| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 8/11/2012 8:58 AM, BAR wrote:
In article om, says... On 8/11/2012 7:54 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 8/11/12 1:50 AM, wrote: In the case of the Aurora shooter the university had pinpointed him as being a potential threat but when he dropped out, they dropped their concern. Maybe instead of suing the movie theater, they should sue the university. What do you think the university should have done after the shooter dropped out in his mental health issues? This is a country with very little in the way of decent public mental health services. That's because the practitioners are mostly quacks who know little of the workings of a human mind. The DSM is just a method for ensuring that the conditions in vogue are considered to be diseases and therefore, fall under in-plan. "By design, the DSM is primarily concerned with the signs and symptoms of mental disorders, rather than the underlying causes. It claims to collect them together based on statistical or clinical patterns. As such, it has been compared to a naturalist?s field guide to birds, with similar advantages and disadvantages." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diagnos...nual_of_Mental _Disorders#Superficial_symptoms I see. They finally wrote a book about Krause. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Uh, yeah.........., right.........., whatever | General | |||
| Oh Yeah! | General | |||
| OT Oh yeah, That | General | |||
| Yeah, it's me! | General | |||