![]() |
America's Navy...
On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 9:23:23 AM UTC-4, x'man wrote:
wrote: On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 7:33:23 AM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote: On 8/8/12 7:28 AM, wrote: On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 7:14:23 AM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote: On 8/8/12 12:05 AM, wrote: On Tue, 07 Aug 2012 20:47:31 -0400, X ` Man wrote: We should have cut military expenditures by 50 percent a dozen years ago, and kept on cutting. What a colossal waste of national resources. The real problem is that is probably the biggest single jobs program. I was just in Southern Md and the Navy points out that if they closed Pax River the whole economy down there would dry up and blow away. You are certainly not supporting that area with a few crab shacks and fishing charters. The CO even thought of paying everyone on the base with $2 bills for a month so everyone else would understand where the money they have, comes from. You hear the same thing everywhere there is a military base. You also have all if the defense contractors, that are fairly evenly spread across the whole country. There are very few congressmen who want to lose a widget factory in their district. It is the kind of Keynesian socialism lefties like you usually support. DoD is a drug that the whole country is addicted to. As I stated, we should have started cutting the military drastically at least a dozen years ago, and turned our attention towards rebuilding our industries and infrastructure, instead of pouring it down the toilet of military expenditures. Those military hardware factories could be turning out components for high speed rail lines or lawnmowers or refrigerators. So we should have socialized our industries, and should be turning out high-priced goods nobody would buy. Yeah, that's the ticket. You need to stick to things you know, like writing fiction. You really need to move out of Stupidville, South Carolina. Nowhere did I say we should have "socialized our industries." Go back and read what you wrote. When you take federal funds from the military and put it into factories that make common household goods, you are socializing industry. That's exactly what you proposed. Maybe that's why you are a liberal. You don't seem to understand what they are all about, or even what you write. When you spend federal funds on military hardware you are socializing defense contractors. No, you are carrying out the constitutional requirement to provide for the defense of our country. When you take over 300 billion dollars (half of the military budget) and use it to make refrigerators and lawnmowers (what you proposed), you are socializing industry. |
America's Navy...
In article ,
says... On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 07:14:23 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 8/8/12 12:05 AM, wrote: On Tue, 07 Aug 2012 20:47:31 -0400, X ` Man wrote: We should have cut military expenditures by 50 percent a dozen years ago, and kept on cutting. What a colossal waste of national resources. The real problem is that is probably the biggest single jobs program. I was just in Southern Md and the Navy points out that if they closed Pax River the whole economy down there would dry up and blow away. You are certainly not supporting that area with a few crab shacks and fishing charters. The CO even thought of paying everyone on the base with $2 bills for a month so everyone else would understand where the money they have, comes from. You hear the same thing everywhere there is a military base. You also have all if the defense contractors, that are fairly evenly spread across the whole country. There are very few congressmen who want to lose a widget factory in their district. It is the kind of Keynesian socialism lefties like you usually support. DoD is a drug that the whole country is addicted to. As I stated, we should have started cutting the military drastically at least a dozen years ago, and turned our attention towards rebuilding our industries and infrastructure, instead of pouring it down the toilet of military expenditures. Those military hardware factories could be turning out components for high speed rail lines or lawnmowers or refrigerators. Eisenhower tried to warn us about the dangers of the military industrial complex in the 50s but JFK started the arms race as soon as he got in power and it went from there. The "missile gap" was his big lie. It was the first WMD scare that wasn't true. JFK knew it wasn't true at his first national security briefing but we still kept building more weapons. Wow, so JFK and Bush have something in common! |
America's Navy...
On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 9:51:01 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 07:14:23 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 8/8/12 12:05 AM, wrote: On Tue, 07 Aug 2012 20:47:31 -0400, X ` Man wrote: We should have cut military expenditures by 50 percent a dozen years ago, and kept on cutting. What a colossal waste of national resources. The real problem is that is probably the biggest single jobs program. I was just in Southern Md and the Navy points out that if they closed Pax River the whole economy down there would dry up and blow away. You are certainly not supporting that area with a few crab shacks and fishing charters. The CO even thought of paying everyone on the base with $2 bills for a month so everyone else would understand where the money they have, comes from. You hear the same thing everywhere there is a military base. You also have all if the defense contractors, that are fairly evenly spread across the whole country. There are very few congressmen who want to lose a widget factory in their district. It is the kind of Keynesian socialism lefties like you usually support. DoD is a drug that the whole country is addicted to. As I stated, we should have started cutting the military drastically at least a dozen years ago, and turned our attention towards rebuilding our industries and infrastructure, instead of pouring it down the toilet of military expenditures. Those military hardware factories could be turning out components for high speed rail lines or lawnmowers or refrigerators. Eisenhower tried to warn us about the dangers of the military industrial complex in the 50s but JFK started the arms race as soon as he got in power and it went from there. The "missile gap" was his big lie. It was the first WMD scare that wasn't true. JFK knew it wasn't true at his first national security briefing but we still kept building more weapons. Wow, so JFK and Bush have something in common! Not just Bush. Remember these words? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSwSDvgw5Uc It was an epidemic in DC. |
America's Navy...
