On 7/18/2012 1:26 AM, thumper wrote:
On 7/17/2012 8:12 PM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/17/2012 9:47 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/17/2012 9:16 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/17/2012 11:48 AM, thumper wrote:

Undoubtedly there are *many* things that science will never "prove".
That doesn't make supernatural explanations valid.

As valid as anything else until it's ruled out.

After re-reading this I have to comment on your logic, it's really
bad... Do you literally believe that "anything" is possible until
proven wrong?

I'll stick to what I actually said rather than what you thought I said.

Many seemingly impossible things have been proven otherwise.

That's not what you said.

There is no scientific evidence that suggests the supernatural is
impossible.

Nor is there any suggesting it possible. Assigning equal probability is
unjustified.

I'm thankful that Jonas Salk's mind wasn't as restricted as yours.