![]() |
Lying to the judge...
....something JustSnot said he would do...along with lying to the
police... doesn't serve a defendant well. George Zimmerman, who stands accused of killing unarmed teenager Trayvon Martin, hasn't done himself any favors with the court during his bond escapades, the judge overseeing his case made clear this week. And that, say some legal analysts, could come back to haunt him during the next major step in his defense: the self-defense hearing. Related stories Although Seminole County (Fla.) Judge Kenneth Lester ruled Thursday that Mr. Zimmerman, who had been returned to jail after first bond was revoked, could be free on $1 million bail, his order also gave a stiff assessment of the defendant's actions to date. George Zimmerman, the judge's summation said, had masterminded a plot with his wife to manipulate the criminal justice system, may have planned to use $130,000 in donated money to flee the country before trial, and whose lawyer improperly portrayed him in court hearings as a scared young man, when the “only male whose youth is relevant” was Trayvon Martin. With Judge Lester’s stern order, it appears that a case that many experts expected would be difficult for the prosecution to prove has become more problematic for Zimmerman. His defense team will have to lay out its version of events leading up to Trayvon's shooting against the backdrop of Zimmerman's damaged credibility – in front of a judge whose neutrality about the defendant's honesty has been sorely tested. “A witness’s credibility is everything, and the judge views everything Zimmerman says with a suspicious eye,” Mark NeJame, an attorney in Orlando, Fla., told the Palm Beach Post on Friday. Zimmerman has said that he simply stood his ground, as permitted under Florida law, and shot Trayvon in self-defense after the boy attacked him. The prosecution, which has charged Zimmerman with second-degree murder, says the defendant profiled Trayvon as a criminal, followed him, confronted him, and then shot and killed him when Trayvon defended himself. Under Florida law, anyone claiming a Stand Your Ground defense is allowed a pretrial hearing before the judge. The defendant gets to make his case, per a landmark 2005 law, as to why he had no duty to retreat and how he used reasonable force in self-defense. If the judge agrees, the defendant is granted immunity from prosecution, and the case is thrown out. At that as-yet-unscheduled Stand Your Ground hearing, Zimmerman is widely expected to take the stand to explain what happened, and also to be cross-examined by prosecutors, legal experts say. Lester is the judge who will preside over that hearing. - - - http://tinyurl.com/btjbawe |
Lying to the judge...
On 7/6/2012 2:54 PM, X ` Man wrote:
...something JustSnot said he would do...along with lying to the police... doesn't serve a defendant well. George Zimmerman, who stands accused of killing unarmed teenager Trayvon Martin, hasn't done himself any favors with the court during his bond escapades, the judge overseeing his case made clear this week. And that, say some legal analysts, could come back to haunt him during the next major step in his defense: the self-defense hearing. Related stories Although Seminole County (Fla.) Judge Kenneth Lester ruled Thursday that Mr. Zimmerman, who had been returned to jail after first bond was revoked, could be free on $1 million bail, his order also gave a stiff assessment of the defendant's actions to date. George Zimmerman, the judge's summation said, had masterminded a plot with his wife to manipulate the criminal justice system, may have planned to use $130,000 in donated money to flee the country before trial, and whose lawyer improperly portrayed him in court hearings as a scared young man, when the “only male whose youth is relevant” was Trayvon Martin. With Judge Lester’s stern order, it appears that a case that many experts expected would be difficult for the prosecution to prove has become more problematic for Zimmerman. His defense team will have to lay out its version of events leading up to Trayvon's shooting against the backdrop of Zimmerman's damaged credibility – in front of a judge whose neutrality about the defendant's honesty has been sorely tested. “A witness’s credibility is everything, and the judge views everything Zimmerman says with a suspicious eye,” Mark NeJame, an attorney in Orlando, Fla., told the Palm Beach Post on Friday. Zimmerman has said that he simply stood his ground, as permitted under Florida law, and shot Trayvon in self-defense after the boy attacked him. The prosecution, which has charged Zimmerman with second-degree murder, says the defendant profiled Trayvon as a criminal, followed him, confronted him, and then shot and killed him when Trayvon defended himself. Under Florida law, anyone claiming a Stand Your Ground defense is allowed a pretrial hearing before the judge. The defendant gets to make his case, per a landmark 2005 law, as to why he had no duty to retreat and how he used reasonable force in self-defense. If the judge agrees, the defendant is granted immunity from prosecution, and the case is thrown out. At that as-yet-unscheduled Stand Your Ground hearing, Zimmerman is widely expected to take the stand to explain what happened, and also to be cross-examined by prosecutors, legal experts say. Lester is the judge who will preside over that hearing. - - - http://tinyurl.com/btjbawe His lawyer should put a zipper on Zimms. mouth Is there going to be a stand your ground hearing? Isn't it more like pure self defense, they'll be arguing? You can't stand your ground when you're lying on your back being pummeled. |
Lying to the judge...
