|
Lying to the judge...
On 7/12/2012 2:56 PM, North Star wrote:
On Jul 12, 3:40 pm, X ` Man dump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you- can.com wrote: On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote: On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote: On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote: Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't understand...zowie. Isn't that what agnostics do? You misspelled theologians... ;) It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will give me the cue to look it up. Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry. You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing ****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles. Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you were going to look up what "agnostic" means. No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of "progressive" political positions and we both have little use for right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you. I agree with this post. One mind two decaying bodies. Yur made for each other. |
Lying to the judge...
|
Lying to the judge...
On 7/12/12 3:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 7/12/12 2:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote: On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote: On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote: Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't understand...zowie. Isn't that what agnostics do? You misspelled theologians... ;) It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will give me the cue to look it up. Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry. You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing ****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles. Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you were going to look up what "agnostic" means. No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of "progressive" political positions and we both have little use for right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you. So did you look up what "agnostic" means like you said you would? If we didn't drop some crumbs on the floor, you and the other two members of the TheThree****heads, Oscar and JustSnot, wouldn't have anything to eat. You didn't answer the question. Yeah, I did...you're just to black or white to understand. You really should stick to guffawing with JustSnotty and the Weiner...they are your intellectual equals, i.e., dumfochs. |
Lying to the judge...
In article , dump-on-
says... On 7/12/12 3:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/12/12 2:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote: On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote: On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote: Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't understand...zowie. Isn't that what agnostics do? You misspelled theologians... ;) It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will give me the cue to look it up. Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry. You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing ****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles. Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you were going to look up what "agnostic" means. No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of "progressive" political positions and we both have little use for right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you. So did you look up what "agnostic" means like you said you would? If we didn't drop some crumbs on the floor, you and the other two members of the TheThree****heads, Oscar and JustSnot, wouldn't have anything to eat. You didn't answer the question. Yeah, I did...you're just to black or white to understand. You really should stick to guffawing with JustSnotty and the Weiner...they are your intellectual equals, i.e., dumfochs. Okay, so you did have to look up the word "agnostic". Got it. |
Lying to the judge...
On 7/12/12 4:13 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 3:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/12/12 2:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote: On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote: On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote: Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't understand...zowie. Isn't that what agnostics do? You misspelled theologians... ;) It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will give me the cue to look it up. Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry. You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing ****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles. Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you were going to look up what "agnostic" means. No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of "progressive" political positions and we both have little use for right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you. So did you look up what "agnostic" means like you said you would? If we didn't drop some crumbs on the floor, you and the other two members of the TheThree****heads, Oscar and JustSnot, wouldn't have anything to eat. You didn't answer the question. Yeah, I did...you're just too black or white to understand. You really should stick to guffawing with JustSnotty and the Weiner...they are your intellectual equals, i.e., dumfochs. Okay, so you did have to look up the word "agnostic". Got it. You're a moron. No need to look that up. Once again, stick with your dumfoch buddies. |
Lying to the judge...
On 7/12/2012 3:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article f2b4af64-2057-4223-a58a-477f525d5330 @l4g2000yqf.googlegroups.com, says... On Jul 12, 3:40 pm, X ` Man dump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you- can.com wrote: On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote: On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote: On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote: Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't understand...zowie. Isn't that what agnostics do? You misspelled theologians... ;) It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will give me the cue to look it up. Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry. You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing ****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles. Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you were going to look up what "agnostic" means. No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of "progressive" political positions and we both have little use for right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you. I agree with this post. Then just why DID Harry answer for you? You aren't going to get anywhere with this line of questioning. |
Lying to the judge...
On 7/12/2012 3:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 7/12/12 2:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote: On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote: On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote: Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't understand...zowie. Isn't that what agnostics do? You misspelled theologians... ;) It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will give me the cue to look it up. Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry. You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing ****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles. Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you were going to look up what "agnostic" means. No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of "progressive" political positions and we both have little use for right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you. So did you look up what "agnostic" means like you said you would? If we didn't drop some crumbs on the floor, you and the other two members of the TheThree****heads, Oscar and JustSnot, wouldn't have anything to eat. You didn't answer the question. Another broken promise. Sigh! |
Lying to the judge...
In article , dump-on-
says... On 7/12/12 4:13 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 3:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/12/12 2:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote: On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote: On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote: Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't understand...zowie. Isn't that what agnostics do? You misspelled theologians... ;) It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will give me the cue to look it up. Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry. You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing ****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles. Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you were going to look up what "agnostic" means. No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of "progressive" political positions and we both have little use for right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you. So did you look up what "agnostic" means like you said you would? If we didn't drop some crumbs on the floor, you and the other two members of the TheThree****heads, Oscar and JustSnot, wouldn't have anything to eat. You didn't answer the question. Yeah, I did...you're just too black or white to understand. You really should stick to guffawing with JustSnotty and the Weiner...they are your intellectual equals, i.e., dumfochs. Okay, so you did have to look up the word "agnostic". Got it. You're a moron. No need to look that up. Once again, stick with your dumfoch buddies. It's okay, Harry, you seem to having a bad day, that sleep apnea is kicking your ass eh? |
Lying to the judge...
On 7/12/12 4:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 4:13 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 3:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/12/12 2:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote: On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote: On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote: Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't understand...zowie. Isn't that what agnostics do? You misspelled theologians... ;) It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will give me the cue to look it up. Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry. You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing ****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles. Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you were going to look up what "agnostic" means. No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of "progressive" political positions and we both have little use for right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you. So did you look up what "agnostic" means like you said you would? If we didn't drop some crumbs on the floor, you and the other two members of the TheThree****heads, Oscar and JustSnot, wouldn't have anything to eat. You didn't answer the question. Yeah, I did...you're just too black or white to understand. You really should stick to guffawing with JustSnotty and the Weiner...they are your intellectual equals, i.e., dumfochs. Okay, so you did have to look up the word "agnostic". Got it. You're a moron. No need to look that up. Once again, stick with your dumfoch buddies. It's okay, Harry, you seem to having a bad day, that sleep apnea is kicking your ass eh? Sleep apnea? Not me. Where did you dredge that up, from one of SnottyScotty's paranoid daydreams? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:49 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com