| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Great day on the Potomac
Took younger daughter, husband, and the grandkids out for a day of playing, tubing and eating on the
Potomac yesterday. Left Quantico and headed north to a place called Leesylvania State Park. Nice place with a nice long beach, camp store, picnic tables, etc. Hadn't been there before. Boats are allowed to be brought right up on the beach, if desired, but the water is shallow for a ways out, so anchoring is easy. No problems with the boat. Put the battery in. launched it, and she fired right up. A 150 Yamaha is a great engine for tubing! Son-in-law thought he could stay on. He lost. Great time was had by all. |
Great day on the Potomac
On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 7:37:14 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:
Took younger daughter, husband, and the grandkids out for a day of playing, tubing and eating on the Potomac yesterday. Left Quantico and headed north to a place called Leesylvania State Park. Nice place with a nice long beach, camp store, picnic tables, etc. Hadn't been there before. Boats are allowed to be brought right up on the beach, if desired, but the water is shallow for a ways out, so anchoring is easy. No problems with the boat. Put the battery in. launched it, and she fired right up. A 150 Yamaha is a great engine for tubing! Son-in-law thought he could stay on. He lost. Great time was had by all. Speaking of Yamahas, were took a little vacation a couple of weeks ago to Playa Mujeres just outside of Cancun. We did the snorkeling trip to Isle Mujeres, and while there waiting for the boat to take us back to the resort, we had a beer and some guacamole at a ocean front restaraunt at the docks. As I sat there looking out at all the boats, I noticed there were two kinds different outboards in view... old two strokes, and new Yamahas. Yamaha seems to have captured the outboard market. It's the same story everywhere I go. If you're looking for an all adult, all inclusive place to relax for a while, I can recommend the Excellence Resort at Playa Mujeres. We've been there twice, and it's a really nice place. We stayed in the Excellence Club Two-Story Rooftop Terrace suite... nice! http://www.excellence-resorts.com/gu...-playa-mujeres |
Great day on the Potomac
On Tue, 29 May 2012 07:37:14 -0400, John H.
wrote: Took younger daughter, husband, and the grandkids out for a day of playing, tubing and eating on the Potomac yesterday. Left Quantico and headed north to a place called Leesylvania State Park. Nice place with a nice long beach, camp store, picnic tables, etc. Hadn't been there before. Boats are allowed to be brought right up on the beach, if desired, but the water is shallow for a ways out, so anchoring is easy. No problems with the boat. Put the battery in. launched it, and she fired right up. A 150 Yamaha is a great engine for tubing! Son-in-law thought he could stay on. He lost. Great time was had by all. nice! glad you guys had a good time |
Great day on the Potomac
"John H." wrote in message
... Took younger daughter, husband, and the grandkids out for a day of playing, tubing and eating on the Potomac yesterday. Left Quantico and headed north to a place called Leesylvania State Park. Nice place with a nice long beach, camp store, picnic tables, etc. Hadn't been there before. Boats are allowed to be brought right up on the beach, if desired, but the water is shallow for a ways out, so anchoring is easy. No problems with the boat. Put the battery in. launched it, and she fired right up. A 150 Yamaha is a great engine for tubing! Son-in-law thought he could stay on. He lost. Great time was had by all. -------------------------------------------- Two problems here. First the wind has been blowing for days. Big winds. Ocean is tore up. 2nd, since we are retired, do not have to go out on weekends and holidays with crowds of boaters. |
Great day on the Potomac
On May 29, 6:37*am, John H. wrote:
Took younger daughter, husband, and the grandkids out for a day of playing, tubing and eating on the Potomac yesterday. Left Quantico and headed north to a place called Leesylvania State Park. Nice place with a nice long beach, camp store, picnic tables, etc. Hadn't been there before. Boats are allowed to be brought right up on the beach, if desired, but the water is shallow for a ways out, so anchoring is easy. No problems with the boat. Put the battery in. launched it, and she fired right up. A 150 Yamaha is a great engine for tubing! Son-in-law thought he could stay on. He lost. Great time was had by all. Fantastic John! Glad you all were able to enjoy the boat. I wish i could have. Oh well... |
Great day on the Potomac
On Tue, 29 May 2012 16:05:49 -0700, "Califbill" wrote:
"John H." wrote in message .. . Took younger daughter, husband, and the grandkids out for a day of playing, tubing and eating on the Potomac yesterday. Left Quantico and headed north to a place called Leesylvania State Park. Nice place with a nice long beach, camp store, picnic tables, etc. Hadn't been there before. Boats are allowed to be brought right up on the beach, if desired, but the water is shallow for a ways out, so anchoring is easy. No problems with the boat. Put the battery in. launched it, and she fired right up. A 150 Yamaha is a great engine for tubing! Son-in-law thought he could stay on. He lost. Great time was had by all. -------------------------------------------- Two problems here. First the wind has been blowing for days. Big winds. Ocean is tore up. 2nd, since we are retired, do not have to go out on weekends and holidays with crowds of boaters. The second part is true for me also, but the grandkids are still in school until 20 June, or so. That limits playing with the kids to the weekends. Once vacation starts, the boat won't see the water on weekends (unless wife says, "Let's go boating!") |
Great day on the Potomac
|
Great day on the Potomac
On Tue, 29 May 2012 18:42:34 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:
On May 29, 6:37*am, John H. wrote: Took younger daughter, husband, and the grandkids out for a day of playing, tubing and eating on the Potomac yesterday. Left Quantico and headed north to a place called Leesylvania State Park. Nice place with a nice long beach, camp store, picnic tables, etc. Hadn't been there before. Boats are allowed to be brought right up on the beach, if desired, but the water is shallow for a ways out, so anchoring is easy. No problems with the boat. Put the battery in. launched it, and she fired right up. A 150 Yamaha is a great engine for tubing! Son-in-law thought he could stay on. He lost. Great time was had by all. Fantastic John! Glad you all were able to enjoy the boat. I wish i could have. Oh well... Fix that Eldorado, come visit, and I'll take you for a ride! |
Great day on the Potomac
"John H." wrote in message