On Fri, 06 Jul 2012 15:07:13 -0400, Oscar wrote:
On 7/6/2012 2:54 PM, X ` Man wrote: ...something JustSnot said he would do...along with lying to the police... doesn't serve a defendant well. George Zimmerman, who stands accused of killing unarmed teenager Trayvon Martin, hasn't done himself any favors with the court during his bond escapades, the judge overseeing his case made clear this week. And that, say some legal analysts, could come back to haunt him during the next major step in his defense: the self-defense hearing. Related stories Although Seminole County (Fla.) Judge Kenneth Lester ruled Thursday that Mr. Zimmerman, who had been returned to jail after first bond was revoked, could be free on $1 million bail, his order also gave a stiff assessment of the defendant's actions to date. George Zimmerman, the judge's summation said, had masterminded a plot with his wife to manipulate the criminal justice system, may have planned to use $130,000 in donated money to flee the country before trial, and whose lawyer improperly portrayed him in court hearings as a scared young man, when the “only male whose youth is relevant” was Trayvon Martin. With Judge Lester’s stern order, it appears that a case that many experts expected would be difficult for the prosecution to prove has become more problematic for Zimmerman. His defense team will have to lay out its version of events leading up to Trayvon's shooting against the backdrop of Zimmerman's damaged credibility – in front of a judge whose neutrality about the defendant's honesty has been sorely tested. “A witness’s credibility is everything, and the judge views everything Zimmerman says with a suspicious eye,” Mark NeJame, an attorney in Orlando, Fla., told the Palm Beach Post on Friday. Zimmerman has said that he simply stood his ground, as permitted under Florida law, and shot Trayvon in self-defense after the boy attacked him. The prosecution, which has charged Zimmerman with second-degree murder, says the defendant profiled Trayvon as a criminal, followed him, confronted him, and then shot and killed him when Trayvon defended himself. Under Florida law, anyone claiming a Stand Your Ground defense is allowed a pretrial hearing before the judge. The defendant gets to make his case, per a landmark 2005 law, as to why he had no duty to retreat and how he used reasonable force in self-defense. If the judge agrees, the defendant is granted immunity from prosecution, and the case is thrown out. At that as-yet-unscheduled Stand Your Ground hearing, Zimmerman is widely expected to take the stand to explain what happened, and also to be cross-examined by prosecutors, legal experts say. Lester is the judge who will preside over that hearing. - - - http://tinyurl.com/btjbawe His lawyer should put a zipper on Zimms. mouth Is there going to be a stand your ground hearing? Isn't it more like pure self defense, they'll be arguing? You can't stand your ground when you're lying on your back being pummeled. I don't envy the judge or any future jury. Expecially not his lawyer. He armed himself, went looking for trouble, and then shot and killed an unarmed man. All he had going for him was to have a good enough story believed. It looks like manslaughter, based on entirely too few facts. Thats why they have trials and he will be guilty of something when the judge says so. Casady |
Lying to the judge...
On Tuesday, July 10, 2012 12:13:35 PM UTC-5, jps wrote:
Pudgy asshole Your fantasy? |
Lying to the judge...
On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote:
Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't understand...zowie. Isn't that what agnostics do? |
Lying to the judge...
On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote: Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't understand...zowie. Isn't that what agnostics do? You misspelled theologians... ;) |
Lying to the judge...
On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote: On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote: Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't understand...zowie. Isn't that what agnostics do? You misspelled theologians... ;) It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will give me the cue to look it up. |
Lying to the judge...
|
Lying to the judge...
