Harryesque. Notice, if you will, the only ones to have trouble with the links I provide are you, Greg and Meyer.... Everyone else says it's not a problem!!! Hmmmmmm? I know how to paste but I have to open a new browser instance, paste the url, delete the space and launch it instead of simply clicking the link. It is really seldom worth the effort for the crap you link. Well, perhaps if you weren't using a 19th Century news reader like Forte Agent... There are a number of reasons for using a simpler news reader than Outlook or some other bloatware. For one thing, it runs off a thumb drive and will execute on any windoze platform without actually being installed. That is handy if you have more than one machine. Is harry bragging about his bootleg software again?? |
So, Scotty is against Sany aid....so....
On 1/7/13 1:18 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 1/7/2013 12:03 PM, wrote: On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 11:19:52 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 1/7/13 11:07 AM, wrote: On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 09:33:11 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: That's odd, Mr. Internet Guru.... I use the same reader as you, and I have no problems! And of course, name calling is what happens when you have been found, once again, to be a complete idiot. How Harryesque. Notice, if you will, the only ones to have trouble with the links I provide are you, Greg and Meyer.... Everyone else says it's not a problem!!! Hmmmmmm? I know how to paste but I have to open a new browser instance, paste the url, delete the space and launch it instead of simply clicking the link. It is really seldom worth the effort for the crap you link. Well, perhaps if you weren't using a 19th Century news reader like Forte Agent... There are a number of reasons for using a simpler news reader than Outlook or some other bloatware. For one thing, it runs off a thumb drive and will execute on any windoze platform without actually being installed. That is handy if you have more than one machine. Is harry bragging about his bootleg software again?? Right, ****-for-brains, I use a bootlegged copy of Mozilla Thunderbird so I don't have to pay for it. What an ignorant little flaming ass you are. How's your cancer? |
So, Scotty is against Sany aid....so....
In article , says...
On 1/7/2013 11:04 AM, wrote: On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 09:25:28 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sat, 5 Jan 2013 13:47:37 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: Yeah, I'm sure, since you first bitched and whined like a friggin' baby that nothing was being done to help Sandy victims. Then when I pointed out WHY, because Boehner wouldn't allow a vote to get something done, you instantly turned to FOX's answer that it was because of pork. Well, the pork is still there, Boehner let the Republicans vote for it. So, the question is, are you okay with it now? If so, what has changed? If not, are you going to vote against those Republicans in office for the pork they allowed? The bill they passed was not the same bill as the one they didn't. Not even close but you are too lazy or lack the intellectual curiosity/ability to find that out. Do I really have to look that one up for you too? The point is there is still much, much pork in the bill, but now that's okay right? And no, you don't look up much of anything, you position like Scotty's is usually made up in your head OK I looked it up and, sa usual you are full of **** This is the text of the bill that passed, No Alaska fisheries, No roof on the Smithsonian or any of the other crap in the 100 page H.R.1 H.R.41 -- To temporarily increase the borrowing authority of the Federal Emergency Management Agency for carrying out the National Flood Insurance Program. (Introduced in House - IH) HR 41 IH 113th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 41 To temporarily increase the borrowing authority of the Federal Emergency Management Agency for carrying out the National Flood Insurance Program. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES January 3, 2013 Mr. GARRETT (for himself, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN, Mr. LANCE, Mr. GRIMM, Mr. HANNA, Mr. KING of New York, Mr. MEEKS, Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New York, Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York, Mr. CROWLEY, Mr. NADLER, Mr. ANDREWS, Mr. RUNYAN, Mr. LOBIONDO, Ms. MENG, Mr. SEAN PATRICK MALONEY of New York, Mr. PASCRELL, Mr. TONKO, and Mr. BISHOP of New York) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned A BILL To temporarily increase the borrowing authority of the Federal Emergency Management Agency for carrying out the National Flood Insurance Program. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. TEMPORARY INCREASE IN BORROWING AUTHORITY FOR NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM. (a) Section 1309(a) of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4016(a)) is amended by striking `$20,725,000,000' and inserting `$30,425,000,000'. (b) The amount provided by this section is designated by the Congress as an emergency requirement pursuant to section 403(a) of S. Con. Res. 13 (111th Congress), the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2010, and as an emergency pursuant to section 4(g) of the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010 (2 U.S.C. 933(g)). Hey, do you have the same for the original bill the republicans forced the dems to dump? Nobody forced anybody to dump anything, stupid. Boehner wouldn't even let a vote be done, so how could that have happened? |
So, Scotty is against Sany aid....so....
|
So, Scotty is against Sany aid....so....
|
So, Scotty is against Sany aid....so....
