| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Zimmerman not the one calling for help, experts say
|
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Zimmerman not the one calling for help, experts say
|
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Zimmerman not the one calling for help, experts say
In article ,
says... On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 09:54:08 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 09:47:42 -0400, Happy John wrote: On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 09:36:04 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , dump-on- says... Do you have proof beyond a reasonable doubt? Isn't 48% well beyond reasonable doubt? In a court of law, it may well be. We aren't talking about picking out an individual from the entire US population. We're only trying to discriminate between two people. What percentage of match is Zimmerman? No, the comparison is between *one* person. Only Zimmerman's voice could be analyzed. The way I read the article, there is only a 48% probability the voice is Zimmerman's, as opposed to the 90%+ that would have been expected. That would imply a 52% probability the voice *is* Zimmerman's (the way I read the article). Even though Zimmerman himself says he killed Wilson on the phone, then at the police station and still sticks to that? |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Zimmerman not the one calling for help, experts say
On 4/1/12 2:39 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 10:40:10 -0400, Happy wrote: On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 09:54:08 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 09:47:42 -0400, Happy wrote: On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 09:36:04 -0400, wrote: In , dump-on- says... Do you have proof beyond a reasonable doubt? Isn't 48% well beyond reasonable doubt? In a court of law, it may well be. We aren't talking about picking out an individual from the entire US population. We're only trying to discriminate between two people. What percentage of match is Zimmerman? No, the comparison is between *one* person. Only Zimmerman's voice could be analyzed. The way I read the article, there is only a 48% probability the voice is Zimmerman's, as opposed to the 90%+ that would have been expected. That would imply a 52% probability the voice *is* Zimmerman's (the way I read the article). You're joking, right? Herring is just another right-wing moron. |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Zimmerman not the one calling for help, experts say
On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 14:39:35 -0400, wrote:
On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 10:40:10 -0400, Happy John wrote: On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 09:54:08 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 09:47:42 -0400, Happy John wrote: On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 09:36:04 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , dump-on- says... Do you have proof beyond a reasonable doubt? Isn't 48% well beyond reasonable doubt? In a court of law, it may well be. We aren't talking about picking out an individual from the entire US population. We're only trying to discriminate between two people. What percentage of match is Zimmerman? No, the comparison is between *one* person. Only Zimmerman's voice could be analyzed. The way I read the article, there is only a 48% probability the voice is Zimmerman's, as opposed to the 90%+ that would have been expected. That would imply a 52% probability the voice *is* Zimmerman's (the way I read the article). You're joking, right? Well, OK, so I left out a 'not'. Harry is the genius around here. Just ask him. |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Zimmerman not the one calling for help, experts say
On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 15:35:25 -0400, wrote:
On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 15:03:59 -0400, Happy John wrote: On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 14:39:35 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 10:40:10 -0400, Happy John wrote: On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 09:54:08 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 09:47:42 -0400, Happy John wrote: On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 09:36:04 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , dump-on- says... Do you have proof beyond a reasonable doubt? Isn't 48% well beyond reasonable doubt? In a court of law, it may well be. We aren't talking about picking out an individual from the entire US population. We're only trying to discriminate between two people. What percentage of match is Zimmerman? No, the comparison is between *one* person. Only Zimmerman's voice could be analyzed. The way I read the article, there is only a 48% probability the voice is Zimmerman's, as opposed to the 90%+ that would have been expected. That would imply a 52% probability the voice *is* Zimmerman's (the way I read the article). You're joking, right? Well, OK, so I left out a 'not'. Harry is the genius around here. Just ask him. OMFG, with that logic, I'm sure you believe that a 60% chance of rain means we didn't get 40% of what we could have. This might explain your logic: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qhm7-LEBznk I'm surprised one of your intellectual prowess would have to resort to YouTube. Please, explain how you interpret the comments. I am definitely not one who can't admit an error! |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Zimmerman not the one calling for help, experts say
In article ,
says... On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 15:03:59 -0400, Happy John wrote: On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 14:39:35 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 10:40:10 -0400, Happy John wrote: On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 09:54:08 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 09:47:42 -0400, Happy John wrote: On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 09:36:04 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , dump-on- says... Do you have proof beyond a reasonable doubt? Isn't 48% well beyond reasonable doubt? In a court of law, it may well be. We aren't talking about picking out an individual from the entire US population. We're only trying to discriminate between two people. What percentage of match is Zimmerman? No, the comparison is between *one* person. Only Zimmerman's voice could be analyzed. The way I read the article, there is only a 48% probability the voice is Zimmerman's, as opposed to the 90%+ that would have been expected. That would imply a 52% probability the voice *is* Zimmerman's (the way I read the article). You're joking, right? Well, OK, so I left out a 'not'. Harry is the genius around here. Just ask him. OMFG, with that logic, I'm sure you believe that a 60% chance of rain means we didn't get 40% of what we could have. This might explain your logic: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qhm7-LEBznk snerk |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Zimmerman not the one calling for help, experts say
On 4/1/2012 2:39 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 10:40:10 -0400, Happy wrote: On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 09:54:08 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 09:47:42 -0400, Happy wrote: On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 09:36:04 -0400, wrote: In , dump-on- says... Do you have proof beyond a reasonable doubt? Isn't 48% well beyond reasonable doubt? In a court of law, it may well be. We aren't talking about picking out an individual from the entire US population. We're only trying to discriminate between two people. What percentage of match is Zimmerman? No, the comparison is between *one* person. Only Zimmerman's voice could be analyzed. The way I read the article, there is only a 48% probability the voice is Zimmerman's, as opposed to the 90%+ that would have been expected. That would imply a 52% probability the voice *is* Zimmerman's (the way I read the article). You're joking, right? He makes it up as he goes along.... |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Zimmerman not the one calling for help, experts say
In article , says...
On 4/1/2012 2:39 PM, wrote: On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 10:40:10 -0400, Happy wrote: On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 09:54:08 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 09:47:42 -0400, Happy wrote: On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 09:36:04 -0400, wrote: In , dump-on- says... Do you have proof beyond a reasonable doubt? Isn't 48% well beyond reasonable doubt? In a court of law, it may well be. We aren't talking about picking out an individual from the entire US population. We're only trying to discriminate between two people. What percentage of match is Zimmerman? No, the comparison is between *one* person. Only Zimmerman's voice could be analyzed. The way I read the article, there is only a 48% probability the voice is Zimmerman's, as opposed to the 90%+ that would have been expected. That would imply a 52% probability the voice *is* Zimmerman's (the way I read the article). You're joking, right? He makes it up as he goes along.... See hoosit's explanation, he's spot on. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Zimmerman has a political future with the GOP | General | |||
| More about the Zimmerman saga | General | |||
| Well, well, Zimmerman defenders..... | General | |||
| Here's Harry in his Zimmerman like lobster boat......... | General | |||
![iBoaterer[_2_] is offline](https://www.boatbanter.com/images/SultanThemeVB3R/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Hybrid Mode
