BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   Lying to the judge... (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/152373-lying-judge.html)

X ` Man[_3_] July 6th 12 07:54 PM

Lying to the judge...
 
....something JustSnot said he would do...along with lying to the
police... doesn't serve a defendant well.



George Zimmerman, who stands accused of killing unarmed teenager Trayvon
Martin, hasn't done himself any favors with the court during his bond
escapades, the judge overseeing his case made clear this week. And that,
say some legal analysts, could come back to haunt him during the next
major step in his defense: the self-defense hearing.
Related stories

Although Seminole County (Fla.) Judge Kenneth Lester ruled Thursday that
Mr. Zimmerman, who had been returned to jail after first bond was
revoked, could be free on $1 million bail, his order also gave a stiff
assessment of the defendant's actions to date.

George Zimmerman, the judge's summation said, had masterminded a plot
with his wife to manipulate the criminal justice system, may have
planned to use $130,000 in donated money to flee the country before
trial, and whose lawyer improperly portrayed him in court hearings as a
scared young man, when the “only male whose youth is relevant” was
Trayvon Martin.

With Judge Lester’s stern order, it appears that a case that many
experts expected would be difficult for the prosecution to prove has
become more problematic for Zimmerman. His defense team will have to lay
out its version of events leading up to Trayvon's shooting against the
backdrop of Zimmerman's damaged credibility – in front of a judge whose
neutrality about the defendant's honesty has been sorely tested.

“A witness’s credibility is everything, and the judge views everything
Zimmerman says with a suspicious eye,” Mark NeJame, an attorney in
Orlando, Fla., told the Palm Beach Post on Friday.

Zimmerman has said that he simply stood his ground, as permitted under
Florida law, and shot Trayvon in self-defense after the boy attacked
him. The prosecution, which has charged Zimmerman with second-degree
murder, says the defendant profiled Trayvon as a criminal, followed him,
confronted him, and then shot and killed him when Trayvon defended himself.

Under Florida law, anyone claiming a Stand Your Ground defense is
allowed a pretrial hearing before the judge. The defendant gets to make
his case, per a landmark 2005 law, as to why he had no duty to retreat
and how he used reasonable force in self-defense. If the judge agrees,
the defendant is granted immunity from prosecution, and the case is
thrown out.

At that as-yet-unscheduled Stand Your Ground hearing, Zimmerman is
widely expected to take the stand to explain what happened, and also to
be cross-examined by prosecutors, legal experts say.

Lester is the judge who will preside over that hearing.
- - -

http://tinyurl.com/btjbawe

Oscar July 6th 12 08:07 PM

Lying to the judge...
 
On 7/6/2012 2:54 PM, X ` Man wrote:
...something JustSnot said he would do...along with lying to the
police... doesn't serve a defendant well.



George Zimmerman, who stands accused of killing unarmed teenager Trayvon
Martin, hasn't done himself any favors with the court during his bond
escapades, the judge overseeing his case made clear this week. And that,
say some legal analysts, could come back to haunt him during the next
major step in his defense: the self-defense hearing.
Related stories

Although Seminole County (Fla.) Judge Kenneth Lester ruled Thursday that
Mr. Zimmerman, who had been returned to jail after first bond was
revoked, could be free on $1 million bail, his order also gave a stiff
assessment of the defendant's actions to date.

George Zimmerman, the judge's summation said, had masterminded a plot
with his wife to manipulate the criminal justice system, may have
planned to use $130,000 in donated money to flee the country before
trial, and whose lawyer improperly portrayed him in court hearings as a
scared young man, when the “only male whose youth is relevant” was
Trayvon Martin.

With Judge Lester’s stern order, it appears that a case that many
experts expected would be difficult for the prosecution to prove has
become more problematic for Zimmerman. His defense team will have to lay
out its version of events leading up to Trayvon's shooting against the
backdrop of Zimmerman's damaged credibility – in front of a judge whose
neutrality about the defendant's honesty has been sorely tested.

“A witness’s credibility is everything, and the judge views everything
Zimmerman says with a suspicious eye,” Mark NeJame, an attorney in
Orlando, Fla., told the Palm Beach Post on Friday.

