|
What the 'ell??
In article ,
says... On Sunday, January 13, 2013 3:30:07 PM UTC-4, True North wrote: On Sunday, January 13, 2013 2:48:38 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 1/13/13 12:27 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 1/13/13 11:47 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article om, says... On 1/13/2013 10:59 AM, ESAD wrote: On 1/13/13 10:53 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... True North wrote: On Saturday, January 12, 2013 11:45:45 PM UTC-4, Earl wrote: wrote: On Monday, December 31, 2012 8:58:58 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Looks like things are getting crazier by the minute down there... http://www.cbc.ca/news/yourcommunity...-shooting.html What is YOUR solution? Disarm the population...with an exception for shotguns and legitimate hunting rifles. My hunting rifle carries a much larger payload than my Colt AR15. My Benneli M4 shotgun could be even more of a menace. You're the menace...those firearms would be just fine in the hands of a balanced stable person. Big guns = Small dick. Tell us about your guns again..... Sure. Nowadays, I have a 9 mm pistol, a .22LR pistol, a .22LR rifle, and, since I sold two shotguns, just one remaining 12 gauge. Also sold, at a good profit, a pair of matched "cowboy" revolvers. None could be considered "big" guns. Here's the rifle, with its five-round mag: http://tinyurl.com/dy7yuwv That's cool. Did you Know the scope is mounted backwards? Just like his small dick!! The scope is mounted properly. The mounting and sighting in was done by a first-class gunsmith. Meyer/Earl probably sucks on the barrel when he pulls the trigger. Good, that must make you feel much better about your small dick. I'll bet you had written excuses ready to get yourself out of high school gym and showers so the other boys would only have your mindlessness and perseveration to laugh at, eh? *I* don't have to own guns to make up for my lack of dick. YOU do. So, how else do you deal with the problem? Enquiring minds want to know. BTW...please don't say you 'have the problem in hand'. Again, stupid, can you read? Harry's the one with the guns. |
What the 'ell??
In article , says...
True North wrote: On Sunday, January 13, 2013 2:48:38 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 1/13/13 12:27 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 1/13/13 11:47 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article om, says... On 1/13/2013 10:59 AM, ESAD wrote: On 1/13/13 10:53 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... True North wrote: On Saturday, January 12, 2013 11:45:45 PM UTC-4, Earl wrote: wrote: On Monday, December 31, 2012 8:58:58 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Looks like things are getting crazier by the minute down there... http://www.cbc.ca/news/yourcommunity...-shooting.html What is YOUR solution? Disarm the population...with an exception for shotguns and legitimate hunting rifles. My hunting rifle carries a much larger payload than my Colt AR15. My Benneli M4 shotgun could be even more of a menace. You're the menace...those firearms would be just fine in the hands of a balanced stable person. Big guns = Small dick. Tell us about your guns again..... Sure. Nowadays, I have a 9 mm pistol, a .22LR pistol, a .22LR rifle, and, since I sold two shotguns, just one remaining 12 gauge. Also sold, at a good profit, a pair of matched "cowboy" revolvers. None could be considered "big" guns. Here's the rifle, with its five-round mag: http://tinyurl.com/dy7yuwv That's cool. Did you Know the scope is mounted backwards? Just like his small dick!! The scope is mounted properly. The mounting and sighting in was done by a first-class gunsmith. Meyer/Earl probably sucks on the barrel when he pulls the trigger. Good, that must make you feel much better about your small dick. I'll bet you had written excuses ready to get yourself out of high school gym and showers so the other boys would only have your mindlessness and perseveration to laugh at, eh? *I* don't have to own guns to make up for my lack of dick. YOU do. So, how else do you deal with the problem? Enquiring minds want to know. ISnotty reaches around. :) Again, little dick, I don't need to own guns to make up for other shortcomings. You DO. |
What the 'ell??
On 1/13/2013 2:30 PM, True North wrote:
*I* don't have to own guns to make up for my lack of dick. YOU do. So, how else do you deal with the problem? Enquiring minds want to know. Why do you need to know? |
What the 'ell??
