http://tinyurl.com/8wq422r

"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...


http://tinyurl.com/8wq422r

----------------------------------------
600hp? How far between battery charges? 4400# So probably 2000# of
battery. We do not say electric cars won't work, but they are not
financially practical. And is this going to require a $100,000 Government
tax credit?

On 10/1/2012 2:13 PM, Califbill wrote:
"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...


http://tinyurl.com/8wq422r

----------------------------------------
600hp? How far between battery charges? 4400# So probably 2000# of
battery. We do not say electric cars won't work, but they are not
financially practical. And is this going to require a $100,000
Government tax credit?


Someone rub some hamburger on him so his dog will play with him
please... The asshole coward is trolling all day long...

In article , says...

On 10/1/2012 2:13 PM, Califbill wrote:
"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...


http://tinyurl.com/8wq422r

----------------------------------------
600hp? How far between battery charges? 4400# So probably 2000# of
battery. We do not say electric cars won't work, but they are not
financially practical. And is this going to require a $100,000
Government tax credit?


Someone rub some hamburger on him so his dog will play with him
please... The asshole coward is trolling all day long...

Awe, how Harryesque of you.

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 1 Oct 2012 11:13:58 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:

"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...


http://tinyurl.com/8wq422r

----------------------------------------
600hp? How far between battery charges? 4400# So probably 2000# of
battery. We do not say electric cars won't work, but they are not
financially practical. And is this going to require a $100,000 Government
tax credit?

C&D said they used 70% of the battery in 60 miles of driving but this
was aggressive driving. I suppose if you are not driving like that
you would not be spending a half million bucks for this car.

It is certainly a toy for billionaires, nothing that the 99.9% will
ever own. Battery cars are a toy for the top 5% anyway. Even the
government, that is subsidizing these cars, said recently that they
are not financially viable yet.
If they can get a 100 mile "plug in" that costs $20k or less, the 20%
people will be able to buy them.
Romney's 47% will still be driving 10 year old Toyotas, Hondas and
Chevys that run on gasoline for the foreseeable future

What you and other righties here fail to understand is that ALL
technology had to start somewhere. Are you still cooking using a fire
made by rubbing two sticks together? Is your only form of transportation
walking? What about that computer you are typing on? All of these once
were too expensive, combursome, and limited in use at one time. I
remember when my brother started college and bought a calculator that
added, subtracted, multiplied divided and did square roots, VERY
expensive and my father was appaled that someone would do that instead
of using a good old slide rule.

On 10/1/2012 3:41 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 1 Oct 2012 11:13:58 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:

"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...


http://tinyurl.com/8wq422r

----------------------------------------
600hp? How far between battery charges? 4400# So probably 2000# of
battery. We do not say electric cars won't work, but they are not
financially practical. And is this going to require a $100,000 Government
tax credit?

C&D said they used 70% of the battery in 60 miles of driving but this
was aggressive driving. I suppose if you are not driving like that
you would not be spending a half million bucks for this car.

It is certainly a toy for billionaires, nothing that the 99.9% will
ever own. Battery cars are a toy for the top 5% anyway. Even the
government, that is subsidizing these cars, said recently that they
are not financially viable yet.
If they can get a 100 mile "plug in" that costs $20k or less, the 20%
people will be able to buy them.
Romney's 47% will still be driving 10 year old Toyotas, Hondas and
Chevys that run on gasoline for the foreseeable future


So, it's impracticable and over priced, that means "it doesn't work"...

In article , says...

On 10/1/2012 3:41 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 1 Oct 2012 11:13:58 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:

"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...


http://tinyurl.com/8wq422r

----------------------------------------
600hp? How far between battery charges? 4400# So probably 2000# of
battery. We do not say electric cars won't work, but they are not
financially practical. And is this going to require a $100,000 Government
tax credit?

C&D said they used 70% of the battery in 60 miles of driving but this
was aggressive driving. I suppose if you are not driving like that
you would not be spending a half million bucks for this car.

It is certainly a toy for billionaires, nothing that the 99.9% will
ever own. Battery cars are a toy for the top 5% anyway. Even the
government, that is subsidizing these cars, said recently that they
are not financially viable yet.
If they can get a 100 mile "plug in" that costs $20k or less, the 20%
people will be able to buy them.
Romney's 47% will still be driving 10 year old Toyotas, Hondas and
Chevys that run on gasoline for the foreseeable future


So, it's impracticable and over priced, that means "it doesn't work"...

Do you still eat your meat raw? Fire was once new technology.

On 10/2/2012 8:49 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says...

On 10/1/2012 3:41 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 1 Oct 2012 11:13:58 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:

"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...


http://tinyurl.com/8wq422r

----------------------------------------
600hp? How far between battery charges? 4400# So probably 2000# of
battery. We do not say electric cars won't work, but they are not
financially practical. And is this going to require a $100,000 Government
tax credit?

C&D said they used 70% of the battery in 60 miles of driving but this
was aggressive driving. I suppose if you are not driving like that
you would not be spending a half million bucks for this car.

It is certainly a toy for billionaires, nothing that the 99.9% will
ever own. Battery cars are a toy for the top 5% anyway. Even the
government, that is subsidizing these cars, said recently that they
are not financially viable yet.
If they can get a 100 mile "plug in" that costs $20k or less, the 20%
people will be able to buy them.
Romney's 47% will still be driving 10 year old Toyotas, Hondas and
Chevys that run on gasoline for the foreseeable future


So, it's impracticable and over priced, that means "it doesn't work"...

Do you still eat your meat raw? Fire was once new technology.

Bad analogy as usual.

On Tuesday, October 2, 2012 9:21:04 AM UTC-4, Meyer wrote:
On 10/2/2012 8:49 AM, iBoaterer wrote:

Do you still eat your meat raw? Fire was once new technology.

Bad analogy as usual.


Yeah, fire has been around since the beginning of time.

Now microwave cooking, there's a technology that was new. It was touted as being the wave of the future, a new quick way to cook a meal. It wasn't long before everyone realized that most things cooked in a microwave are crap, and now the majority of people only use them to reheat food or make popcorn.

Reheating cooked meat in a microwave makes it taste funny. I try to avoid it.

On Mon, 01 Oct 2012 14:10:35 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 1 Oct 2012 12:30:25 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:


http://tinyurl.com/8wq422r


Wow, an electric car with a 90 mile range that sells for over a half
million bucks. Where do I sign?

http://www.itworld.com/data-centerse...-sticker-shock

You are a have not. This car is designed for the haves. Mitt will
buy one for each son if he wins the white house.