|
What the 'ell??
On Monday, December 31, 2012 4:22:26 PM UTC-4, Califbill wrote:
wrote: On Monday, December 31, 2012 8:58:58 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Looks like things are getting crazier by the minute down there... http://www.cbc.ca/news/yourcommunity...-shooting.html What is YOUR solution? Disarm the population...with an exception for shotguns and legitimate hunting rifles. The founders did not include gun rights because of hunting. They wanted the leaders to have a fear of the populace. The problem we have, and seeing a few mass murders in Canada also, the problem includes canada, is that we have both a general breakdown in society and a mental health system that is mostly nonexistent and overly constrained by law. All the more reason to limit ownership of firearms. |
What the 'ell??
ESAD wrote:
On 12/31/12 3:22 PM, Califbill wrote: wrote: On Monday, December 31, 2012 8:58:58 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Looks like things are getting crazier by the minute down there... http://www.cbc.ca/news/yourcommunity...-shooting.html What is YOUR solution? Disarm the population...with an exception for shotguns and legitimate hunting rifles. The founders did not include gun rights because of hunting. They wanted the leaders to have a fear of the populace. The problem we have, and seeing a few mass murders in Canada also, the problem includes canada, is that we have both a general breakdown in society and a mental health system that is mostly nonexistent and overly constrained by law. Unless you have money or decent health insurance, the mental health system is more nonexistent than overly constrained. Even decent health insurance does not cover much mental health costs. The public mental health budget is non existent and going lower as we wait. Plus with all the lawyering up people that are nuts can just not get treated if they so desire. |
What the 'ell??
wrote:
On Monday, December 31, 2012 4:22:26 PM UTC-4, Califbill wrote: wrote: On Monday, December 31, 2012 8:58:58 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Looks like things are getting crazier by the minute down there... http://www.cbc.ca/news/yourcommunity...-shooting.html What is YOUR solution? Disarm the population...with an exception for shotguns and legitimate hunting rifles. The founders did not include gun rights because of hunting. They wanted the leaders to have a fear of the populace. The problem we have, and seeing a few mass murders in Canada also, the problem includes canada, is that we have both a general breakdown in society and a mental health system that is mostly nonexistent and overly constrained by law. All the more reason to limit ownership of firearms. See what the control advocates in Canada have accomplished. You can have you petty dictator run roughshod all he wants. |
What the 'ell??
On 12/31/2012 4:43 PM, BAR wrote:
In article , says... On Monday, December 31, 2012 4:22:26 PM UTC-4, Califbill wrote: wrote: On Monday, December 31, 2012 8:58:58 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Looks like things are getting crazier by the minute down there... http://www.cbc.ca/news/yourcommunity...-shooting.html What is YOUR solution? Disarm the population...with an exception for shotguns and legitimate hunting rifles. The founders did not include gun rights because of hunting. They wanted the leaders to have a fear of the populace. The problem we have, and seeing a few mass murders in Canada also, the problem includes canada, is that we have both a general breakdown in society and a mental health system that is mostly nonexistent and overly constrained by law. All the more reason to limit ownership of firearms. Cars kill people, we need to limit cars, especially those evil SUVs. Hey, what do you expect? Do you really want fat old men to have to sit way down into a small economical car? Geeze, what's with you? |
What the 'ell??
On 12/31/12 5:17 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 12/31/2012 4:43 PM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Monday, December 31, 2012 4:22:26 PM UTC-4, Califbill wrote: wrote: On Monday, December 31, 2012 8:58:58 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Looks like things are getting crazier by the minute down there... http://www.cbc.ca/news/yourcommunity...-shooting.html What is YOUR solution? Disarm the population...with an exception for shotguns and legitimate hunting rifles. The founders did not include gun rights because of hunting. They wanted the leaders to have a fear of the populace. The problem we have, and seeing a few mass murders in Canada also, the problem includes canada, is that we have both a general breakdown in society and a mental health system that is mostly nonexistent and overly constrained by law. All the more reason to limit ownership of firearms. Cars kill people, we need to limit cars, especially those evil SUVs. Hey, what do you expect? Do you really want fat old men to have to sit way down into a small economical car? Geeze, what's with you? Ahh...*you* read Bert****'s posts. I wondered once who did. |
What the 'ell??
On 12/31/2012 1:23 PM, Califbill wrote:
See what the control advocates in Canada have accomplished. You can have you petty dictator run roughshod all he wants. If they tried that here you'd shoot him? |
What the 'ell??