Zimmerman has said that he simply stood his ground, as permitted under
Florida law, and shot Trayvon in self-defense after the boy attacked
him. The prosecution, which has charged Zimmerman with second-degree
murder, says the defendant profiled Trayvon as a criminal, followed him,
confronted him, and then shot and killed him when Trayvon defended himself.

Under Florida law, anyone claiming a Stand Your Ground defense is
allowed a pretrial hearing before the judge. The defendant gets to make
his case, per a landmark 2005 law, as to why he had no duty to retreat
and how he used reasonable force in self-defense. If the judge agrees,
the defendant is granted immunity from prosecution, and the case is
thrown out.

At that as-yet-unscheduled Stand Your Ground hearing, Zimmerman is
widely expected to take the stand to explain what happened, and also to
be cross-examined by prosecutors, legal experts say.

Lester is the judge who will preside over that hearing.
- - -

http://tinyurl.com/btjbawe


His lawyer should put a zipper on Zimms. mouth

Is there going to be a stand your ground hearing?
Isn't it more like pure self defense, they'll be arguing?
You can't stand your ground when you're lying on your back being pummeled.


Richard Casady July 7th 12 04:21 AM

Lying to the judge...
 
On Fri, 06 Jul 2012 15:07:13 -0400, Oscar wrote:

On 7/6/2012 2:54 PM, X ` Man wrote:
...something JustSnot said he would do...along with lying to the
police... doesn't serve a defendant well.



George Zimmerman, who stands accused of killing unarmed teenager Trayvon
Martin, hasn't done himself any favors with the court during his bond
escapades, the judge overseeing his case made clear this week. And that,
say some legal analysts, could come back to haunt him during the next
major step in his defense: the self-defense hearing.
Related stories

Although Seminole County (Fla.) Judge Kenneth Lester ruled Thursday that
Mr. Zimmerman, who had been returned to jail after first bond was
revoked, could be free on $1 million bail, his order also gave a stiff
assessment of the defendant's actions to date.

George Zimmerman, the judge's summation said, had masterminded a plot
with his wife to manipulate the criminal justice system, may have
planned to use $130,000 in donated money to flee the country before
trial, and whose lawyer improperly portrayed him in court hearings as a
scared young man, when the “only male whose youth is relevant” was
Trayvon Martin.

With Judge Lester’s stern order, it appears that a case that many
experts expected would be difficult for the prosecution to prove has
become more problematic for Zimmerman. His defense team will have to lay
out its version of events leading up to Trayvon's shooting against the
backdrop of Zimmerman's damaged credibility – in front of a judge whose
neutrality about the defendant's honesty has been sorely tested.

“A witness’s credibility is everything, and the judge views everything
Zimmerman says with a suspicious eye,” Mark NeJame, an attorney in
Orlando, Fla., told the Palm Beach Post on Friday.

Zimmerman has said that he simply stood his ground, as permitted under
Florida law, and shot Trayvon in self-defense after the boy attacked
him. The prosecution, which has charged Zimmerman with second-degree
murder, says the defendant profiled Trayvon as a criminal, followed him,
confronted him, and then shot and killed him when Trayvon defended himself.

Under Florida law, anyone claiming a Stand Your Ground defense is
allowed a pretrial hearing before the judge. The defendant gets to make
his case, per a landmark 2005 law, as to why he had no duty to retreat
and how he used reasonable force in self-defense. If the judge agrees,
the defendant is granted immunity from prosecution, and the case is
thrown out.

At that as-yet-unscheduled Stand Your Ground hearing, Zimmerman is
widely expected to take the stand to explain what happened, and also to
be cross-examined by prosecutors, legal experts say.

Lester is the judge who will preside over that hearing.
- - -

http://tinyurl.com/btjbawe


His lawyer should put a zipper on Zimms. mouth

Is there going to be a stand your ground hearing?
Isn't it more like pure self defense, they'll be arguing?
You can't stand your ground when you're lying on your back being pummeled.


I don't envy the judge or any future jury. Expecially not his lawyer.
He armed himself, went looking for trouble, and then shot and killed
an unarmed man. All he had going for him was to have a good enough
story believed. It looks like manslaughter, based on entirely too few
facts. Thats why they have trials and he will be guilty of something
when the judge says so.

Casady

[email protected] July 12th 12 01:26 AM

Lying to the judge...
 
