On 5/29/12 3:07 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 29 May 2012 14:10:47 -0400, X `
wrote:

But it used to be that way here, before the
rich became even more greedy.

===

There was certainly plenty of middle class greed during the "dot com"
bubble and the housing asset bubble. People who leveraged up those
investments with mortgage re-financing and home equity loans are the
ones who are now doing the most crying about loss of the middle class,
specifically "their" middle class. They should start out by giving up
their fancy leased cars/SUVs and buy a good used Toyota or Honda.



And therein is the reason why I rarely respond to "inquiries" here, and
why I rarely post more than a sentence or two about boating. Why bother?
You and your fellow right-wing assholes have no interest in furthering
discussion in any sort of intellectual way. One sentence posts and
responses...that's what's called for in rec.boats.


How would *you* possibly know who is doing "the most crying" about the
loss of the middle class and why they are "crying," by the way? Have you
done a study? Have you seen a couple of opinionated URLs somewhere?
Oh, and who are you to make the sort of suggestions you have?

There are millions and millions of Americans suffering financially, not
because they were overleveraged, but because they were ****ed by Wall
Street, the banks, vulture capitalists, and corporations offshoring jobs.

On Tue, 29 May 2012 15:17:56 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

How would *you* possibly know who is doing "the most crying" about the
loss of the middle class and why they are "crying," by the way?

===

Easy, close friends and relatives.

On 5/29/12 3:30 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 29 May 2012 15:17:56 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

How would *you* possibly know who is doing "the most crying" about the
loss of the middle class and why they are "crying," by the way?

===

Easy, close friends and relatives.



Oh...a scientific sampling.

On Tue, 29 May 2012 15:30:30 -0400, Wayne.B wrote:

On Tue, 29 May 2012 15:17:56 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

How would *you* possibly know who is doing "the most crying" about the
loss of the middle class and why they are "crying," by the way?

===

Easy, close friends and relatives.

One must wonder why you are engaging in this rhetoric in the first place.

On 5/29/12 4:28 PM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 29 May 2012 15:30:30 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 29 May 2012 15:17:56 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

How would *you* possibly know who is doing "the most crying" about the
loss of the middle class and why they are "crying," by the way?

===

Easy, close friends and relatives.

One must wonder why you are engaging in this rhetoric in the first place.

You mean, as opposed to discussions about travel trailers, golf,
grandkids, motorbikes?

On 5/29/2012 4:27 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 5/29/12 4:28 PM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 29 May 2012 15:30:30 -0400,
wrote:

On Tue, 29 May 2012 15:17:56 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

How would *you* possibly know who is doing "the most crying" about the
loss of the middle class and why they are "crying," by the way?

===

Easy, close friends and relatives.

One must wonder why you are engaging in this rhetoric in the first place.

You mean, as opposed to discussions about travel trailers, golf,
grandkids, motorbikes?

No, he means why would anybody respond to a rant that starts like this:

"Why bother? You and your fellow right-wing assholes..."

When you know the author has nothing to add but misery and hate...

In article , says...

On 5/29/2012 4:27 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 5/29/12 4:28 PM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 29 May 2012 15:30:30 -0400,
wrote:

On Tue, 29 May 2012 15:17:56 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

How would *you* possibly know who is doing "the most crying" about the
loss of the middle class and why they are "crying," by the way?

===

Easy, close friends and relatives.

One must wonder why you are engaging in this rhetoric in the first place.

You mean, as opposed to discussions about travel trailers, golf,
grandkids, motorbikes?

No, he means why would anybody respond to a rant that starts like this:

"Why bother? You and your fellow right-wing assholes..."

When you know the author has nothing to add but misery and hate...

Misery and hate? Do you mean kind of like calling people low life names
like "****"?

On 5/30/2012 8:08 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In , says...

On 5/29/2012 4:27 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 5/29/12 4:28 PM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 29 May 2012 15:30:30 -0400,
wrote:

On Tue, 29 May 2012 15:17:56 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

How would *you* possibly know who is doing "the most crying" about the
loss of the middle class and why they are "crying," by the way?

===

Easy, close friends and relatives.

One must wonder why you are engaging in this rhetoric in the first place.

You mean, as opposed to discussions about travel trailers, golf,
grandkids, motorbikes?

No, he means why would anybody respond to a rant that starts like this:

"Why bother? You and your fellow right-wing assholes..."

When you know the author has nothing to add but misery and hate...

Misery and hate? Do you mean kind of like calling people low life names
like "****"?

Oh, you are soooo superior... LOL!

On 5/29/2012 4:27 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 5/29/12 4:28 PM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 29 May 2012 15:30:30 -0400,
wrote:

On Tue, 29 May 2012 15:17:56 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

How would *you* possibly know who is doing "the most crying" about the
loss of the middle class and why they are "crying," by the way?

===

Easy, close friends and relatives.

One must wonder why you are engaging in this rhetoric in the first place.

You mean, as opposed to discussions about travel trailers, golf,
grandkids, motorbikes?

Yes, anything but religion and politics.

On May 29, 3:27*pm, X ` Man dump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote:
On 5/29/12 4:28 PM, John H. wrote:

On Tue, 29 May 2012 15:30:30 -0400, *wrote:

On Tue, 29 May 2012 15:17:56 -0400, X ` Man
*wrote:

How would *you* possibly know who is doing "the most crying" about the
loss of the middle class and why they are "crying," by the way?

===

Easy, close friends and relatives.

One must wonder why you are engaging in this rhetoric in the first place.

You mean, as opposed to discussions about travel trailers, golf,
grandkids, motorbikes?

I'll take the discussions about travel trailers, golf, grand kids,
motorbikes etc. any day. They're not designed to hack people off and
start ****ing matches.