On 12/31/12 7:03 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 18:37:26 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 12/31/12 6:31 PM, wrote: No. Mental health problems of teachers come from students, sorry-ass parents that won't parent, and impotent administrators trying to be politicians. Gosh, and I thought your area of expertise was limited to assholish snarky comments. Little did I know you were a ranking expert on our education system, teachers, parenting, school administration and mental health issues. Apparently, I'm everything you aren't. Nah...you're just an asshole making snarky remarks. |
What the 'ell??
thumper wrote:
On 12/31/2012 1:23 PM, Califbill wrote: See what the control advocates in Canada have accomplished. You can have you petty dictator run roughshod all he wants. If they tried that here you'd shoot him? Someone might. |
What the 'ell??
ESAD wrote:
On 12/31/12 5:24 PM, thumper wrote: On 12/31/2012 1:23 PM, Califbill wrote: See what the control advocates in Canada have accomplished. You can have you petty dictator run roughshod all he wants. If they tried that here you'd shoot him? Bilious Bill thinks the army of NRA members, once it emerges from its beer-induced stupor in the woods deer hunting expedition, will be able to stage a successful insurrection against the forces of the United States. More likely, they'll shoot each other. Actually only takes one shooter to really change history. WW1 started with one shooter. Biggest change in US history was probably Sirhan Sirhan. He gave us Nixon, Carter, Reagan. |
What the 'ell??
On 12/31/2012 4:56 PM, Califbill wrote:
thumper wrote: On 12/31/2012 1:23 PM, Califbill wrote: See what the control advocates in Canada have accomplished. You can have you petty dictator run roughshod all he wants. If they tried that here you'd shoot him? Someone might. I prefer elections. |
What the 'ell??
On 12/31/12 7:56 PM, Califbill wrote:
ESAD wrote: On 12/31/12 5:24 PM, thumper wrote: On 12/31/2012 1:23 PM, Califbill wrote: See what the control advocates in Canada have accomplished. You can have you petty dictator run roughshod all he wants. If they tried that here you'd shoot him? Bilious Bill thinks the army of NRA members, once it emerges from its beer-induced stupor in the woods deer hunting expedition, will be able to stage a successful insurrection against the forces of the United States. More likely, they'll shoot each other. Actually only takes one shooter to really change history. WW1 started with one shooter. Biggest change in US history was probably Sirhan Sirhan. He gave us Nixon, Carter, Reagan. Your boy Crazy Zell is past his prime. |
What the 'ell??
On Dec 31 2012, 6:11*pm, Meyer wrote:
On 12/31/2012 4:43 PM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Monday, December 31, 2012 4:22:26 PM UTC-4, Califbill wrote: wrote: On Monday, December 31, 2012 8:58:58 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Looks like things are getting crazier by the minute down there... http://www.cbc.ca/news/yourcommunity...ers-get-gun-tr... What is YOUR solution? Disarm the population...with an exception for shotguns and legitimate hunting rifles. The founders did not include gun rights because of hunting. *They wanted the leaders to have a fear of the populace. *The problem we have, and seeing a few mass murders in Canada also, the problem includes canada, is that we have both a general breakdown in society and a mental health system that is mostly nonexistent and overly constrained by law. All the more reason to limit ownership of firearms. Cars kill people, we need to limit cars, especially those evil SUVs. Lets start with the Rave 4 (AKA: the Saturday night special of SUVs) HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH |
What the 'ell??
|
What the 'ell??
|
What the 'ell??
On Dec 31 2012, 4:43*pm, ESAD wrote:
Bilious Bill thinks the army of NRA members, once it emerges from its beer-induced stupor in the woods deer hunting expedition, will be able to stage a successful insurrection against the forces of the United States. More likely, they'll shoot each other. I'm sure King George used that type of thinking too ?;^ ) |
What the 'ell??
Tim wrote:
On Dec 31 2012, 4:43 pm, ESAD wrote: Bilious Bill thinks the army of NRA members, once it emerges from its beer-induced stupor in the woods deer hunting expedition, will be able to stage a successful insurrection against the forces of the United States. More likely, they'll shoot each other. I'm sure King George used that type of thinking too ?;^ ) You aren't naive enough to believe in such a comparison. |
What the 'ell??
On Monday, December 31, 2012 3:43:40 PM UTC-5, Boating All Out wrote:
The pot smokers are all wired to vote. No, they are "wired" to eat cheetos and watch cartoons. They'd forget to vote. Proof your ramblings are those of an idiot. |
What the 'ell??