On Tuesday, July 10, 2012 12:13:35 PM UTC-5, jps wrote:

Pudgy asshole


Your fantasy?

Meyer[_2_] July 12th 12 03:19 PM

Lying to the judge...
 
On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote:


Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't
understand...zowie.

Isn't that what agnostics do?


thumper July 12th 12 06:34 PM

Lying to the judge...
 
On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote:


Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't
understand...zowie.


Isn't that what agnostics do?


You misspelled theologians... ;)



X ` Man[_3_] July 12th 12 06:36 PM

Lying to the judge...
 
On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote:


Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't
understand...zowie.


Isn't that what agnostics do?


You misspelled theologians... ;)



It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will
give me the cue to look it up.


iBoaterer[_2_] July 12th 12 06:57 PM

Lying to the judge...
 
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote:


Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't
understand...zowie.


Isn't that what agnostics do?


You misspelled theologians... ;)



It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will
give me the cue to look it up.


Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry.

X ` Man[_3_] July 12th 12 07:03 PM

Lying to the judge...
 
On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote:

Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't
understand...zowie.

Isn't that what agnostics do?

You misspelled theologians... ;)



It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will
give me the cue to look it up.


Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry.



You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing
****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just
read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles.


Meyer[_2_] July 12th 12 07:18 PM

Lying to the judge...
 
On 7/12/2012 1:34 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote:


Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't
understand...zowie.


Isn't that what agnostics do?


You misspelled theologians... ;)


That's another topic.


Meyer[_2_] July 12th 12 07:24 PM

Lying to the judge...
 
On 7/12/2012 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote:

Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't
understand...zowie.

Isn't that what agnostics do?

You misspelled theologians... ;)



It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will
give me the cue to look it up.


Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry.

That was almost an hour ago. Apparently his look up didn't render any
material he could use.


X ` Man July 12th 12 07:32 PM

Lying to the judge...
 
On 7/12/12 1:36 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote:


Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't
understand...zowie.


Isn't that what agnostics do?


You misspelled theologians... ;)



It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will
give me the cue to look it up.


give "you" the cue to look it up, of course. I already have my Agnostic
Member Pin.


iBoaterer[_2_] July 12th 12 07:34 PM

Lying to the judge...
 
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote:

Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't
understand...zowie.

Isn't that what agnostics do?

You misspelled theologians... ;)



It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will
give me the cue to look it up.


Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry.



You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing
****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just
read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles.


Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you
were going to look up what "agnostic" means.

X ` Man[_3_] July 12th 12 07:40 PM

Lying to the judge...
 
On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote:

Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't
understand...zowie.

Isn't that what agnostics do?

You misspelled theologians... ;)



It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will
give me the cue to look it up.

Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry.



You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing
****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just
read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles.


Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you
were going to look up what "agnostic" means.



No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer
for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of
"progressive" political positions and we both have little use for
right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you.


iBoaterer[_2_] July 12th 12 07:43 PM

Lying to the judge...
 
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote:

Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't
understand...zowie.

Isn't that what agnostics do?

You misspelled theologians... ;)



It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will
give me the cue to look it up.

Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry.



You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing
****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just
read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles.


Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you
were going to look up what "agnostic" means.



No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer
for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of
"progressive" political positions and we both have little use for
right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you.


So did you look up what "agnostic" means like you said you would?

North Star July 12th 12 07:56 PM

Lying to the judge...
 
On Jul 12, 3:40*pm, X ` Man dump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote:
On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote:









In article , dump-on-
says...


On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...


On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote:


Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't
understand...zowie.


Isn't that what agnostics do?


You misspelled theologians... ;)


It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will
give me the cue to look it up.


Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry.


You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing
****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just
read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles.


Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you
were going to look up what "agnostic" means.


No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer
for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of
"progressive" political positions and we both have little use for
right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you.


I agree with this post.

X ` Man July 12th 12 08:02 PM

Lying to the judge...
 
On 7/12/12 2:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote:

Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't
understand...zowie.

Isn't that what agnostics do?

You misspelled theologians... ;)



It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will
give me the cue to look it up.

Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry.



You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing
****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just
read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles.

Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you
were going to look up what "agnostic" means.



No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer
for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of
"progressive" political positions and we both have little use for
right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you.