In article ,
says... On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 9:51:01 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 07:14:23 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 8/8/12 12:05 AM, wrote: On Tue, 07 Aug 2012 20:47:31 -0400, X ` Man wrote: We should have cut military expenditures by 50 percent a dozen years ago, and kept on cutting. What a colossal waste of national resources. The real problem is that is probably the biggest single jobs program. I was just in Southern Md and the Navy points out that if they closed Pax River the whole economy down there would dry up and blow away. You are certainly not supporting that area with a few crab shacks and fishing charters. The CO even thought of paying everyone on the base with $2 bills for a month so everyone else would understand where the money they have, comes from. You hear the same thing everywhere there is a military base. You also have all if the defense contractors, that are fairly evenly spread across the whole country. There are very few congressmen who want to lose a widget factory in their district. It is the kind of Keynesian socialism lefties like you usually support. DoD is a drug that the whole country is addicted to. As I stated, we should have started cutting the military drastically at least a dozen years ago, and turned our attention towards rebuilding our industries and infrastructure, instead of pouring it down the toilet of military expenditures. Those military hardware factories could be turning out components for high speed rail lines or lawnmowers or refrigerators. Eisenhower tried to warn us about the dangers of the military industrial complex in the 50s but JFK started the arms race as soon as he got in power and it went from there. The "missile gap" was his big lie. It was the first WMD scare that wasn't true. JFK knew it wasn't true at his first national security briefing but we still kept building more weapons. Wow, so JFK and Bush have something in common! Not just Bush. Remember these words? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSwSDvgw5Uc It was an epidemic in DC. None of those were POTUS. |
America's Navy...
On 8/8/12 9:38 AM, wrote:
On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 9:23:23 AM UTC-4, x'man wrote: wrote: On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 7:33:23 AM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote: On 8/8/12 7:28 AM, wrote: On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 7:14:23 AM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote: On 8/8/12 12:05 AM, wrote: On Tue, 07 Aug 2012 20:47:31 -0400, X ` Man wrote: We should have cut military expenditures by 50 percent a dozen years ago, and kept on cutting. What a colossal waste of national resources. The real problem is that is probably the biggest single jobs program. I was just in Southern Md and the Navy points out that if they closed Pax River the whole economy down there would dry up and blow away. You are certainly not supporting that area with a few crab shacks and fishing charters. The CO even thought of paying everyone on the base with $2 bills for a month so everyone else would understand where the money they have, comes from. You hear the same thing everywhere there is a military base. You also have all if the defense contractors, that are fairly evenly spread across the whole country. There are very few congressmen who want to lose a widget factory in their district. It is the kind of Keynesian socialism lefties like you usually support. DoD is a drug that the whole country is addicted to. As I stated, we should have started cutting the military drastically at least a dozen years ago, and turned our attention towards rebuilding our industries and infrastructure, instead of pouring it down the toilet of military expenditures. Those military hardware factories could be turning out components for high speed rail lines or lawnmowers or refrigerators. So we should have socialized our industries, and should be turning out high-priced goods nobody would buy. Yeah, that's the ticket. You need to stick to things you know, like writing fiction. You really need to move out of Stupidville, South Carolina. Nowhere did I say we should have "socialized our industries." Go back and read what you wrote. When you take federal funds from the military and put it into factories that make common household goods, you are socializing industry. That's exactly what you proposed. Maybe that's why you are a liberal. You don't seem to understand what they are all about, or even what you write. When you spend federal funds on military hardware you are socializing defense contractors. No, you are carrying out the constitutional requirement to provide for the defense of our country. When you take over 300 billion dollars (half of the military budget) and use it to make refrigerators and lawnmowers (what you proposed), you are socializing industry. There's nothing in the Constitution that specifies how much must be spent on the military. -- I'm a liberal because the militant fundamentalist ignorant science-denying religious xenophobic corporate oligarchy of modern Republican conservatism just doesn't work for me or my country. |
America's Navy...