In article , says...
On 1/7/2013 11:23 AM, Meyer wrote: On 1/7/2013 11:07 AM, wrote: On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 09:33:11 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: That's odd, Mr. Internet Guru.... I use the same reader as you, and I have no problems! And of course, name calling is what happens when you have been found, once again, to be a complete idiot. How Harryesque. Notice, if you will, the only ones to have trouble with the links I provide are you, Greg and Meyer.... Everyone else says it's not a problem!!! Hmmmmmm? I know how to paste but I have to open a new browser instance, paste the url, delete the space and launch it instead of simply clicking the link. It is really seldom worth the effort for the crap you link. Exactly! Exactly. I have told you all before. I don't know what it's called but kevin is a diseased mind. He seems to get off on simply wasting as much of your time as possible. For him, it's a rush knowing you are going through all that to read something that isn't even related to the conversation we are having.... I just don't get it, maybe some kind of head injury?? Go give your wife another pound or so of tobacco to smoke or eat or whatever she does with it, it should help with the cancer...... |
So, Scotty is against Sany aid....so....
On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 13:35:29 -0500, wrote:
On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 12:20:22 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 1/7/13 12:03 PM, wrote: Well, perhaps if you weren't using a 19th Century news reader like Forte Agent... There are a number of reasons for using a simpler news reader than Outlook or some other bloatware. For one thing, it runs off a thumb drive and will execute on any windoze platform without actually being installed. That is handy if you have more than one machine. You must follow some usenet groups other than rec.boats, because carrying a thumb drive to be able to read this one from any windoze machine seems a waste of time and effort, considering the lack of content here. Facebook, interestingly, updates itself to its users no matter what machine they are on. If I visit with my iMac and then the next day visit with my tablet, my stuff to read is just where I left it after I logged out with the iMac...the old stuff I've already read is way down at the bottom of the list. Of course, no one really gives a damn about usenet anymore, so development ceased ages ago. Yes I follow several text usenet groups and a number of binary groups. If you don't keep your headers updated on some of the binary groups it becomes very cumbersome. Alt.binary.e-book.technical is very active. That is a great source for government papers and technical documents. It is amazing what is out there. Can stuff be downloaded to a kindle from the e-book groups? |
So, Scotty is against Sany aid....so....
In article ,
says... On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 13:35:29 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 12:20:22 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 1/7/13 12:03 PM, wrote: Well, perhaps if you weren't using a 19th Century news reader like Forte Agent... There are a number of reasons for using a simpler news reader than Outlook or some other bloatware. For one thing, it runs off a thumb drive and will execute on any windoze platform without actually being installed. That is handy if you have more than one machine. You must follow some usenet groups other than rec.boats, because carrying a thumb drive to be able to read this one from any windoze machine seems a waste of time and effort, considering the lack of content here. Facebook, interestingly, updates itself to its users no matter what machine they are on. If I visit with my iMac and then the next day visit with my tablet, my stuff to read is just where I left it after I logged out with the iMac...the old stuff I've already read is way down at the bottom of the list. Of course, no one really gives a damn about usenet anymore, so development ceased ages ago. Yes I follow several text usenet groups and a number of binary groups. If you don't keep your headers updated on some of the binary groups it becomes very cumbersome. Alt.binary.e-book.technical is very active. That is a great source for government papers and technical documents. It is amazing what is out there. Can stuff be downloaded to a kindle from the e-book groups? Probably, but not by people that are too stupid to cut and paste URL's. |
So, Scotty is against Sany aid....so....