So did you look up what "agnostic" means like you said you would?



If we didn't drop some crumbs on the floor, you and the other two
members of the TheThree****heads, Oscar and JustSnot, wouldn't have
anything to eat.


Meyer[_2_] July 12th 12 08:19 PM

Lying to the judge...
 
On 7/12/2012 2:32 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/12/12 1:36 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote:

Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't
understand...zowie.

Isn't that what agnostics do?

You misspelled theologians... ;)



It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will
give me the cue to look it up.


give "you" the cue to look it up, of course. I already have my Agnostic
Member Pin.

Sorry dude.Can't change it now.


Meyer[_2_] July 12th 12 08:21 PM

Lying to the judge...
 
On 7/12/2012 2:40 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote:

Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't
understand...zowie.

Isn't that what agnostics do?

You misspelled theologians... ;)



It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this
will
give me the cue to look it up.

Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry.



You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing
****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just
read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles.


Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you
were going to look up what "agnostic" means.



No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer
for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of
"progressive" political positions and we both have little use for
right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you.

This is where he'd say the feeling is mutual.


Meyer[_2_] July 12th 12 08:24 PM

Lying to the judge...
 
On 7/12/2012 3:02 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/12/12 2:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote:

Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't
understand...zowie.

Isn't that what agnostics do?

You misspelled theologians... ;)



It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and
this will
give me the cue to look it up.

Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry.



You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing
****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand,
just
read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles.

Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you
were going to look up what "agnostic" means.



No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer
for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of
"progressive" political positions and we both have little use for
right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you.


So did you look up what "agnostic" means like you said you would?



If we didn't drop some crumbs on the floor, you and the other two
members of the TheThree****heads, Oscar and JustSnot, wouldn't have
anything to eat.

It's more like you stepped on your tongue again.
Fergit about it. It's over. Score one for the good guys.


Meyer[_2_] July 12th 12 08:26 PM

Lying to the judge...
 
On 7/12/2012 2:56 PM, North Star wrote:
On Jul 12, 3:40 pm, X ` Man dump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote:
On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote:









In article , dump-on-
says...


On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...


On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote:


Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't
understand...zowie.


Isn't that what agnostics do?


You misspelled theologians... ;)


It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will
give me the cue to look it up.


Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry.


You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing
****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just
read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles.


Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you
were going to look up what "agnostic" means.


No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer
for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of
"progressive" political positions and we both have little use for
right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you.


I agree with this post.

One mind two decaying bodies. Yur made for each other.


iBoaterer[_2_] July 12th 12 08:48 PM

Lying to the judge...
 
In article f2b4af64-2057-4223-a58a-477f525d5330
@l4g2000yqf.googlegroups.com, says...

On Jul 12, 3:40*pm, X ` Man dump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote:
On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote:









In article , dump-on-
says...


On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...


On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote:


Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't
understand...zowie.


Isn't that what agnostics do?


You misspelled theologians... ;)


It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will
give me the cue to look it up.


Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry.


You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing
****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just
read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles.


Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you
were going to look up what "agnostic" means.


No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer
for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of
"progressive" political positions and we both have little use for
right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you.


I agree with this post.


Then just why DID Harry answer for you?

iBoaterer[_2_] July 12th 12 08:48 PM

Lying to the judge...
 
In article ,
says...

On 7/12/12 2:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote:

Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't
understand...zowie.

Isn't that what agnostics do?

You misspelled theologians... ;)



It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will
give me the cue to look it up.

Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry.



You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing
****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just
read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles.

Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you
were going to look up what "agnostic" means.



No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer
for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of
"progressive" political positions and we both have little use for
right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you.


So did you look up what "agnostic" means like you said you would?



If we didn't drop some crumbs on the floor, you and the other two
members of the TheThree****heads, Oscar and JustSnot, wouldn't have
anything to eat.


You didn't answer the question.

X ` Man[_3_] July 12th 12 08:54 PM

Lying to the judge...
 
On 7/12/12 3:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 7/12/12 2:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote:

Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't
understand...zowie.

Isn't that what agnostics do?

You misspelled theologians... ;)



It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will
give me the cue to look it up.

Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry.



You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing
****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just
read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles.

Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you
were going to look up what "agnostic" means.