... On Tue, 29 May 2012 16:05:49 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . Took younger daughter, husband, and the grandkids out for a day of playing, tubing and eating on the Potomac yesterday. Left Quantico and headed north to a place called Leesylvania State Park. Nice place with a nice long beach, camp store, picnic tables, etc. Hadn't been there before. Boats are allowed to be brought right up on the beach, if desired, but the water is shallow for a ways out, so anchoring is easy. No problems with the boat. Put the battery in. launched it, and she fired right up. A 150 Yamaha is a great engine for tubing! Son-in-law thought he could stay on. He lost. Great time was had by all. -------------------------------------------- Two problems here. First the wind has been blowing for days. Big winds. Ocean is tore up. 2nd, since we are retired, do not have to go out on weekends and holidays with crowds of boaters. The second part is true for me also, but the grandkids are still in school until 20 June, or so. That limits playing with the kids to the weekends. Once vacation starts, the boat won't see the water on weekends (unless wife says, "Let's go boating!") --------------------- My oldest grandkid just turned 4, but the parents work. :) Which is good these days. |
Great day on the Potomac
On Wed, 30 May 2012 10:01:04 -0700, "Califbill" wrote:
"John H." wrote in message .. . On Tue, 29 May 2012 16:05:49 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. Took younger daughter, husband, and the grandkids out for a day of playing, tubing and eating on the Potomac yesterday. Left Quantico and headed north to a place called Leesylvania State Park. Nice place with a nice long beach, camp store, picnic tables, etc. Hadn't been there before. Boats are allowed to be brought right up on the beach, if desired, but the water is shallow for a ways out, so anchoring is easy. No problems with the boat. Put the battery in. launched it, and she fired right up. A 150 Yamaha is a great engine for tubing! Son-in-law thought he could stay on. He lost. Great time was had by all. -------------------------------------------- Two problems here. First the wind has been blowing for days. Big winds. Ocean is tore up. 2nd, since we are retired, do not have to go out on weekends and holidays with crowds of boaters. The second part is true for me also, but the grandkids are still in school until 20 June, or so. That limits playing with the kids to the weekends. Once vacation starts, the boat won't see the water on weekends (unless wife says, "Let's go boating!") --------------------- My oldest grandkid just turned 4, but the parents work. :) Which is good these days. My oldest is almost 13, just got a girlfriend, and has other things on his mind besides boating. But, that's OK. The youngest is three, and gets a bang out of tubing in the Potomac. |
Great day on the Potomac
On Wed, 30 May 2012 10:01:04 -0700, "Califbill" wrote:
"John H." wrote in message .. . On Tue, 29 May 2012 16:05:49 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. Took younger daughter, husband, and the grandkids out for a day of playing, tubing and eating on the Potomac yesterday. Left Quantico and headed north to a place called Leesylvania State Park. Nice place with a nice long beach, camp store, picnic tables, etc. Hadn't been there before. Boats are allowed to be brought right up on the beach, if desired, but the water is shallow for a ways out, so anchoring is easy. No problems with the boat. Put the battery in. launched it, and she fired right up. A 150 Yamaha is a great engine for tubing! Son-in-law thought he could stay on. He lost. Great time was had by all. -------------------------------------------- Two problems here. First the wind has been blowing for days. Big winds. Ocean is tore up. 2nd, since we are retired, do not have to go out on weekends and holidays with crowds of boaters. The second part is true for me also, but the grandkids are still in school until 20 June, or so. That limits playing with the kids to the weekends. Once vacation starts, the boat won't see the water on weekends (unless wife says, "Let's go boating!") --------------------- My oldest grandkid just turned 4, but the parents work. :) Which is good these days. It's nice that the Potomac has cleaned up from what it was many years ago. Of course the water isn't drinkable, but it's clean enough for the Nation’s Triathlon - which it wouldn't have been thirty years ago. http://www.welovedc.com/2010/09/13/n...-record-crowd/ |
Great day on the Potomac
On 5/30/12 5:48 PM, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2012 10:01:04 -0700, wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Tue, 29 May 2012 16:05:49 -0700, wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... Took younger daughter, husband, and the grandkids out for a day of playing, tubing and eating on the Potomac yesterday. Left Quantico and headed north to a place called Leesylvania State Park. Nice place with a nice long beach, camp store, picnic tables, etc. Hadn't been there before. Boats are allowed to be brought right up on the beach, if desired, but the water is shallow for a ways out, so anchoring is easy. No problems with the boat. Put the battery in. launched it, and she fired right up. A 150 Yamaha is a great engine for tubing! Son-in-law thought he could stay on. He lost. Great time was had by all. -------------------------------------------- Two problems here. First the wind has been blowing for days. Big winds. Ocean is tore up. 2nd, since we are retired, do not have to go out on weekends and holidays with crowds of boaters. The second part is true for me also, but the grandkids are still in school until 20 June, or so. That limits playing with the kids to the weekends. Once vacation starts, the boat won't see the water on weekends (unless wife says, "Let's go boating!") --------------------- My oldest grandkid just turned 4, but the parents work. :) Which is good these days. It's nice that the Potomac has cleaned up from what it was many years ago. Of course the water isn't drinkable, but it's clean enough for the Nation’s Triathlon - which it wouldn't have been thirty years ago. http://www.welovedc.com/2010/09/13/n...-record-crowd/ Not only isn't it drinkable, the water in the Potomac is hazardous to your health. http://wamu.org/news/11/05/04/potoma..._in_health.php If you are swimming in the Potomac, you are drinking the Potomac. |
Great day on the Potomac
On 5/30/2012 4:42 PM, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2012 10:01:04 -0700, wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Tue, 29 May 2012 16:05:49 -0700, wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... Took younger daughter, husband, and the grandkids out for a day of playing, tubing and eating on the Potomac yesterday. Left Quantico and headed north to a place called Leesylvania State Park. Nice place with a nice long beach, camp store, picnic tables, etc. Hadn't been there before. Boats are allowed to be brought right up on the beach, if desired, but the water is shallow for a ways out, so anchoring is easy. No problems with the boat. Put the battery in. launched it, and she fired right up. A 150 Yamaha is a great engine for tubing! Son-in-law thought he could stay on. He lost. Great time was had by all. -------------------------------------------- Two problems here. First the wind has been blowing for days. Big winds. Ocean is tore up. 2nd, since we are retired, do not have to go out on weekends and holidays with crowds of boaters. The second part is true for me also, but the grandkids are still in school until 20 June, or so. That limits playing with the kids to the weekends. Once vacation starts, the boat won't see the water on weekends (unless wife says, "Let's go boating!") --------------------- My oldest grandkid just turned 4, but the parents work. :) Which is good these days. My oldest is almost 13, just got a girlfriend, and has other things on his mind besides boating. But, that's OK. The youngest is three, and gets a bang out of tubing in the Potomac. My youngest is just 18 and gets a kick out of killing it in the gym:) |