On Jan 1, 7:44*am, ESAD wrote:
Tim wrote: On Dec 31 2012, 4:43 pm, ESAD wrote: Bilious Bill thinks the army of NRA members, once it emerges from its beer-induced stupor in the woods deer hunting expedition, will be able to stage a successful insurrection against the forces of the United States. More likely, they'll shoot each other. I'm sure King George used that type of thinking too ?;^ ) You aren't naive enough to believe in such a comparison. I'm definitely not naive enough to believe your statement. |
What the 'ell??
In article 1805701577378681744.653332bmckeenospam-
, says... wrote: On Monday, December 31, 2012 4:22:26 PM UTC-4, Califbill wrote: wrote: On Monday, December 31, 2012 8:58:58 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Looks like things are getting crazier by the minute down there... http://www.cbc.ca/news/yourcommunity...-shooting.html What is YOUR solution? Disarm the population...with an exception for shotguns and legitimate hunting rifles. The founders did not include gun rights because of hunting. They wanted the leaders to have a fear of the populace. The problem we have, and seeing a few mass murders in Canada also, the problem includes canada, is that we have both a general breakdown in society and a mental health system that is mostly nonexistent and overly constrained by law. All the more reason to limit ownership of firearms. See what the control advocates in Canada have accomplished. You can have you petty dictator run roughshod all he wants. Here's how you do it: http://www.economist.com/blogs/lexin...12/gun-control And, to be crude, having few guns does mean that few people get shot. In 2008-2009, there were 39 fatal injuries from crimes involving firearms in England and Wales, with a population about one sixth the size of America?s. In America, there were 12,000 gun-related homicides in 2008. |
What the 'ell??
In article 1268645888378694356.654977bmckeenospam-
, says... ESAD wrote: On 12/31/12 5:24 PM, thumper wrote: On 12/31/2012 1:23 PM, Califbill wrote: See what the control advocates in Canada have accomplished. You can have you petty dictator run roughshod all he wants. If they tried that here you'd shoot him? Bilious Bill thinks the army of NRA members, once it emerges from its beer-induced stupor in the woods deer hunting expedition, will be able to stage a successful insurrection against the forces of the United States. More likely, they'll shoot each other. Actually only takes one shooter to really change history. WW1 started with one shooter. Biggest change in US history was probably Sirhan Sirhan. He gave us Nixon, Carter, Reagan. Sirhan had the ability to read and act into the future, altering what happens? How? |
What the 'ell??
In article ,
says... In article , says... On 12/31/12 5:24 PM, thumper wrote: On 12/31/2012 1:23 PM, Califbill wrote: See what the control advocates in Canada have accomplished. You can have you petty dictator run roughshod all he wants. If they tried that here you'd shoot him? Bilious Bill thinks the army of NRA members, once it emerges from its beer-induced stupor in the woods deer hunting expedition, will be able to stage a successful insurrection against the forces of the United States. More likely, they'll shoot each other. Why does Harry Reid carry a concealed handgun? Cite? |
What the 'ell??
In article 599645904378681561.480769bmckeenospam-
, says... ESAD wrote: On 12/31/12 3:22 PM, Califbill wrote: wrote: On Monday, December 31, 2012 8:58:58 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Looks like things are getting crazier by the minute down there... http://www.cbc.ca/news/yourcommunity...-shooting.html What is YOUR solution? Disarm the population...with an exception for shotguns and legitimate hunting rifles. The founders did not include gun rights because of hunting. They wanted the leaders to have a fear of the populace. The problem we have, and seeing a few mass murders in Canada also, the problem includes canada, is that we have both a general breakdown in society and a mental health system that is mostly nonexistent and overly constrained by law. Unless you have money or decent health insurance, the mental health system is more nonexistent than overly constrained. Even decent health insurance does not cover much mental health costs. The public mental health budget is non existent and going lower as we wait. Plus with all the lawyering up people that are nuts can just not get treated if they so desire. You are correct. |
What the 'ell??