No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer
for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of
"progressive" political positions and we both have little use for
right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you.

So did you look up what "agnostic" means like you said you would?



If we didn't drop some crumbs on the floor, you and the other two
members of the TheThree****heads, Oscar and JustSnot, wouldn't have
anything to eat.


You didn't answer the question.



Yeah, I did...you're just to black or white to understand. You really
should stick to guffawing with JustSnotty and the Weiner...they are your
intellectual equals, i.e., dumfochs.


iBoaterer[_2_] July 12th 12 09:13 PM

Lying to the judge...
 
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 3:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...

On 7/12/12 2:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote:

Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't
understand...zowie.

Isn't that what agnostics do?

You misspelled theologians... ;)



It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will
give me the cue to look it up.

Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry.



You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing
****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just
read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles.

Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you
were going to look up what "agnostic" means.



No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer
for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of
"progressive" political positions and we both have little use for
right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you.

So did you look up what "agnostic" means like you said you would?



If we didn't drop some crumbs on the floor, you and the other two
members of the TheThree****heads, Oscar and JustSnot, wouldn't have
anything to eat.


You didn't answer the question.



Yeah, I did...you're just to black or white to understand. You really
should stick to guffawing with JustSnotty and the Weiner...they are your
intellectual equals, i.e., dumfochs.


Okay, so you did have to look up the word "agnostic". Got it.

X ` Man[_3_] July 12th 12 09:15 PM

Lying to the judge...
 
On 7/12/12 4:13 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 3:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...

On 7/12/12 2:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote:

Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't
understand...zowie.

Isn't that what agnostics do?

You misspelled theologians... ;)



It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will
give me the cue to look it up.

Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry.



You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing
****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just
read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles.

Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you
were going to look up what "agnostic" means.



No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer
for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of
"progressive" political positions and we both have little use for
right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you.

So did you look up what "agnostic" means like you said you would?



If we didn't drop some crumbs on the floor, you and the other two
members of the TheThree****heads, Oscar and JustSnot, wouldn't have
anything to eat.

You didn't answer the question.



Yeah, I did...you're just too black or white to understand. You really
should stick to guffawing with JustSnotty and the Weiner...they are your
intellectual equals, i.e., dumfochs.


Okay, so you did have to look up the word "agnostic". Got it.



You're a moron. No need to look that up. Once again, stick with your
dumfoch buddies.




Meyer[_2_] July 12th 12 09:35 PM

Lying to the judge...
 
On 7/12/2012 3:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article f2b4af64-2057-4223-a58a-477f525d5330
@l4g2000yqf.googlegroups.com, says...

On Jul 12, 3:40 pm, X ` Man dump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote:
On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote:









In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote:

Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't
understand...zowie.

Isn't that what agnostics do?

You misspelled theologians... ;)

It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will
give me the cue to look it up.

Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry.

You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing
****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just
read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles.

Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you
were going to look up what "agnostic" means.

No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer
for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of
"progressive" political positions and we both have little use for
right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you.


I agree with this post.


Then just why DID Harry answer for you?

You aren't going to get anywhere with this line of questioning.


Meyer[_2_] July 12th 12 09:36 PM

Lying to the judge...
 
On 7/12/2012 3:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 7/12/12 2:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote:

Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't
understand...zowie.

Isn't that what agnostics do?

You misspelled theologians... ;)



It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will
give me the cue to look it up.

Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry.



You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing
****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just
read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles.

Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you
were going to look up what "agnostic" means.



No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer
for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of
"progressive" political positions and we both have little use for
right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you.

So did you look up what "agnostic" means like you said you would?



If we didn't drop some crumbs on the floor, you and the other two
members of the TheThree****heads, Oscar and JustSnot, wouldn't have
anything to eat.


You didn't answer the question.

Another broken promise. Sigh!


iBoaterer[_2_] July 12th 12 09:48 PM

Lying to the judge...
 
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 4:13 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 3:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...

On 7/12/12 2:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote:

Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't
understand...zowie.

Isn't that what agnostics do?

You misspelled theologians... ;)



It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will
give me the cue to look it up.

Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry.



You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing
****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just
read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles.

Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you
were going to look up what "agnostic" means.



No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer
for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of
"progressive" political positions and we both have little use for
right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you.

