On 6/2/12 5:52 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 6/2/2012 5:24 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 02/06/2012 10:13 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 6/2/2012 11:37 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 6/2/12 10:13 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 6/2/2012 9:25 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

In ,
says...

On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 13:21:17 -0400, wrote:

http://www.tampabay.com/stand-your-ground-law/



The law is not stupid. The absolute lack of common sense in America
is. So is the fact that the richest Americans have, since
Eisenhower,
gradually bought more and more of the government until today, they
own
it.

A gun in the hand is better than a cop on the phone.

The police are not available to protect you. They are available to
document the crimes you have committed or that have been committed
against you.

Yeah, the stand your ground law lets you kill innocent children,
that's
great huh?

Keeps harry feelin' secure...


Uh, we don't have a Florida-like "stand your ground" law, little dummy.
If, however, a violent little turd like you breaks into a house down
here, it is unlikely anymore than the prosecutors will claim the
victims
had an "obligation to retreat." In other words, when you break into a
house down here, you'll likely be shot. The question is, how good a
shot
is your intended victim? Will they shoot you dead or just use a shotgun
to blow off your legs from the knees down?

You should think about that before you engage in home invasion, little
putz.

Wow, you sure talk tough for a guy who obviously wouldn't have the balls
to pull the trigger... LOL!

True, harry was too chicken to serve.

It's one thing to wave a weapon around but to actually bead down and
pull the trigger as you are being bum rushed, is a lot different... Same
thing with a knife.. Punks will wave them around and slice at you, but
very few have the guts to drive to the chest. harry will pull his widdew
cap gun on someone someday and if we are lucky the guy will take it and
feed it to him a click at a time...


Setting yourself up for a home invasion down here, little putz?

X ` Man wrote:
Then, if you aren't referring to Zimmerman, you are totally wrong.
Then your statement, "Yeah, the stand your ground law lets you kill
innocent children, that's great huh?" is totally false.



If Zimmerman walks, it'll be totally true.
He won't walk. He'll get manslaughter and life in prison - well deserved.

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 13:30:29 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 10:06:32 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 09:25:15 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 13:21:17 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

http://www.tampabay.com/stand-your-ground-law/



The law is not stupid. The absolute lack of common sense in America
is. So is the fact that the richest Americans have, since Eisenhower,
gradually bought more and more of the government until today, they own
it.

A gun in the hand is better than a cop on the phone.

The police are not available to protect you. They are available to
document the crimes you have committed or that have been committed
against you.

Yeah, the stand your ground law lets you kill innocent children, that's
great huh?

No, the stand your ground law is being mis-applied in this case.
Zimmerman drew the line in the sand to stand his ground, but when HE
crossed that line, that action made that law inapplicable.

Apparently, Florida is common sense challenged.

Well true, but I said nothing about Zimmerman.

Then, if you aren't referring to Zimmerman, you are totally wrong.
Then your statement, "Yeah, the stand your ground law lets you kill
innocent children, that's great huh?" is totally false.

Nope. Take a look at the victims.

Since you didn't mention Zimmerman, what victims?

Follow my link, the answer is very clear.

In article , says...

On 6/2/2012 3:51 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 6/2/12 3:21 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 6/2/2012 1:57 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 6/2/12 1:16 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 6/2/2012 1:09 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 6/2/12 1:05 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 10:06:32 -0400, wrote:

In ,
says...

On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 09:25:15 -0400, wrote:

In ,

says...

In ,
says...

On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 13:21:17 -0400,
wrote:

http://www.tampabay.com/stand-your-ground-law/



The law is not stupid. The absolute lack of common sense in
America
is. So is the fact that the richest Americans have, since
Eisenhower,
gradually bought more and more of the government until today,
they own
it.

A gun in the hand is better than a cop on the phone.

The police are not available to protect you. They are
available to
document the crimes you have committed or that have been
committed
against you.

Yeah, the stand your ground law lets you kill innocent children,
that's
great huh?

No, the stand your ground law is being mis-applied in this case.
Zimmerman drew the line in the sand to stand his ground, but
when HE
crossed that line, that action made that law inapplicable.

Apparently, Florida is common sense challenged.

