On 5/29/12 7:50 PM, Tim wrote:
On May 29, 3:27 pm, X ` Mandump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote:
On 5/29/12 4:28 PM, John H. wrote:

On Tue, 29 May 2012 15:30:30 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 29 May 2012 15:17:56 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

How would *you* possibly know who is doing "the most crying" about the
loss of the middle class and why they are "crying," by the way?

===

Easy, close friends and relatives.

One must wonder why you are engaging in this rhetoric in the first place.

You mean, as opposed to discussions about travel trailers, golf,
grandkids, motorbikes?

I'll take the discussions about travel trailers, golf, grand kids,
motorbikes etc. any day. They're not designed to hack people off and
start ****ing matches.


If it is off-topic, it is off-topic. I don't really give a damn whether
posts are or are not on-topic, but do chuckle over arguments about
whether certain topics are acceptable in an off-topic newsgroup while
others are not.

On 5/29/2012 8:04 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 5/29/12 7:50 PM, Tim wrote:
On May 29, 3:27 pm, X ` Mandump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote:
On 5/29/12 4:28 PM, John H. wrote:

On Tue, 29 May 2012 15:30:30 -0400,
wrote:

On Tue, 29 May 2012 15:17:56 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

How would *you* possibly know who is doing "the most crying" about
the
loss of the middle class and why they are "crying," by the way?

===

Easy, close friends and relatives.

One must wonder why you are engaging in this rhetoric in the first
place.

You mean, as opposed to discussions about travel trailers, golf,
grandkids, motorbikes?

I'll take the discussions about travel trailers, golf, grand kids,
motorbikes etc. any day. They're not designed to hack people off and
start ****ing matches.


If it is off-topic, it is off-topic. I don't really give a damn whether
posts are or are not on-topic, but do chuckle over arguments about
whether certain topics are acceptable in an off-topic newsgroup while
others are not.


No discussion at all, we all know the difference between OT which is ok,
and troll posts, which are not... You know the difference too, but...

On 5/29/12 8:21 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 5/29/2012 8:04 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 5/29/12 7:50 PM, Tim wrote:
On May 29, 3:27 pm, X ` Mandump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote:
On 5/29/12 4:28 PM, John H. wrote:

On Tue, 29 May 2012 15:30:30 -0400,
wrote:

On Tue, 29 May 2012 15:17:56 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

How would *you* possibly know who is doing "the most crying" about
the
loss of the middle class and why they are "crying," by the way?

===

Easy, close friends and relatives.

One must wonder why you are engaging in this rhetoric in the first
place.

You mean, as opposed to discussions about travel trailers, golf,
grandkids, motorbikes?

I'll take the discussions about travel trailers, golf, grand kids,
motorbikes etc. any day. They're not designed to hack people off and
start ****ing matches.


If it is off-topic, it is off-topic. I don't really give a damn whether
posts are or are not on-topic, but do chuckle over arguments about
whether certain topics are acceptable in an off-topic newsgroup while
others are not.


No discussion at all, we all know the difference between OT which is ok,
and troll posts, which are not... You know the difference too, but...


If you were concerned about "behavior" in this newsgroup, you'd behave.
You don't. In fact, your behavior in this newsgroup is probably the most
vile.