| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting New Global Warming Study
On 7/31/12 8:32 AM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 07:55:34 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 7/31/12 7:53 AM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 07:19:13 -0400, wrote: In summation: Wow, the last skeptic has been drug across the finish line and now, only now, the "skeptics" believe what virtually every other scientist has known for years! That, in retrospect, might really be the bad news. === Either way, global warming is probably going to be bad news. There are several reasons in my opinion why there have been die hard skeptics, including myself. 1) Al Gore was absolutely the wrong spokesman for the original message. His overall lack of credibility and borderline hysteria made him a poor messenger. 2) It is abundantly clear that there have been many past instances of global warming/cooling that demonstrably had nothing to do with fossil fuel emissions. Which means that warming and cooling and warming again is just a natural cycle that the Earth goes through. Isn't wonderful that we have a university-educated, Ph.D level climatologist like BAR here in rec.boats who is correct? Yes! It's sort of sad that bottomfeeders like you and your buttbuddy Meyer find it necessary to change the posts of others to make them fit into your narrow little minds. But, what the hell, that's all you Conservatrashers have these days, right? -- I'm a liberal because the militant fundamentalist ignorant science-denying religious xenophobic corporate oligarchy of modern Republican conservatism just doesn't work for me or my country. |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Interesting New Global Warming Study
In article , dump-on-
says... On 7/31/12 8:32 AM, John H. wrote: On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 07:55:34 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 7/31/12 7:53 AM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 07:19:13 -0400, wrote: In summation: Wow, the last skeptic has been drug across the finish line and now, only now, the "skeptics" believe what virtually every other scientist has known for years! That, in retrospect, might really be the bad news. === Either way, global warming is probably going to be bad news. There are several reasons in my opinion why there have been die hard skeptics, including myself. 1) Al Gore was absolutely the wrong spokesman for the original message. His overall lack of credibility and borderline hysteria made him a poor messenger. 2) It is abundantly clear that there have been many past instances of global warming/cooling that demonstrably had nothing to do with fossil fuel emissions. Which means that warming and cooling and warming again is just a natural cycle that the Earth goes through. Isn't wonderful that we have a university-educated, Ph.D level climatologist like BAR here in rec.boats who is correct? Yes! It's sort of sad that bottomfeeders like you and your buttbuddy Meyer find it necessary to change the posts of others to make them fit into your narrow little minds. But, what the hell, that's all you Conservatrashers have these days, right? John does childish things when a topic isn't going his way. |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Interesting New Global Warming Study
On 7/31/2012 8:56 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on- says... On 7/31/12 8:32 AM, John H. wrote: On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 07:55:34 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 7/31/12 7:53 AM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 07:19:13 -0400, wrote: In summation: Wow, the last skeptic has been drug across the finish line and now, only now, the "skeptics" believe what virtually every other scientist has known for years! That, in retrospect, might really be the bad news. === Either way, global warming is probably going to be bad news. There are several reasons in my opinion why there have been die hard skeptics, including myself. 1) Al Gore was absolutely the wrong spokesman for the original message. His overall lack of credibility and borderline hysteria made him a poor messenger. 2) It is abundantly clear that there have been many past instances of global warming/cooling that demonstrably had nothing to do with fossil fuel emissions. Which means that warming and cooling and warming again is just a natural cycle that the Earth goes through. Isn't wonderful that we have a university-educated, Ph.D level climatologist like BAR here in rec.boats who is correct? Yes! It's sort of sad that bottomfeeders like you and your buttbuddy Meyer find it necessary to change the posts of others to make them fit into your narrow little minds. But, what the hell, that's all you Conservatrashers have these days, right? John simply has a little fun with the assholes. Oops that's me. I'm glad you are setting things straight. |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Interesting New Global Warming Study
On 7/31/2012 8:38 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/31/12 8:32 AM, John H. wrote: On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 07:55:34 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 7/31/12 7:53 AM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 07:19:13 -0400, wrote: In summation: Wow, the last skeptic has been drug across the finish line and now, only now, the "skeptics" believe what virtually every other scientist has known for years! That, in retrospect, might really be the bad news. === Either way, global warming is probably going to be bad news. There are several reasons in my opinion why there have been die hard skeptics, including myself. 1) Al Gore was absolutely the wrong spokesman for the original message. His overall lack of credibility and borderline hysteria made him a poor messenger. 2) It is abundantly clear that there have been many past instances of global warming/cooling that demonstrably had nothing to do with fossil fuel emissions. Which means that warming and cooling and warming again is just a natural cycle that the Earth goes through. Isn't wonderful that we have a university-educated, Ph.D level climatologist like BAR here in rec.boats who is correct? Yes! It's sort of sad that bottomfeeders like you and your buttbuddy Meyer find it necessary to change the posts of others to make them fit into your narrow little minds. But, what the hell, that's all you Conservatrashers have these days, right? Don't be sad. You'll be reunited with Skipper soon enough. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Global warming | Cruising | |||
| So much for global warming . . . | Cruising | |||
| Global Warming? | General | |||
| global warming | ASA | |||
| More On Global Warming | ASA | |||
![John H.[_5_] is offline](https://www.boatbanter.com/images/SultanThemeVB3R/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Hybrid Mode
