| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Do you...
....fear and demonize intelligent people who have a higher education
because they are the ones who can thwart your effort to brainwash people? You then attempt to prevent others from achieving a higher education because you want the people as ignorant as possible so you can convince them that your way is the right way. Congratulations, Republican. |
Do you...
On Sat, 05 May 2012 18:36:20 -0400, X ` Man wrote:
...fear and demonize intelligent people who have a higher education because they are the ones who can thwart your effort to brainwash people? You then attempt to prevent others from achieving a higher education because you want the people as ignorant as possible so you can convince them that your way is the right way. Congratulations, Republican. The Democrats have contributed greatly to the education of the poor - by keeping them uneducated and poor. Interesting........ City, State, % of People Below the Poverty Level 1. Detroit, MI 32.5% 2. Buffalo, NY 29..9% 3. Cincinnati, OH 27.8% 4. Cleveland, OH 27.0% 5. Miami, FL 26.9% 5. St. Louis, MO 26.8% 7. El Paso, TX 26.4% 8. Milwaukee, WI 26.2% 9. Philadelphia, PA 25.1% 10. Newark, NJ 24.2% U.S. Census Bureau, 2006 American Community Survey, August 2007 What do the top ten cities (over 250,000) with the highest poverty rate all have in common? Democrat mayors. Detroit, MI (1st on the poverty rate list) hasn't elected a Republican mayor since 1961; Buffalo, NY (2nd) hasn't elected one since 1954; Cincinnati, OH (3rd)...since 1984; Cleveland, OH (4th)...since 1989; Miami, FL (5th) has never had a Republican mayor; St. Louis, MO (6th)....since 1949; El Paso, TX (7th) has never had a Republican mayor; Milwaukee, WI (8th)...since 1908; Philadelphia, PA (9th)...since 1952; Newark, NJ (10th)...since 1907. Einstein once said, 'The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.' I'll respond to you again in June, unless you say something just as stupid again. |
Do you...
On 5/5/12 6:47 PM, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 05 May 2012 18:36:20 -0400, X ` wrote: ...fear and demonize intelligent people who have a higher education because they are the ones who can thwart your effort to brainwash people? You then attempt to prevent others from achieving a higher education because you want the people as ignorant as possible so you can convince them that your way is the right way. Congratulations, Republican. The Democrats have contributed greatly to the education of the poor - by keeping them uneducated and poor. Interesting........ City, State, % of People Below the Poverty Level 1. Detroit, MI 32.5% 2. Buffalo, NY 29..9% 3. Cincinnati, OH 27.8% 4. Cleveland, OH 27.0% 5. Miami, FL 26.9% 5. St. Louis, MO 26.8% 7. El Paso, TX 26.4% 8. Milwaukee, WI 26.2% 9. Philadelphia, PA 25.1% 10. Newark, NJ 24.2% U.S. Census Bureau, 2006 American Community Survey, August 2007 What do the top ten cities (over 250,000) with the highest poverty rate all have in common? Democrat mayors. Detroit, MI (1st on the poverty rate list) hasn't elected a Republican mayor since 1961; Buffalo, NY (2nd) hasn't elected one since 1954; Cincinnati, OH (3rd)...since 1984; Cleveland, OH (4th)...since 1989; Miami, FL (5th) has never had a Republican mayor; St. Louis, MO (6th)....since 1949; El Paso, TX (7th) has never had a Republican mayor; Milwaukee, WI (8th)...since 1908; Philadelphia, PA (9th)...since 1952; Newark, NJ (10th)...since 1907. Einstein once said, 'The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.' I'll respond to you again in June, unless you say something just as stupid again. I'm supposed to care? I don't give a **** whether you do or you don't. You're just another right-wing racist. “In this world of sin and sorrow there is always something to be thankful for; as for me, I rejoice that I am not a Republican.” ~H. L. Mencken |
Do you...
On May 5, 5:49*pm, X ` Man dump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote: On 5/5/12 6:47 PM, John H. wrote: On Sat, 05 May 2012 18:36:20 -0400, X ` *wrote: ...fear and demonize intelligent people who have a higher education because they are the ones who can thwart your effort to brainwash people? You then attempt to prevent others from achieving a higher education because you want the people as ignorant as possible so you can convince them that your way is the right way. Congratulations, Republican. The Democrats have contributed greatly to the education of the poor - by keeping them uneducated and poor. Interesting........ City, State, % of People Below the Poverty Level 1. *Detroit, *MI * 32.5% 2. *Buffalo, *NY * 29..9% 3. *Cincinnati, *OH * * * *27.8% 4. *Cleveland, *OH 27.0% 5. *Miami, *FL * * 26.9% 5. *St. Louis, *MO 26.8% 7. *El Paso, *TX * 26.4% 8. *Milwaukee, *WI 26.2% 9. *Philadelphia, *PA * * *25.1% 10. *Newark, *NJ * 24.2% U.S. Census Bureau, 2006 American Community Survey, August 2007 What do the top ten cities (over 250,000) with the highest poverty rate all have in common? *Democrat mayors. Detroit, *MI *(1st on the poverty rate list) hasn't elected a Republican mayor since 1961; Buffalo, *NY *(2nd) hasn't elected one since 1954; Cincinnati, *OH *(3rd)...since 1984; Cleveland, *OH *(4th)...since 1989; Miami, *FL *(5th) has never had a Republican mayor; St. Louis, *MO *(6th)....since 1949; El Paso, *TX *(7th) has never had a Republican mayor; Milwaukee, *WI *(8th)...since 1908; Philadelphia, *PA *(9th)...since 1952; Newark, *NJ *(10th)...since 1907. Einstein once said, 'The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.' I'll respond to you again in June, unless you say something just as stupid again. I'm supposed to care? I don't give a **** whether you do or you don't. You're just another right-wing racist. * “In this world of sin and sorrow there is always something to be thankful for; as for me, I rejoice that I am not a Republican.” ~H. L. Mencken Well Harry, didn't you care enough to bring the subject up? |
Do you...