On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote: On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote: On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote: Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't understand...zowie. Isn't that what agnostics do? You misspelled theologians... ;) It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will give me the cue to look it up. Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry. You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing ****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles. |
Lying to the judge...
On 7/12/2012 1:34 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote: On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote: Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't understand...zowie. Isn't that what agnostics do? You misspelled theologians... ;) That's another topic. |
Lying to the judge...
On 7/12/2012 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote: On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote: On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote: Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't understand...zowie. Isn't that what agnostics do? You misspelled theologians... ;) It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will give me the cue to look it up. Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry. That was almost an hour ago. Apparently his look up didn't render any material he could use. |
Lying to the judge...
On 7/12/12 1:36 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote: On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote: On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote: Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't understand...zowie. Isn't that what agnostics do? You misspelled theologians... ;) It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will give me the cue to look it up. give "you" the cue to look it up, of course. I already have my Agnostic Member Pin. |
Lying to the judge...
On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote: On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote: On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote: Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't understand...zowie. Isn't that what agnostics do? You misspelled theologians... ;) It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will give me the cue to look it up. Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry. You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing ****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles. Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you were going to look up what "agnostic" means. No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of "progressive" political positions and we both have little use for right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you. |
Lying to the judge...
In article , dump-on-
says... On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote: On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote: On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote: Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't understand...zowie. Isn't that what agnostics do? You misspelled theologians... ;) It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will give me the cue to look it up. Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry. You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing ****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles. Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you were going to look up what "agnostic" means. No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of "progressive" political positions and we both have little use for right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you. So did you look up what "agnostic" means like you said you would? |
Lying to the judge...
On Jul 12, 3:40*pm, X ` Man dump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote: On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote: On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote: On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote: Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't understand...zowie. Isn't that what agnostics do? You misspelled theologians... ;) It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will give me the cue to look it up. Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry. You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing ****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles. Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you were going to look up what "agnostic" means. No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of "progressive" political positions and we both have little use for right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you. I agree with this post. |
Lying to the judge...
On 7/12/12 2:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote: On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote: On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote: Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't understand...zowie. Isn't that what agnostics do? You misspelled theologians... ;) It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will give me the cue to look it up. Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry. You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing ****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles. Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you were going to look up what "agnostic" means. No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of "progressive" political positions and we both have little use for right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you. So did you look up what "agnostic" means like you said you would? If we didn't drop some crumbs on the floor, you and the other two members of the TheThree****heads, Oscar and JustSnot, wouldn't have anything to eat. |
Lying to the judge...
On 7/12/2012 2:32 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/12/12 1:36 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote: On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote: On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote: Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't understand...zowie. Isn't that what agnostics do? You misspelled theologians... ;) It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will give me the cue to look it up. give "you" the cue to look it up, of course. I already have my Agnostic Member Pin. Sorry dude.Can't change it now. |
Lying to the judge...
On 7/12/2012 2:40 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote: On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote: On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote: Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't understand...zowie. Isn't that what agnostics do? You misspelled theologians... ;) It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will give me the cue to look it up. Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry. You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing ****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles. Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you were going to look up what "agnostic" means. No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of "progressive" political positions and we both have little use for right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you. This is where he'd say the feeling is mutual. |
Lying to the judge...
On 7/12/2012 3:02 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/12/12 2:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote: On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote: On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote: Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't understand...zowie. Isn't that what agnostics do? You misspelled theologians... ;) It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will give me the cue to look it up. Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry. You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing ****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles. Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you were going to look up what "agnostic" means. No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of "progressive" political positions and we both have little use for right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you. So did you look up what "agnostic" means like you said you would? If we didn't drop some crumbs on the floor, you and the other two members of the TheThree****heads, Oscar and JustSnot, wouldn't have anything to eat. It's more like you stepped on your tongue again. Fergit about it. It's over. Score one for the good guys. |
Lying to the judge...
On 7/12/2012 2:56 PM, North Star wrote:
On Jul 12, 3:40 pm, X ` Man dump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you- can.com wrote: On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote: On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote: On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote: Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't understand...zowie. Isn't that what agnostics do? You misspelled theologians... ;) It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will give me the cue to look it up. Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry. You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing ****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles. Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you were going to look up what "agnostic" means. No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of "progressive" political positions and we both have little use for right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you. I agree with this post. One mind two decaying bodies. Yur made for each other. |
Lying to the judge...
|
Lying to the judge...
