On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote:

Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't
understand...zowie.

Isn't that what agnostics do?

You misspelled theologians...



It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will
give me the cue to look it up.

In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote:

Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't
understand...zowie.

Isn't that what agnostics do?

You misspelled theologians...



It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will
give me the cue to look it up.

Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry.

On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote:

Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't
understand...zowie.

Isn't that what agnostics do?

You misspelled theologians...



It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will
give me the cue to look it up.

Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry.



You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing
****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just
read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles.

In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote:

Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't
understand...zowie.

Isn't that what agnostics do?

You misspelled theologians...



It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will
give me the cue to look it up.

Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry.



You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing
****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just
read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles.

Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you
were going to look up what "agnostic" means.

On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote:

Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't
understand...zowie.

Isn't that what agnostics do?

You misspelled theologians...



It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will
give me the cue to look it up.

Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry.



You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing
****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just
read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles.

Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you
were going to look up what "agnostic" means.



No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer
for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of
"progressive" political positions and we both have little use for
right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you.

In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote:

Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't
understand...zowie.

Isn't that what agnostics do?

You misspelled theologians...



It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will
give me the cue to look it up.

Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry.



You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing
****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just
read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles.

Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you
were going to look up what "agnostic" means.



No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer
for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of
"progressive" political positions and we both have little use for
right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you.

So did you look up what "agnostic" means like you said you would?

On 7/12/12 2:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote:

Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't
understand...zowie.

Isn't that what agnostics do?

You misspelled theologians...



It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will
give me the cue to look it up.

Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry.



You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing
****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just
read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles.

Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you
were going to look up what "agnostic" means.



No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer
for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of
"progressive" political positions and we both have little use for
right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you.

So did you look up what "agnostic" means like you said you would?



If we didn't drop some crumbs on the floor, you and the other two
members of the TheThree****heads, Oscar and JustSnot, wouldn't have
anything to eat.

On Jul 12, 3:40*pm, X ` Man dump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote:
On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote:









In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote:

Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't
understand...zowie.

Isn't that what agnostics do?

You misspelled theologians...

It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will
give me the cue to look it up.

Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry.

You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing
****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just
read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles.

Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you
were going to look up what "agnostic" means.

No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer
for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of
"progressive" political positions and we both have little use for
right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you.

I agree with this post.

On 7/12/2012 2:56 PM, North Star wrote:
On Jul 12, 3:40 pm, X ` Man dump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote:
On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote:









In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote:

Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't
understand...zowie.

Isn't that what agnostics do?

You misspelled theologians...

It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will
give me the cue to look it up.

Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry.

You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing
****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just
read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles.

Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you
were going to look up what "agnostic" means.

No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer
for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of
"progressive" political positions and we both have little use for
right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you.

I agree with this post.

One mind two decaying bodies. Yur made for each other.

In article f2b4af64-2057-4223-a58a-477f525d5330
@l4g2000yqf.googlegroups.com, says...

On Jul 12, 3:40*pm, X ` Man dump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote:
On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote:









In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote:

Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't
understand...zowie.

Isn't that what agnostics do?

You misspelled theologians...

It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will
give me the cue to look it up.

Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry.

You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing
****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just
read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles.

Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you
were going to look up what "agnostic" means.

No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer
for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of
"progressive" political positions and we both have little use for
right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you.

I agree with this post.

Then just why DID Harry answer for you?