In article ,
says... In article , says... On Monday, December 31, 2012 4:22:26 PM UTC-4, Califbill wrote: wrote: On Monday, December 31, 2012 8:58:58 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Looks like things are getting crazier by the minute down there... http://www.cbc.ca/news/yourcommunity...-shooting.html What is YOUR solution? Disarm the population...with an exception for shotguns and legitimate hunting rifles. The founders did not include gun rights because of hunting. They wanted the leaders to have a fear of the populace. The problem we have, and seeing a few mass murders in Canada also, the problem includes canada, is that we have both a general breakdown in society and a mental health system that is mostly nonexistent and overly constrained by law. All the more reason to limit ownership of firearms. Cars kill people, we need to limit cars, especially those evil SUVs. Do you really, I mean really fall for that ignorant rhetoric?? Every time I hear a far right wing NRA whack job spew that **** I always think, I wonder if that individual is really that stupid.... |
What the 'ell??
In article , says...
On 12/31/2012 4:43 PM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Monday, December 31, 2012 4:22:26 PM UTC-4, Califbill wrote: wrote: On Monday, December 31, 2012 8:58:58 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Looks like things are getting crazier by the minute down there... http://www.cbc.ca/news/yourcommunity...-shooting.html What is YOUR solution? Disarm the population...with an exception for shotguns and legitimate hunting rifles. The founders did not include gun rights because of hunting. They wanted the leaders to have a fear of the populace. The problem we have, and seeing a few mass murders in Canada also, the problem includes canada, is that we have both a general breakdown in society and a mental health system that is mostly nonexistent and overly constrained by law. All the more reason to limit ownership of firearms. Cars kill people, we need to limit cars, especially those evil SUVs. Hey, what do you expect? Do you really want fat old men to have to sit way down into a small economical car? Geeze, what's with you? Oops, there's one we KNOW is that stupid.... |
What the 'ell??
In article om,
says... On 12/31/2012 4:43 PM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Monday, December 31, 2012 4:22:26 PM UTC-4, Califbill wrote: wrote: On Monday, December 31, 2012 8:58:58 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Looks like things are getting crazier by the minute down there... http://www.cbc.ca/news/yourcommunity...-shooting.html What is YOUR solution? Disarm the population...with an exception for shotguns and legitimate hunting rifles. The founders did not include gun rights because of hunting. They wanted the leaders to have a fear of the populace. The problem we have, and seeing a few mass murders in Canada also, the problem includes canada, is that we have both a general breakdown in society and a mental health system that is mostly nonexistent and overly constrained by law. All the more reason to limit ownership of firearms. Cars kill people, we need to limit cars, especially those evil SUVs. Lets start with the Rave 4 (AKA: the Saturday night special of SUVs) Harmless, it's too little to do any damage, and the drivers don't want to risk breaking a fingernail. |
What the 'ell??
In article ,
says... On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 14:51:45 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:02:02 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:49:48 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 08:05:31 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 19:56:46 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 19:36:43 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 12/30/12 6:52 PM, wrote: Looks like things are getting crazier by the minute down there... http://www.cbc.ca/news/yourcommunity...-shooting.html It'll be interesting to see what happens when the first sort of trained teacher ends up shooting a kid "by sccident." Hey, this is the United States. Rather than deal with the issues, we arm teacher. We arm everybody that is truly expected to protect and defend. Now, that responsibility falls to those people acting in loco parentis. Deal with the issues? There is no squishy idealism debate of issues. This is about crazy armed people looking for a soft underbelly and finding it among unprotected children. This isn't necessarily about guns, either. Other countries are having the same problem with crazies employing knives, machetes, and hatchets to eviscerate and hack off school children's body parts. It is already legal for teachers in Utah to carry. I applaud them for seeking further training in pursuit of protect the children and fellow employees. An interesting thing is I have not heard about any shootings in Utah. I googled Utah Shooting and I got this story, one story about a drug raid and a ****load of stories and ads for places to shoot. Maybe those Mormons are too scary to start up any **** with. So are you ASSuming that the teachers toting guns to school will be any more mentally stable than the general population of the U.S. where the shooters have come from? So, you think the shooters are representative of the general population? Interesting logic, that. Who else comes from the general population? Yes, the shooters came from the general population of the U.S. That's where everyone else comes from, INCLUDING teachers. So, you are drawing specifics from the widest possible generality? You don't think that a teacher can go off like anyone else might be capable of? What if this teacher, who until this time was just fine, was allowed to carry a gun?? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODbAHqn_qmo Or this one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NLQkTfKosY Or this one: http://sitchnews.com/3774/teachers-g...s-during-math- class What if schools sent students that were making the teachers go crazy to reform schools instead? Oh, so all mental health problems of teachers comes from the students, eh? No. Mental health problems of teachers come from students, sorry-ass parents that won't parent, and impotent administrators trying to be politicians. ALL teacher's mental health problems are because of someone else..... interesting. Is that the way you think it is with the general public, too, it's always someone else's fault? |
What the 'ell??