On 5/5/12 7:54 PM, Tim wrote:
On May 5, 5:49 pm, X ` Mandump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you- can.com wrote: On 5/5/12 6:47 PM, John H. wrote: On Sat, 05 May 2012 18:36:20 -0400, X ` wrote: ...fear and demonize intelligent people who have a higher education because they are the ones who can thwart your effort to brainwash people? You then attempt to prevent others from achieving a higher education because you want the people as ignorant as possible so you can convince them that your way is the right way. Congratulations, Republican. The Democrats have contributed greatly to the education of the poor - by keeping them uneducated and poor. Interesting........ City, State, % of People Below the Poverty Level 1. Detroit, MI 32.5% 2. Buffalo, NY 29..9% 3. Cincinnati, OH 27.8% 4. Cleveland, OH 27.0% 5. Miami, FL 26.9% 5. St. Louis, MO 26.8% 7. El Paso, TX 26.4% 8. Milwaukee, WI 26.2% 9. Philadelphia, PA 25.1% 10. Newark, NJ 24.2% U.S. Census Bureau, 2006 American Community Survey, August 2007 What do the top ten cities (over 250,000) with the highest poverty rate all have in common? Democrat mayors. Detroit, MI (1st on the poverty rate list) hasn't elected a Republican mayor since 1961; Buffalo, NY (2nd) hasn't elected one since 1954; Cincinnati, OH (3rd)...since 1984; Cleveland, OH (4th)...since 1989; Miami, FL (5th) has never had a Republican mayor; St. Louis, MO (6th)....since 1949; El Paso, TX (7th) has never had a Republican mayor; Milwaukee, WI (8th)...since 1908; Philadelphia, PA (9th)...since 1952; Newark, NJ (10th)...since 1907. Einstein once said, 'The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.' I'll respond to you again in June, unless you say something just as stupid again. I'm supposed to care? I don't give a **** whether you do or you don't. You're just another right-wing racist. “In this world of sin and sorrow there is always something to be thankful for; as for me, I rejoice that I am not a Republican.” ~H. L. Mencken Well Harry, didn't you care enough to bring the subject up? My comment was aimed at Herring the Racist. |
Do you...
On 5/5/2012 7:56 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 5/5/12 7:54 PM, Tim wrote: On May 5, 5:49 pm, X ` Mandump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you- can.com wrote: On 5/5/12 6:47 PM, John H. wrote: On Sat, 05 May 2012 18:36:20 -0400, X ` wrote: ...fear and demonize intelligent people who have a higher education because they are the ones who can thwart your effort to brainwash people? You then attempt to prevent others from achieving a higher education because you want the people as ignorant as possible so you can convince them that your way is the right way. Congratulations, Republican. The Democrats have contributed greatly to the education of the poor - by keeping them uneducated and poor. Interesting........ City, State, % of People Below the Poverty Level 1. Detroit, MI 32.5% 2. Buffalo, NY 29..9% 3. Cincinnati, OH 27.8% 4. Cleveland, OH 27.0% 5. Miami, FL 26.9% 5. St. Louis, MO 26.8% 7. El Paso, TX 26.4% 8. Milwaukee, WI 26.2% 9. Philadelphia, PA 25.1% 10. Newark, NJ 24.2% U.S. Census Bureau, 2006 American Community Survey, August 2007 What do the top ten cities (over 250,000) with the highest poverty rate all have in common? Democrat mayors. Detroit, MI (1st on the poverty rate list) hasn't elected a Republican mayor since 1961; Buffalo, NY (2nd) hasn't elected one since 1954; Cincinnati, OH (3rd)...since 1984; Cleveland, OH (4th)...since 1989; Miami, FL (5th) has never had a Republican mayor; St. Louis, MO (6th)....since 1949; El Paso, TX (7th) has never had a Republican mayor; Milwaukee, WI (8th)...since 1908; Philadelphia, PA (9th)...since 1952; Newark, NJ (10th)...since 1907. Einstein once said, 'The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.' I'll respond to you again in June, unless you say something just as stupid again. I'm supposed to care? I don't give a **** whether you do or you don't. You're just another right-wing racist. “In this world of sin and sorrow there is always something to be thankful for; as for me, I rejoice that I am not a Republican.” ~H. L. Mencken Well Harry, didn't you care enough to bring the subject up? My comment was aimed at Herring the Racist. Sour grapes. He got you good. Admit it. ;-) |
Do you...
|
Do you...
X ` Man wrote:
On 5/5/12 7:54 PM, Tim wrote: On May 5, 5:49 pm, X ` Mandump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you- can.com wrote: On 5/5/12 6:47 PM, John H. wrote: On Sat, 05 May 2012 18:36:20 -0400, X ` wrote: ...fear and demonize intelligent people who have a higher education because they are the ones who can thwart your effort to brainwash people? You then attempt to prevent others from achieving a higher education because you want the people as ignorant as possible so you can convince them that your way is the right way. Congratulations, Republican. The Democrats have contributed greatly to the education of the poor - by keeping them uneducated and poor. Interesting........ City, State, % of People Below the Poverty Level 1. Detroit, MI 32.5% 2. Buffalo, NY 29..9% 3. Cincinnati, OH 27.8% 4. Cleveland, OH 27.0% 5. Miami, FL 26.9% 5. St. Louis, MO 26.8% 7. El Paso, TX 26.4% 8. Milwaukee, WI 26.2% 9. Philadelphia, PA 25.1% 10. Newark, NJ 24.2% U.S. Census Bureau, 2006 American Community Survey, August 2007 What do the top ten cities (over 250,000) with the highest poverty rate all have in common? Democrat mayors. Detroit, MI (1st on the poverty rate list) hasn't elected a Republican mayor since 1961; Buffalo, NY (2nd) hasn't elected one since 1954; Cincinnati, OH (3rd)...since 1984; Cleveland, OH (4th)...since 1989; Miami, FL (5th) has never had a Republican mayor; St. Louis, MO (6th)....since 1949; El Paso, TX (7th) has never had a Republican mayor; Milwaukee, WI (8th)...since 1908; Philadelphia, PA (9th)...since 1952; Newark, NJ (10th)...since 1907. Einstein once said, 'The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.' I'll respond to you again in June, unless you say something just as stupid again. I'm supposed to care? I don't give a **** whether you do or you don't. You're just another right-wing racist. “In this world of sin and sorrow there is always something to be thankful for; as for me, I rejoice that I am not a Republican.” ~H. L. Mencken Well Harry, didn't you care enough to bring the subject up? My comment was aimed at Herring the Racist. I've never seen a racist post from John. |
Do you...
|
Do you...
