| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
What are these fools thinking, Scotty says this will not work...
|
What are these fools thinking, Scotty says this will not work...
"iBoaterer" wrote in message
... http://tinyurl.com/8wq422r ---------------------------------------- 600hp? How far between battery charges? 4400# So probably 2000# of battery. We do not say electric cars won't work, but they are not financially practical. And is this going to require a $100,000 Government tax credit? |
What are these fools thinking, Scotty says this will not work...
In article ,
says... On Mon, 1 Oct 2012 11:13:58 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: "iBoaterer" wrote in message ... http://tinyurl.com/8wq422r ---------------------------------------- 600hp? How far between battery charges? 4400# So probably 2000# of battery. We do not say electric cars won't work, but they are not financially practical. And is this going to require a $100,000 Government tax credit? C&D said they used 70% of the battery in 60 miles of driving but this was aggressive driving. I suppose if you are not driving like that you would not be spending a half million bucks for this car. It is certainly a toy for billionaires, nothing that the 99.9% will ever own. Battery cars are a toy for the top 5% anyway. Even the government, that is subsidizing these cars, said recently that they are not financially viable yet. If they can get a 100 mile "plug in" that costs $20k or less, the 20% people will be able to buy them. Romney's 47% will still be driving 10 year old Toyotas, Hondas and Chevys that run on gasoline for the foreseeable future What you and other righties here fail to understand is that ALL technology had to start somewhere. Are you still cooking using a fire made by rubbing two sticks together? Is your only form of transportation walking? What about that computer you are typing on? All of these once were too expensive, combursome, and limited in use at one time. I remember when my brother started college and bought a calculator that added, subtracted, multiplied divided and did square roots, VERY expensive and my father was appaled that someone would do that instead of using a good old slide rule. |
poor lonely kevin is begging for attention again...
On 10/1/2012 2:13 PM, Califbill wrote:
"iBoaterer" wrote in message ... http://tinyurl.com/8wq422r ---------------------------------------- 600hp? How far between battery charges? 4400# So probably 2000# of battery. We do not say electric cars won't work, but they are not financially practical. And is this going to require a $100,000 Government tax credit? Someone rub some hamburger on him so his dog will play with him please... The asshole coward is trolling all day long... |
kevin noble begging for attention again....
On 10/1/2012 3:41 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 1 Oct 2012 11:13:58 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: "iBoaterer" wrote in message ... http://tinyurl.com/8wq422r ---------------------------------------- 600hp? How far between battery charges? 4400# So probably 2000# of battery. We do not say electric cars won't work, but they are not financially practical. And is this going to require a $100,000 Government tax credit? C&D said they used 70% of the battery in 60 miles of driving but this was aggressive driving. I suppose if you are not driving like that you would not be spending a half million bucks for this car. It is certainly a toy for billionaires, nothing that the 99.9% will ever own. Battery cars are a toy for the top 5% anyway. Even the government, that is subsidizing these cars, said recently that they are not financially viable yet. If they can get a 100 mile "plug in" that costs $20k or less, the 20% people will be able to buy them. Romney's 47% will still be driving 10 year old Toyotas, Hondas and Chevys that run on gasoline for the foreseeable future So, it's impracticable and over priced, that means "it doesn't work"... |
poor lonely kevin is begging for attention again...
In article , says...
On 10/1/2012 2:13 PM, Califbill wrote: "iBoaterer" wrote in message ... http://tinyurl.com/8wq422r ---------------------------------------- 600hp? How far between battery charges? 4400# So probably 2000# of battery. We do not say electric cars won't work, but they are not financially practical. And is this going to require a $100,000 Government tax credit? Someone rub some hamburger on him so his dog will play with him please... The asshole coward is trolling all day long... Awe, how Harryesque of you. |
kevin noble begging for attention again....
In article , says...
On 10/1/2012 3:41 PM, wrote: On Mon, 1 Oct 2012 11:13:58 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: "iBoaterer" wrote in message ... http://tinyurl.com/8wq422r ---------------------------------------- 600hp? How far between battery charges? 4400# So probably 2000# of battery. We do not say electric cars won't work, but they are not financially practical. And is this going to require a $100,000 Government tax credit? C&D said they used 70% of the battery in 60 miles of driving but this was aggressive driving. I suppose if you are not driving like that you would not be spending a half million bucks for this car. It is certainly a toy for billionaires, nothing that the 99.9% will ever own. Battery cars are a toy for the top 5% anyway. Even the government, that is subsidizing these cars, said recently that they are not financially viable yet. If they can get a 100 mile "plug in" that costs $20k or less, the 20% people will be able to buy them. Romney's 47% will still be driving 10 year old Toyotas, Hondas and Chevys that run on gasoline for the foreseeable future So, it's impracticable and over priced, that means "it doesn't work"... Do you still eat your meat raw? Fire was once new technology. |
kevin noble begging for attention again....
On 10/2/2012 8:49 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 10/1/2012 3:41 PM, wrote: On Mon, 1 Oct 2012 11:13:58 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: "iBoaterer" wrote in message ... http://tinyurl.com/8wq422r ---------------------------------------- 600hp? How far between battery charges? 4400# So probably 2000# of battery. We do not say electric cars won't work, but they are not financially practical. And is this going to require a $100,000 Government tax credit? C&D said they used 70% of the battery in 60 miles of driving but this was aggressive driving. I suppose if you are not driving like that you would not be spending a half million bucks for this car. It is certainly a toy for billionaires, nothing that the 99.9% will ever own. Battery cars are a toy for the top 5% anyway. Even the government, that is subsidizing these cars, said recently that they are not financially viable yet. If they can get a 100 mile "plug in" that costs $20k or less, the 20% people will be able to buy them. Romney's 47% will still be driving 10 year old Toyotas, Hondas and Chevys that run on gasoline for the foreseeable future So, it's impracticable and over priced, that means "it doesn't work"... Do you still eat your meat raw? Fire was once new technology. Bad analogy as usual. |
kevin noble begging for attention again....
On Tuesday, October 2, 2012 9:21:04 AM UTC-4, Meyer wrote:
On 10/2/2012 8:49 AM, iBoaterer wrote: Do you still eat your meat raw? Fire was once new technology. Bad analogy as usual. Yeah, fire has been around since the beginning of time. Now microwave cooking, there's a technology that was new. It was touted as being the wave of the future, a new quick way to cook a meal. It wasn't long before everyone realized that most things cooked in a microwave are crap, and now the majority of people only use them to reheat food or make popcorn. Reheating cooked meat in a microwave makes it taste funny. I try to avoid it. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:23 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com