On 1/13/2013 2:36 PM, ESAD wrote:
True North wrote: On Sunday, January 13, 2013 2:48:38 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... *I* don't have to own guns to make up for my lack of dick. YOU do. So, how else do you deal with the problem? Enquiring minds want to know. ISnotty reaches around. :) Harry needs to hire a pro to do his short arm work. |
What the 'ell??
On 1/13/2013 2:33 PM, True North wrote:
*I* don't have to own guns to make up for my lack of dick. YOU do. So, how else do you deal with the problem? Enquiring minds want to know. BTW...please don't say you 'have the problem in hand'. You've got that covered, eh? |
What the 'ell??
On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 05:03:26 -0800 (PST), True North wrote:
On Saturday, January 12, 2013 11:45:45 PM UTC-4, Earl wrote: wrote: On Monday, December 31, 2012 8:58:58 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Looks like things are getting crazier by the minute down there... http://www.cbc.ca/news/yourcommunity...-shooting.html What is YOUR solution? Disarm the population...with an exception for shotguns and legitimate hunting rifles. My hunting rifle carries a much larger payload than my Colt AR15. My Benneli M4 shotgun could be even more of a menace. You're the menace...those firearms would be just fine in the hands of a balanced stable person. Thank you, Donnie. You've just made the case. *Any* gun is just fine in the hands of a balanced, stable person. That's the point. Glad to see you finally figured it out. The problem is the determination of who is not a balanced, stable person, then recording the information, then publicizing the information, and then acting on the information by denying the purchase of a firearm. Of course, that's not to say that the mother of the individual in question couldn't purchase the firearm. What we need is a big government agency to do all the above. That'll work until some liberal begins to wonder about all the 'privacy' issues they've been addressing for years. And y'all thought the Patriot Act was bad. Salmonbait -- **Those who think they can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government take care of them better take a closer look at the American Indian.** |
What the 'ell??
On Monday, January 14, 2013 10:10:25 AM UTC-4, Salmonbait wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 05:03:26 -0800 (PST), True North wrote: On Saturday, January 12, 2013 11:45:45 PM UTC-4, Earl wrote: wrote: On Monday, December 31, 2012 8:58:58 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Looks like things are getting crazier by the minute down there... http://www.cbc.ca/news/yourcommunity...-shooting.html What is YOUR solution? Disarm the population...with an exception for shotguns and legitimate hunting rifles. My hunting rifle carries a much larger payload than my Colt AR15. My Benneli M4 shotgun could be even more of a menace. You're the menace...those firearms would be just fine in the hands of a balanced stable person. Thank you, Donnie. You've just made the case. *Any* gun is just fine in the hands of a balanced, stable person. That's the point. Glad to see you finally figured it out. The problem is the determination of who is not a balanced, stable person, then recording the information, then publicizing the information, and then acting on the information by denying the purchase of a firearm. Of course, that's not to say that the mother of the individual in question couldn't purchase the firearm. What we need is a big government agency to do all the above. That'll work until some liberal begins to wonder about all the 'privacy' issues they've been addressing for years. And y'all thought the Patriot Act was bad. Salmonbait -- **Those who think they can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government take care of them better take a closer look at the American Indian.** You've also made my point, Johnny. What with y'all history of violent 'cowboy' like behaviour etc... how can we really tell which 'mericans are stable and balanced. Best to keep handguns and assault rifles away from everyone until there is a foolproof way to assess y'all. |
What the 'ell??
ESAD wrote:
True North wrote: On Saturday, January 12, 2013 11:45:45 PM UTC-4, Earl wrote: wrote: On Monday, December 31, 2012 8:58:58 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Looks like things are getting crazier by the minute down there... http://www.cbc.ca/news/yourcommunity...-shooting.html What is YOUR solution? Disarm the population...with an exception for shotguns and legitimate hunting rifles. My hunting rifle carries a much larger payload than my Colt AR15. My Benneli M4 shotgun could be even more of a menace. You're the menace...those firearms would be just fine in the hands of a balanced stable person. Big guns = Small dick. Responsible adults don't respond with petty remarks like that and they pay their taxes. |
What the 'ell??