On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 10:37:25 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 9:51:01 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 07:14:23 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 8/8/12 12:05 AM, wrote: On Tue, 07 Aug 2012 20:47:31 -0400, X ` Man wrote: We should have cut military expenditures by 50 percent a dozen years ago, and kept on cutting. What a colossal waste of national resources. The real problem is that is probably the biggest single jobs program. I was just in Southern Md and the Navy points out that if they closed Pax River the whole economy down there would dry up and blow away. You are certainly not supporting that area with a few crab shacks and fishing charters. The CO even thought of paying everyone on the base with $2 bills for a month so everyone else would understand where the money they have, comes from. You hear the same thing everywhere there is a military base. You also have all if the defense contractors, that are fairly evenly spread across the whole country. There are very few congressmen who want to lose a widget factory in their district. It is the kind of Keynesian socialism lefties like you usually support. DoD is a drug that the whole country is addicted to. As I stated, we should have started cutting the military drastically at least a dozen years ago, and turned our attention towards rebuilding our industries and infrastructure, instead of pouring it down the toilet of military expenditures. Those military hardware factories could be turning out components for high speed rail lines or lawnmowers or refrigerators. Eisenhower tried to warn us about the dangers of the military industrial complex in the 50s but JFK started the arms race as soon as he got in power and it went from there. The "missile gap" was his big lie. It was the first WMD scare that wasn't true. JFK knew it wasn't true at his first national security briefing but we still kept building more weapons. Wow, so JFK and Bush have something in common! Not just Bush. Remember these words? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSwSDvgw5Uc It was an epidemic in DC. None of those were POTUS. The second person on the video was Clinton. He was POTUS, remember? |
America's Navy...
On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 10:39:19 AM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote:
On 8/8/12 9:38 AM, wrote: On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 9:23:23 AM UTC-4, x'man wrote: wrote: On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 7:33:23 AM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote: On 8/8/12 7:28 AM, wrote: On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 7:14:23 AM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote: On 8/8/12 12:05 AM, wrote: On Tue, 07 Aug 2012 20:47:31 -0400, X ` Man wrote: We should have cut military expenditures by 50 percent a dozen years ago, and kept on cutting. What a colossal waste of national resources. The real problem is that is probably the biggest single jobs program. I was just in Southern Md and the Navy points out that if they closed Pax River the whole economy down there would dry up and blow away. You are certainly not supporting that area with a few crab shacks and fishing charters. The CO even thought of paying everyone on the base with $2 bills for a month so everyone else would understand where the money they have, comes from. You hear the same thing everywhere there is a military base. You also have all if the defense contractors, that are fairly evenly spread across the whole country. There are very few congressmen who want to lose a widget factory in their district. It is the kind of Keynesian socialism lefties like you usually support. DoD is a drug that the whole country is addicted to. As I stated, we should have started cutting the military drastically at least a dozen years ago, and turned our attention towards rebuilding our industries and infrastructure, instead of pouring it down the toilet of military expenditures. Those military hardware factories could be turning out components for high speed rail lines or lawnmowers or refrigerators. So we should have socialized our industries, and should be turning out high-priced goods nobody would buy. Yeah, that's the ticket. You need to stick to things you know, like writing fiction. You really need to move out of Stupidville, South Carolina. Nowhere did I say we should have "socialized our industries." Go back and read what you wrote. When you take federal funds from the military and put it into factories that make common household goods, you are socializing industry. That's exactly what you proposed. Maybe that's why you are a liberal. You don't seem to understand what they are all about, or even what you write. When you spend federal funds on military hardware you are socializing defense contractors. No, you are carrying out the constitutional requirement to provide for the defense of our country. When you take over 300 billion dollars (half of the military budget) and use it to make refrigerators and lawnmowers (what you proposed), you are socializing industry. There's nothing in the Constitution that specifies how much must be spent on the military. There's also nothing in the Constitution authorizing socialization of US industry. |
America's Navy...
