|
The only way Republicans can win
On 3/30/2012 8:53 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 3/30/12 8:43 AM, Happy John wrote: On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 07:57:56 -0400, X ` wrote: On 3/30/12 7:09 AM, Happy John wrote: On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 06:32:24 -0400, X ` wrote: On 3/30/12 3:40 AM, jps wrote: On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 21:16:03 -0400, wrote: On 3/29/2012 9:09 PM, wrote: On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 01:29:21 -0700, wrote: On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 01:28:36 -0400, wrote: If the TV station can find over a hundred in the city of Ft Myers with their weak assed investigation team it must be more wide spread than you would have us believe. Considering we had a whole presidential election decided by less than 500 Florida votes, I would think you would want more integrity in the system. Hispanics (the majority of our aliens) are more likely to vote GOP than democratic. They tend to be pro life and anti gay. If that were true, there's no friggin' way the Republican legislature in Floriduh would've passed the law. You can vote with a Sams club card. You can pretty much eliminate anybody who thinks voter id is not important, from any logical discussion involving your rights. These are the same folks who believe the Constitution is a "living, evolving document"... Oh, and you cannot admit that many of these laws are passed by Republicans knowing that they're suppressing the voter of people who are poor and likely to vote Democratic? If so, stop fooling yourself. Voting fraud is an infinitesimally small problem that has nothing to do with these laws. It's ginned up bull****. Indeed, there are national statistics indicating fraud based on false voter ID is an incredibly tiny problem. The motivation is suppressing the votes of minorities, and that is all there is to it. Indeed, indeed! MSNBC, the Washington Post, and Brian Williams all say the same thing. Why, then, are f'ing liberals so against ID's? Don't say 'money', 'cause we both know that's bull****. There are no studies showing significant voter fraud based upon false IDs. It's a canard conservatrash use to keep down the vote of voters who won't vote for conservative candidates. Weasel out of answering the questions, then call names. You're so f'ing predictable. I didn't weasel out of anything. My understanding of the problem is that a lot of lower income folks simply don't have the sort of photo ID the conservatrashers want, and it would be a major hassle for many of them to get one. We all know the right-wing motivation for this...it's to restrict voting on the part of lower income and minority groups. It's not fraud...that's just the excuse the conservatrashers are using. BTW, conservatrash is not name calling. It's truth-telling. Most of today's conservatives are nothing more than trash, and you're a perfect example. Still angry with John for refusing that boat ride. Get over it. -- http://tinyurl.com/75bq9db |
The only way Republicans can win
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:48:07 -0400, Oscar wrote:
On 3/30/2012 8:53 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/30/12 8:43 AM, Happy John wrote: On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 07:57:56 -0400, X ` wrote: On 3/30/12 7:09 AM, Happy John wrote: On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 06:32:24 -0400, X ` wrote: On 3/30/12 3:40 AM, jps wrote: On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 21:16:03 -0400, wrote: On 3/29/2012 9:09 PM, wrote: On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 01:29:21 -0700, wrote: On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 01:28:36 -0400, wrote: If the TV station can find over a hundred in the city of Ft Myers with their weak assed investigation team it must be more wide spread than you would have us believe. Considering we had a whole presidential election decided by less than 500 Florida votes, I would think you would want more integrity in the system. Hispanics (the majority of our aliens) are more likely to vote GOP than democratic. They tend to be pro life and anti gay. If that were true, there's no friggin' way the Republican legislature in Floriduh would've passed the law. You can vote with a Sams club card. You can pretty much eliminate anybody who thinks voter id is not important, from any logical discussion involving your rights. These are the same folks who believe the Constitution is a "living, evolving document"... Oh, and you cannot admit that many of these laws are passed by Republicans knowing that they're suppressing the voter of people who are poor and likely to vote Democratic? If so, stop fooling yourself. Voting fraud is an infinitesimally small problem that has nothing to do with these laws. It's ginned up bull****. Indeed, there are national statistics indicating fraud based on false voter ID is an incredibly tiny problem. The motivation is suppressing the votes of minorities, and