True North wrote:
On Saturday, January 12, 2013 11:45:45 PM UTC-4, Earl wrote: wrote: On Monday, December 31, 2012 8:58:58 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Looks like things are getting crazier by the minute down there... http://www.cbc.ca/news/yourcommunity...-shooting.html What is YOUR solution? Disarm the population...with an exception for shotguns and legitimate hunting rifles. My hunting rifle carries a much larger payload than my Colt AR15. My Benneli M4 shotgun could be even more of a menace. You're the menace...those firearms would be just fine in the hands of a balanced stable person. You don't know me, Don, and your remarks are unremarkable. |
What the 'ell??
ESAD wrote:
On 1/13/13 10:53 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... True North wrote: On Saturday, January 12, 2013 11:45:45 PM UTC-4, Earl wrote: wrote: On Monday, December 31, 2012 8:58:58 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Looks like things are getting crazier by the minute down there... http://www.cbc.ca/news/yourcommunity...-shooting.html What is YOUR solution? Disarm the population...with an exception for shotguns and legitimate hunting rifles. My hunting rifle carries a much larger payload than my Colt AR15. My Benneli M4 shotgun could be even more of a menace. You're the menace...those firearms would be just fine in the hands of a balanced stable person. Big guns = Small dick. Tell us about your guns again..... Sure. Nowadays, I have a 9 mm pistol, a .22LR pistol, a .22LR rifle, and, since I sold two shotguns, just one remaining 12 gauge. Also sold, at a good profit, a pair of matched "cowboy" revolvers. None could be considered "big" guns. Here's the rifle, with its five-round mag: http://tinyurl.com/dy7yuwv The scope is in on backwards, moron. What is the criteria for a big or small gun? Shotguns carry the biggest payload. The criteria for debt payment is you either pay your taxes or you are a tax cheat. Simple! |
What the 'ell??
ESAD wrote:
On 1/13/13 11:47 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article om, says... On 1/13/2013 10:59 AM, ESAD wrote: On 1/13/13 10:53 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... True North wrote: On Saturday, January 12, 2013 11:45:45 PM UTC-4, Earl wrote: wrote: On Monday, December 31, 2012 8:58:58 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Looks like things are getting crazier by the minute down there... http://www.cbc.ca/news/yourcommunity...-shooting.html What is YOUR solution? Disarm the population...with an exception for shotguns and legitimate hunting rifles. My hunting rifle carries a much larger payload than my Colt AR15. My Benneli M4 shotgun could be even more of a menace. You're the menace...those firearms would be just fine in the hands of a balanced stable person. Big guns = Small dick. Tell us about your guns again..... Sure. Nowadays, I have a 9 mm pistol, a .22LR pistol, a .22LR rifle, and, since I sold two shotguns, just one remaining 12 gauge. Also sold, at a good profit, a pair of matched "cowboy" revolvers. None could be considered "big" guns. Here's the rifle, with its five-round mag: http://tinyurl.com/dy7yuwv That's cool. Did you Know the scope is mounted backwards? Just like his small dick!! The scope is mounted properly. The mounting and sighting in was done by a first-class gunsmith. Meyer/Earl probably sucks on the barrel when he pulls the trigger. He should be fired. You must have screwed him out of money like you did the American people. |
What the 'ell??
True North wrote:
*I* don't have to own guns to make up for my lack of dick. YOU do. So, how else do you deal with the problem? Enquiring minds want to know. BTW...please don't say you 'have the problem in hand'. BTW - Trim your posts - as stupid as they are. Can your RIM do that? |
What the 'ell??
|
What the 'ell??
On 1/15/13 9:19 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 20:52:32 -0500, Earl wrote: The scope is in on backwards, moron. Ther big end (objective lens) in on the down range side on all of my scoped rifles. My guess is that "Earl," if he ever had his hands on a scoped rifle, pointed it towards himself when he fired. It would explain his obvious brain damage. The rifle, btw, is a Thompson Center R-55. Mine has a stainless barrel and receiver. There are a number R-55 models, including a couple with wood stock. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2Vc8EbgSS0 |
What the 'ell??