On 5/5/2012 10:58 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 5/5/12 10:20 PM, wrote: Email was created for the purpose of aiming comments at one person. USENET was created to be used much like a forum. Why must you, then, involve us in your petty quarrels with others? Got anything interesting to post about boating? I didn't think so. Kindered spirits, you and he. Snerk |
Do you...
On 5/6/2012 1:35 AM, Earl wrote:
X ` Man wrote: On 5/5/12 7:54 PM, Tim wrote: On May 5, 5:49 pm, X ` Mandump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you- can.com wrote: On 5/5/12 6:47 PM, John H. wrote: On Sat, 05 May 2012 18:36:20 -0400, X ` wrote: ...fear and demonize intelligent people who have a higher education because they are the ones who can thwart your effort to brainwash people? You then attempt to prevent others from achieving a higher education because you want the people as ignorant as possible so you can convince them that your way is the right way. Congratulations, Republican. The Democrats have contributed greatly to the education of the poor - by keeping them uneducated and poor. Interesting........ City, State, % of People Below the Poverty Level 1. Detroit, MI 32.5% 2. Buffalo, NY 29..9% 3. Cincinnati, OH 27.8% 4. Cleveland, OH 27.0% 5. Miami, FL 26.9% 5. St. Louis, MO 26.8% 7. El Paso, TX 26.4% 8. Milwaukee, WI 26.2% 9. Philadelphia, PA 25.1% 10. Newark, NJ 24.2% U.S. Census Bureau, 2006 American Community Survey, August 2007 What do the top ten cities (over 250,000) with the highest poverty rate all have in common? Democrat mayors. Detroit, MI (1st on the poverty rate list) hasn't elected a Republican mayor since 1961; Buffalo, NY (2nd) hasn't elected one since 1954; Cincinnati, OH (3rd)...since 1984; Cleveland, OH (4th)...since 1989; Miami, FL (5th) has never had a Republican mayor; St. Louis, MO (6th)....since 1949; El Paso, TX (7th) has never had a Republican mayor; Milwaukee, WI (8th)...since 1908; Philadelphia, PA (9th)...since 1952; Newark, NJ (10th)...since 1907. Einstein once said, 'The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.' I'll respond to you again in June, unless you say something just as stupid again. I'm supposed to care? I don't give a **** whether you do or you don't. You're just another right-wing racist. “In this world of sin and sorrow there is always something to be thankful for; as for me, I rejoice that I am not a Republican.” ~H. L. Mencken Well Harry, didn't you care enough to bring the subject up? My comment was aimed at Herring the Racist. I've never seen a racist post from John. Harry knows deep down in his evil pea size heart that all conservatives are racist. His buddy Big Al Sharpton told him so. |
Do you...
|
Do you...
On 5/6/2012 9:00 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 05 May 2012 22:58:54 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 5/5/12 10:20 PM, wrote: Email was created for the purpose of aiming comments at one person. USENET was created to be used much like a forum. Why must you, then, involve us in your petty quarrels with others? Got anything interesting to post about boating? I didn't think so. Yes, actually, I asked you about YOUR boat. He's still working on the rough edit of that story. |
Do you...
On 5/6/2012 10:03 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 5/6/12 9:00 AM, wrote: On Sat, 05 May 2012 22:58:54 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 5/5/12 10:20 PM, wrote: Email was created for the purpose of aiming comments at one person. USENET was created to be used much like a forum. Why must you, then, involve us in your petty quarrels with others? Got anything interesting to post about boating? I didn't think so. Yes, actually, I asked you about YOUR boat. You can google it. Don't waste your time bayboat. I googled him for boating content and all I got was this lame attempt to prove his existence. http://www.boatingforumz.com/live-li...ict101269.html |
Do you...
On May 5, 6:56*pm, X ` Man
My comment was aimed at Herring the Racist. Well Harry, I didn't see anything in your post about John. Just a smack at republicans. |
Do you...
On May 6, 1:35*am, Earl wrote:
X ` Man wrote: On 5/5/12 7:54 PM, Tim wrote: On May 5, 5:49 pm, X ` Mandump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you- can.com *wrote: On 5/5/12 6:47 PM, John H. wrote: On Sat, 05 May 2012 18:36:20 -0400, X ` * *wrote: ...fear and demonize intelligent people who have a higher education because they are the ones who can thwart your effort to brainwash people? You then attempt to prevent others from achieving a higher education because you want the people as ignorant as possible so you can convince them that your way is the right way. Congratulations, Republican. The Democrats have contributed greatly to the education of the poor - by keeping them uneducated and poor. Interesting........ City, State, % of People Below the Poverty Level 1. *Detroit, *MI * 32.5% 2. *Buffalo, *NY * 29..9% 3. *Cincinnati, *OH * * * *27.8% 4. *Cleveland, *OH 27.0% 5. *Miami, *FL * * 26.9% 5. *St. Louis, *MO 26.8% 7. *El Paso, *TX * 26.4% 8. *Milwaukee, *WI 26.2% 9. *Philadelphia, *PA * * *25.1% 10. *Newark, *NJ * 24.2% U.S. Census Bureau, 2006 American Community Survey, August 2007 What do the top ten cities (over 250,000) with the highest poverty rate all have in common? *Democrat mayors. Detroit, *MI *(1st on the poverty rate list) hasn't elected a Republican mayor since 1961; Buffalo, *NY *(2nd) hasn't elected one since 1954; Cincinnati, *OH *(3rd)...since 1984; Cleveland, *OH *(4th)...since 1989; Miami, *FL *(5th) has never had a Republican mayor; St. Louis, *MO *(6th)....since 1949; El Paso, *TX *(7th) has never had a Republican mayor; Milwaukee, *WI *(8th)...since 1908; Philadelphia, *PA *(9th)...since 1952; Newark, *NJ *(10th)...since 1907. Einstein once said, 'The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.' I'll respond to you again in June, unless you say something just as stupid again. I'm supposed to care? I don't give a **** whether you do or you don't.. You're just another right-wing racist. * *“In this world of sin and sorrow there is always something to be thankful for; as for me, I rejoice that I am not a Republican.” ~H. L. Mencken Well Harry, didn't you care enough to bring the subject up? My comment was aimed at Herring the Racist. I've never seen a racist post from John. Havent been here long, huh? |
Do you...