So did you look up what "agnostic" means like you said you would?



If we didn't drop some crumbs on the floor, you and the other two
members of the TheThree****heads, Oscar and JustSnot, wouldn't have
anything to eat.

You didn't answer the question.



Yeah, I did...you're just too black or white to understand. You really
should stick to guffawing with JustSnotty and the Weiner...they are your
intellectual equals, i.e., dumfochs.


Okay, so you did have to look up the word "agnostic". Got it.



You're a moron. No need to look that up. Once again, stick with your
dumfoch buddies.


It's okay, Harry, you seem to having a bad day, that sleep apnea is
kicking your ass eh?

X ` Man[_3_] July 12th 12 09:50 PM

Lying to the judge...
 
On 7/12/12 4:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 4:13 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 3:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...

On 7/12/12 2:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote:

Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't
understand...zowie.

Isn't that what agnostics do?

You misspelled theologians... ;)



It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will
give me the cue to look it up.

Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry.



You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing
****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just
read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles.

Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you
were going to look up what "agnostic" means.



No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer
for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of
"progressive" political positions and we both have little use for
right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you.

So did you look up what "agnostic" means like you said you would?



If we didn't drop some crumbs on the floor, you and the other two
members of the TheThree****heads, Oscar and JustSnot, wouldn't have
anything to eat.

You didn't answer the question.



Yeah, I did...you're just too black or white to understand. You really
should stick to guffawing with JustSnotty and the Weiner...they are your
intellectual equals, i.e., dumfochs.

Okay, so you did have to look up the word "agnostic". Got it.



You're a moron. No need to look that up. Once again, stick with your
dumfoch buddies.


It's okay, Harry, you seem to having a bad day, that sleep apnea is
kicking your ass eh?


Sleep apnea? Not me. Where did you dredge that up, from one of
SnottyScotty's paranoid daydreams?


iBoaterer[_2_] July 12th 12 10:08 PM

Lying to the judge...
 
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 4:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 4:13 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 3:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...

On 7/12/12 2:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote:

Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't
understand...zowie.

Isn't that what agnostics do?

You misspelled theologians... ;)



It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will
give me the cue to look it up.

Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry.



You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing
****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just
read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles.

Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you
were going to look up what "agnostic" means.



No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer
for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of
"progressive" political positions and we both have little use for
right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you.

So did you look up what "agnostic" means like you said you would?



If we didn't drop some crumbs on the floor, you and the other two
members of the TheThree****heads, Oscar and JustSnot, wouldn't have
anything to eat.

You didn't answer the question.



Yeah, I did...you're just too black or white to understand. You really
should stick to guffawing with JustSnotty and the Weiner...they are your
intellectual equals, i.e., dumfochs.

Okay, so you did have to look up the word "agnostic". Got it.


You're a moron. No need to look that up. Once again, stick with your
dumfoch buddies.


It's okay, Harry, you seem to having a bad day, that sleep apnea is
kicking your ass eh?


Sleep apnea? Not me. Where did you dredge that up, from one of
SnottyScotty's paranoid daydreams?


Oh, you know...

X ` Man[_3_] July 12th 12 10:18 PM

Lying to the judge...
 
On 7/12/12 5:08 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 4:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 4:13 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 3:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...

On 7/12/12 2:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote:

Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't
understand...zowie.

Isn't that what agnostics do?

You misspelled theologians... ;)



It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will
give me the cue to look it up.

Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry.



You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing
****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just
read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles.

Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you
were going to look up what "agnostic" means.



No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer
for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of
"progressive" political positions and we both have little use for
right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you.

So did you look up what "agnostic" means like you said you would?



If we didn't drop some crumbs on the floor, you and the other two
members of the TheThree****heads, Oscar and JustSnot, wouldn't have
anything to eat.

You didn't answer the question.



Yeah, I did...you're just too black or white to understand. You really
should stick to guffawing with JustSnotty and the Weiner...they are your
intellectual equals, i.e., dumfochs.

Okay, so you did have to look up the word "agnostic". Got it.


You're a moron. No need to look that up. Once again, stick with your
dumfoch buddies.


It's okay, Harry, you seem to having a bad day, that sleep apnea is
kicking your ass eh?