On 1/16/13 11:32 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 06:40:15 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 1/15/13 9:19 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 20:52:32 -0500, Earl wrote: The scope is in on backwards, moron. Ther big end (objective lens) in on the down range side on all of my scoped rifles. My guess is that "Earl," if he ever had his hands on a scoped rifle, pointed it towards himself when he fired. It would explain his obvious brain damage. The rifle, btw, is a Thompson Center R-55. Mine has a stainless barrel and receiver. There are a number R-55 models, including a couple with wood stock. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2Vc8EbgSS0 I am not that familiar with TC rifles. I do have a few .22s and I just sold my .22 machine gun (for a 700% profit) It's a nicely made rifle, and pretty accurate right out of the box. I was going to get one of the ubiquitous Ruger .22s, but everyone I know who has one said it would "need work" to get as accurate as we'd want. I also looked at a CZ .22, which was also nice. But my local gun shop handles TC's, and gave me a good deal on the rifle and scope, mounted the scope properly, and sighted it in for me. I also buy my fishing bottom rigs and lures there, or at least I did when I spent more time fishing. |
What the 'ell??
"ESAD" wrote in message
... On 1/16/13 11:32 AM, wrote: On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 06:40:15 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 1/15/13 9:19 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 20:52:32 -0500, Earl wrote: The scope is in on backwards, moron. Ther big end (objective lens) in on the down range side on all of my scoped rifles. My guess is that "Earl," if he ever had his hands on a scoped rifle, pointed it towards himself when he fired. It would explain his obvious brain damage. The rifle, btw, is a Thompson Center R-55. Mine has a stainless barrel and receiver. There are a number R-55 models, including a couple with wood stock. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2Vc8EbgSS0 I am not that familiar with TC rifles. I do have a few .22s and I just sold my .22 machine gun (for a 700% profit) It's a nicely made rifle, and pretty accurate right out of the box. I was going to get one of the ubiquitous Ruger .22s, but everyone I know who has one said it would "need work" to get as accurate as we'd want. I also looked at a CZ .22, which was also nice. But my local gun shop handles TC's, and gave me a good deal on the rifle and scope, mounted the scope properly, and sighted it in for me. I also buy my fishing bottom rigs and lures there, or at least I did when I spent more time fishing. ------------- You were posting that rifle as your own. Another fib? |
What the 'ell??
"Califbill" wrote:
"ESAD" wrote in message ... On 1/16/13 11:32 AM, wrote: On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 06:40:15 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 1/15/13 9:19 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 20:52:32 -0500, Earl wrote: The scope is in on backwards, moron. Ther big end (objective lens) in on the down range side on all of my scoped rifles. My guess is that "Earl," if he ever had his hands on a scoped rifle, pointed it towards himself when he fired. It would explain his obvious brain damage. The rifle, btw, is a Thompson Center R-55. Mine has a stainless barrel and receiver. There are a number R-55 models, including a couple with wood stock. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2Vc8EbgSS0 I am not that familiar with TC rifles. I do have a few .22s and I just sold my .22 machine gun (for a 700% profit) It's a nicely made rifle, and pretty accurate right out of the box. I was going to get one of the ubiquitous Ruger .22s, but everyone I know who has one said it would "need work" to get as accurate as we'd want. I also looked at a CZ .22, which was also nice. But my local gun shop handles TC's, and gave me a good deal on the rifle and scope, mounted the scope properly, and sighted it in for me. I also buy my fishing bottom rigs and lures there, or at least I did when I spent more time fishing. ------------- You were posting that rifle as your own. Another fib? Come on by and you can sniff the barrel. |
What the 'ell??
|
What the 'ell??
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 15:49:20 -0800, "Califbill" wrote:
"ESAD" wrote in message ... On 1/16/13 11:32 AM, wrote: On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 06:40:15 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 1/15/13 9:19 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 20:52:32 -0500, Earl wrote: The scope is in on backwards, moron. Ther big end (objective lens) in on the down range side on all of my scoped rifles. My guess is that "Earl," if he ever had his hands on a scoped rifle, pointed it towards himself when he fired. It would explain his obvious brain damage. The rifle, btw, is a Thompson Center R-55. Mine has a stainless barrel and receiver. There are a number R-55 models, including a couple with wood stock. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2Vc8EbgSS0 I am not that familiar with TC rifles. I do have a few .22s and I just sold my .22 machine gun (for a 700% profit) It's a nicely made rifle, and pretty accurate right out of the box. I was going to get one of the ubiquitous Ruger .22s, but everyone I know who has one said it would "need work" to get as accurate as we'd want. I also looked at a CZ .22, which was also nice. But my local gun shop handles TC's, and gave me a good deal on the rifle and scope, mounted the scope properly, and sighted it in for me. I also buy my fishing bottom rigs and lures there, or at least I did when I spent more time fishing. ------------- You were posting that rifle as your own. Another fib? Notice we've not heard of this rifle until someone else posted a reference to it. Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument! |
What the 'ell??
