|
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
In article ,
says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 16:15:27 -0500, JustWait wrote: On 12/26/2012 2:07 PM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:14:56 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: http://tinyurl.com/c59s6hm Yeah, it is working great in Chicago and DC where hand guns are virtually banned NBC news' David Gregory is in some serious trouble because he asked the police if he could use a 30 round magazine and was told no they are illegal to poses in DC. Gregory did it anyway and is now facing the possibility of being arrested, convicted, fined and jailed. Do you really think Holder is gonna' let anybody do anything to a lib-activist? LOL! I hope that by the time the DC cops get around to going over there somebody has the good sense to remove the follower and spring from that magazine. Then it is just a metal box. Yeah, commit another crime by withholding evidence, that's a great idea, get that directly from the NRA did you? For that matter you could just put a plug under the magazine follower so it only takes 10 rounds. There were a bunch of Chinese magazines that came in during the ban, made legal with the plug. See above. |
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
On Dec 27, 2:17*am, Boating All Out wrote:
In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 16:37:45 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 15:05:09 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:14:56 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: http://tinyurl.com/c59s6hm Yeah, it is working great in Chicago and DC where hand guns are virtually banned Did you read the article and note the facts given? Yup but I didn't see them explain Chicago or DC. I also saw them gloss over Newtown." Connecticut has more restrictions on gun ownership than most states", the first line of the article. What's to explain? Chicago and DC don't show up on any mass shooter list I've seen. Gangbangers shooting each other, with the occasional innocent collateral. Mass shootings happen where gun nuts live. A legal CT gun nut provided the guns in that case. Not hard to figure out. Most mass shootings happen in "gun country," not cities that discourage gun nuts. And what makes you think you can't legally have a handgun in Chicago? NRA tell you that? Gangbangers and other criminals would have a much harder time getting guns without the "legal" gun nut purchasers around to make it all easy.. The Lanza woman is a perfect example. A gun nut providing weapons for a mass shooter. So you only care about murder when it is white victims. I see. No you don't. *Gun nuts don't see clearly. There have always been more gun deaths where there is poverty and gangs. More stabbings too. Violent death goes with that territory. I never grieved over Italian, Irish, German, Russian and Jew mobsters shooting and slicing each other up either. These guys are all gun nuts. *Part of their "business." Mass murder is down around snake bite and below lightning as a likely cause of death. Gun deaths themselves are rare enough. *I never even think about it unless it's in the news. *You and krause probably dwell on it quite a bit. *It's the nature of the gun nut. *Comes from fondling guns, I suppose, and thinking about getting more firepower. Maybe like a fatty thinking about more pastry. *Don't really know. BTW, the gun death map pretty much follows the Red state/Blue state pattern.http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...-violence.html Folks living in cracker Republican-voting states have an increased chance of dying by gun. Funny, all these mass shootings lately in blue states like Oregon, CT, NY..... And the blues here are the only ones who seem to have a double standard and of course I have been subjected to harry fondling and racking his guns.... so as usual thump, you are full of ****... Of course, those slacker states produce more "I want mine and now it's gone" types than the "cracker red states". When little progressive bitches don't get it handed to them, they seem to resort to shooting things up. |
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
In article ,
says... On 12/26/12 4:15 PM, JustWait wrote: On 12/26/2012 2:07 PM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:14:56 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: http://tinyurl.com/c59s6hm Yeah, it is working great in Chicago and DC where hand guns are virtually banned NBC news' David Gregory is in some serious trouble because he asked the police if he could use a 30 round magazine and was told no they are illegal to poses in DC. Gregory did it anyway and is now facing the possibility of being arrested, convicted, fined and jailed. Do you really think Holder is gonna' let anybody do anything to a lib-activist? LOL! Do you think the attorney general of the United States is going to involve himself in a matter that falls strictly under the purview of the District of Columbia? I find it hard to believe you actually graduated from a public high school in Connecticut. Check the Residence Act of 1790. |
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
In article ,
says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 13:54:55 -0800, thumper wrote: On 12/26/2012 1:20 PM, wrote: On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 15:05:09 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: Did you read the article and note the facts given? Yup but I didn't see them explain Chicago or DC. I also saw them gloss over Newtown." Connecticut has more restrictions on gun ownership than most states", the first line of the article. I thought you had a better understanding of statistics. I know a whole lot about statistics. Mostly that you can selectively create "views" from a database that will prove just about anything you like by what you include and what you leave out. That is why the NRA can use that same data set and get perfectly valid numbers that say more guns create less crime. If I was going to dig into their numbers I would start with how many of the "banned" gun styles are responsible for the murders in the states where they are not banned. "Assault weapons" are not really used in that many murders but they tend to be the ones that make the news. Nobody is going to tune in to hear about a couple of black gangsters who are killed by another black gangster over a drug corner. That will usually be with a $100 stolen handgun not an AR. I think you would find out that the "banned" gun styles that are most often used in crimes are of the type pistol. Since the vast majority of pistols are semi-automatics, where revolvers and "autos" are effectively the same due to their operation what specifiability are we going to ban? |