that is all there is to it. Indeed, indeed! MSNBC, the Washington Post, and Brian Williams all say the same thing. Why, then, are f'ing liberals so against ID's? Don't say 'money', 'cause we both know that's bull****. There are no studies showing significant voter fraud based upon false IDs. It's a canard conservatrash use to keep down the vote of voters who won't vote for conservative candidates. Weasel out of answering the questions, then call names. You're so f'ing predictable. I didn't weasel out of anything. My understanding of the problem is that a lot of lower income folks simply don't have the sort of photo ID the conservatrashers want, and it would be a major hassle for many of them to get one. We all know the right-wing motivation for this...it's to restrict voting on the part of lower income and minority groups. It's not fraud...that's just the excuse the conservatrashers are using. BTW, conservatrash is not name calling. It's truth-telling. Most of today's conservatives are nothing more than trash, and you're a perfect example. Still angry with John for refusing that boat ride. Get over it. He's not offered me a ride on the new, twin-dieseled trawler. |
The only way Republicans can win
On 3/30/2012 10:02 AM, Happy John wrote:
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:48:07 -0400, wrote: On 3/30/2012 8:53 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/30/12 8:43 AM, Happy John wrote: On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 07:57:56 -0400, X ` wrote: On 3/30/12 7:09 AM, Happy John wrote: On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 06:32:24 -0400, X ` wrote: On 3/30/12 3:40 AM, jps wrote: On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 21:16:03 -0400, wrote: On 3/29/2012 9:09 PM, wrote: On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 01:29:21 -0700, wrote: On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 01:28:36 -0400, wrote: If the TV station can find over a hundred in the city of Ft Myers with their weak assed investigation team it must be more wide spread than you would have us believe. Considering we had a whole presidential election decided by less than 500 Florida votes, I would think you would want more integrity in the system. Hispanics (the majority of our aliens) are more likely to vote GOP than democratic. They tend to be pro life and anti gay. If that were true, there's no friggin' way the Republican legislature in Floriduh would've passed the law. You can vote with a Sams club card. You can pretty much eliminate anybody who thinks voter id is not important, from any logical discussion involving your rights. These are the same folks who believe the Constitution is a "living, evolving document"... Oh, and you cannot admit that many of these laws are passed by Republicans knowing that they're suppressing the voter of people who are poor and likely to vote Democratic? If so, stop fooling yourself. Voting fraud is an infinitesimally small problem that has nothing to do with these laws. It's ginned up bull****. Indeed, there are national statistics indicating fraud based on false voter ID is an incredibly tiny problem. The motivation is suppressing the votes of minorities, and that is all there is to it. Indeed, indeed! MSNBC, the Washington Post, and Brian Williams all say the same thing. Why, then, are f'ing liberals so against ID's? Don't say 'money', 'cause we both know that's bull****. There are no studies showing significant voter fraud based upon false IDs. It's a canard conservatrash use to keep down the vote of voters who won't vote for conservative candidates. Weasel out of answering the questions, then call names. You're so f'ing predictable. I didn't weasel out of anything. My understanding of the problem is that a lot of lower income folks simply don't have the sort of photo ID the conservatrashers want, and it would be a major hassle for many of them to get one. We all know the right-wing motivation for this...it's to restrict voting on the part of lower income and minority groups. It's not fraud...that's just the excuse the conservatrashers are using. BTW, conservatrash is not name calling. It's truth-telling. Most of today's conservatives are nothing more than trash, and you're a perfect example. Still angry with John for refusing that boat ride. Get over it. He's not offered me a ride on the new, twin-dieseled trawler. He knows you wouldn't want to sit with him in his bath tub... |
The only way Republicans can win
In article ,
says... Bull****. They buy beer and booze don't they? Do they not drive? Plenty of Americans don't drive. Plenty of living Americans were born at home and don't have a birth certificate. Plenty of Americans are tee-totalers. That's laughable anyway, since nobody over 30 or so has to show ID to buy spirits. I don't think these new laws will matter much. Here's something: http://tinyurl.com/7294q9h Doesn't add up to a hill of beans. Only thing it does is raise a big stink when some Americans can't cast their vote. It looks bad, real bad. And everybody knows who is to blame for it. |