On 1/17/13 10:55 AM, Salmonbait wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 15:49:20 -0800, "Califbill" wrote: "ESAD" wrote in message ... On 1/16/13 11:32 AM, wrote: On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 06:40:15 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 1/15/13 9:19 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 20:52:32 -0500, Earl wrote: The scope is in on backwards, moron. Ther big end (objective lens) in on the down range side on all of my scoped rifles. My guess is that "Earl," if he ever had his hands on a scoped rifle, pointed it towards himself when he fired. It would explain his obvious brain damage. The rifle, btw, is a Thompson Center R-55. Mine has a stainless barrel and receiver. There are a number R-55 models, including a couple with wood stock. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2Vc8EbgSS0 I am not that familiar with TC rifles. I do have a few .22s and I just sold my .22 machine gun (for a 700% profit) It's a nicely made rifle, and pretty accurate right out of the box. I was going to get one of the ubiquitous Ruger .22s, but everyone I know who has one said it would "need work" to get as accurate as we'd want. I also looked at a CZ .22, which was also nice. But my local gun shop handles TC's, and gave me a good deal on the rifle and scope, mounted the scope properly, and sighted it in for me. I also buy my fishing bottom rigs and lures there, or at least I did when I spent more time fishing. ------------- You were posting that rifle as your own. Another fib? Notice we've not heard of this rifle until someone else posted a reference to it. Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument! Wrong again, **** for brains. I posted photos of this rifle when I got it a few years ago. If you want to drive out here, I'll let you look at it. But not touch it. With your infirmities, you'd probably drop it. Here's another photo of the rifle: http://tinyurl.com/dy7yuwv |
What the 'ell??
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 11:08:54 -0500, ESAD wrote:
On 1/17/13 10:55 AM, Salmonbait wrote: On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 15:49:20 -0800, "Califbill" wrote: "ESAD" wrote in message ... On 1/16/13 11:32 AM, wrote: On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 06:40:15 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 1/15/13 9:19 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 20:52:32 -0500, Earl wrote: The scope is in on backwards, moron. Ther big end (objective lens) in on the down range side on all of my scoped rifles. My guess is that "Earl," if he ever had his hands on a scoped rifle, pointed it towards himself when he fired. It would explain his obvious brain damage. The rifle, btw, is a Thompson Center R-55. Mine has a stainless barrel and receiver. There are a number R-55 models, including a couple with wood stock. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2Vc8EbgSS0 I am not that familiar with TC rifles. I do have a few .22s and I just sold my .22 machine gun (for a 700% profit) It's a nicely made rifle, and pretty accurate right out of the box. I was going to get one of the ubiquitous Ruger .22s, but everyone I know who has one said it would "need work" to get as accurate as we'd want. I also looked at a CZ .22, which was also nice. But my local gun shop handles TC's, and gave me a good deal on the rifle and scope, mounted the scope properly, and sighted it in for me. I also buy my fishing bottom rigs and lures there, or at least I did when I spent more time fishing. ------------- You were posting that rifle as your own. Another fib? Notice we've not heard of this rifle until someone else posted a reference to it. Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument! Wrong again, **** for brains. I posted photos of this rifle when I got it a few years ago. If you want to drive out here, I'll let you look at it. But not touch it. With your infirmities, you'd probably drop it. Here's another photo of the rifle: http://tinyurl.com/dy7yuwv Here's another: http://i3.ytimg.com/vi/n3WDmue9OuY/default.jpg and another: http://tinyurl.com/ar8xle3 and yet another: http://tinyurl.com/9wzstdz and a whole bunch mo http://tinyurl.com/bzfg67a More names, ESAD? Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument! |
What the 'ell??