On 8/8/12 10:49 AM, wrote:
On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 10:39:19 AM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote: On 8/8/12 9:38 AM, wrote: On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 9:23:23 AM UTC-4, x'man wrote: wrote: On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 7:33:23 AM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote: On 8/8/12 7:28 AM, wrote: On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 7:14:23 AM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote: On 8/8/12 12:05 AM, wrote: On Tue, 07 Aug 2012 20:47:31 -0400, X ` Man wrote: We should have cut military expenditures by 50 percent a dozen years ago, and kept on cutting. What a colossal waste of national resources. The real problem is that is probably the biggest single jobs program. I was just in Southern Md and the Navy points out that if they closed Pax River the whole economy down there would dry up and blow away. You are certainly not supporting that area with a few crab shacks and fishing charters. The CO even thought of paying everyone on the base with $2 bills for a month so everyone else would understand where the money they have, comes from. You hear the same thing everywhere there is a military base. You also have all if the defense contractors, that are fairly evenly spread across the whole country. There are very few congressmen who want to lose a widget factory in their district. It is the kind of Keynesian socialism lefties like you usually support. DoD is a drug that the whole country is addicted to. As I stated, we should have started cutting the military drastically at least a dozen years ago, and turned our attention towards rebuilding our industries and infrastructure, instead of pouring it down the toilet of military expenditures. Those military hardware factories could be turning out components for high speed rail lines or lawnmowers or refrigerators. So we should have socialized our industries, and should be turning out high-priced goods nobody would buy. Yeah, that's the ticket. You need to stick to things you know, like writing fiction. You really need to move out of Stupidville, South Carolina. Nowhere did I say we should have "socialized our industries." Go back and read what you wrote. When you take federal funds from the military and put it into factories that make common household goods, you are socializing industry. That's exactly what you proposed. Maybe that's why you are a liberal. You don't seem to understand what they are all about, or even what you write. When you spend federal funds on military hardware you are socializing defense contractors. No, you are carrying out the constitutional requirement to provide for the defense of our country. When you take over 300 billion dollars (half of the military budget) and use it to make refrigerators and lawnmowers (what you proposed), you are socializing industry. There's nothing in the Constitution that specifies how much must be spent on the military. There's also nothing in the Constitution authorizing socialization of US industry. No one is suggesting that. The conclusion you reached is a figment of your imagination. Were you edu-ma-cated in South Carolina? -- I'm a liberal because the militant fundamentalist ignorant science-denying religious xenophobic corporate oligarchy of modern Republican conservatism just doesn't work for me or my country. |
America's Navy...
On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 11:02:09 -0400, X ` Man wrote:
On 8/8/12 10:49 AM, wrote: On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 10:39:19 AM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote: On 8/8/12 9:38 AM, wrote: On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 9:23:23 AM UTC-4, x'man wrote: wrote: On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 7:33:23 AM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote: On 8/8/12 7:28 AM, wrote: On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 7:14:23 AM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote: On 8/8/12 12:05 AM, wrote: On Tue, 07 Aug 2012 20:47:31 -0400, X ` Man wrote: We should have cut military expenditures by 50 percent a dozen years ago, and kept on cutting. What a colossal waste of national resources. The real problem is that is probably the biggest single jobs program. I was just in Southern Md and the Navy points out that if they closed Pax River the whole economy down there would dry up and blow away. You are certainly not supporting that area with a few crab shacks and fishing charters. The CO even thought of paying everyone on the base with $2 bills for a month so everyone else would understand where the money they have, comes from. You hear the same thing everywhere there is a military base. You also have all if the defense contractors, that are fairly evenly spread across the whole country. There are very few congressmen who want to lose a widget factory in their district. It is the kind of Keynesian socialism lefties like you usually support. DoD is a drug that the whole country is addicted to. As I stated, we should have started cutting the military drastically at least a dozen years ago, and turned our attention towards rebuilding our industries and infrastructure, instead of pouring it down the toilet of military expenditures. Those military hardware factories could be turning out components for high speed rail lines or lawnmowers or refrigerators. So we should have socialized our industries, and should be turning out high-priced goods nobody would buy. Yeah, that's the ticket. You need to stick to things you know, like writing fiction. You really need to move out of Stupidville, South Carolina. Nowhere did I say we should have "socialized our industries." Go back and read what you wrote. When you take federal funds from the military and put it into factories that make common household goods, you are socializing industry. That's exactly what you proposed. Maybe that's why you are a liberal. You don't seem to understand what they are all about, or even what you write. When you spend federal funds on military hardware you are socializing defense contractors. No, you are carrying out the constitutional requirement to provide for the defense of our country. When you take over 300 billion dollars (half of the military budget) and use it to make refrigerators and lawnmowers (what you proposed), you are socializing industry. There's nothing in the Constitution that specifies how much must be spent on the military. There's also nothing in the Constitution authorizing socialization of US industry. No one is suggesting that. The conclusion you reached is a figment of your imagination. Were you edu-ma-cated in South Carolina? Gotta attack the person when losing, Harry? WATOABH! |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:27 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com