The only way Republicans can win
On 3/30/2012 10:02 AM, Happy John wrote:
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:48:07 -0400, wrote: On 3/30/2012 8:53 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/30/12 8:43 AM, Happy John wrote: On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 07:57:56 -0400, X ` wrote: On 3/30/12 7:09 AM, Happy John wrote: On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 06:32:24 -0400, X ` wrote: On 3/30/12 3:40 AM, jps wrote: On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 21:16:03 -0400, wrote: On 3/29/2012 9:09 PM, wrote: On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 01:29:21 -0700, wrote: On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 01:28:36 -0400, wrote: If the TV station can find over a hundred in the city of Ft Myers with their weak assed investigation team it must be more wide spread than you would have us believe. Considering we had a whole presidential election decided by less than 500 Florida votes, I would think you would want more integrity in the system. Hispanics (the majority of our aliens) are more likely to vote GOP than democratic. They tend to be pro life and anti gay. If that were true, there's no friggin' way the Republican legislature in Floriduh would've passed the law. You can vote with a Sams club card. You can pretty much eliminate anybody who thinks voter id is not important, from any logical discussion involving your rights. These are the same folks who believe the Constitution is a "living, evolving document"... Oh, and you cannot admit that many of these laws are passed by Republicans knowing that they're suppressing the voter of people who are poor and likely to vote Democratic? If so, stop fooling yourself. Voting fraud is an infinitesimally small problem that has nothing to do with these laws. It's ginned up bull****. Indeed, there are national statistics indicating fraud based on false voter ID is an incredibly tiny problem. The motivation is suppressing the votes of minorities, and that is all there is to it. Indeed, indeed! MSNBC, the Washington Post, and Brian Williams all say the same thing. Why, then, are f'ing liberals so against ID's? Don't say 'money', 'cause we both know that's bull****. There are no studies showing significant voter fraud based upon false IDs. It's a canard conservatrash use to keep down the vote of voters who won't vote for conservative candidates. Weasel out of answering the questions, then call names. You're so f'ing predictable. I didn't weasel out of anything. My understanding of the problem is that a lot of lower income folks simply don't have the sort of photo ID the conservatrashers want, and it would be a major hassle for many of them to get one. We all know the right-wing motivation for this...it's to restrict voting on the part of lower income and minority groups. It's not fraud...that's just the excuse the conservatrashers are using. BTW, conservatrash is not name calling. It's truth-telling. Most of today's conservatives are nothing more than trash, and you're a perfect example. Still angry with John for refusing that boat ride. Get over it. He's not offered me a ride on the new, twin-dieseled trawler. And I'll bet you haven't seen the emperors new clothes yet either. ;-) -- http://tinyurl.com/75bq9db |
The only way Republicans can win
On 3/30/12 10:03 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 3/30/2012 10:02 AM, Happy John wrote: On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:48:07 -0400, wrote: On 3/30/2012 8:53 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/30/12 8:43 AM, Happy John wrote: On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 07:57:56 -0400, X ` wrote: On 3/30/12 7:09 AM, Happy John wrote: On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 06:32:24 -0400, X ` wrote: On 3/30/12 3:40 AM, jps wrote: On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 21:16:03 -0400, wrote: On 3/29/2012 9:09 PM, wrote: On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 01:29:21 -0700, wrote: On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 01:28:36 -0400, wrote: If the TV station can find over a hundred in the city of Ft Myers with their weak assed investigation team it must be more wide spread than you would have us believe. Considering we had a whole presidential election decided by less than 500 Florida votes, I would think you would want more integrity in the system. Hispanics (the majority of our aliens) are more likely to vote GOP than democratic. They tend to be pro life and anti gay. If that were true, there's no friggin' way the Republican legislature in Floriduh would've passed the law. You can vote with a Sams club card. You can pretty much eliminate anybody who thinks voter id is not important, from any logical discussion involving your rights. These are the same folks who believe the Constitution is a "living, evolving document"... Oh, and you cannot admit that many of these laws are passed by Republicans knowing that they're suppressing the