On 1/17/13 11:30 AM, Salmonbait wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 11:08:54 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 1/17/13 10:55 AM, Salmonbait wrote: On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 15:49:20 -0800, "Califbill" wrote: "ESAD" wrote in message ... On 1/16/13 11:32 AM, wrote: On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 06:40:15 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 1/15/13 9:19 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 20:52:32 -0500, Earl wrote: The scope is in on backwards, moron. Ther big end (objective lens) in on the down range side on all of my scoped rifles. My guess is that "Earl," if he ever had his hands on a scoped rifle, pointed it towards himself when he fired. It would explain his obvious brain damage. The rifle, btw, is a Thompson Center R-55. Mine has a stainless barrel and receiver. There are a number R-55 models, including a couple with wood stock. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2Vc8EbgSS0 I am not that familiar with TC rifles. I do have a few .22s and I just sold my .22 machine gun (for a 700% profit) It's a nicely made rifle, and pretty accurate right out of the box. I was going to get one of the ubiquitous Ruger .22s, but everyone I know who has one said it would "need work" to get as accurate as we'd want. I also looked at a CZ .22, which was also nice. But my local gun shop handles TC's, and gave me a good deal on the rifle and scope, mounted the scope properly, and sighted it in for me. I also buy my fishing bottom rigs and lures there, or at least I did when I spent more time fishing. ------------- You were posting that rifle as your own. Another fib? Notice we've not heard of this rifle until someone else posted a reference to it. Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument! Wrong again, **** for brains. I posted photos of this rifle when I got it a few years ago. If you want to drive out here, I'll let you look at it. But not touch it. With your infirmities, you'd probably drop it. Here's another photo of the rifle: http://tinyurl.com/dy7yuwv Here's another: http://i3.ytimg.com/vi/n3WDmue9OuY/default.jpg and another: http://tinyurl.com/ar8xle3 and yet another: http://tinyurl.com/9wzstdz and a whole bunch mo http://tinyurl.com/bzfg67a More names, ESAD? Salmonbait -- Here you go, asshole: http://tinyurl.com/by87gv9 |
What the 'ell??
In article ,
says... On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 11:08:54 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 1/17/13 10:55 AM, Salmonbait wrote: On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 15:49:20 -0800, "Califbill" wrote: "ESAD" wrote in message ... On 1/16/13 11:32 AM, wrote: On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 06:40:15 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 1/15/13 9:19 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 20:52:32 -0500, Earl wrote: The scope is in on backwards, moron. Ther big end (objective lens) in on the down range side on all of my scoped rifles. My guess is that "Earl," if he ever had his hands on a scoped rifle, pointed it towards himself when he fired. It would explain his obvious brain damage. The rifle, btw, is a Thompson Center R-55. Mine has a stainless barrel and receiver. There are a number R-55 models, including a couple with wood stock. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2Vc8EbgSS0 I am not that familiar with TC rifles. I do have a few .22s and I just sold my .22 machine gun (for a 700% profit) It's a nicely made rifle, and pretty accurate right out of the box. I was going to get one of the ubiquitous Ruger .22s, but everyone I know who has one said it would "need work" to get as accurate as we'd want. I also looked at a CZ .22, which was also nice. But my local gun shop handles TC's, and gave me a good deal on the rifle and scope, mounted the scope properly, and sighted it in for me. I also buy my fishing bottom rigs and lures there, or at least I did when I spent more time fishing. ------------- You were posting that rifle as your own. Another fib? Notice we've not heard of this rifle until someone else posted a reference to it. Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument! Wrong again, **** for brains. I posted photos of this rifle when I got it a few years ago. If you want to drive out here, I'll let you look at it. But not touch it. With your infirmities, you'd probably drop it. Here's another photo of the rifle: http://tinyurl.com/dy7yuwv Here's another: http://i3.ytimg.com/vi/n3WDmue9OuY/default.jpg and another: http://tinyurl.com/ar8xle3 and yet another: http://tinyurl.com/9wzstdz and a whole bunch mo http://tinyurl.com/bzfg67a More names, ESAD? That's all you have, eh? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:43 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com