On May 6, 10:35*am, Oscar wrote:
On 5/6/2012 1:35 AM, Earl wrote: X ` Man wrote: On 5/5/12 7:54 PM, Tim wrote: On May 5, 5:49 pm, X ` Mandump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you- can.com wrote: On 5/5/12 6:47 PM, John H. wrote: On Sat, 05 May 2012 18:36:20 -0400, X ` wrote: ...fear and demonize intelligent people who have a higher education because they are the ones who can thwart your effort to brainwash people? You then attempt to prevent others from achieving a higher education because you want the people as ignorant as possible so you can convince them that your way is the right way. Congratulations, Republican. The Democrats have contributed greatly to the education of the poor - by keeping them uneducated and poor. Interesting........ City, State, % of People Below the Poverty Level 1. Detroit, MI 32.5% 2. Buffalo, NY 29..9% 3. Cincinnati, OH 27.8% 4. Cleveland, OH 27.0% 5. Miami, FL 26.9% 5. St. Louis, MO 26.8% 7. El Paso, TX 26.4% 8. Milwaukee, WI 26.2% 9. Philadelphia, PA 25.1% 10. Newark, NJ 24.2% U.S. Census Bureau, 2006 American Community Survey, August 2007 What do the top ten cities (over 250,000) with the highest poverty rate all have in common? Democrat mayors. Detroit, MI (1st on the poverty rate list) hasn't elected a Republican mayor since 1961; Buffalo, NY (2nd) hasn't elected one since 1954; Cincinnati, OH (3rd)...since 1984; Cleveland, OH (4th)...since 1989; Miami, FL (5th) has never had a Republican mayor; St. Louis, MO (6th)....since 1949; El Paso, TX (7th) has never had a Republican mayor; Milwaukee, WI (8th)...since 1908; Philadelphia, PA (9th)...since 1952; Newark, NJ (10th)...since 1907. Einstein once said, 'The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.' I'll respond to you again in June, unless you say something just as stupid again. I'm supposed to care? I don't give a **** whether you do or you don't. |
Do you...
On May 6, 11:37*am, Oscar wrote:
On 5/6/2012 10:03 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 5/6/12 9:00 AM, wrote: On Sat, 05 May 2012 22:58:54 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 5/5/12 10:20 PM, wrote: Email was created for the purpose of aiming comments at one person. USENET was created to be used much like a forum. Why must you, then, involve us in your petty quarrels with others? Got anything interesting to post about boating? I didn't think so. Yes, actually, I asked you about YOUR boat. You can google it. Don't waste your time bayboat. I googled him for boating content and all I got was this lame attempt to prove his existence. *http://www.boatingforumz.com/live-li...ict101269.html Ya, I asked him for a picture of his Boat....and got nothing. Maybe he really DOESN'T have a Boat. |
Do you...
On 5/6/12 10:39 PM, *e#c wrote:
On May 6, 11:37 am, wrote: On 5/6/2012 10:03 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 5/6/12 9:00 AM, wrote: On Sat, 05 May 2012 22:58:54 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 5/5/12 10:20 PM, wrote: Email was created for the purpose of aiming comments at one person. USENET was created to be used much like a forum. Why must you, then, involve us in your petty quarrels with others? Got anything interesting to post about boating? I didn't think so. Yes, actually, I asked you about YOUR boat. You can google it. Don't waste your time bayboat. I googled him for boating content and all I got was this lame attempt to prove his existence. http://www.boatingforumz.com/live-li...ict101269.html Ya, I asked him for a picture of his Boat....and got nothing. Maybe he really DOESN'T have a Boat. I post boating-related photos on boating sites. This isn't a boating site, it hasn't been for years, and it has no possibility of becoming one again. There are only a couple of people left here with whom I will engage in badinage, and if they were friends on Facebook, I wouldn't visit here at all. Think it through...why would I want to engage in pleasantries and photo-swapping with the likes of JustHate, iLoogy, Oscar, Herring and the rest of the twerpy, mindless assholes who pollute this place? A couple more "defections" here and I'll be gone, too, and the remaining boys can petition someone to rename this sty. |
Do you...
On May 7, 5:53*am, X ` Man wrote:
On 5/6/12 10:39 PM, *e#c wrote: On May 6, 11:37 am, *wrote: On 5/6/2012 10:03 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 5/6/12 9:00 AM, wrote: On Sat, 05 May 2012 22:58:54 -0400, X ` Man *wrote: On 5/5/12 10:20 PM, wrote: Email was created for the purpose of aiming comments at one person.. USENET was created to be used much like a forum. Why must you, then, involve us in your petty quarrels with others? Got anything interesting to post about boating? I didn't think so. Yes, actually, I asked you about YOUR boat. You can google it. Don't waste your time bayboat. I googled him for boating content and all I got was this lame attempt to prove his existence. *http://www.boatingforumz.com/live-li...ict101269.html Ya, I asked him for a picture of his Boat....and got nothing. Maybe he really DOESN'T have a Boat. I post boating-related photos on boating sites. This isn't a boating site, it hasn't been for years, and it has no possibility of becoming one again. Sure it is! The problem is there are those who wish to fill it with obnoxious political threads which do nothing but de-hamonize the place, cause arguments and an eventual hatred for each other. Sure it's a boating forum, except for those who wish it not to be. |
Do you...
On May 7, 7:53*am, X ` Man wrote:
On 5/6/12 10:39 PM, *e#c wrote: On May 6, 11:37 am, *wrote: On 5/6/2012 10:03 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 5/6/12 9:00 AM, wrote: On Sat, 05 May 2012 22:58:54 -0400, X ` Man *wrote: On 5/5/12 10:20 PM, wrote: Email was created for the purpose of aiming comments at one person.. USENET was created to be used much like a forum. Why must you, then, involve us in your petty quarrels with others? Got anything interesting to post about boating? I didn't think so. Yes, actually, I asked you about YOUR boat. You can google it. Don't waste your time bayboat. I googled him for boating content and all I got was this lame attempt to prove his existence. *http://www.boatingforumz.com/live-li...ict101269.html Ya, I asked him for a picture of his Boat....and got nothing. Maybe he really DOESN'T have a Boat. I post boating-related photos on boating sites. This isn't a boating site, it hasn't been for years, and it has no possibility of becoming one again. There are only a couple of people left here with whom I will engage in badinage, and if they were friends on Facebook, I wouldn't visit here at all. Think it through...why would I want to engage in pleasantries and photo-swapping with the likes of JustHate, iLoogy, Oscar, Herring and the rest of the twerpy, mindless assholes who pollute this place? A couple more "defections" here and I'll be gone, too, and the remaining boys can petition someone to rename this sty. We never hear the Dopers refer to "over there" anymore nor do we hear anything about The Freaks little website. Wonder what happened there? |
Do you...