Great day on the Potomac
On Thu, 31 May 2012 01:07:53 -0400, wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2012 18:06:58 -0400, X ` Man wrote: It's nice that the Potomac has cleaned up from what it was many years ago. Of course the water isn't drinkable, but it's clean enough for the Nation’s Triathlon - which it wouldn't have been thirty years ago. http://www.welovedc.com/2010/09/13/n...-record-crowd/ Not only isn't it drinkable, the water in the Potomac is hazardous to your health. http://wamu.org/news/11/05/04/potoma..._in_health.php If you are swimming in the Potomac, you are drinking the Potomac. "Overall health" in that article probably refers to nutrient contamination and low DO numbers, not necessarily the various coliforms that are unhealthy to people. When I get a minute I will look at the test numbers and see what they are talking about. Usually we start looking at coliforms when the colony count gets over 200 or so. If it is enterococcus you really want it under 35. The whole damned bay ain't really "pure". ;-( Badmouthing is a thing some folks do out jealousy or childish spite. Best to disregard it. Your comment about the bay is on target. Sandy Point beach gets closed quite frequently because of the fecal stuff floating in the bay. |
Great day on the Potomac
On 5/31/12 11:12 AM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 31 May 2012 01:07:53 -0400, wrote: On Wed, 30 May 2012 18:06:58 -0400, X ` wrote: It's nice that the Potomac has cleaned up from what it was many years ago. Of course the water isn't drinkable, but it's clean enough for the Nation’s Triathlon - which it wouldn't have been thirty years ago. http://www.welovedc.com/2010/09/13/n...-record-crowd/ Not only isn't it drinkable, the water in the Potomac is hazardous to your health. http://wamu.org/news/11/05/04/potoma..._in_health.php If you are swimming in the Potomac, you are drinking the Potomac. "Overall health" in that article probably refers to nutrient contamination and low DO numbers, not necessarily the various coliforms that are unhealthy to people. When I get a minute I will look at the test numbers and see what they are talking about. Usually we start looking at coliforms when the colony count gets over 200 or so. If it is enterococcus you really want it under 35. The whole damned bay ain't really "pure". ;-( Badmouthing is a thing some folks do out jealousy or childish spite. Best to disregard it. Your comment about the bay is on target. Sandy Point beach gets closed quite frequently because of the fecal stuff floating in the bay. Herring, it's just fine with me if you and your whole family want to swim in polluted water. I hear there are still timeshares available at the Love Canal. I think boating on the Potomac is fine. I've done it a few times. I wouldn't swim in that river, and I wouldn't eat fish caught in it. In fact, I prefer the River above Key Bridge, though I wouldn't swim in it there, either. You like to "recreate" south of the Blue Plains sewage treatment plant. Perfectly appropriate for you and your brood. Oh...I don't swim in Chesapeake Bay, either. I prefer the ocean or properly maintained swimming pools. |
Great day on the Potomac
In article ,
says... On Thu, 31 May 2012 11:12:50 -0400, John H. wrote: On Thu, 31 May 2012 01:07:53 -0400, wrote: On Wed, 30 May 2012 18:06:58 -0400, X ` Man wrote: It's nice that the Potomac has cleaned up from what it was many years ago. Of course the water isn't drinkable, but it's clean enough for the Nation?s Triathlon - which it wouldn't have been thirty years ago. http://www.welovedc.com/2010/09/13/n...-record-crowd/ Not only isn't it drinkable, the water in the Potomac is hazardous to your health. http://wamu.org/news/11/05/04/potoma..._in_health.php If you are swimming in the Potomac, you are drinking the Potomac. "Overall health" in that article probably refers to nutrient contamination and low DO numbers, not necessarily the various coliforms that are unhealthy to people. When I get a minute I will look at the test numbers and see what they are talking about. Usually we start looking at coliforms when the colony count gets over 200 or so. If it is enterococcus you really want it under 35. The whole damned bay ain't really "pure". ;-( Badmouthing is a thing some folks do out jealousy or childish spite. Best to disregard it. Your comment about the bay is on target. Sandy Point beach gets closed quite frequently because of the fecal stuff floating in the bay. I did not have much luck finding current WQ numbers on the web. There are some numbers on the Fairfax County site referring to the Wilson Bridge project but they are aimed at nutrients, turbidity and DO, not coliforms. The DO numbers are pretty dismal tho (2s and low 3s). That will limit the types of fish that can live there. They did not specify a time of day but if these are not done at dawn, the number will be higher than the accepted standard monitoring protocol would give you. I have an Email in to the Potomac Riverkeepers organization to see what they can tell me. Most of the problems with the Potomac in the 60's and 70's was due to Blue Plains. Even today they are a major cause of problems in the Potomac. http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress...5257359003f534 8/4c0ca7a507be26cf8525779a00536add!OpenDocument |
Great day on the Potomac
On 5/31/12 8:10 PM, BAR wrote:
