Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , says...
On 4/1/2012 2:39 PM, wrote: On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 10:40:10 -0400, Happy wrote: On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 09:54:08 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 09:47:42 -0400, Happy wrote: On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 09:36:04 -0400, wrote: In , dump-on- says... Do you have proof beyond a reasonable doubt? Isn't 48% well beyond reasonable doubt? In a court of law, it may well be. We aren't talking about picking out an individual from the entire US population. We're only trying to discriminate between two people. What percentage of match is Zimmerman? No, the comparison is between *one* person. Only Zimmerman's voice could be analyzed. The way I read the article, there is only a 48% probability the voice is Zimmerman's, as opposed to the 90%+ that would have been expected. That would imply a 52% probability the voice *is* Zimmerman's (the way I read the article). You're joking, right? He makes it up as he goes along.... See hoosit's explanation, he's spot on. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Zimmerman has a political future with the GOP | General | |||
More about the Zimmerman saga | General | |||
Well, well, Zimmerman defenders..... | General | |||
Here's Harry in his Zimmerman like lobster boat......... | General |