On 5/7/12 8:47 AM, North Star wrote:
On May 7, 7:53 am, X ` wrote: On 5/6/12 10:39 PM, *e#c wrote: On May 6, 11:37 am, wrote: On 5/6/2012 10:03 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 5/6/12 9:00 AM, wrote: On Sat, 05 May 2012 22:58:54 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 5/5/12 10:20 PM, wrote: Email was created for the purpose of aiming comments at one person. USENET was created to be used much like a forum. Why must you, then, involve us in your petty quarrels with others? Got anything interesting to post about boating? I didn't think so. Yes, actually, I asked you about YOUR boat. You can google it. Don't waste your time bayboat. I googled him for boating content and all I got was this lame attempt to prove his existence. http://www.boatingforumz.com/live-li...ict101269.html Ya, I asked him for a picture of his Boat....and got nothing. Maybe he really DOESN'T have a Boat. I post boating-related photos on boating sites. This isn't a boating site, it hasn't been for years, and it has no possibility of becoming one again. There are only a couple of people left here with whom I will engage in badinage, and if they were friends on Facebook, I wouldn't visit here at all. Think it through...why would I want to engage in pleasantries and photo-swapping with the likes of JustHate, iLoogy, Oscar, Herring and the rest of the twerpy, mindless assholes who pollute this place? A couple more "defections" here and I'll be gone, too, and the remaining boys can petition someone to rename this sty. We never hear the Dopers refer to "over there" anymore nor do we hear anything about The Freaks little website. Wonder what happened there? They were assimilated by the Borg. Resistance was futile. |
Do you...
On 5/7/12 8:31 AM, Tim wrote:
On May 7, 5:53 am, X ` wrote: On 5/6/12 10:39 PM, *e#c wrote: On May 6, 11:37 am, wrote: On 5/6/2012 10:03 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 5/6/12 9:00 AM, wrote: On Sat, 05 May 2012 22:58:54 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 5/5/12 10:20 PM, wrote: Email was created for the purpose of aiming comments at one person. USENET was created to be used much like a forum. Why must you, then, involve us in your petty quarrels with others? Got anything interesting to post about boating? I didn't think so. Yes, actually, I asked you about YOUR boat. You can google it. Don't waste your time bayboat. I googled him for boating content and all I got was this lame attempt to prove his existence. http://www.boatingforumz.com/live-li...ict101269.html Ya, I asked him for a picture of his Boat....and got nothing. Maybe he really DOESN'T have a Boat. I post boating-related photos on boating sites. This isn't a boating site, it hasn't been for years, and it has no possibility of becoming one again. Sure it is! The problem is there are those who wish to fill it with obnoxious political threads which do nothing but de-hamonize the place, cause arguments and an eventual hatred for each other. Sure it's a boating forum, except for those who wish it not to be. I've been watching for some time to see if any interesting boating posts pop up. I haven't seen any here in a long time. |
Do you...
On 5/7/2012 9:09 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 5/7/12 8:31 AM, Tim wrote: On May 7, 5:53 am, X ` wrote: On 5/6/12 10:39 PM, *e#c wrote: On May 6, 11:37 am, wrote: On 5/6/2012 10:03 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 5/6/12 9:00 AM, wrote: On Sat, 05 May 2012 22:58:54 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 5/5/12 10:20 PM, wrote: Email was created for the purpose of aiming comments at one person. USENET was created to be used much like a forum. Why must you, then, involve us in your petty quarrels with others? Got anything interesting to post about boating? I didn't think so. Yes, actually, I asked you about YOUR boat. You can google it. Don't waste your time bayboat. I googled him for boating content and all I got was this lame attempt to prove his existence. http://www.boatingforumz.com/live-li...ict101269.html Ya, I asked him for a picture of his Boat....and got nothing. Maybe he really DOESN'T have a Boat. I post boating-related photos on boating sites. This isn't a boating site, it hasn't been for years, and it has no possibility of becoming one again. Sure it is! The problem is there are those who wish to fill it with obnoxious political threads which do nothing but de-hamonize the place, cause arguments and an eventual hatred for each other. Sure it's a boating forum, except for those who wish it not to be. I've been watching for some time to see if any interesting boating posts pop up. I haven't seen any here in a long time. LOL! |
Do you...
On 5/7/2012 10:19 AM, Oscar wrote:
On 5/7/2012 8:47 AM, North Star wrote: On May 7, 7:53 am, X ` wrote: On 5/6/12 10:39 PM, *e#c wrote: On May 6, 11:37 am, wrote: On 5/6/2012 10:03 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 5/6/12 9:00 AM, wrote: On Sat, 05 May 2012 22:58:54 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 5/5/12 10:20 PM, wrote: Email was created for the purpose of aiming comments at one person. USENET was created to be used much like a forum. Why must you, then, involve us in your petty quarrels with others? Got anything interesting to post about boating? I didn't think so. Yes, actually, I asked you about YOUR boat. You can google it. Don't waste your time bayboat. I googled him for boating content and all I got was this lame attempt to prove his existence. http://www.boatingforumz.com/live-li...ict101269.html Ya, I asked him for a picture of his Boat....and got nothing. Maybe he really DOESN'T have a Boat. I post boating-related photos on boating sites. This isn't a boating site, it hasn't been for years, and it has no possibility of becoming one again. There are only a couple of people left here with whom I will engage in badinage, and if they were friends on Facebook, I wouldn't visit here at all. Think it through...why would I want to engage in pleasantries and photo-swapping with the likes of JustHate, iLoogy, Oscar, Herring and the rest of the twerpy, mindless assholes who pollute this place? A couple more "defections" here and I'll be gone, too, and the remaining boys can petition someone to rename this sty. We never hear the Dopers refer to "over there" anymore nor do we hear anything about The Freaks little website. Wonder what happened there? I guess over there type places aren't popular any more. Gould tried it, Tom Francis tried to manage it when Gould lost control to Harry. Scott tried to host a photo site with Tom's assistance, which proved to cumbersome to navigate. And then there all the incarnations of Harry's "follow me over there" attempts that never got a single visitor except you. That's what happened there. There is still a lot of good photos there. |
Do you...