Well true, but I said nothing about Zimmerman.

Then, if you aren't referring to Zimmerman, you are totally wrong.
Then your statement, "Yeah, the stand your ground law lets you kill
innocent children, that's great huh?" is totally false.


If Zimmerman walks, it'll be totally true.

Guess you are the only one left who hasn't figured out this isn't your
meal ticket, virtually all of Zimmermans story has been backed up by
the
evidence AND witness initial testimony... Why do you think the rest of
the race baiters in Congress and the Media have left poor Treyvon
Martin
behind? Come on harry, try to keep up...


The only eyewitness is Zimmerman, and his bail is being revoked because
he is a liar. The so-called witnesses have changed their tales several
times.

Why would it be my meal ticket? I have an income. You're the one who is
without a job and the skills to get and hold onto one.

I have had the same job since 1994 liar...

Your chronic unemployment is not a job, dummy.


Tell me Mr. Dr. Karen Grear of Catholic University of America, why do
Democrats hate small business so much?

What a bigoted question.

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 02 Jun 2012 13:16:00 -0400, JustWait
wrote:

On 6/2/2012 1:09 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 6/2/12 1:05 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 10:06:32 -0400, wrote:

In ,
says...

On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 09:25:15 -0400, wrote:

In ,
says...

In ,
says...

On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 13:21:17 -0400, wrote:

http://www.tampabay.com/stand-your-ground-law/



The law is not stupid. The absolute lack of common sense in America
is. So is the fact that the richest Americans have, since
Eisenhower,
gradually bought more and more of the government until today,
they own
it.

A gun in the hand is better than a cop on the phone.

The police are not available to protect you. They are available to
document the crimes you have committed or that have been committed
against you.

Yeah, the stand your ground law lets you kill innocent children,
that's
great huh?

No, the stand your ground law is being mis-applied in this case.
Zimmerman drew the line in the sand to stand his ground, but when HE
crossed that line, that action made that law inapplicable.

Apparently, Florida is common sense challenged.

Well true, but I said nothing about Zimmerman.

Then, if you aren't referring to Zimmerman, you are totally wrong.
Then your statement, "Yeah, the stand your ground law lets you kill
innocent children, that's great huh?" is totally false.


If Zimmerman walks, it'll be totally true.

Guess you are the only one left who hasn't figured out this isn't your
meal ticket, virtually all of Zimmermans story has been backed up by the
evidence AND witness initial testimony... Why do you think the rest of
the race baiters in Congress and the Media have left poor Treyvon Martin
behind? Come on harry, try to keep up...

Zimmerman opened the door for this confrontation. He rightfully
deserves a hefty portion of the criminal responsibility. Not all,
certainly, but a hefty portion as determined by the courts.

The homeowner who hears a commotion outside and who then goes outside
and finds someone trying to kill a person. The someone doing the killing
turns on the homeowner and lunges at him with a bloody knife and the
homeowner kills the guy with his gun. Did the homeowner initiate the
confrontation and should the homeowner be bear responsibility for a
hefty portion of the criminal responsibility of killing the killer?

The problem with the FL law is that the judgment of good shooting or
not is made solely by a judge, a single man. That decision should be
made by 12.

Tell that to the guy in Philly.

In article , earl87591
@hotmail.com says...

X ` Man wrote:
Then, if you aren't referring to Zimmerman, you are totally wrong.
Then your statement, "Yeah, the stand your ground law lets you kill
innocent children, that's great huh?" is totally false.



If Zimmerman walks, it'll be totally true.
He won't walk. He'll get manslaughter and life in prison - well deserved.

He will walk.

In article ,
says...

On 02/06/2012 9:42 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 6/2/12 11:33 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 6/2/2012 10:48 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In , says...

On 6/2/2012 9:25 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

In ,
says...

On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 13:21:17 -0400, wrote:

http://www.tampabay.com/stand-your-ground-law/



The law is not stupid. The absolute lack of common sense in America
is. So is the fact that the richest Americans have, since
Eisenhower,
gradually bought more and more of the government until today, they
own
it.

A gun in the hand is better than a cop on the phone.