On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 16:05:50 -0500, Salmonbait
wrote: Can stuff be downloaded to a kindle from the e-book groups? === Yes, indirectly, through your computer and a USB cable, or uploaded to Amazon for a small fee. Here are some links you might find useful: http://gadgetwise.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/05/20/want-to-send-a-document-to-your-kindle-15-cents-please/ http://www.amazon.com/gp/help/customer/display.html?nodeId=200375630 http://nancyhendrickson.com/selling-your-work/preparing-your-book-or-article-for-kindle-part-ii/ |
So, Scotty is against Sany aid....so....
On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 16:50:12 -0500, Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 16:05:50 -0500, Salmonbait wrote: Can stuff be downloaded to a kindle from the e-book groups? === Yes, indirectly, through your computer and a USB cable, or uploaded to Amazon for a small fee. Here are some links you might find useful: http://gadgetwise.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/05/20/want-to-send-a-document-to-your-kindle-15-cents-please/ http://www.amazon.com/gp/help/customer/display.html?nodeId=200375630 http://nancyhendrickson.com/selling-your-work/preparing-your-book-or-article-for-kindle-part-ii/ Thanks, Wayne. Good to know in case the library runs out of e-books. |
So, Scotty is against Sany aid....so....
On 1/7/2013 1:41 PM, ESAD wrote:
On 1/7/13 1:18 PM, JustWait wrote: On 1/7/2013 12:03 PM, wrote: On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 11:19:52 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 1/7/13 11:07 AM, wrote: On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 09:33:11 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: That's odd, Mr. Internet Guru.... I use the same reader as you, and I have no problems! And of course, name calling is what happens when you have been found, once again, to be a complete idiot. How Harryesque. Notice, if you will, the only ones to have trouble with the links I provide are you, Greg and Meyer.... Everyone else says it's not a problem!!! Hmmmmmm? I know how to paste but I have to open a new browser instance, paste the url, delete the space and launch it instead of simply clicking the link. It is really seldom worth the effort for the crap you link. Well, perhaps if you weren't using a 19th Century news reader like Forte Agent... There are a number of reasons for using a simpler news reader than Outlook or some other bloatware. For one thing, it runs off a thumb drive and will execute on any windoze platform without actually being installed. That is handy if you have more than one machine. Is harry bragging about his bootleg software again?? Right, ****-for-brains, I use a bootlegged copy of Mozilla Thunderbird so I don't have to pay for it. What an ignorant little flaming ass you are. How's your cancer? How's your sleep apnea and osteopenia? |
So, Scotty is against Sany aid....so....
In article ,
says... On 1/7/13 12:03 PM, wrote: On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 11:19:52 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 1/7/13 11:07 AM, wrote: On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 09:33:11 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: That's odd, Mr. Internet Guru.... I use the same reader as you, and I have no problems! And of course, name calling is what happens when you have been found, once again, to be a complete idiot. How Harryesque. Notice, if you will, the only ones to have trouble with the links I provide are you, Greg and Meyer.... Everyone else says it's not a problem!!! Hmmmmmm? I know how to paste but I have to open a new browser instance, paste the url, delete the space and launch it instead of simply clicking the link. It is really seldom worth the effort for the crap you link. Well, perhaps if you weren't using a 19th Century news reader like Forte Agent... There are a number of reasons for using a simpler news reader than Outlook or some other bloatware. For one thing, it runs off a thumb drive and will execute on any windoze platform without actually being installed. That is handy if you have more than one machine. You must follow some usenet groups other than rec.boats, because carrying a thumb drive to be able to read this one from any windoze machine seems a waste of time and effort, considering the lack of content here. Facebook, interestingly, updates itself to its users no matter what machine they are on. If I visit with my iMac and then the next day visit with my tablet, my stuff to read is just where I left it after I logged out with the iMac...the old stuff I've already read is way down at the bottom of the list. Of course, no one really gives a damn about usenet anymore, so development ceased ages ago. Facebook is a marketing tool, data mining specifically. There is no other value to anyone but its users than the data and their interconnections. |
So, Scotty is against Sany aid....so....
|
So, Scotty is against Sany aid....so....