On 5/7/12 9:27 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 5/7/2012 9:09 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 5/7/12 8:31 AM, Tim wrote: On May 7, 5:53 am, X ` wrote: On 5/6/12 10:39 PM, *e#c wrote: On May 6, 11:37 am, wrote: On 5/6/2012 10:03 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 5/6/12 9:00 AM, wrote: On Sat, 05 May 2012 22:58:54 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 5/5/12 10:20 PM, wrote: Email was created for the purpose of aiming comments at one person. USENET was created to be used much like a forum. Why must you, then, involve us in your petty quarrels with others? Got anything interesting to post about boating? I didn't think so. Yes, actually, I asked you about YOUR boat. You can google it. Don't waste your time bayboat. I googled him for boating content and all I got was this lame attempt to prove his existence. http://www.boatingforumz.com/live-li...ict101269.html Ya, I asked him for a picture of his Boat....and got nothing. Maybe he really DOESN'T have a Boat. I post boating-related photos on boating sites. This isn't a boating site, it hasn't been for years, and it has no possibility of becoming one again. Sure it is! The problem is there are those who wish to fill it with obnoxious political threads which do nothing but de-hamonize the place, cause arguments and an eventual hatred for each other. Sure it's a boating forum, except for those who wish it not to be. I've been watching for some time to see if any interesting boating posts pop up. I haven't seen any here in a long time. LOL! Obviously, there is divergence between what you consider an interesting boating post and what I consider an interesting boating post. |
Do you...
On 5/7/12 9:28 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 5/7/2012 10:19 AM, Oscar wrote: On 5/7/2012 8:47 AM, North Star wrote: On May 7, 7:53 am, X ` wrote: On 5/6/12 10:39 PM, *e#c wrote: On May 6, 11:37 am, wrote: On 5/6/2012 10:03 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 5/6/12 9:00 AM, wrote: On Sat, 05 May 2012 22:58:54 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 5/5/12 10:20 PM, wrote: Email was created for the purpose of aiming comments at one person. USENET was created to be used much like a forum. Why must you, then, involve us in your petty quarrels with others? Got anything interesting to post about boating? I didn't think so. Yes, actually, I asked you about YOUR boat. You can google it. Don't waste your time bayboat. I googled him for boating content and all I got was this lame attempt to prove his existence. http://www.boatingforumz.com/live-li...ict101269.html Ya, I asked him for a picture of his Boat....and got nothing. Maybe he really DOESN'T have a Boat. I post boating-related photos on boating sites. This isn't a boating site, it hasn't been for years, and it has no possibility of becoming one again. There are only a couple of people left here with whom I will engage in badinage, and if they were friends on Facebook, I wouldn't visit here at all. Think it through...why would I want to engage in pleasantries and photo-swapping with the likes of JustHate, iLoogy, Oscar, Herring and the rest of the twerpy, mindless assholes who pollute this place? A couple more "defections" here and I'll be gone, too, and the remaining boys can petition someone to rename this sty. We never hear the Dopers refer to "over there" anymore nor do we hear anything about The Freaks little website. Wonder what happened there? I guess over there type places aren't popular any more. Gould tried it, Tom Francis tried to manage it when Gould lost control to Harry. Scott tried to host a photo site with Tom's assistance, which proved to cumbersome to navigate. And then there all the incarnations of Harry's "follow me over there" attempts that never got a single visitor except you. That's what happened there. There is still a lot of good photos there. I participate in a handful of pretty good boating/fishing message boards. There are so many on-topic posts put up daily on these boards that I doubt anyone actually reads through all of them. There are plenty of experts on these boards who are willing to share their knowledge without having the non-boating little snarks like you, iloogy, oscar, and the rest of the know-nothing turdbrains posting their never-ending little insults. Gould "lost control" to me? That's nothing more than another fantasy from the mindless. And whatever happened to Tom? Did he finally end up moving to whitesville, south carolina? |
Do you...
|
Do you...
On 5/7/2012 6:53 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 5/6/12 10:39 PM, *e#c wrote: On May 6, 11:37 am, wrote: On 5/6/2012 10:03 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 5/6/12 9:00 AM, wrote: On Sat, 05 May 2012 22:58:54 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 5/5/12 10:20 PM, wrote: Email was created for the purpose of aiming comments at one person. USENET was created to be used much like a forum. Why must you, then, involve us in your petty quarrels with others? Got anything interesting to post about boating? I didn't think so. Yes, actually, I asked you about YOUR boat. You can google it. Don't waste your time bayboat. I googled him for boating content and all I got was this lame attempt to prove his existence. http://www.boatingforumz.com/live-li...ict101269.html Ya, I asked him for a picture of his Boat....and got nothing. Maybe he really DOESN'T have a Boat. I post boating-related photos on boating sites. This isn't a boating site, it hasn't been for years, and it has no possibility of becoming one again. There are only a couple of people left here with whom I will engage in badinage, and if they were friends on Facebook, I wouldn't visit here at all. Think it through...why would I want to engage in pleasantries and photo-swapping with the likes of JustHate, iLoogy, Oscar, Herring and the rest of the twerpy, mindless assholes who pollute this place? A couple more "defections" here and I'll be gone, too, and the remaining boys can petition someone to rename this sty. Your "bandiage" friends have dwindled from 5 a week ago to 2 today. And you're lying about boating photos. Google found only two photos of your old, slab sided, homely Parker. Nothing else. |
Do you...
