Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Eisboch" wrote in message
... "X ` Man" wrote in message m... On 8/6/12 8:43 AM, Eisboch wrote: "X ` Man" wrote in message news ![]() Perhaps such a study wasn't needed, since we already knew the answer, eh? Intelligence Study Links Low I.Q. To Prejudice, Racism, Conservatism Are racists dumb? Do conservatives tend to be less intelligent than liberals? A provocative new study from Brock University in Ontario suggests the answer to both questions may be a qualified yes. The study, published in Psychological Science, showed that people who score low on I.Q. tests in childhood are more likely to develop prejudiced beliefs and socially conservative politics in adulthood. I.Q., or intelligence quotient, is a score determined by standardized tests, but whether the tests truly reveal intelligence remains a topic of hot debate among psychologists. Dr. Gordon Hodson, a professor of psychology at the university and the study's lead author, said the finding represented evidence of a vicious cycle: *People of low intelligence gravitate toward socially conservative ideologies, which stress resistance to change and, in turn, prejudice,* he told LiveScience. Why might less intelligent people be drawn to conservative ideologies? Because such ideologies feature "structure and order" that make it easier to comprehend a complicated world, Dodson said. "Unfortunately, many of these features can also contribute to prejudice," he added. Dr. Brian Nosek, a University of Virginia psychologist, echoed those sentiments. "Reality is complicated and messy," he told The Huffington Post in an email. "Ideologies get rid of the messiness and impose a simpler solution. So, it may not be surprising that people with less cognitive capacity will be attracted to simplifying ideologies." --------------------------------------------------------- John F. Kennedy had an IQ of 117 .... above average, but no Einstein who had an IQ of 160. Abraham Lincoln had an estimated IQ of 128. Bill Clinton has an IQ of 137 George W. Bush has an IQ of 125 Adolph Hitler had an IQ of 141. A high IQ has nothing to do with what a person is. A high IQ is nothing to be particularly proud or boastful about. It' a gift at birth. It's what you do with the IQ that you have that qualifies and classifies you as a person. The study wasn't about "high" or "low" IQ tests but a correlation between "people who score low on I.Q. tests in childhood are more likely to develop prejudiced beliefs and socially conservative politics in adulthood." -------------------------------------------- I understand that. I was not commenting on the study you cited. I was commenting on those who think they are superior in some way because they were gifted with a higher than average IQ. First of all, they didn't earn it and second of all not all put it to productive use. =========================== As a girl told me when I was stationed in Biloxi in 1965. We have white trash with little skills. But no one wants to be at the bottom of the totem pole, so they use racism to raise their esteem in their own eyes. One of the the major problems with racism in the south. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/6/12 7:50 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 6 Aug 2012 19:16:48 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... A high IQ has nothing to do with what a person is. A high IQ is nothing to be particularly proud or boastful about. It' a gift at birth. It's what you do with the IQ that you have that qualifies and classifies you as a person. Who would have thought I was in Bill Clintons class of smart? Bill Clinton may have had a high IQ but he was pretty stupid. Did he really think any of his lies would hold? For that matter how smart are you if you are sticking your pecker in girls around the office? Still obsessed with Bill's sex life, eh? -- I'm a liberal because the militant fundamentalist ignorant science-denying religious xenophobic corporate oligarchy of modern Republican conservatism just doesn't work for me or my country. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/6/12 9:34 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 19:55:20 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 8/6/12 7:50 PM, wrote: On Mon, 6 Aug 2012 19:16:48 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... A high IQ has nothing to do with what a person is. A high IQ is nothing to be particularly proud or boastful about. It' a gift at birth. It's what you do with the IQ that you have that qualifies and classifies you as a person. Who would have thought I was in Bill Clintons class of smart? Bill Clinton may have had a high IQ but he was pretty stupid. Did he really think any of his lies would hold? For that matter how smart are you if you are sticking your pecker in girls around the office? Still obsessed with Bill's sex life, eh? The issue was how smart he was supposed to be. That was dumb. It will also be his legacy That must be why he is so popular today, eh? -- I'm a liberal because the militant fundamentalist ignorant science-denying religious xenophobic corporate oligarchy of modern Republican conservatism just doesn't work for me or my country. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/6/12 10:56 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 22:15:35 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 8/6/12 9:34 PM, wrote: The issue was how smart he was supposed to be. That was dumb. It will also be his legacy That must be why he is so popular today, eh? People like a bad boy, That is why Charlie Sheen keeps getting work. Oh, right. Sheesh. You should consider cutting back on the kool-aid. -- I'm a liberal because the militant fundamentalist ignorant science-denying religious xenophobic corporate oligarchy of modern Republican conservatism just doesn't work for me or my country. |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 21:34:17 -0400, wrote:
On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 19:55:20 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 8/6/12 7:50 PM, wrote: On Mon, 6 Aug 2012 19:16:48 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... A high IQ has nothing to do with what a person is. A high IQ is nothing to be particularly proud or boastful about. It' a gift at birth. It's what you do with the IQ that you have that qualifies and classifies you as a person. Who would have thought I was in Bill Clintons class of smart? Bill Clinton may have had a high IQ but he was pretty stupid. Did he really think any of his lies would hold? For that matter how smart are you if you are sticking your pecker in girls around the office? Still obsessed with Bill's sex life, eh? The issue was how smart he was supposed to be. That was dumb. It will also be his legacy Harry knows better than to discuss an issue and lose. He persists in changing it to a personal attack.... and losing. |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/7/2012 6:28 AM, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 21:34:17 -0400, wrote: On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 19:55:20 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 8/6/12 7:50 PM, wrote: On Mon, 6 Aug 2012 19:16:48 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... A high IQ has nothing to do with what a person is. A high IQ is nothing to be particularly proud or boastful about. It' a gift at birth. It's what you do with the IQ that you have that qualifies and classifies you as a person. Who would have thought I was in Bill Clintons class of smart? Bill Clinton may have had a high IQ but he was pretty stupid. Did he really think any of his lies would hold? For that matter how smart are you if you are sticking your pecker in girls around the office? Still obsessed with Bill's sex life, eh? The issue was how smart he was supposed to be. That was dumb. It will also be his legacy Harry knows better than to discuss an issue and lose. He persists in changing it to a personal attack.... and losing. Harry is flailing away at everybody these days. I wonder what's wrong with him? |