voter of people who are poor and likely to vote Democratic? If so, stop fooling yourself. Voting fraud is an infinitesimally small problem that has nothing to do with these laws. It's ginned up bull****. Indeed, there are national statistics indicating fraud based on false voter ID is an incredibly tiny problem. The motivation is suppressing the votes of minorities, and that is all there is to it. Indeed, indeed! MSNBC, the Washington Post, and Brian Williams all say the same thing. Why, then, are f'ing liberals so against ID's? Don't say 'money', 'cause we both know that's bull****. There are no studies showing significant voter fraud based upon false IDs. It's a canard conservatrash use to keep down the vote of voters who won't vote for conservative candidates. Weasel out of answering the questions, then call names. You're so f'ing predictable. I didn't weasel out of anything. My understanding of the problem is that a lot of lower income folks simply don't have the sort of photo ID the conservatrashers want, and it would be a major hassle for many of them to get one. We all know the right-wing motivation for this...it's to restrict voting on the part of lower income and minority groups. It's not fraud...that's just the excuse the conservatrashers are using. BTW, conservatrash is not name calling. It's truth-telling. Most of today's conservatives are nothing more than trash, and you're a perfect example. Still angry with John for refusing that boat ride. Get over it. He's not offered me a ride on the new, twin-dieseled trawler. He knows you wouldn't want to sit with him in his bath tub... We try to keep trash off the boat. |
The only way Republicans can win
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:05:19 -0500, Boating All Out wrote:
In article , says... Bull****. They buy beer and booze don't they? Do they not drive? Plenty of Americans don't drive. Plenty of living Americans were born at home and don't have a birth certificate. Plenty of Americans are tee-totalers. That's laughable anyway, since nobody over 30 or so has to show ID to buy spirits. I don't think these new laws will matter much. Here's something: http://tinyurl.com/7294q9h Doesn't add up to a hill of beans. Only thing it does is raise a big stink when some Americans can't cast their vote. It looks bad, real bad. And everybody knows who is to blame for it. So they were born at home, without a birth certificate, never bought a beer or booze before they were 30 or so, and never drove. I suppose they never worked, so wouldn't have a social security number, and surely never had a credit card or a checking account. They most likely don't even know anyone with a car, and therefore couldn't get to a DMV anyway. In fact, even getting a free picture ID would be a tremendous pain in the ass, 'cause they'd have to get out of bed. What happy horse**** you folks preach. I wonder why? |
The only way Republicans can win
On 3/30/2012 10:05 AM, Boating All Out wrote:
In , says... Bull****. They buy beer and booze don't they? Do they not drive? Plenty of Americans don't drive. Plenty of living Americans were born at home and don't have a birth certificate. Plenty of Americans are tee-totalers. That's laughable anyway, since nobody over 30 or so has to show ID to buy spirits. I don't think these new laws will matter much. Here's something: http://tinyurl.com/7294q9h Doesn't add up to a hill of beans. Only thing it does is raise a big stink when some Americans can't cast their vote. It looks bad, real bad. And everybody knows who is to blame for it. I don't have a birth certificate, I have a licence... |
The only way Republicans can win
On 3/30/2012 10:41 AM, Happy John wrote:
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:05:19 -0500, Boating All wrote: In , says... Bull****. They buy beer and booze don't they? Do they not drive? Plenty of Americans don't drive. Plenty of living Americans were born at home and don't have a birth certificate. Plenty of Americans are tee-totalers. That's laughable anyway, since nobody over 30 or so has to show ID to buy spirits. I don't think these new laws will matter much. Here's something: http://tinyurl.com/7294q9h Doesn't add up to a hill of beans. Only thing it does is raise a big stink when some Americans can't cast their vote. It looks bad, real bad. And everybody knows who is to blame for it. So they were born at home, without a birth certificate, never bought a beer or booze before they were 30 or so, and never drove. I suppose they never worked, so wouldn't have a social security number, and surely never had a credit card or a checking account. They most likely don't even know anyone with a car, and therefore couldn't get to a DMV anyway. In fact, even getting a free picture ID would be a tremendous pain in the ass, 'cause they'd have to get out of bed. What happy horse**** you folks preach. I wonder why? Because voter fraud is the Democrats best election tool... |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:40 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com