In article , says...

On 3/30/2012 7:01 PM, BAR wrote:
In , dump-on-
says...

On 3/30/12 8:58 AM, Happy John wrote:
...has sure helped Washington DC.

http://newsone.com/nation/associated...most-50-years/



Please provide us with the legitimate study that shows that connection
proven scientifically.

Isn't an unnamed source good enough for you? Or do you only believe
unnamed sources when the push your side of the argument?



There you go... Making sense again. Now you lost the plum.

Huh, that's funny, just a little bit ago, you **** all over an article
in your defense of Zimmerman because the source was unnamed. Now it's
good enough, eh?

In article , says...

On 3/30/2012 7:01 PM, BAR wrote:
In , dump-on-
says...

On 3/30/12 8:58 AM, Happy John wrote:
...has sure helped Washington DC.

http://newsone.com/nation/associated...most-50-years/



Please provide us with the legitimate study that shows that connection
proven scientifically.

Isn't an unnamed source good enough for you? Or do you only believe
unnamed sources when the push your side of the argument?



There you go... Making sense again. Now you lost the plum.

Who said this:

"Wow, and another anonymous person said some guy said another guy here
broke his kids arms, but he was just looking for attention too..."

In article ,
says...

In article , dump-on-
says...

On 3/30/12 8:58 AM, Happy John wrote:
...has sure helped Washington DC.

http://newsone.com/nation/associated...most-50-years/



Please provide us with the legitimate study that shows that connection
proven scientifically.

Isn't an unnamed source good enough for you? Or do you only believe
unnamed sources when the push your side of the argument?

It isn't good enough for JustWait, at least when it comes to defending
Zimmerman.