On 1/8/2013 8:03 AM, BAR wrote:
In article , says... On 1/7/13 12:03 PM, wrote: On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 11:19:52 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 1/7/13 11:07 AM, wrote: On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 09:33:11 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: That's odd, Mr. Internet Guru.... I use the same reader as you, and I have no problems! And of course, name calling is what happens when you have been found, once again, to be a complete idiot. How Harryesque. Notice, if you will, the only ones to have trouble with the links I provide are you, Greg and Meyer.... Everyone else says it's not a problem!!! Hmmmmmm? I know how to paste but I have to open a new browser instance, paste the url, delete the space and launch it instead of simply clicking the link. It is really seldom worth the effort for the crap you link. Well, perhaps if you weren't using a 19th Century news reader like Forte Agent... There are a number of reasons for using a simpler news reader than Outlook or some other bloatware. For one thing, it runs off a thumb drive and will execute on any windoze platform without actually being installed. That is handy if you have more than one machine. You must follow some usenet groups other than rec.boats, because carrying a thumb drive to be able to read this one from any windoze machine seems a waste of time and effort, considering the lack of content here. Facebook, interestingly, updates itself to its users no matter what machine they are on. If I visit with my iMac and then the next day visit with my tablet, my stuff to read is just where I left it after I logged out with the iMac...the old stuff I've already read is way down at the bottom of the list. Of course, no one really gives a damn about usenet anymore, so development ceased ages ago. Facebook is a marketing tool, data mining specifically. There is no other value to anyone but its users than the data and their interconnections. Yup, FB is real hard looking to have every face tagged.. Even try to get your friends to put tags to your face in there. I am sure they already have all the data they need for a full face recognition on most of the county by now.... |
So, Scotty is against Sany aid....so....
On 1/8/13 10:29 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 1/8/2013 8:03 AM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On 1/7/13 12:03 PM, wrote: On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 11:19:52 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 1/7/13 11:07 AM, wrote: On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 09:33:11 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: That's odd, Mr. Internet Guru.... I use the same reader as you, and I have no problems! And of course, name calling is what happens when you have been found, once again, to be a complete idiot. How Harryesque. Notice, if you will, the only ones to have trouble with the links I provide are you, Greg and Meyer.... Everyone else says it's not a problem!!! Hmmmmmm? I know how to paste but I have to open a new browser instance, paste the url, delete the space and launch it instead of simply clicking the link. It is really seldom worth the effort for the crap you link. Well, perhaps if you weren't using a 19th Century news reader like Forte Agent... There are a number of reasons for using a simpler news reader than Outlook or some other bloatware. For one thing, it runs off a thumb drive and will execute on any windoze platform without actually being installed. That is handy if you have more than one machine. You must follow some usenet groups other than rec.boats, because carrying a thumb drive to be able to read this one from any windoze machine seems a waste of time and effort, considering the lack of content here. Facebook, interestingly, updates itself to its users no matter what machine they are on. If I visit with my iMac and then the next day visit with my tablet, my stuff to read is just where I left it after I logged out with the iMac...the old stuff I've already read is way down at the bottom of the list. Of course, no one really gives a damn about usenet anymore, so development ceased ages ago. Facebook is a marketing tool, data mining specifically. There is no other value to anyone but its users than the data and their interconnections. Yup, FB is real hard looking to have every face tagged.. Even try to get your friends to put tags to your face in there. I am sure they already have all the data they need for a full face recognition on most of the county by now.... You don't need FB for that...I'm sure your face is on the post office wall. |
So, Scotty is against Sany aid....so....
In article , says...