In article ,
says... On 7/12/12 2:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote: On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote: On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote: Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't understand...zowie. Isn't that what agnostics do? You misspelled theologians... ;) It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will give me the cue to look it up. Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry. You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing ****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles. Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you were going to look up what "agnostic" means. No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of "progressive" political positions and we both have little use for right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you. So did you look up what "agnostic" means like you said you would? If we didn't drop some crumbs on the floor, you and the other two members of the TheThree****heads, Oscar and JustSnot, wouldn't have anything to eat. You didn't answer the question. |
Lying to the judge...
On 7/12/12 3:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 7/12/12 2:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote: On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote: On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote: Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't understand...zowie. Isn't that what agnostics do? You misspelled theologians... ;) It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will give me the cue to look it up. Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry. You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing ****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles. Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you were going to look up what "agnostic" means. No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of "progressive" political positions and we both have little use for right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you. So did you look up what "agnostic" means like you said you would? If we didn't drop some crumbs on the floor, you and the other two members of the TheThree****heads, Oscar and JustSnot, wouldn't have anything to eat. You didn't answer the question. Yeah, I did...you're just to black or white to understand. You really should stick to guffawing with JustSnotty and the Weiner...they are your intellectual equals, i.e., dumfochs. |
Lying to the judge...
In article , dump-on-
says... On 7/12/12 3:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/12/12 2:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote: On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote: On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote: Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't understand...zowie. Isn't that what agnostics do? You misspelled theologians... ;) It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will give me the cue to look it up. Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry. You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing ****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles. Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you were going to look up what "agnostic" means. No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of "progressive" political positions and we both have little use for right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you. So did you look up what "agnostic" means like you said you would? If we didn't drop some crumbs on the floor, you and the other two members of the TheThree****heads, Oscar and JustSnot, wouldn't have anything to eat. You didn't answer the question. Yeah, I did...you're just to black or white to understand. You really should stick to guffawing with JustSnotty and the Weiner...they are your intellectual equals, i.e., dumfochs. Okay, so you did have to look up the word "agnostic". Got it. |
Lying to the judge...
On 7/12/12 4:13 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 3:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/12/12 2:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote: On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote: On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote: Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't understand...zowie. Isn't that what agnostics do? You misspelled theologians... ;) It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will give me the cue to look it up. Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry. You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing ****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles. Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you were going to look up what "agnostic" means. No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of "progressive" political positions and we both have little use for right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you. So did you look up what "agnostic" means like you said you would? If we didn't drop some crumbs on the floor, you and the other two members of the TheThree****heads, Oscar and JustSnot, wouldn't have anything to eat. You didn't answer the question. Yeah, I did...you're just too black or white to understand. You really should stick to guffawing with JustSnotty and the Weiner...they are your intellectual equals, i.e., dumfochs. Okay, so you did have to look up the word "agnostic". Got it. You're a moron. No need to look that up. Once again, stick with your dumfoch buddies. |
Lying to the judge...
On 7/12/2012 3:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article f2b4af64-2057-4223-a58a-477f525d5330 @l4g2000yqf.googlegroups.com, says... On Jul 12, 3:40 pm, X ` Man dump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you- can.com wrote: On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote: On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote: On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote: Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't understand...zowie. Isn't that what agnostics do? You misspelled theologians... ;) It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will give me the cue to look it up. Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry. You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing ****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles. Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you were going to look up what "agnostic" means. No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of "progressive" political positions and we both have little use for right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you. I agree with this post. Then just why DID Harry answer for you? You aren't going to get anywhere with this line of questioning. |
Lying to the judge...
On 7/12/2012 3:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 7/12/12 2:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote: On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote: On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote: Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't understand...zowie. Isn't that what agnostics do? You misspelled theologians... ;) It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will give me the cue to look it up. Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry. You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing ****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles. Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you were going to look up what "agnostic" means. No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of "progressive" political positions and we both have little use for right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you. So did you look up what "agnostic" means like you said you would? If we didn't drop some crumbs on the floor, you and the other two members of the TheThree****heads, Oscar and JustSnot, wouldn't have anything to eat. You didn't answer the question. Another broken promise. Sigh! |
Lying to the judge...