Sleep apnea? Not me. Where did you dredge that up, from one of
SnottyScotty's paranoid daydreams?


Oh, you know...



Well, whatever its source, probably wishful thinking, it's bull****.
You're well back on your way to the totally ignore pile. A few days of
tic-tac-toe with morons like you just bores me.



Meyer[_2_] July 12th 12 11:02 PM

Lying to the judge...
 
On 7/12/2012 4:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 4:13 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 3:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...

On 7/12/12 2:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote:

Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't
understand...zowie.

Isn't that what agnostics do?

You misspelled theologians... ;)



It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will
give me the cue to look it up.

Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry.



You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing
****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just
read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles.

Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you
were going to look up what "agnostic" means.



No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer
for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of
"progressive" political positions and we both have little use for
right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you.

So did you look up what "agnostic" means like you said you would?



If we didn't drop some crumbs on the floor, you and the other two
members of the TheThree****heads, Oscar and JustSnot, wouldn't have
anything to eat.

You didn't answer the question.



Yeah, I did...you're just too black or white to understand. You really
should stick to guffawing with JustSnotty and the Weiner...they are your
intellectual equals, i.e., dumfochs.

Okay, so you did have to look up the word "agnostic". Got it.



You're a moron. No need to look that up. Once again, stick with your
dumfoch buddies.


It's okay, Harry, you seem to having a bad day, that sleep apnea is
kicking your ass eh?

Now you know why the backup generator was such a priority.


Meyer[_2_] July 12th 12 11:04 PM

Lying to the judge...
 
On 7/12/2012 5:18 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/12/12 5:08 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 4:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 4:13 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 3:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...

On 7/12/12 2:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article
, dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote:

Three stooges arguing the fine points of something
they don't
understand...zowie.

Isn't that what agnostics do?

You misspelled theologians... ;)



It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic"
means...and this will
give me the cue to look it up.

Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry.



You certainly have an interesting relationship with the
right-wing
****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the
other hand, just
read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles.

Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence?
It said you
were going to look up what "agnostic" means.



No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't
have to answer
for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of
"progressive" political positions and we both have little use
for
right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you.

So did you look up what "agnostic" means like you said you would?



If we didn't drop some crumbs on the floor, you and the other two
members of the TheThree****heads, Oscar and JustSnot, wouldn't
have
anything to eat.

You didn't answer the question.



Yeah, I did...you're just too black or white to understand. You
really
should stick to guffawing with JustSnotty and the Weiner...they
are your
intellectual equals, i.e., dumfochs.

Okay, so you did have to look up the word "agnostic". Got it.


You're a moron. No need to look that up. Once again, stick with your
dumfoch buddies.


It's okay, Harry, you seem to having a bad day, that sleep apnea is
kicking your ass eh?


Sleep apnea? Not me. Where did you dredge that up, from one of
SnottyScotty's paranoid daydreams?


Oh, you know...



Well, whatever its source, probably wishful thinking, it's bull****.
You're well back on your way to the totally ignore pile. A few days of
tic-tac-toe with morons like you just bores me.


Ah deflection. But not effective.


iBoaterer[_2_] July 13th 12 01:35 PM

Lying to the judge...
 
In article m,
says...

On 7/12/2012 4:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 4:13 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 3:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...

On 7/12/12 2:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote:

Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't
understand...zowie.

Isn't that what agnostics do?

You misspelled theologians... ;)



It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will
give me the cue to look it up.

Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry.



You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing
****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just
read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles.

Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you
were going to look up what "agnostic" means.



No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer
for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of
"progressive" political positions and we both have little use for
right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you.

So did you look up what "agnostic" means like you said you would?



If we didn't drop some crumbs on the floor, you and the other two
members of the TheThree****heads, Oscar and JustSnot, wouldn't have
anything to eat.

You didn't answer the question.



Yeah, I did...you're just too black or white to understand. You really
should stick to guffawing with JustSnotty and the Weiner...they are your
intellectual equals, i.e., dumfochs.

Okay, so you did have to look up the word "agnostic". Got it.


You're a moron. No need to look that up. Once again, stick with your
dumfoch buddies.


It's okay, Harry, you seem to having a bad day, that sleep apnea is
kicking your ass eh?

Now you know why the backup generator was such a priority.


Yup!


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com