On 1/8/2013 8:03 AM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On 1/7/13 12:03 PM, wrote: On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 11:19:52 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 1/7/13 11:07 AM, wrote: On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 09:33:11 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: That's odd, Mr. Internet Guru.... I use the same reader as you, and I have no problems! And of course, name calling is what happens when you have been found, once again, to be a complete idiot. How Harryesque. Notice, if you will, the only ones to have trouble with the links I provide are you, Greg and Meyer.... Everyone else says it's not a problem!!! Hmmmmmm? I know how to paste but I have to open a new browser instance, paste the url, delete the space and launch it instead of simply clicking the link. It is really seldom worth the effort for the crap you link. Well, perhaps if you weren't using a 19th Century news reader like Forte Agent... There are a number of reasons for using a simpler news reader than Outlook or some other bloatware. For one thing, it runs off a thumb drive and will execute on any windoze platform without actually being installed. That is handy if you have more than one machine. You must follow some usenet groups other than rec.boats, because carrying a thumb drive to be able to read this one from any windoze machine seems a waste of time and effort, considering the lack of content here. Facebook, interestingly, updates itself to its users no matter what machine they are on. If I visit with my iMac and then the next day visit with my tablet, my stuff to read is just where I left it after I logged out with the iMac...the old stuff I've already read is way down at the bottom of the list. Of course, no one really gives a damn about usenet anymore, so development ceased ages ago. Facebook is a marketing tool, data mining specifically. There is no other value to anyone but its users than the data and their interconnections. Yup, FB is real hard looking to have every face tagged.. Even try to get your friends to put tags to your face in there. I am sure they already have all the data they need for a full face recognition on most of the county by now.... Insane Scotty thinking Facebook is going to take over the world.. Like a guy I heard call in on the radio yesterday, claiming that he thinks China has GPS coordinates for every American and are going to use them to send bumblebee like drones to inject us with poison!!!! Just about as sane.... |
So, Scotty is against Sany aid....so....
On 1/8/13 11:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 1/8/2013 8:03 AM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On 1/7/13 12:03 PM, wrote: On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 11:19:52 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 1/7/13 11:07 AM, wrote: On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 09:33:11 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: That's odd, Mr. Internet Guru.... I use the same reader as you, and I have no problems! And of course, name calling is what happens when you have been found, once again, to be a complete idiot. How Harryesque. Notice, if you will, the only ones to have trouble with the links I provide are you, Greg and Meyer.... Everyone else says it's not a problem!!! Hmmmmmm? I know how to paste but I have to open a new browser instance, paste the url, delete the space and launch it instead of simply clicking the link. It is really seldom worth the effort for the crap you link. Well, perhaps if you weren't using a 19th Century news reader like Forte Agent... There are a number of reasons for using a simpler news reader than Outlook or some other bloatware. For one thing, it runs off a thumb drive and will execute on any windoze platform without actually being installed. That is handy if you have more than one machine. You must follow some usenet groups other than rec.boats, because carrying a thumb drive to be able to read this one from any windoze machine seems a waste of time and effort, considering the lack of content here. Facebook, interestingly, updates itself to its users no matter what machine they are on. If I visit with my iMac and then the next day visit with my tablet, my stuff to read is just where I left it after I logged out with the iMac...the old stuff I've already read is way down at the bottom of the list. Of course, no one really gives a damn about usenet anymore, so development ceased ages ago. Facebook is a marketing tool, data mining specifically. There is no other value to anyone but its users than the data and their interconnections. Yup, FB is real hard looking to have every face tagged.. Even try to get your friends to put tags to your face in there. I am sure they already have all the data they need for a full face recognition on most of the county by now.... Insane Scotty thinking Facebook is going to take over the world.. Like a guy I heard call in on the radio yesterday, claiming that he thinks China has GPS coordinates for every American and are going to use them to send bumblebee like drones to inject us with poison!!!! Just about as sane.... I don't give a **** what FB tracks. There are ways to stay "private" on FB and there are apps available that help you customize it to your liking, including the elimination of virtually all advertising. Through FB, I've been able to re-connect with dozens of people I've known over the decades and meet some new people, too, including actual boaters from all around the world, and I've hooked up with a couple of SIGs that have some really funny stuff, travel info, food, et cetera, and all this without any of the right-wing assholes who have destroyed rec.boats. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:34 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com