In article ,
says... On 12/31/12 6:31 PM, wrote: No. Mental health problems of teachers come from students, sorry-ass parents that won't parent, and impotent administrators trying to be politicians. Gosh, and I thought your area of expertise was limited to assholish snarky comments. Little did I know you were a ranking expert on our education system, teachers, parenting, school administration and mental health issues. Actually no, unlike you, he's knowledgeable and has a lot of interesting ideas. |
What the 'ell??
On 1/1/2013 8:35 AM, BAR wrote:
In article , says... On 12/31/12 11:37 AM, JustWait wrote: Quite frankly I think the training should be based on the training a rookie Police Officer comes in with... This might mean a couple years of night school, but if you are going to have armed anybody in the schools I think they need all the tools of conflict resolution, physical ability, tactical awareness, etc that a fully trained Police Officer has. You're barely literate and you're coming with "plans" on educating and putting armed guards in the public schools? Funny stuff. You are a pedophile, we don't even want to know what your plans would be for the kids... You are fiscally irresponsible and you continue to tell us that we don't spend our money correctly, the government can do it better for us. |
What the 'ell??
On 1/1/2013 8:15 AM, BAR wrote:
In article , says... On 12/31/12 5:24 PM, thumper wrote: On 12/31/2012 1:23 PM, Califbill wrote: See what the control advocates in Canada have accomplished. You can have you petty dictator run roughshod all he wants. If they tried that here you'd shoot him? Bilious Bill thinks the army of NRA members, once it emerges from its beer-induced stupor in the woods deer hunting expedition, will be able to stage a successful insurrection against the forces of the United States. More likely, they'll shoot each other. Why does Harry Reid carry a concealed handgun? Uh, cause he's a democrat... er, uh, hypocrite... |
What the 'ell??
|
What the 'ell??
On 1/1/2013 8:37 AM, Tim wrote:
On Dec 31 2012, 4:43 pm, ESAD wrote: Bilious Bill thinks the army of NRA members, once it emerges from its beer-induced stupor in the woods deer hunting expedition, will be able to stage a successful insurrection against the forces of the United States. More likely, they'll shoot each other. I'm sure King George used that type of thinking too ?;^ ) Or any other deadbeat drunk.... |
What the 'ell??
On Tuesday, January 1, 2013 10:27:26 AM UTC-5, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Monday, December 31, 2012 3:43:40 PM UTC-5, Boating All Out wrote: The pot smokers are all wired to vote. No, they are "wired" to eat cheetos and watch cartoons. They'd forget to vote. Proof your ramblings are those of an idiot. Proof that you are narrow minded. Have some personal experience with that, eh? |
What the 'ell??
On 1/1/13 10:26 AM, JustWait wrote:
In article , says... On 12/31/12 11:37 AM, JustWait wrote: Quite frankly I think the training should be based on the training a rookie Police Officer comes in with... This might mean a couple years of night school, but if you are going to have armed anybody in the schools I think they need all the tools of conflict resolution, physical ability, tactical awareness, etc that a fully trained Police Officer has. You're barely literate and you're coming with "plans" on educating and putting armed guards in the public schools? Funny stuff. You are a pedophile, we don't even want to know what your plans would be for the kids... You are projecting your pedophilia onto others, little **** of a boy-man. |
What the 'ell??
In article ,
says... On Tuesday, January 1, 2013 10:27:26 AM UTC-5, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Monday, December 31, 2012 3:43:40 PM UTC-5, Boating All Out wrote: The pot smokers are all wired to vote. No, they are "wired" to eat cheetos and watch cartoons. They'd forget to vote. Proof your ramblings are those of an idiot. Proof that you are narrow minded. Have some personal experience with that, eh? I sure do, you and Scotty are very narrow minded, and I watch and listen. |
What the 'ell??
On Tuesday, January 1, 2013 12:07:51 PM UTC-5, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Tuesday, January 1, 2013 10:27:26 AM UTC-5, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Monday, December 31, 2012 3:43:40 PM UTC-5, Boating All Out wrote: The pot smokers are all wired to vote. No, they are "wired" to eat cheetos and watch cartoons. They'd forget to vote. Proof your ramblings are those of an idiot. Proof that you are narrow minded. Have some personal experience with that, eh? I sure do, So you're a pot-head? Figures. |
What the 'ell??