In article , dump-on-
says... On 7/12/12 4:13 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 3:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/12/12 2:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote: On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote: On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote: Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't understand...zowie. Isn't that what agnostics do? You misspelled theologians... ;) It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will give me the cue to look it up. Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry. You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing ****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles. Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you were going to look up what "agnostic" means. No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of "progressive" political positions and we both have little use for right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you. So did you look up what "agnostic" means like you said you would? If we didn't drop some crumbs on the floor, you and the other two members of the TheThree****heads, Oscar and JustSnot, wouldn't have anything to eat. You didn't answer the question. Yeah, I did...you're just too black or white to understand. You really should stick to guffawing with JustSnotty and the Weiner...they are your intellectual equals, i.e., dumfochs. Okay, so you did have to look up the word "agnostic". Got it. You're a moron. No need to look that up. Once again, stick with your dumfoch buddies. It's okay, Harry, you seem to having a bad day, that sleep apnea is kicking your ass eh? |
Lying to the judge...
On 7/12/12 4:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 4:13 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 3:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/12/12 2:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote: On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote: On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote: Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't understand...zowie. Isn't that what agnostics do? You misspelled theologians... ;) It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will give me the cue to look it up. Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry. You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing ****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles. Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you were going to look up what "agnostic" means. No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of "progressive" political positions and we both have little use for right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you. So did you look up what "agnostic" means like you said you would? If we didn't drop some crumbs on the floor, you and the other two members of the TheThree****heads, Oscar and JustSnot, wouldn't have anything to eat. You didn't answer the question. Yeah, I did...you're just too black or white to understand. You really should stick to guffawing with JustSnotty and the Weiner...they are your intellectual equals, i.e., dumfochs. Okay, so you did have to look up the word "agnostic". Got it. You're a moron. No need to look that up. Once again, stick with your dumfoch buddies. It's okay, Harry, you seem to having a bad day, that sleep apnea is kicking your ass eh? Sleep apnea? Not me. Where did you dredge that up, from one of SnottyScotty's paranoid daydreams? |
Lying to the judge...
In article , dump-on-
says... On 7/12/12 4:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 4:13 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 3:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/12/12 2:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote: On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote: On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote: Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't understand...zowie. Isn't that what agnostics do? You misspelled theologians... ;) It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will give me the cue to look it up. Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry. You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing ****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles. Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you were going to look up what "agnostic" means. No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of "progressive" political positions and we both have little use for right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you. So did you look up what "agnostic" means like you said you would? If we didn't drop some crumbs on the floor, you and the other two members of the TheThree****heads, Oscar and JustSnot, wouldn't have anything to eat. You didn't answer the question. Yeah, I did...you're just too black or white to understand. You really should stick to guffawing with JustSnotty and the Weiner...they are your intellectual equals, i.e., dumfochs. Okay, so you did have to look up the word "agnostic". Got it. You're a moron. No need to look that up. Once again, stick with your dumfoch buddies. It's okay, Harry, you seem to having a bad day, that sleep apnea is kicking your ass eh? Sleep apnea? Not me. Where did you dredge that up, from one of SnottyScotty's paranoid daydreams? Oh, you know... |
Lying to the judge...
On 7/12/12 5:08 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 4:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 4:13 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 3:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/12/12 2:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote: On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote: On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote: Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't understand...zowie. Isn't that what agnostics do? You misspelled theologians... ;) It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will give me the cue to look it up. Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry. You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing ****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles. Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you were going to look up what "agnostic" means. No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of "progressive" political positions and we both have little use for right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you. So did you look up what "agnostic" means like you said you would? If we didn't drop some crumbs on the floor, you and the other two members of the TheThree****heads, Oscar and JustSnot, wouldn't have anything to eat. You didn't answer the question. Yeah, I did...you're just too black or white to understand. You really should stick to guffawing with JustSnotty and the Weiner...they are your intellectual equals, i.e., dumfochs. Okay, so you did have to look up the word "agnostic". Got it. You're a moron. No need to look that up. Once again, stick with your dumfoch buddies. It's okay, Harry, you seem to having a bad day, that sleep apnea is kicking your ass eh? Sleep apnea? Not me. Where did you dredge that up, from one of SnottyScotty's paranoid daydreams? Oh, you know... Well, whatever its source, probably wishful thinking, it's bull****. You're well back on your way to the totally ignore pile. A few days of tic-tac-toe with morons like you just bores me. |
Lying to the judge...
