have bowed to the need for votes:

"Embarrassed by Republicans, Democrats amended their convention platform Wednesday to add a mention of God and declare that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel."

----------------

Heh. Wonder if those hard-line God-denying liberals in this group will still vote for their chosen team?

In article ,
says...

have bowed to the need for votes:

"Embarrassed by Republicans, Democrats amended their convention platform Wednesday to add a mention of God and declare that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel."

----------------

Heh. Wonder if those hard-line God-denying liberals in this group will still vote for their chosen team?

Okay, if you deem liberals as "God-denying", then prove that there is
one. In order to deny something, it must exist, so prove it.

On Thursday, September 6, 2012 8:47:30 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...



have bowed to the need for votes:



"Embarrassed by Republicans, Democrats amended their convention platform Wednesday to add a mention of God and declare that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel."



----------------



Heh. Wonder if those hard-line God-denying liberals in this group will still vote for their chosen team?



Okay, if you deem liberals as "God-denying", then prove that there is
one. In order to deny something, it must exist, so prove it.

No, I deemed you (for one) as denying God. The question is... Are you OK with the fact that your party acknowledges and embraces God in their platform statement? Or are they now, as you would put it, "insane"?

In article ,
says...

On Thursday, September 6, 2012 8:47:30 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...



have bowed to the need for votes:



"Embarrassed by Republicans, Democrats amended their convention platform Wednesday to add a mention of God and declare that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel."



----------------



Heh. Wonder if those hard-line God-denying liberals in this group will still vote for their chosen team?



Okay, if you deem liberals as "God-denying", then prove that there is
one. In order to deny something, it must exist, so prove it.

No, I deemed you (for one) as denying God. The question is... Are you OK with the fact that your party acknowledges and embraces God in their platform statement? Or are they now, as you would put it, "insane"?

Now, just where do you get the idea that *I* am "denying God"? Secondly,
I don't have a "party", I am quite capable of making my mind up by the
actions of the politicians, there stance on issues, and what I want out
of them, no matter what side of the fence they are on. Unlike you and
others here that are hypnotized by FOX.

On Thursday, September 6, 2012 9:23:06 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...



On Thursday, September 6, 2012 8:47:30 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,



says...







have bowed to the need for votes:







"Embarrassed by Republicans, Democrats amended their convention platform Wednesday to add a mention of God and declare that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel."







----------------







Heh. Wonder if those hard-line God-denying liberals in this group will still vote for their chosen team?







Okay, if you deem liberals as "God-denying", then prove that there is

one. In order to deny something, it must exist, so prove it.



No, I deemed you (for one) as denying God. The question is... Are you OK with the fact that your party acknowledges and embraces God in their platform statement? Or are they now, as you would put it, "insane"?



Now, just where do you get the idea that *I* am "denying God"?

From your many statements in this NG, such as:

"What does ANY of that have to do with the fact that the bible is a piece of fiction?"

The Bible asserts the existence of God. If you think it's fiction (and assert that as a "fact"), then you think He's fiction too. Can't have it both ways.

Or do you really beleive in Him? It's a simple question with a y/n answer. You lying then or lying now?

Secondly,
I don't have a "party", I am quite capable of making my mind up by the
actions of the politicians, there stance on issues, and what I want out
of them, no matter what side of the fence they are on. Unlike you and
others here that are hypnotized by FOX.

Well. I don't watch or listen to FOX. You seem to be the one hypnotized by FOX, as you're the only one that brings them up. But you never answered the questions.

Are you OK with the fact that the Democratic party acknowledges and embraces God in their platform statement? Or are they now, as you would put it, "insane"?

Answer, if you can.

On 9/6/2012 12:40 PM, wrote:
On Thursday, September 6, 2012 9:23:06 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...



On Thursday, September 6, 2012 8:47:30 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,



says...







have bowed to the need for votes:







"Embarrassed by Republicans, Democrats amended their convention platform Wednesday to add a mention of God and declare that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel."







----------------







Heh. Wonder if those hard-line God-denying liberals in this group will still vote for their chosen team?







Okay, if you deem liberals as "God-denying", then prove that there is

one. In order to deny something, it must exist, so prove it.



No, I deemed you (for one) as denying God. The question is... Are you OK with the fact that your party acknowledges and embraces God in their platform statement? Or are they now, as you would put it, "insane"?



Now, just where do you get the idea that *I* am "denying God"?

From your many statements in this NG, such as:

"What does ANY of that have to do with the fact that the bible is a piece of fiction?"

The Bible asserts the existence of God. If you think it's fiction (and assert that as a "fact"), then you think He's fiction too. Can't have it both ways.

Or do you really beleive in Him? It's a simple question with a y/n answer. You lying then or lying now?

Secondly,
I don't have a "party", I am quite capable of making my mind up by the
actions of the politicians, there stance on issues, and what I want out
of them, no matter what side of the fence they are on. Unlike you and
others here that are hypnotized by FOX.