The police are not available to protect you. They are available to
document the crimes you have committed or that have been committed
against you.

Yeah, the stand your ground law lets you kill innocent children,
that's
great huh?

Keeps harry feelin' secure...

Harry's in Maryland.....

harry has stated several times here he would shoot anybody who came
through his door... and suggests he wouldn't go to prison for it
although based on this group postings alone, any judge would probably
concur he has been "planning" to shoot someone for a long time...


No, **** for brains, I've stated I will shoot any home invader. We have
lots of people coming through the door, all invited. But if you tried
that - to get inside the house, you would not be an "invitee," and would
be considered a home invader. Hey, I know language skills are not your
forte. Perhaps someone in your family has the ability to explain simple,
declarative sentences to you.

Face it harry, you are a hypocrite.

Harry's problem is that his definition of home invader is different from
the legal definition of home invader.

On 6/3/12 8:24 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On 02/06/2012 9:42 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 6/2/12 11:33 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 6/2/2012 10:48 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In , says...

On 6/2/2012 9:25 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

In ,
says...

On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 13:21:17 -0400, wrote:

http://www.tampabay.com/stand-your-ground-law/



The law is not stupid. The absolute lack of common sense in America
is. So is the fact that the richest Americans have, since
Eisenhower,
gradually bought more and more of the government until today, they
own
it.

A gun in the hand is better than a cop on the phone.

The police are not available to protect you. They are available to
document the crimes you have committed or that have been committed
against you.

Yeah, the stand your ground law lets you kill innocent children,
that's
great huh?

Keeps harry feelin' secure...

Harry's in Maryland.....

harry has stated several times here he would shoot anybody who came
through his door... and suggests he wouldn't go to prison for it
although based on this group postings alone, any judge would probably
concur he has been "planning" to shoot someone for a long time...


No, **** for brains, I've stated I will shoot any home invader. We have
lots of people coming through the door, all invited. But if you tried
that - to get inside the house, you would not be an "invitee," and would
be considered a home invader. Hey, I know language skills are not your
forte. Perhaps someone in your family has the ability to explain simple,
declarative sentences to you.

Face it harry, you are a hypocrite.

Harry's problem is that his definition of home invader is different from
the legal definition of home invader.




There is no "the legal definition" of home invader, Mr. Uneducated.
There are many definitions of the term in use. For me, a home invader is
a criminal who breaks into or forces his way into your house with
criminal intent while people are at home. If no one is at home, it's
burglary.

My assumption is that if someone breaks in here while we are at home,
he's intent on causing physical harm. It's not necessarily easy to
"retreat."

Your slow-witted right-wing buddy JustHate has implied any number of
times that he'd try to *push* his way in here. That is home invasion. If
he tried that, he'd be leaving on a gurney or in a body bag, and I'd
probably get an award for improving the gene pool.

On 6/3/2012 8:53 AM, X ` Man wrote:


Your slow-witted right-wing buddy JustHate has implied any number of
times that he'd try to *push* his way in here. That is home invasion. If
he tried that, he'd be leaving on a gurney or in a body bag, and I'd
probably get an award for improving the gene pool.

Doubt it. Show us one instance where you imagined he made that
implication. You got some crazy ideas floating around in that swelled
head of yours.

On Sat, 02 Jun 2012 09:35:15 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 09:25:15 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 13:21:17 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

http://www.tampabay.com/stand-your-ground-law/



The law is not stupid. The absolute lack of common sense in America
is. So is the fact that the richest Americans have, since Eisenhower,
gradually bought more and more of the government until today, they own
it.

A gun in the hand is better than a cop on the phone.

The police are not available to protect you. They are available to
document the crimes you have committed or that have been committed
against you.

Yeah, the stand your ground law lets you kill innocent children, that's
great huh?

No, the stand your ground law is being mis-applied in this case.
Zimmerman drew the line in the sand to stand his ground, but when HE
crossed that line, that action made that law inapplicable.

Apparently, Florida is common sense challenged.

Perhaps that's a true statement. But if Zimmerman is guilty and found guilty, then there must be
some folks down there with good sense, no?

Of course, if he is not guilty and found not guilty, then there will be many who reiterate your
comment.