In , says... On Thu, 31 May 2012 11:12:50 -0400, John wrote: On Thu, 31 May 2012 01:07:53 -0400, wrote: On Wed, 30 May 2012 18:06:58 -0400, X ` wrote: It's nice that the Potomac has cleaned up from what it was many years ago. Of course the water isn't drinkable, but it's clean enough for the Nation?s Triathlon - which it wouldn't have been thirty years ago. http://www.welovedc.com/2010/09/13/n...-record-crowd/ Not only isn't it drinkable, the water in the Potomac is hazardous to your health. http://wamu.org/news/11/05/04/potoma..._in_health.php If you are swimming in the Potomac, you are drinking the Potomac. "Overall health" in that article probably refers to nutrient contamination and low DO numbers, not necessarily the various coliforms that are unhealthy to people. When I get a minute I will look at the test numbers and see what they are talking about. Usually we start looking at coliforms when the colony count gets over 200 or so. If it is enterococcus you really want it under 35. The whole damned bay ain't really "pure". ;-( Badmouthing is a thing some folks do out jealousy or childish spite. Best to disregard it. Your comment about the bay is on target. Sandy Point beach gets closed quite frequently because of the fecal stuff floating in the bay. I did not have much luck finding current WQ numbers on the web. There are some numbers on the Fairfax County site referring to the Wilson Bridge project but they are aimed at nutrients, turbidity and DO, not coliforms. The DO numbers are pretty dismal tho (2s and low 3s). That will limit the types of fish that can live there. They did not specify a time of day but if these are not done at dawn, the number will be higher than the accepted standard monitoring protocol would give you. I have an Email in to the Potomac Riverkeepers organization to see what they can tell me. Most of the problems with the Potomac in the 60's and 70's was due to Blue Plains. Even today they are a major cause of problems in the Potomac. http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress...5257359003f534 8/4c0ca7a507be26cf8525779a00536add!OpenDocument The Potomac above Key Bridge looks a lot cleaner to me, but I've never seen any test results from that area. I've canoed there, along thousands of other people. |
Great day on the Potomac
In article ,
says... On Thu, 31 May 2012 20:10:03 -0400, BAR wrote: Your comment about the bay is on target. Sandy Point beach gets closed quite frequently because of the fecal stuff floating in the bay. I did not have much luck finding current WQ numbers on the web. There are some numbers on the Fairfax County site referring to the Wilson Bridge project but they are aimed at nutrients, turbidity and DO, not coliforms. The DO numbers are pretty dismal tho (2s and low 3s). That will limit the types of fish that can live there. They did not specify a time of day but if these are not done at dawn, the number will be higher than the accepted standard monitoring protocol would give you. I have an Email in to the Potomac Riverkeepers organization to see what they can tell me. Most of the problems with the Potomac in the 60's and 70's was due to Blue Plains. Even today they are a major cause of problems in the Potomac. http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress...5257359003f534 8/4c0ca7a507be26cf8525779a00536add!OpenDocument They are talking about nitrogen and phosphorus, (nutrients). Those are tough on DO but it is not what closes beaches and makes people sick. When they look at swimmer safety they look at coliforms. Blue Plains shoots enough chlorine into the effluent that it would be safe to drink if you could get over the yuck factor. When I was there they did have a plant manager take a big drink on TV. This is still down river of DC. It would not affect people up there. I would worry more about street runoff if I fell in the water at the 14th street bridge. The Anacostia has it's own unique problems with industrial pollution that you don't see on the west side. Blue Plains was constantly letting untreated waste into the rivers. There are no good swimming areas above Haynes Point and most of the fishing for eating is down below Alexandria. |
Great day on the Potomac
On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 02:18:38 -0400, wrote:
On Thu, 31 May 2012 20:10:03 -0400, BAR wrote: Your comment about the bay is on target. Sandy Point beach gets closed quite frequently because of the fecal stuff floating in the bay. I did not have much luck finding current WQ numbers on the web. There are some numbers on the Fairfax County site referring to the Wilson Bridge project but they are aimed at nutrients, turbidity and DO, not coliforms. The DO numbers are pretty dismal tho (2s and low 3s). That will limit the types of fish that can live there. They did not specify a time of day but if these are not done at dawn, the number will be higher than the accepted standard monitoring protocol would give you. I have an Email in to the Potomac Riverkeepers organization to see what they can tell me. Most of the problems with the Potomac in the 60's and 70's was due to Blue Plains. Even today they are a major cause of problems in the Potomac. http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress...5257359003f534 8/4c0ca7a507be26cf8525779a00536add!OpenDocument They are talking about nitrogen and phosphorus, (nutrients). Those are tough on DO but it is not what closes beaches and makes people sick. When they look at swimmer safety they look at coliforms. Blue Plains shoots enough chlorine into the effluent that it would be safe to drink if you could get over the yuck factor. When I was there they did have a plant manager take a big drink on TV. This is still down river of DC. It would not affect people up there. I would worry more about street runoff if I fell in the water at the 14th street bridge. The Anacostia has it's own unique problems with industrial pollution that you don't see on the west side. Careful!! Any mention of pollution in the Anacostia *can* be used as 'proof' of racism! I've taken friends up the Anacostia to see the sights and been embarrassed by the crap floating on the water and lining the banks. It's a mess. If, as some say, it's caused by blacks living in the area, then they should start using trash cans instead of the river for their trash. |
Great day on the Potomac
On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 07:28:14 -0400, BAR wrote:
In article , says... On Thu, 31 May 2012 20:10:03 -0400, BAR wrote: Your comment about the bay is on target. Sandy Point beach gets closed quite frequently because of the fecal stuff floating in the bay. I did not have much luck finding current WQ numbers on the web. There are some numbers on the Fairfax County site referring to the Wilson Bridge project but they are aimed at nutrients, turbidity and DO, not coliforms. The DO numbers are pretty dismal tho (2s and low 3s). That will limit the types of fish that can live there. They did not specify a time of day but if these are not done at dawn, the number will be higher than the accepted standard monitoring protocol would give you. I have an Email in to the Potomac Riverkeepers organization to see what they can tell me. Most of the problems with the Potomac in the 60's and 70's was due to Blue Plains. Even today they are a major cause of problems in the Potomac. http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress...5257359003f534 8/4c0ca7a507be26cf8525779a00536add!OpenDocument They are talking about nitrogen and phosphorus, (nutrients). Those are tough on DO but it is not what closes beaches and makes people sick. When they look at swimmer safety they look at coliforms. Blue Plains shoots enough chlorine into the effluent that it would be safe to drink if you could get over the yuck factor. When I was there they did have a plant manager take a big drink on TV. This is still down river of DC. It would not affect people up there. I would worry more about street runoff if I fell in the water at the 14th street bridge. The Anacostia has it's own unique problems with industrial pollution that you don't see on the west side. Blue Plains was constantly letting untreated waste into the rivers. There are no good swimming areas above Haynes Point and most of the fishing for eating is down below Alexandria. Yup, after a heavy rain, one should not be drinking the water in either the Anacostia or Potomac rivers. One shouldn't be drinking water out of the Chesapeake either. But, the Blue Plains discharges of untreated water aren't quite 'constant'. http://www.dcwasa.com/wastewater_col...ss/default.cfm |