On 7/12/2012 4:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 4:13 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 3:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/12/12 2:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote: On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote: On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote: Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't understand...zowie. Isn't that what agnostics do? You misspelled theologians... ;) It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will give me the cue to look it up. Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry. You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing ****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles. Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you were going to look up what "agnostic" means. No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of "progressive" political positions and we both have little use for right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you. So did you look up what "agnostic" means like you said you would? If we didn't drop some crumbs on the floor, you and the other two members of the TheThree****heads, Oscar and JustSnot, wouldn't have anything to eat. You didn't answer the question. Yeah, I did...you're just too black or white to understand. You really should stick to guffawing with JustSnotty and the Weiner...they are your intellectual equals, i.e., dumfochs. Okay, so you did have to look up the word "agnostic". Got it. You're a moron. No need to look that up. Once again, stick with your dumfoch buddies. It's okay, Harry, you seem to having a bad day, that sleep apnea is kicking your ass eh? Now you know why the backup generator was such a priority. |
Lying to the judge...
On 7/12/2012 5:18 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/12/12 5:08 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 4:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 4:13 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 3:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/12/12 2:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote: On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote: On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote: Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't understand...zowie. Isn't that what agnostics do? You misspelled theologians... ;) It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will give me the cue to look it up. Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry. You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing ****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles. Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you were going to look up what "agnostic" means. No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of "progressive" political positions and we both have little use for right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you. So did you look up what "agnostic" means like you said you would? If we didn't drop some crumbs on the floor, you and the other two members of the TheThree****heads, Oscar and JustSnot, wouldn't have anything to eat. You didn't answer the question. Yeah, I did...you're just too black or white to understand. You really should stick to guffawing with JustSnotty and the Weiner...they are your intellectual equals, i.e., dumfochs. Okay, so you did have to look up the word "agnostic". Got it. You're a moron. No need to look that up. Once again, stick with your dumfoch buddies. It's okay, Harry, you seem to having a bad day, that sleep apnea is kicking your ass eh? Sleep apnea? Not me. Where did you dredge that up, from one of SnottyScotty's paranoid daydreams? Oh, you know... Well, whatever its source, probably wishful thinking, it's bull****. You're well back on your way to the totally ignore pile. A few days of tic-tac-toe with morons like you just bores me. Ah deflection. But not effective. |
Lying to the judge...
In article m,
says... On 7/12/2012 4:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 4:13 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 3:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/12/12 2:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 2:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/12/12 1:34 PM, thumper wrote: On 7/12/2012 7:19 AM, Meyer wrote: On 7/12/2012 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote: Three stooges arguing the fine points of something they don't understand...zowie. Isn't that what agnostics do? You misspelled theologians... ;) It's apparent "Meyer" has no idea what "agnostic" means...and this will give me the cue to look it up. Well, I'm glad you're going to look it up, Harry. You certainly have an interesting relationship with the right-wing ****heads who despise you, lil loogy. Don and I, on the other hand, just read your moronic posts for ****s'n'giggles. Now you have to answer for Don? Did you read your sentence? It said you were going to look up what "agnostic" means. No, moron, I don't have to answer for Don and Don doesn't have to answer for me. It is true, however, that Don and I share a number of "progressive" political positions and we both have little use for right-wing ****heads or empty-headed loogy-types like you. So did you look up what "agnostic" means like you said you would? If we didn't drop some crumbs on the floor, you and the other two members of the TheThree****heads, Oscar and JustSnot, wouldn't have anything to eat. You didn't answer the question. Yeah, I did...you're just too black or white to understand. You really should stick to guffawing with JustSnotty and the Weiner...they are your intellectual equals, i.e., dumfochs. Okay, so you did have to look up the word "agnostic". Got it. You're a moron. No need to look that up. Once again, stick with your dumfoch buddies. It's okay, Harry, you seem to having a bad day, that sleep apnea is kicking your ass eh? Now you know why the backup generator was such a priority. Yup! |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:10 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com