On 5/7/2012 10:02 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 5/7/12 9:58 AM, wrote: Well, what a surprise! In your sanctimonious drive to run off people YOU don't deem worthy, YOU have run off everybody that posted boating content. So, now, nobody is left except (almost exclusively) people that want to argue angry politics with you and, thus, continue an unfriendly environment for anybody new (or old) to visit. Speaking of sanctimonious, "Here's bayboat..." I haven't run anyone off. Got any interesting boating posts? Didn't think so. Carry on, asshole. Several posters have been run off by you, starting with Karen, MadCow, and a couple recently here that stated they were leaving because of you... Who do you think you are fooling? |
Do you...
On 5/7/12 10:06 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 5/7/2012 10:02 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 5/7/12 9:58 AM, wrote: Well, what a surprise! In your sanctimonious drive to run off people YOU don't deem worthy, YOU have run off everybody that posted boating content. So, now, nobody is left except (almost exclusively) people that want to argue angry politics with you and, thus, continue an unfriendly environment for anybody new (or old) to visit. Speaking of sanctimonious, "Here's bayboat..." I haven't run anyone off. Got any interesting boating posts? Didn't think so. Carry on, asshole. Several posters have been run off by you, starting with Karen, MadCow, and a couple recently here that stated they were leaving because of you... Who do you think you are fooling? Bull****. |
Do you...
On 5/7/2012 10:08 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 5/7/12 10:06 AM, JustWait wrote: On 5/7/2012 10:02 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 5/7/12 9:58 AM, wrote: Well, what a surprise! In your sanctimonious drive to run off people YOU don't deem worthy, YOU have run off everybody that posted boating content. So, now, nobody is left except (almost exclusively) people that want to argue angry politics with you and, thus, continue an unfriendly environment for anybody new (or old) to visit. Speaking of sanctimonious, "Here's bayboat..." I haven't run anyone off. Got any interesting boating posts? Didn't think so. Carry on, asshole. Several posters have been run off by you, starting with Karen, MadCow, and a couple recently here that stated they were leaving because of you... Who do you think you are fooling? Bull****. LOL, yeah... |
Do you...
On Mon, 7 May 2012 05:31:26 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote: Sure it's a boating forum, except for those who wish it not to be. === And "those who wish it not to be" should be ignored. |
Do you...
In article 37972e48-b112-494b-b2f3-
, says... On May 7, 7:53*am, X ` Man wrote: On 5/6/12 10:39 PM, *e#c wrote: On May 6, 11:37 am, *wrote: On 5/6/2012 10:03 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 5/6/12 9:00 AM, wrote: On Sat, 05 May 2012 22:58:54 -0400, X ` Man *wrote: On 5/5/12 10:20 PM, wrote: Email was created for the purpose of aiming comments at one person. USENET was created to be used much like a forum. Why must you, then, involve us in your petty quarrels with others? Got anything interesting to post about boating? I didn't think so. Yes, actually, I asked you about YOUR boat. You can google it. Don't waste your time bayboat. I googled him for boating content and all I got was this lame attempt to prove his existence. *http://www.boatingforumz.com/live-li...ict101269.html Ya, I asked him for a picture of his Boat....and got nothing. Maybe he really DOESN'T have a Boat. I post boating-related photos on boating sites. This isn't a boating site, it hasn't been for years, and it has no possibility of becoming one again. There are only a couple of people left here with whom I will engage in badinage, and if they were friends on Facebook, I wouldn't visit here at all. Think it through...why would I want to engage in pleasantries and photo-swapping with the likes of JustHate, iLoogy, Oscar, Herring and the rest of the twerpy, mindless assholes who pollute this place? A couple more "defections" here and I'll be gone, too, and the remaining boys can petition someone to rename this sty. We never hear the Dopers refer to "over there" anymore nor do we hear anything about The Freaks little website. Wonder what happened there? What do you care? |
Do you...
In article , dump-on-
says... On 5/7/12 9:28 AM, JustWait wrote: On 5/7/2012 10:19 AM, Oscar wrote: On 5/7/2012 8:47 AM, North Star wrote: On May 7, 7:53 am, X ` wrote: On 5/6/12 10:39 PM, *e#c wrote: On May 6, 11:37 am, wrote: On 5/6/2012 10:03 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 5/6/12 9:00 AM, wrote: On Sat, 05 May 2012 22:58:54 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 5/5/12 10:20 PM, wrote: Email was created for the purpose of aiming comments at one person. USENET was created to be used much like a forum. Why must you, then, involve us in your petty quarrels with others? Got anything interesting to post about boating? I didn't think so. Yes, actually, I asked you about YOUR boat. You can google it. Don't waste your time bayboat. I googled him for boating content and all I got was this lame attempt to prove his existence. http://www.boatingforumz.com/live-li...ict101269.html Ya, I asked him for a picture of his Boat....and got nothing. Maybe he really DOESN'T have a Boat. I post boating-related photos on boating sites. This isn't a boating site, it hasn't been for years, and it has no possibility of becoming one again. There are only a couple of people left here with whom I will engage in badinage, and if they were friends on Facebook, I wouldn't visit here at all. Think it through...why would I want to engage in pleasantries and photo-swapping with the likes of JustHate, iLoogy, Oscar, Herring and the rest of the twerpy, mindless assholes who pollute this place? A couple more "defections" here and I'll be gone, too, and the remaining boys can petition someone to rename this sty. We never hear the Dopers refer to "over there" anymore nor do we hear anything about The Freaks little website. Wonder what happened there? I guess over there type places aren't popular any more. Gould tried it, Tom Francis tried to manage it when Gould lost control to Harry. Scott tried to host a photo site with Tom's assistance, which proved to cumbersome to navigate. And then there all the incarnations of Harry's "follow me over there" attempts that never got a single visitor except you. That's what happened there. There is still a lot of good photos there. I participate in a handful of pretty good boating/fishing message boards. There are so many on-topic posts put up daily on these boards that I doubt anyone actually reads through all of them. There are plenty of experts on these boards who are willing to share their knowledge without having the non-boating little snarks like you, iloogy, oscar, and the rest of the know-nothing turdbrains posting their never-ending little insults. He says while posting his never ending insults..... |
Do you...