Great day on the Potomac
On 6/1/12 7:28 AM, BAR wrote:
In , says... On Thu, 31 May 2012 20:10:03 -0400, wrote: Your comment about the bay is on target. Sandy Point beach gets closed quite frequently because of the fecal stuff floating in the bay. I did not have much luck finding current WQ numbers on the web. There are some numbers on the Fairfax County site referring to the Wilson Bridge project but they are aimed at nutrients, turbidity and DO, not coliforms. The DO numbers are pretty dismal tho (2s and low 3s). That will limit the types of fish that can live there. They did not specify a time of day but if these are not done at dawn, the number will be higher than the accepted standard monitoring protocol would give you. I have an Email in to the Potomac Riverkeepers organization to see what they can tell me. Most of the problems with the Potomac in the 60's and 70's was due to Blue Plains. Even today they are a major cause of problems in the Potomac. http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress...5257359003f534 8/4c0ca7a507be26cf8525779a00536add!OpenDocument They are talking about nitrogen and phosphorus, (nutrients). Those are tough on DO but it is not what closes beaches and makes people sick. When they look at swimmer safety they look at coliforms. Blue Plains shoots enough chlorine into the effluent that it would be safe to drink if you could get over the yuck factor. When I was there they did have a plant manager take a big drink on TV. This is still down river of DC. It would not affect people up there. I would worry more about street runoff if I fell in the water at the 14th street bridge. The Anacostia has it's own unique problems with industrial pollution that you don't see on the west side. Blue Plains was constantly letting untreated waste into the rivers. There are no good swimming areas above Haynes Point and most of the fishing for eating is down below Alexandria. *Way* down below Alexandria, if at all. |
Great day on the Potomac
In article , dump-on-
says... On 5/31/12 8:10 PM, BAR wrote: In , says... On Thu, 31 May 2012 11:12:50 -0400, John wrote: On Thu, 31 May 2012 01:07:53 -0400, wrote: On Wed, 30 May 2012 18:06:58 -0400, X ` wrote: It's nice that the Potomac has cleaned up from what it was many years ago. Of course the water isn't drinkable, but it's clean enough for the Nation?s Triathlon - which it wouldn't have been thirty years ago. http://www.welovedc.com/2010/09/13/n...-record-crowd/ Not only isn't it drinkable, the water in the Potomac is hazardous to your health. http://wamu.org/news/11/05/04/potoma..._in_health.php If you are swimming in the Potomac, you are drinking the Potomac. "Overall health" in that article probably refers to nutrient contamination and low DO numbers, not necessarily the various coliforms that are unhealthy to people. When I get a minute I will look at the test numbers and see what they are talking about. Usually we start looking at coliforms when the colony count gets over 200 or so. If it is enterococcus you really want it under 35. The whole damned bay ain't really "pure". ;-( Badmouthing is a thing some folks do out jealousy or childish spite. Best to disregard it. Your comment about the bay is on target. Sandy Point beach gets closed quite frequently because of the fecal stuff floating in the bay. I did not have much luck finding current WQ numbers on the web. There are some numbers on the Fairfax County site referring to the Wilson Bridge project but they are aimed at nutrients, turbidity and DO, not coliforms. The DO numbers are pretty dismal tho (2s and low 3s). That will limit the types of fish that can live there. They did not specify a time of day but if these are not done at dawn, the number will be higher than the accepted standard monitoring protocol would give you. I have an Email in to the Potomac Riverkeepers organization to see what they can tell me. Most of the problems with the Potomac in the 60's and 70's was due to Blue Plains. Even today they are a major cause of problems in the Potomac. http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress...5257359003f534 8/4c0ca7a507be26cf8525779a00536add!OpenDocument The Potomac above Key Bridge looks a lot cleaner to me, but I've never seen any test results from that area. I've canoed there, along thousands of other people. Looks clean? Are you really that stupid? |
Great day on the Potomac
On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 12:15:53 -0400, wrote:
On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 07:35:09 -0400, John H. wrote: On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 02:18:38 -0400, wrote: They are talking about nitrogen and phosphorus, (nutrients). Those are tough on DO but it is not what closes beaches and makes people sick. When they look at swimmer safety they look at coliforms. Blue Plains shoots enough chlorine into the effluent that it would be safe to drink if you could get over the yuck factor. When I was there they did have a plant manager take a big drink on TV. This is still down river of DC. It would not affect people up there. I would worry more about street runoff if I fell in the water at the 14th street bridge. The Anacostia has it's own unique problems with industrial pollution that you don't see on the west side. Careful!! Any mention of pollution in the Anacostia *can* be used as 'proof' of racism! I've taken friends up the Anacostia to see the sights and been embarrassed by the crap floating on the water and lining the banks. It's a mess. If, as some say, it's caused by blacks living in the area, then they should start using trash cans instead of the river for their trash. It is probably a little more complicated than that. The higher level of industrial pollution is coming from North East DC and near in Maryland, simply because they don't have that kind of development in North West. They also say most of the trash is coming down the storm drain system. It could be an indication that people in NE/SE are more likely to sit on the corner and drink. They don't have the nice patios that the people in North West have ;-) That explains it. And the DC government folks pocket so much of the city's income that the city can' put trash cans on the corners and empty them. |
Great day on the Potomac
On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 12:06:59 -0400, wrote:
On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 07:28:14 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 31 May 2012 20:10:03 -0400, BAR wrote: Your comment about the bay is on target. Sandy Point beach gets closed quite frequently because of the fecal stuff floating in the bay. I did not have much luck finding current WQ numbers on the web. There are some numbers on the Fairfax County site referring to the Wilson Bridge project but they are aimed at nutrients, turbidity and DO, not coliforms. The DO numbers are pretty dismal tho (2s and low 3s). That will limit the types of fish that can live there. They did not specify a time of day but if these are not done at dawn, the number will be higher than the accepted standard monitoring protocol would give you. I have an Email in to the Potomac Riverkeepers organization to see what they can tell me. Most of the problems with the Potomac in the 60's and 70's was due to Blue Plains. Even today they are a major cause of problems in the Potomac. http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress...5257359003f534 8/4c0ca7a507be26cf8525779a00536add!OpenDocument They are talking about nitrogen and phosphorus, (nutrients). Those are tough on DO but it is not what closes beaches and makes people sick. When they look at swimmer safety they look at coliforms. Blue Plains shoots enough chlorine into the effluent that it would be safe to drink if you could get over the yuck factor. When I was there they did have a plant manager take a big drink on TV. This is still down river of DC. It would not affect people up there. I would worry more about street runoff if I fell in the water at the 14th street bridge. The Anacostia has it's own unique problems with industrial pollution that you don't see on the west side. Blue Plains was constantly letting untreated waste into the rivers. There are no good swimming areas above Haynes Point and most of the fishing for eating is down below Alexandria. That is not cited in the article you linked. It may be true tho. I am still waiting for the river keeper guy to get back to me with the monitoring site data. I have to believe they are testing for coliforms around Ft Washington or Quantico. All I have found so far is salinity, DO and nutrients, I suppose because that is what they are worried about in the bay. Nutrients are persistent. Coliforms tend to go away pretty quickly when exposed to sunlight and oxygen. Bass fishermen go up north of the Woodrow Wilson bridge. Don't know if they eat the bass, but I've not heard they were bad to eat. According to the following, carp, channel cats 18", and American eel shouldn't be eaten at all. Many others are OK no more than twice a month. http://tinyurl.com/7aypyhh |
Great day on the Potomac
On 6/1/12 12:43 PM, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 12:15:53 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 07:35:09 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 02:18:38 -0400, wrote: They are talking about nitrogen and phosphorus, (nutrients). Those are tough on DO but it is not what closes beaches and makes people sick. When they look at swimmer safety they look at coliforms. Blue Plains shoots enough chlorine into the effluent that it would be safe to drink if you could get over the yuck factor. When I was there they did have a plant manager take a big drink on TV. This is still down river of DC. It would not affect people up there. I would worry more about street runoff if I fell in the water at the 14th street bridge. The Anacostia has it's own unique problems with industrial pollution that you don't see on the west side. Careful!! Any mention of pollution in the Anacostia *can* be used as 'proof' of racism! I've taken friends up the Anacostia to see the sights and been embarrassed by the crap floating on the water and lining the banks. It's a mess. If, as some say, it's caused by blacks living in the area, then they should start using trash cans instead of the river for their trash. It is probably a little more complicated than that. The higher level of industrial pollution is coming from North East DC and near in Maryland, simply because they don't have that kind of development in North West. They also say most of the trash is coming down the storm drain system. It could be an indication that people in NE/SE are more likely to sit on the corner and drink. They don't have the nice patios that the people in North West have ;-) That explains it. And the DC government folks pocket so much of the city's income that the city can' put trash cans on the corners and empty them. There's no public trash can on your street corner, Herring. |
Great day on the Potomac
In article ,
says... On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 12:06:59 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 07:28:14 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 31 May 2012 20:10:03 -0400, BAR wrote: Your comment about the bay is on target. Sandy Point beach gets closed quite frequently because of the fecal stuff floating in the bay. I did not have much luck finding current WQ numbers on the web. There are some numbers on the Fairfax County site referring to the Wilson Bridge project but they are aimed at nutrients, turbidity and DO, not coliforms. The DO numbers are pretty dismal tho (2s and low 3s). That will limit the types of fish that can live there. They did not specify a time of day but if these are not done at dawn, the number will be higher than the accepted standard monitoring protocol would give you. I have an Email in to the Potomac Riverkeepers organization to see what they can tell me. Most of the problems with the Potomac in the 60's and 70's was due to Blue Plains. Even today they are a major cause of problems in the Potomac. http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress...5257359003f534 8/4c0ca7a507be26cf8525779a00536add!OpenDocument They are talking about nitrogen and phosphorus, (nutrients). Those are tough on DO but it is not what closes beaches and makes people sick. When they look at swimmer safety they look at coliforms. Blue Plains shoots enough chlorine into the effluent that it would be safe to drink if you could get over the yuck factor. When I was there they did have a plant manager take a big drink on TV. This is still down river of DC. It would not affect people up there. I would worry more about street runoff if I fell in the water at the 14th street bridge. The Anacostia has it's own unique problems with industrial pollution that you don't see on the west side. Blue Plains was constantly letting untreated waste into the rivers. There are no good swimming areas above Haynes Point and most of the fishing for eating is down below Alexandria. That is not cited in the article you linked. It may be true tho. I am still waiting for the river keeper guy to get back to me with the monitoring site data. I have to believe they are testing for coliforms around Ft Washington or Quantico. All I have found so far is salinity, DO and nutrients, I suppose because that is what they are worried about in the bay. Nutrients are persistent. Coliforms tend to go away pretty quickly when exposed to sunlight and oxygen. Bass fishermen go up north of the Woodrow Wilson bridge. Don't know if they eat the bass, but I've not heard they were bad to eat. According to the following, carp, channel cats 18", and American eel shouldn't be eaten at all. Many others are OK no more than twice a month. http://tinyurl.com/7aypyhh According to Scotty, people don't eat bass!!!!!!! |