On 1/1/13 12:37 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 14:33:45 -0500, GuzzisRule wrote: On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 10:02:40 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 12/31/12 8:32 AM, wrote: Disarm the population...with an exception for shotguns and legitimate hunting rifles. Too rational for the lunatics in this country. How would you 'disarm the population' in DC and Anacostia, ESAD? They must have already been disarmed. Owning a handgun has been illegal in DC since 1968 (unless it was registered at that time) and long guns are heavily regulated. This should be the safest city in the country. I proposed a plan. The plan was to round up all the useless old racist right-wing farts like Herring and send them into the tough neighborhoods in DC to knock on doors and insist on having the occupants turn over their firearms. My plan: 1. Provides honest work for the old-fart right wingers. 2. Might result in some of the old farts being terminated, an event that would cut down on the number of racists *and* the CO2 they emit. 3. Might get some firearms out of the hands of those who might not be legally entitled to have them. Such duties might help people like Herring atone for the horrors they visited upon SE Asia. |
What the 'ell??
On Tuesday, January 1, 2013 11:19:05 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article 1805701577378681744.653332bmckeenospam- , says... wrote: On Monday, December 31, 2012 4:22:26 PM UTC-4, Califbill wrote: wrote: On Monday, December 31, 2012 8:58:58 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Looks like things are getting crazier by the minute down there... http://www.cbc.ca/news/yourcommunity...-shooting.html What is YOUR solution? Disarm the population...with an exception for shotguns and legitimate hunting rifles. The founders did not include gun rights because of hunting. They wanted the leaders to have a fear of the populace. The problem we have, and seeing a few mass murders in Canada also, the problem includes canada, is that we have both a general breakdown in society and a mental health system that is mostly nonexistent and overly constrained by law. All the more reason to limit ownership of firearms. See what the control advocates in Canada have accomplished. You can have you petty dictator run roughshod all he wants. Here's how you do it: http://www.economist.com/blogs/lexin...12/gun-control And, to be crude, having few guns does mean that few people get shot. In 2008-2009, there were 39 fatal injuries from crimes involving firearms in England and Wales, with a population about one sixth the size of America?s. In America, there were 12,000 gun-related homicides in 2008. Here's how who does it? You do know that Canada makes it's own laws, eh? That lady is talking about Britain. Being next door to y'all makes it much harder to control hand guns and ammunition. |
What the 'ell??
|
What the 'ell??
On 1/1/13 12:55 PM, wrote:
On Tuesday, January 1, 2013 11:19:05 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article 1805701577378681744.653332bmckeenospam- , says... wrote: On Monday, December 31, 2012 4:22:26 PM UTC-4, Califbill wrote: wrote: On Monday, December 31, 2012 8:58:58 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Looks like things are getting crazier by the minute down there... http://www.cbc.ca/news/yourcommunity...-shooting.html What is YOUR solution? Disarm the population...with an exception for shotguns and legitimate hunting rifles. The founders did not include gun rights because of hunting. They wanted the leaders to have a fear of the populace. The problem we have, and seeing a few mass murders in Canada also, the problem includes canada, is that we have both a general breakdown in society and a mental health system that is mostly nonexistent and overly constrained by law. All the more reason to limit ownership of firearms. See what the control advocates in Canada have accomplished. You can have you petty dictator run roughshod all he wants. Here's how you do it: http://www.economist.com/blogs/lexin...12/gun-control And, to be crude, having few guns does mean that few people get shot. In 2008-2009, there were 39 fatal injuries from crimes involving firearms in England and Wales, with a population about one sixth the size of America?s. In America, there were 12,000 gun-related homicides in 2008. Here's how who does it? You do know that Canada makes it's own laws, eh? That lady is talking about Britain. Being next door to y'all makes it much harder to control hand guns and ammunition. Even so, Canada is a far safer country than the United States, especially as it relates to firearm murders. It's funny that you bring up that bit about Canada making its own laws. Undereducated Americans think Elizabeth II is the head of government in Canada, rather than just the head of state. In the 2008 elections, Sarah Palin thought the Queen, not the Prime Minister, was the head of government of the United Kingdom. D'oh. The Queen is the head of state, the constitutional monarch. Of course, Palin was the dumbest candidate for high elective office in the history of the United States, and much beloved by righties of similar intellectual capabilities. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:17 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com