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
In article 728c3341-c7bc-43e3-8317-ed3b501300d7
@s6g2000pby.googlegroups.com, says... On Dec 27, 2:17*am, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 16:37:45 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 15:05:09 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:14:56 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: http://tinyurl.com/c59s6hm Yeah, it is working great in Chicago and DC where hand guns are virtually banned Did you read the article and note the facts given? Yup but I didn't see them explain Chicago or DC. I also saw them gloss over Newtown." Connecticut has more restrictions on gun ownership than most states", the first line of the article. What's to explain? Chicago and DC don't show up on any mass shooter list I've seen. Gangbangers shooting each other, with the occasional innocent collateral. Mass shootings happen where gun nuts live. A legal CT gun nut provided the guns in that case. Not hard to figure out. Most mass shootings happen in "gun country," not cities that discourage gun nuts. And what makes you think you can't legally have a handgun in Chicago? NRA tell you that? Gangbangers and other criminals would have a much harder time getting guns without the "legal" gun nut purchasers around to make it all easy. The Lanza woman is a perfect example. A gun nut providing weapons for a mass shooter. So you only care about murder when it is white victims. I see. No you don't. *Gun nuts don't see clearly. There have always been more gun deaths where there is poverty and gangs. More stabbings too. Violent death goes with that territory. I never grieved over Italian, Irish, German, Russian and Jew mobsters shooting and slicing each other up either. These guys are all gun nuts. *Part of their "business." Mass murder is down around snake bite and below lightning as a likely cause of death. Gun deaths themselves are rare enough. *I never even think about it unless it's in the news. *You and krause probably dwell on it quite a bit. *It's the nature of the gun nut. *Comes from fondling guns, I suppose, and thinking about getting more firepower. Maybe like a fatty thinking about more pastry. *Don't really know. BTW, the gun death map pretty much follows the Red state/Blue state pattern.http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...-violence.html Folks living in cracker Republican-voting states have an increased chance of dying by gun. Funny, all these mass shootings lately in blue states like Oregon, CT, NY..... And the blues here are the only ones who seem to have a double standard and of course I have been subjected to harry fondling and racking his guns.... so as usual thump, you are full of ****... Of course, those slacker states produce more "I want mine and now it's gone" types than the "cracker red states". When little progressive bitches don't get it handed to them, they seem to resort to shooting things up. More total insanity from Scotty!!! |
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
In article ,
says... In article , says... On 12/26/12 4:15 PM, JustWait wrote: On 12/26/2012 2:07 PM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:14:56 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: http://tinyurl.com/c59s6hm Yeah, it is working great in Chicago and DC where hand guns are virtually banned NBC news' David Gregory is in some serious trouble because he asked the police if he could use a 30 round magazine and was told no they are illegal to poses in DC. Gregory did it anyway and is now facing the possibility of being arrested, convicted, fined and jailed. Do you really think Holder is gonna' let anybody do anything to a lib-activist? LOL! Do you think the attorney general of the United States is going to involve himself in a matter that falls strictly under the purview of the District of Columbia? I find it hard to believe you actually graduated from a public high school in Connecticut. Check the Residence Act of 1790. That's not what was asked. |
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
On 12/27/12 9:09 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... In article , says... On 12/26/12 4:15 PM, JustWait wrote: On 12/26/2012 2:07 PM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:14:56 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: http://tinyurl.com/c59s6hm Yeah, it is working great in Chicago and DC where hand guns are virtually banned NBC news' David Gregory is in some serious trouble because he asked the police if he could use a 30 round magazine and was told no they are illegal to poses in DC. Gregory did it anyway and is now facing the possibility of being arrested, convicted, fined and jailed. Do you really think Holder is gonna' let anybody do anything to a lib-activist? LOL! Do you think the attorney general of the United States is going to involve himself in a matter that falls strictly under the purview of the District of Columbia? I find it hard to believe you actually graduated from a public high school in Connecticut. Check the Residence Act of 1790. That's not what was asked. The Residence Act? Hehehe. The alleged violation relating to the hi-cap mag is related to laws of the District of Columbia. The hi-cap mags are not illegal under federal law. |
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
On Dec 27, 9:09*am, iBoaterer wrote:
In article 728c3341-c7bc-43e3-8317-ed3b501300d7 @s6g2000pby.googlegroups.com, says... On Dec 27, 2:17*am, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 16:37:45 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 15:05:09 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:14:56 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: http://tinyurl.com/c59s6hm Yeah, it is working great in Chicago and DC where hand guns are virtually banned Did you read the article and note the facts given? Yup but I didn't see them explain Chicago or DC. I also saw them gloss over Newtown." Connecticut has more restrictions on gun ownership than most states", the first line of the article. What's to explain? Chicago and DC don't show up on any mass shooter list I've seen. Gangbangers shooting each other, with the occasional innocent collateral. Mass shootings happen where gun nuts live. A legal CT gun nut provided the guns in that case. Not hard to figure out. Most mass shootings happen in "gun country," not cities that discourage gun nuts. And what makes you think you can't legally have a handgun in Chicago? NRA tell you that? Gangbangers and other criminals would have a much harder time getting guns without the "legal" gun nut purchasers around to make it all easy. The Lanza woman is a perfect example. A gun nut providing weapons for a mass shooter. So you only care about murder when it is white victims. I see. No you don't. *Gun nuts don't see clearly. There have always been more gun deaths where there is poverty and gangs. More stabbings too. Violent death goes with that territory. I never grieved over Italian, Irish, German, Russian and Jew mobsters shooting and slicing each other up either. These guys are all gun nuts. *Part of their "business." Mass murder is down around snake bite and below lightning as a likely cause of death. Gun deaths themselves are rare enough. *I never even think about it unless it's in the news. *You and krause probably dwell on it quite a bit. *It's the nature of the gun nut. *Comes from fondling guns, I suppose, and thinking about getting more firepower. Maybe like a fatty thinking about more pastry. *Don't really know. BTW, the gun death map pretty much follows the Red state/Blue state pattern.http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...violence..html Folks living in cracker Republican-voting states have an increased chance of dying by gun. Funny, all these mass shootings lately in blue states like Oregon, CT, NY..... And the blues here are the only ones who seem to have a double standard and of course I have been subjected to harry fondling and racking his guns.... so as usual thump, you are full of ****... Of course, those slacker states produce more "I want mine and now it's gone" types than the "cracker red states". When little progressive bitches don't get it handed to them, they seem to resort to shooting things up. More total insanity from Scotty!!! More lazy trolling from kevin!!! |
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
On 12/27/12 9:45 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On Dec 27, 9:09 am, iBoaterer wrote: In article 728c3341-c7bc-43e3-8317-ed3b501300d7 @s6g2000pby.googlegroups.com, says... On Dec 27, 2:17 am, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 16:37:45 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 15:05:09 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:14:56 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: http://tinyurl.com/c59s6hm Yeah, it is working great in Chicago and DC where hand guns are virtually banned Did you read the article and note the facts given? Yup but I didn't see them explain Chicago or DC. I also saw them gloss over Newtown." Connecticut has more restrictions on gun ownership than most states", the first line of the article. What's to explain? Chicago and DC don't show up on any mass shooter list I've seen. Gangbangers shooting each other, with the occasional innocent collateral. Mass shootings happen where gun nuts live. A legal CT gun nut provided the guns in that case. Not hard to figure out. Most mass shootings happen in "gun country," not cities that discourage gun nuts. And what makes you think you can't legally have a handgun in Chicago? NRA tell you that? Gangbangers and other criminals would have a much harder time getting guns without the "legal" gun nut purchasers around to make it all easy. The Lanza woman is a perfect example. A gun nut providing weapons for a mass shooter. So you only care about murder when it is white victims. I see. No you don't. Gun nuts don't see clearly. There have always been more gun deaths where there is poverty and gangs. More stabbings too. Violent death goes with that territory. I never grieved over Italian, Irish, German, Russian and Jew mobsters shooting and slicing each other up either. These guys are all gun nuts. Part of their "business." Mass murder is down around snake bite and below lightning as a likely cause of death. Gun deaths themselves are rare enough. I never even think about it unless it's in the news. You and krause probably dwell on it quite a bit. It's the nature of the gun nut. Comes from fondling guns, I suppose, and thinking about getting more firepower. Maybe like a fatty thinking about more pastry. Don't really know. BTW, the gun death map pretty much follows the Red state/Blue state pattern.http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...-violence.html Folks living in cracker Republican-voting states have an increased chance of dying by gun. Funny, all these mass shootings lately in blue states like Oregon, CT, NY..... And the blues here are the only ones who seem to have a double standard and of course I have been subjected to harry fondling and racking his guns.... so as usual thump, you are full of ****... Of course, those slacker states produce more "I want mine and now it's gone" types than the "cracker red states". When little progressive bitches don't get it handed to them, they seem to resort to shooting things up. More total insanity from Scotty!!! More lazy trolling from kevin!!! You think the craziness you post here is worth a response that takes any effort? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:13 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com