Well. I don't watch or listen to FOX. You seem to be the one hypnotized by FOX, as you're the only one that brings them up. But you never answered the questions.

Are you OK with the fact that the Democratic party acknowledges and embraces God in their platform statement? Or are they now, as you would put it, "insane"?

Answer, if you can.




He still won't even answer where he gets his facts beyond Jon Stewart
and the Huffington Hoax...

On Thursday, September 6, 2012 12:40:04 PM UTC-4, (unknown) wrote:
On Thursday, September 6, 2012 9:23:06 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,



says...







On Thursday, September 6, 2012 8:47:30 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:



In article ,







says...















have bowed to the need for votes:















"Embarrassed by Republicans, Democrats amended their convention platform Wednesday to add a mention of God and declare that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel."















----------------















Heh. Wonder if those hard-line God-denying liberals in this group will still vote for their chosen team?















Okay, if you deem liberals as "God-denying", then prove that there is



one. In order to deny something, it must exist, so prove it.







No, I deemed you (for one) as denying God. The question is... Are you OK with the fact that your party acknowledges and embraces God in their platform statement? Or are they now, as you would put it, "insane"?







Now, just where do you get the idea that *I* am "denying God"?



From your many statements in this NG, such as:



"What does ANY of that have to do with the fact that the bible is a piece of fiction?"



The Bible asserts the existence of God. If you think it's fiction (and assert that as a "fact"), then you think He's fiction too. Can't have it both ways.



Or do you really beleive in Him? It's a simple question with a y/n answer. You lying then or lying now?



Secondly,

I don't have a "party", I am quite capable of making my mind up by the

actions of the politicians, there stance on issues, and what I want out

of them, no matter what side of the fence they are on. Unlike you and

others here that are hypnotized by FOX.



Well. I don't watch or listen to FOX. You seem to be the one hypnotized by FOX, as you're the only one that brings them up. But you never answered the questions.



Are you OK with the fact that the Democratic party acknowledges and embraces God in their platform statement? Or are they now, as you would put it, "insane"?



Answer, if you can.

OK, when confronted with his lies and BS, iboat goes silent. Typical.

In article ,
says...

On Thursday, September 6, 2012 9:23:06 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...



On Thursday, September 6, 2012 8:47:30 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,



says...







have bowed to the need for votes:







"Embarrassed by Republicans, Democrats amended their convention platform Wednesday to add a mention of God and declare that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel."







----------------







Heh. Wonder if those hard-line God-denying liberals in this group will still vote for their chosen team?







Okay, if you deem liberals as "God-denying", then prove that there is

one. In order to deny something, it must exist, so prove it.



No, I deemed you (for one) as denying God. The question is... Are you OK with the fact that your party acknowledges and embraces God in their platform statement? Or are they now, as you would put it, "insane"?



Now, just where do you get the idea that *I* am "denying God"?

From your many statements in this NG, such as:

"What does ANY of that have to do with the fact that the bible is a piece of fiction?"

It is! The bible has been edited, changed and re-changed until it is
nothing but. Now how does that tell you that *I* "deny" God?

The Bible asserts the existence of God. If you think it's fiction (and assert that as a "fact"), then you think He's fiction too. Can't have it both ways.

Well, no, but you aren't open minded enough to understand. Again, it's
been edited, changed, re-changed, changed again to fit the agendas of
those in charge.

Or do you really beleive in Him? It's a simple question with a y/n answer. You lying then or lying now?

I'm agnostic.

Secondly,
I don't have a "party", I am quite capable of making my mind up by the
actions of the politicians, there stance on issues, and what I want out
of them, no matter what side of the fence they are on. Unlike you and
others here that are hypnotized by FOX.

Well. I don't watch or listen to FOX. You seem to be the one hypnotized by FOX, as you're the only one that brings them up. But you never answered the questions.

Are you OK with the fact that the Democratic party acknowledges and embraces God in their platform statement?

Sure, it bothers me none.

Or are they now, as you would put it, "insane"?

Answer, if you can.

I've never said anybody was "insane" for believing in God.

On 9/6/2012 12:15 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012 17:57:30 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

have bowed to the need for votes:

"Embarrassed by Republicans, Democrats amended their convention platform Wednesday to add a mention of God and declare that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel."

----------------

Heh. Wonder if those hard-line God-denying liberals in this group will still vote for their chosen team?

Did you watch that process?
They took 3 swings at a voice vote and the plank was shouted down 3
times. In the end they finally just declared victory and ignored the
boos.


This is emblematic of the democrat party elites...

In article , says...

On 9/6/2012 12:15 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012 17:57:30 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

have bowed to the need for votes:

"Embarrassed by Republicans, Democrats amended their convention platform Wednesday to add a mention of God and declare that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel."

----------------

Heh. Wonder if those hard-line God-denying liberals in this group will still vote for their chosen team?

Did you watch that process?
They took 3 swings at a voice vote and the plank was shouted down 3
times. In the end they finally just declared victory and ignored the
boos.


This is emblematic of the democrat party elites...

Only the democrats, eh?