Great day on the Potomac
On 6/1/12 12:48 PM, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 12:06:59 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 07:28:14 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Thu, 31 May 2012 20:10:03 -0400, wrote: Your comment about the bay is on target. Sandy Point beach gets closed quite frequently because of the fecal stuff floating in the bay. I did not have much luck finding current WQ numbers on the web. There are some numbers on the Fairfax County site referring to the Wilson Bridge project but they are aimed at nutrients, turbidity and DO, not coliforms. The DO numbers are pretty dismal tho (2s and low 3s). That will limit the types of fish that can live there. They did not specify a time of day but if these are not done at dawn, the number will be higher than the accepted standard monitoring protocol would give you. I have an Email in to the Potomac Riverkeepers organization to see what they can tell me. Most of the problems with the Potomac in the 60's and 70's was due to Blue Plains. Even today they are a major cause of problems in the Potomac. http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress...5257359003f534 8/4c0ca7a507be26cf8525779a00536add!OpenDocument They are talking about nitrogen and phosphorus, (nutrients). Those are tough on DO but it is not what closes beaches and makes people sick. When they look at swimmer safety they look at coliforms. Blue Plains shoots enough chlorine into the effluent that it would be safe to drink if you could get over the yuck factor. When I was there they did have a plant manager take a big drink on TV. This is still down river of DC. It would not affect people up there. I would worry more about street runoff if I fell in the water at the 14th street bridge. The Anacostia has it's own unique problems with industrial pollution that you don't see on the west side. Blue Plains was constantly letting untreated waste into the rivers. There are no good swimming areas above Haynes Point and most of the fishing for eating is down below Alexandria. That is not cited in the article you linked. It may be true tho. I am still waiting for the river keeper guy to get back to me with the monitoring site data. I have to believe they are testing for coliforms around Ft Washington or Quantico. All I have found so far is salinity, DO and nutrients, I suppose because that is what they are worried about in the bay. Nutrients are persistent. Coliforms tend to go away pretty quickly when exposed to sunlight and oxygen. Bass fishermen go up north of the Woodrow Wilson bridge. Don't know if they eat the bass, but I've not heard they were bad to eat. According to the following, carp, channel cats18", and American eel shouldn't be eaten at all. Many others are OK no more than twice a month. http://tinyurl.com/7aypyhh JustHate, your buddy, aka Ranking Moron of Rec.Boats, claims no one eats these freshwater bass, so how could you have not heard they were bad to eat? :) |
Great day on the Potomac
On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 13:11:33 -0400, wrote:
On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 07:56:15 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 6/1/12 7:28 AM, BAR wrote: They are talking about nitrogen and phosphorus, (nutrients). Those are tough on DO but it is not what closes beaches and makes people sick. When they look at swimmer safety they look at coliforms. Blue Plains shoots enough chlorine into the effluent that it would be safe to drink if you could get over the yuck factor. When I was there they did have a plant manager take a big drink on TV. This is still down river of DC. It would not affect people up there. I would worry more about street runoff if I fell in the water at the 14th street bridge. The Anacostia has it's own unique problems with industrial pollution that you don't see on the west side. Blue Plains was constantly letting untreated waste into the rivers. There are no good swimming areas above Haynes Point and most of the fishing for eating is down below Alexandria. *Way* down below Alexandria, if at all. Fin fish are not really much of a problem if you are just talking about sewer pollution. The things you have to worry about in fish are the heavy metals and some other organic chemicals that can settle in the muscle tissue. That is persistent pollution and it will be in the water forever, all the way to the bay and ocean. (only being diluted) Clams and oysters are the ones that collect coliforms. OTOH when the DO gets as low as they were measuring at the sites I looked at (2.5 - 3), you are only going to catch trash fish that can live in a low oxygen environment. Part of the treatment process is oxygenating the water so Blue Plains might actually help the fish near the discharge. It doesn't take long until the nutrients and the problem that causes to eat all of the oxygen tho. The other number you want to see in reference to that is chlorophyll. Somebody up there must be running a full panel of water quality measurements but I can't find it. Not enough info here? http://www.vdh.state.va.us/epidemiol...lthtoxicology/ |
Great day on the Potomac
In article ,
says... On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 07:49:09 -0400, John H. wrote: On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 07:28:14 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 31 May 2012 20:10:03 -0400, BAR wrote: Your comment about the bay is on target. Sandy Point beach gets closed quite frequently because of the fecal stuff floating in the bay. I did not have much luck finding current WQ numbers on the web. There are some numbers on the Fairfax County site referring to the Wilson Bridge project but they are aimed at nutrients, turbidity and DO, not coliforms. The DO numbers are pretty dismal tho (2s and low 3s). That will limit the types of fish that can live there. They did not specify a time of day but if these are not done at dawn, the number will be higher than the accepted standard monitoring protocol would give you. I have an Email in to the Potomac Riverkeepers organization to see what they can tell me. Most of the problems with the Potomac in the 60's and 70's was due to Blue Plains. Even today they are a major cause of problems in the Potomac. http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress...5257359003f534 8/4c0ca7a507be26cf8525779a00536add!OpenDocument They are talking about nitrogen and phosphorus, (nutrients). Those are tough on DO but it is not what closes beaches and makes people sick. When they look at swimmer safety they look at coliforms. Blue Plains shoots enough chlorine into the effluent that it would be safe to drink if you could get over the yuck factor. When I was there they did have a plant manager take a big drink on TV. This is still down river of DC. It would not affect people up there. I would worry more about street