Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 1, 5:11*pm, Richard Casady wrote:
On Tue, 01 May 2012 15:34:52 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 1 May 2012 13:29:10 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: Well, let's see, injury evidence, toxocology evidence, trajectory evidence, physical evidence, forensic evidence, witness evidence, and on and on..... That is all irrelevant to a self defense case. If Zimmerman can demonstrate that he had a fear of great bodily harm he has the right to use deadly force. The state has said they don't have evidence that he was in pursuit of Martin at the time of the confrontation They don't have proof that martin did not initiate the confrontation and they don't have evidence that Martin did not attack Zimmerman. It is actually unclear under the stand your ground law whether the alleged pursuit and initiating the contact would deny Zimmerman of the right to self defense. I am waiting on the hearing where hopefully more facts will come out. All I have now is the suspicion the both were eager for trouble. Casady and that is only proper. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
So why did Zimmerman...... | General | |||
More about the right's new darling: | General | |||
More about the Zimmerman saga | General | |||
The Darling of the Right, Dick Cheney Gets an Award | General | |||
Right Wing loses, Left Wing Wins Big | General |