On 5/7/2012 8:47 AM, North Star wrote:
On May 7, 7:53 am, X ` wrote: On 5/6/12 10:39 PM, *e#c wrote: On May 6, 11:37 am, wrote: On 5/6/2012 10:03 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 5/6/12 9:00 AM, wrote: On Sat, 05 May 2012 22:58:54 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 5/5/12 10:20 PM, wrote: Email was created for the purpose of aiming comments at one person. USENET was created to be used much like a forum. Why must you, then, involve us in your petty quarrels with others? Got anything interesting to post about boating? I didn't think so. Yes, actually, I asked you about YOUR boat. You can google it. Don't waste your time bayboat. I googled him for boating content and all I got was this lame attempt to prove his existence. http://www.boatingforumz.com/live-li...ict101269.html Ya, I asked him for a picture of his Boat....and got nothing. Maybe he really DOESN'T have a Boat. I post boating-related photos on boating sites. This isn't a boating site, it hasn't been for years, and it has no possibility of becoming one again. There are only a couple of people left here with whom I will engage in badinage, and if they were friends on Facebook, I wouldn't visit here at all. Think it through...why would I want to engage in pleasantries and photo-swapping with the likes of JustHate, iLoogy, Oscar, Herring and the rest of the twerpy, mindless assholes who pollute this place? A couple more "defections" here and I'll be gone, too, and the remaining boys can petition someone to rename this sty. We never hear the Dopers refer to "over there" anymore nor do we hear anything about The Freaks little website. Wonder what happened there? I guess over there type places aren't popular any more. Gould tried it, Tom Francis tried to manage it when Gould lost control to Harry. Scott tried to host a photo site with Tom's assistance, which proved to cumbersome to navigate. And then there all the incarnations of Harry's "follow me over there" attempts that never got a single visitor except you. That's what happened there. |
Do you...
On 5/7/2012 10:15 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article37972e48-b112-494b-b2f3- , says... On May 7, 7:53 am, X ` wrote: On 5/6/12 10:39 PM, *e#c wrote: On May 6, 11:37 am, wrote: On 5/6/2012 10:03 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 5/6/12 9:00 AM, wrote: On Sat, 05 May 2012 22:58:54 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 5/5/12 10:20 PM, wrote: Email was created for the purpose of aiming comments at one person. USENET was created to be used much like a forum. Why must you, then, involve us in your petty quarrels with others? Got anything interesting to post about boating? I didn't think so. Yes, actually, I asked you about YOUR boat. You can google it. Don't waste your time bayboat. I googled him for boating content and all I got was this lame attempt to prove his existence. http://www.boatingforumz.com/live-li...ict101269.html Ya, I asked him for a picture of his Boat....and got nothing. Maybe he really DOESN'T have a Boat. I post boating-related photos on boating sites. This isn't a boating site, it hasn't been for years, and it has no possibility of becoming one again. There are only a couple of people left here with whom I will engage in badinage, and if they were friends on Facebook, I wouldn't visit here at all. Think it through...why would I want to engage in pleasantries and photo-swapping with the likes of JustHate, iLoogy, Oscar, Herring and the rest of the twerpy, mindless assholes who pollute this place? A couple more "defections" here and I'll be gone, too, and the remaining boys can petition someone to rename this sty. We never hear the Dopers refer to "over there" anymore nor do we hear anything about The Freaks little website. Wonder what happened there? What do you care? He doesn't, he just needed to call names again. |
Do you...
On 5/7/2012 9:09 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 5/7/12 8:31 AM, Tim wrote: On May 7, 5:53 am, X ` wrote: On 5/6/12 10:39 PM, *e#c wrote: On May 6, 11:37 am, wrote: On 5/6/2012 10:03 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 5/6/12 9:00 AM, wrote: On Sat, 05 May 2012 22:58:54 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 5/5/12 10:20 PM, wrote: Email was created for the purpose of aiming comments at one person. USENET was created to be used much like a forum. Why must you, then, involve us in your petty quarrels with others? Got anything interesting to post about boating? I didn't think so. Yes, actually, I asked you about YOUR boat. You can google it. Don't waste your time bayboat. I googled him for boating content and all I got was this lame attempt to prove his existence. http://www.boatingforumz.com/live-li...ict101269.html Ya, I asked him for a picture of his Boat....and got nothing. Maybe he really DOESN'T have a Boat. I post boating-related photos on boating sites. This isn't a boating site, it hasn't been for years, and it has no possibility of becoming one again. Sure it is! The problem is there are those who wish to fill it with obnoxious political threads which do nothing but de-hamonize the place, cause arguments and an eventual hatred for each other. Sure it's a boating forum, except for those who wish it not to be. I've been watching for some time to see if any interesting boating posts pop up. I haven't seen any here in a long time. You don't need to go through life being an armchair quarterback. Spread some of your vast BOATING knowledge and experience. Don't be afraid now. Just do it. |
Do you...
On 5/7/12 10:19 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 7 May 2012 10:15:03 -0400, wrote: In article37972e48-b112-494b-b2f3- , says... On May 7, 7:53 am, X ` wrote: On 5/6/12 10:39 PM, *e#c wrote: On May 6, 11:37 am, wrote: On 5/6/2012 10:03 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 5/6/12 9:00 AM, wrote: On Sat, 05 May 2012 22:58:54 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 5/5/12 10:20 PM, wrote: Email was created for the purpose of aiming comments at one person. USENET was created to be used much like a forum. Why must you, then, involve us in your petty quarrels with others? Got anything interesting to post about boating? I didn't think so. Yes, actually, I asked you about YOUR boat. You can google it. Don't waste your time bayboat. I googled him for boating content and all I got was this lame attempt to prove his existence. http://www.boatingforumz.com/live-li...ict101269.html Ya, I asked him for a picture of his Boat....and got nothing. Maybe he really DOESN'T have a Boat. I post boating-related photos on boating sites. This isn't a boating site, it hasn't been for years, and it has no possibility of becoming one again. There are only a couple of people left here with whom I will engage in badinage, and if they were friends on Facebook, I wouldn't visit here at all. Think it through...why would I want to engage in pleasantries and photo-swapping with the likes of JustHate, iLoogy, Oscar, Herring and the rest of the twerpy, mindless assholes who pollute this place? A couple more "defections" here and I'll be gone, too, and the remaining boys can petition someone to rename this sty. We never hear the Dopers refer to "over there" anymore nor do we hear anything about The Freaks little website. Wonder what happened there? What do you care? He doesn't, it is just something else to stir up. Another "interesting" boating post from "Bayboat." |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:24 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com