runoff if I fell in the water at the 14th street bridge. The Anacostia has it's own unique problems with industrial pollution that you don't see on the west side. Blue Plains was constantly letting untreated waste into the rivers. There are no good swimming areas above Haynes Point and most of the fishing for eating is down below Alexandria. Yup, after a heavy rain, one should not be drinking the water in either the Anacostia or Potomac rivers. One shouldn't be drinking water out of the Chesapeake either. But, the Blue Plains discharges of untreated water aren't quite 'constant'. http://www.dcwasa.com/wastewater_col...ss/default.cfm That CSO in Rock Creek sort of shoots the hell out of thinking Haines Point is so safe. It sounds like Blue Plains isn't even most of the problem. They have 52 other direct dump sites. It also shows why South East is the source of most of the trash. They have a separate storm water system that bypasses the treatment plant. If a can goes in a storm drain in Anacostia, it ends up in the river. If you tossed a can in the storm drain in Chevy Chase, it would end up in the sewer system. I live up near the Gaithersburg, Maryland airport (GAI) and this is where the Rock Creek begins. Rock Creek runs from close to my house all the way down through the county through DC and into the the Potomac River in Georgetown. That is quite a bit of run-off area to pull from that goes straight into the bay. When you check the storm drains you see them painted with the words empties into Chesapeake Bay or something similar. http://www.cbf.org/page.aspx?pid=406 |
Great day on the Potomac
In article ,
says... On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:25:00 -0400, John H. wrote: On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 13:11:33 -0400, wrote: Somebody up there must be running a full panel of water quality measurements but I can't find it. Not enough info here? http://www.vdh.state.va.us/epidemiol...lthtoxicology/ The site looks like it hasn't been updated since 2005 (the USGS data) All of these sites seem to have one axe to grind and they glaze over everything else. This one seems to be going for organics and metals. Pick the best stone to grind your axe on to ensure that you sharpen your axe. It is like poll shopping. |
Great day on the Potomac
In article ,
says... In article , says... On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:25:00 -0400, John H. wrote: On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 13:11:33 -0400, wrote: Somebody up there must be running a full panel of water quality measurements but I can't find it. Not enough info here? http://www.vdh.state.va.us/epidemiol...lthtoxicology/ The site looks like it hasn't been updated since 2005 (the USGS data) All of these sites seem to have one axe to grind and they glaze over everything else. This one seems to be going for organics and metals. Pick the best stone to grind your axe on to ensure that you sharpen your axe. It is like poll shopping. I suppose in your mind polluting our waterways is okay? |
Great day on the Potomac
On 6/2/2012 10:48 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In , says... In , says... On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:25:00 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 13:11:33 -0400, wrote: Somebody up there must be running a full panel of water quality measurements but I can't find it. Not enough info here? http://www.vdh.state.va.us/epidemiol...lthtoxicology/ The site looks like it hasn't been updated since 2005 (the USGS data) All of these sites seem to have one axe to grind and they glaze over everything else. This one seems to be going for organics and metals. Pick the best stone to grind your axe on to ensure that you sharpen your axe. It is like poll shopping. I suppose in your mind polluting our waterways is okay? You won't receive any awards for your mind reading. |
Great day on the Potomac
|
Great day on the Potomac
On 6/2/2012 12:18 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 10:48:44 -0400, wrote: I suppose in your mind polluting our waterways is okay? It seems to be when it is the DC government doing it. I was amazed that 50 years after the feds decided to clean up the river that it is still so bad. I really believed they were making measurable progress but from what I am reading, sadly, that is not true. Forgot the link... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hockanum_River |
Great day on the Potomac
|
Great day on the Potomac
|
Great day on the Potomac
In article , says...
On 6/2/2012 12:18 PM, wrote: On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 10:48:44 -0400, wrote: I suppose in your mind polluting our waterways is okay? It seems to be when it is the DC government doing it. I was amazed that 50 years after the feds decided to clean up the river that it is still so bad. I really believed they were making measurable progress but from what I am reading, sadly, that is not true. We have a river down the street that was a nasty hole when I was a kid. You literally held your nose as you drove across it, it was so brown you couldn't see 12 inches to the bottom, and it was littered with garbage and floating debris. Now it's "cleaned up" and a "trophy trout stream" according to the State snerk. I checked it out once a couple years ago and yeah, it doesn't smell any more, but my dog wouldn't drink it and I certainly wouldn't eat any fish out of it. I see a lot of folks from the city down there and they seem happy fishing, still don't see anybody wading in, at least it's better than when I grew up there.. What river is that? I'd like to see the data. |
Great day on the Potomac
In article , says...
On 6/2/2012 12:18 PM, wrote: On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 10:48:44 -0400, wrote: I suppose in your mind polluting our waterways is okay? It seems to be when it is the DC government doing it. I was amazed that 50 years after the feds decided to clean up the river that it is still so bad. I really believed they were making measurable progress but from what I am reading, sadly, that is not true. Forgot the link... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hockanum_River Thanks! |
Great day on the Potomac
In article , says...
On 6/2/2012 12:18 PM, wrote: On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 10:48:44 -0400, wrote: I suppose in your mind polluting our waterways is okay? It seems to be when it is the DC government doing it. I was amazed that 50 years after the feds decided to clean up the river that it is still so bad. I really believed they were making measurable progress but from what I am reading, sadly, that is not true. Forgot the link... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hockanum_River "Historically used for industry, the river has in recent years had hiking trails and linear parks developed along its banks. The banks of the river are slowly being cleaned up after years of pollution and dumping." That's a bad thing in your eyes? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:58 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com